Prostate Cancer-specific and All-cause Mortality After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years' Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group.
Eur Urol Oncol 2023:S2588-9311(23)00168-2. [PMID:
37661459 DOI:
10.1016/j.euo.2023.08.005]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Evidence on long-term oncological efficacy is available only for open radical prostatectomy but remains scarce for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
OBJECTIVE
To validate the long-term survival rates after RARP and provide stratified outcomes based on contemporary prostate cancer (PCa) risk-stratification tools.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
A retrospective analysis of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group international multicenter database for RARP was performed. Patients who underwent RARP at seven pioneer robotic urology programs in Europe and the USA between 2002 and 2012 were included.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
The primary outcomes were PCa-specific mortality and all-cause mortality. The probability of cancer-specific survival (CSS) was estimated with the competing risks method, and the probability of overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
A total of 9876 patients who underwent RARP between 2002 and 2012 were included. Within follow-up, 1071 deaths occurred and 159 were due to PCa. At 15 yr of follow-up, CSS and OS were 97.6% (97.2%, 98.0%) and 85.5% (84.6%, 86.4%), respectively. Stratified analyses based on EAU risk groups at diagnosis and pT stage showed favorable survival rates, with low-risk (n = 4601, 46.6%), intermediate-risk (n = 4056, 41.1%), and high-risk (n = 1219, 12.3%) patients demonstrating CSS rates of 99%, 98%, and 90% at 15 yr, respectively. Notably, patients with pT3a disease had similar survival outcomes to those with pT2 disease, with worse CSS in patients with pT3b PCa (98.9% vs 97.4% vs 86.5%). Multivariable analyses identified age, prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason grade group, clinical T stage, and treatment year as independent predictors of worse oncological outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Our multicenter study with long-term follow-up confirms favorable survival outcomes after RARP for localized PCa. Patients with low- and intermediate-risk disease face a higher risk of mortality from causes other than PCa. On the contrary, high-risk patients have a significantly higher risk of PCa-specific mortality.
PATIENT SUMMARY
In the present study, we reported the outcomes of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between 10 and 20 yr ago, and we found a very low probability of dying from PCa in patients with low- and intermediate-risk PCa.
Collapse