[Differential diagnosis and tactics of managing a patient with primary hypophysitis on the example of a clinical case]

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the prevalence of autoimmune endocrinopathies, which are known to affect various levels of the endocrine system, including the pituitary gland. Hypophysitis is a general term used to describe any form of sellar and suprasellar inflammation that leads to structural changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary region and manifests itself in varying degrees of hormonal deficiency of the anterior and posterior pituitary glands. To date, there is a primary form of hypophysitis, which occurs as a result of an autoimmune lesion directly to the pituitary gland, and a secondary form of hypophysitis, which occurs as a result of the presence of a systemic autoimmune disease. Regardless of the etiology, patients with hypophysitis show various signs and symptoms caused by an inflammatory process in the pituitary gland, which can lead to the development of hypopituitarism, compression of the sellar and parasellar structures. MRI is currently the best non-invasive diagnostic tool for diagnosing hypopituitarism, however, the diagnosis can be made with certainty only by histological examination of the pituitary tissue, which requires an invasive approach, which greatly reduces the feasibility of this procedure. In this article, we present a patient with MRI showing signs of hypophysitis in the absence of clear clinical symptoms.

[Clinical features, diagnostics and treatment of FGF23 secreting tumors: series of 40 clinical cases]

INTRODUCTION

Tumor-induced osteomalacia is an acquired rare disease manifested by hypophosphatemic osteomalacia due to excessive secretion of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23). FGF 23 is a non-classical hormone secreted by bone tissue (osteocytes) and regulates phosphorus metabolism.The aim of this work is to present clinical experience in the diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with tumor-induced osteomalacia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

40 patients with clinically-confirmed tumor-induced osteomalacia were included in the study, 34 of whom had the tumor localized, 27 underwent surgical treatment and 21 achieved stable remission.

RESULTS

The median age was 48 [41; 63] years, 43% were men, the time left from the the onset of the disease was 8 [4; 10] years. Biochemical findings were hypophosphatemia 0.47 [0.4; 0.53] mmol/l, a decrease in the tubular reabsorption phosphate 62 [52; 67]%, and an increase in alkaline phosphatase of 183 [112; 294] units/l. At the time of diagnosis, 100% had multiple pathological fractures, only 10% could move independently, and 77.5% classified the pain as unbearable (8-10 points according to the 10-point pain syndrome scale ). Among the methods used to detect tumors, the most sensitive were scintigraphy with tectrotide with SPECT/CT 71.4% (20/28) and MRI 90% (18/20). In 35% of cases, the tumor was localized in soft tissues and in 65% in bone tissue; The tumor was most often detected in the lower extremities, followed by the head in frequency of localization. 18 patients currently have no remission and they receive conservative treatment (phosphorus and alfacalcidol n=15 and burosumab n=3). In case of achieving remission (n=21), regression of clinical symptoms and restoration of bone and muscle mass was observed. Extensive excision of the tumor without prior biopsy resulted in the best percentage of remission - 87%.

CONCLUSION

Tumor-induced osteomalacia is characterized by severe damage to bone and muscle tissue with the development of multiple fractures, muscle weakness and severe pain syndrome. In laboratory diagnostics, attention should be paid to hypophosphatemia, a decrease in the tubular reabsorption phosphate index and increased alkaline phosphatase. The use of functional diagnostic methods with a labeled somatostatin analogue to the subtype 2 receptor and MRI with contrast enhancement are the most accurate methods of topical diagnostics. In case of localization of the tumor, a wide excision without a preliminary biopsy is recommended.

[Dynamics the parameters of mineral metabolism in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, the impact of etiotropic and pathogenetic therapy]

The high prevalence of COVID-19 requires the research progress on the disease pathogenesis. There is a lot of data confirming the association between mineral metabolism and the severity of COVID-19.

AIM

To study the dynamics of mineral metabolism parameters in patients with a confirmed COVID-19 at the time of hospitalization and after discharge, including the impact of etiotropic and pathogenetic therapy on them.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center study of 106 patients (aged ≥18 years) with clinically or laboratory confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 was carried out at the Endocrinology Research Centre, Moscow. Baseline biochemical parameters, including serum calcium, phosphorus, albumin, 25(OH)D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), inflammatory markers, and instrumental assessment of COVID-19 severity were performed before specific immunotherapy, as well as on 3rd and 7th days of hospitalization and before discharge. Statistical analysis was performed with Statistica 13 software (StatSoft, USA).

RESULTS

On the first day, hypocalcemia (low albumin-adjusted calcium level) was detected in 40.6% of cases, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency amounted to 95.3% of cases. At the same time, secondary hyperparathyroidism was identified only in 14.2% of patients. A comparative analysis of mineral metabolism during hospitalization (between 1, 3, 7 days of hospitalization and before discharge) during baricitinib treatment revealed a statistically significant increase in albumin-adjusted calcium by the end of hospitalization (p<0.001, Friedman criterion, Bonferroni correction p0=0.01). A pairwise comparison of subgroups, depending on the therapy, revealed a statistically significantly lower level of albumin-adjusted calcium on 3rd day among patients on baricitinib monotherapy or combined with tocilizumab compared with a subgroup of patients undergoing etiotropic treatment (2.16 [2.13; 2.18] mmol/l vs 2.23 [2.19; 2.28] mmol/l, p=0.002, U-test, Bonferroni correction p0=0.012).

CONCLUSION

Patients with severe coronavirus infection are characterized by a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and hypocalcemia. Associations between calcium and saturation as well as the severity of lung lesion characterizes hypocalcemia as an important predictor of severe course and poor outcome in COVID-19. Pathogenetic therapy with baricitinib, including in combination with tocilizumab, contributes to achieve normocalcemia, but further studies are required.