Utility of CT angiography for evaluation of living kidney donors

We reviewed our initial experience with helical computed tomography (CT) angiography in the evaluation of living kidney donors which, until now, has necessitated arteriography. Nineteen donors (12 women, 7 men) have had their renal anatomy evaluated solely by CT angiography preoperatively. All scans demonstrated normal collecting systems and single ureters. Five donors (26%) had supernumerary renal arteries. Fourteen donors had single, 4 donors had two, and 1 donor had three renal arteries. Helical CT demonstrated small polar vessels in several donors. Two donors (10%) had supernumerary renal veins. Accuracy of vascular anatomy defined on CT was 90% when confirmed at operation. Anatomically all CT findings were consistent with operative findings except in 1 donor who was found to have a 0.8 cm lesion near the renal hilum. At our institution, the total charges for selective renal arteriography are $3845 and for helical CT with three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction are $1546. The amount of contrast dye (approximately 100 mL) is equivalent. Patients uniformly reported that the CT scan was a convenient and painless procedure. The accuracy of helical CT angiography is equivalent to arteriography in assessing renal vascular anatomy (with the additional benefit of imaging venous and parenchymal anatomy). Charges for helical CT are 59% less. There is greater patient acceptance and potentially less morbidity associated with the non-invasive nature of helical CT. We believe that CT angiography is the radiologic procedure of choice for the assessment of renal anatomy in potential living kidney donors.

Renal allograft rupture: a clinical review

Rupture of a renal allograft (RAR) is an uncommon but serious complication of renal transplantation. A recent RAR prompted a review of our experience, with the purpose of (1) identifying conditions that may predispose this complication and (2) defining strategies for prevention. A 5-yr, consecutive living-related (LRD) and cadaver donor (CD) cohort of 331 patients was studied retrospectively. Twelve patients (3.6%) had RAR. Donor characteristics, procurement and preservation conditions, and recipient characteristics were major study categories. Data analysis was computer-based and included multivariate analysis. The nine White and two Black cadaver donors were "ideal", mean age 29 yr, with mean high creatinine (CR) of 1.3 and terminal CR of 1.1 mg/dl and mean terminal urine output of 423 ml/min. Nine of 11 CD had low-dose dopamine use (terminal, mean 8, range 5-13 micrograms/kg/min). Eleven of 11 donors had procurement en-bloc, 9 of which were multiple organ procurement. All had 4+/4+ flush and cold storage with UW solution. Mean cold ischemia time (CIT) was 22 h, 28 min (range 15 h, 16 min to 40 h). For patients with RAR mean age was 39 yr; there were 12 Black patients and 7 males, 5 females. HLA match was 1 antigen (AG) for 3, 2 AG for 8, and 4 AG for 1 (mean 1.9). Nine patients had delayed or declining renal function requiring dialysis. The panel reactive antibody was at peak, mean 47% (range 0-100%) and current, mean 18% (range 0-84%). Six of 12 had OKT3 therapy at time of RAR and six had biopsies. Day of RAR was mean 10, median 9 (range 4-21). Pain and drop in hematocrit were observed in most. There was one fatality (8%), and all kidneys were removed. All kidneys showed at least minimal rejection but six had severe acute tubular necrosis (ATN) with edema and minimal rejection. Statistically significant associations with RAR were older recipient age (p = 0.01), donor-recipient race mismatch (White donor to Black recipient) (p = 0.007), and dialysis requirement (p < 0.001). Other variables were not statistically correlated: gender, race, CIT, transplant number, LRD vs. CD, peak or current PRA, and total HLA and BDR mismatch. The data suggest that ATN and rejection act synergistically to cause RAR and that early delayed function requires intensive and perhaps novel immunosuppression, especially in Black recipients.

Sexual dysfunction in the male end stage renal disease patient

This article reviews the anatomy and physiology of the male reproductive system and pathophysiology attributed to chronic renal disease. Clinical evaluation strategies are outlined and treatment modalities explained. The role of the nephrology nurse is outlined as a patient advocate and advisor.