[Surgical and interventional management of benign prostatic obstruction: Guidelines from the Committee for Male Voiding Disorders of the French Urology Association]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Committee (CTMH) of the French Urology Association was to propose an update of the guidelines for surgical and interventional management of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).

METHODS

All available data published on PubMed® between 2018 and 2020 were systematically searched and reviewed. All papers assessing surgical and interventional management of adult patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) were included for analysis. After studies critical analysis, conclusions with level of evidence and French guidelines were elaborated in order to answer the predefined clinical questions.

RESULTS/GUIDELINES

Offer a trans-uretral incision of the prostate to treat patients with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with a prostate volume<30cm³, without a middle lobe. TUIP increases the chances of preserving ejaculation. Propose mono- or bipolar trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP) to treat patients with moderate to severe LUTS with a prostate volume between 30 and 80cm³. Vaporization by Greenlight™ or by bipolar energy can be offered as an alternative to TURP. Offer a Greenlight™ laser vaporization to patients at risk of bleeding. Offer endoscopic prostate enucleation to surgically treat patients with moderate to severe LUTS as an alternative to TURP and open prostatectomy (OP). Minimally invasive prostatectomy is an alternative to OP in centers without access to adequate endoscopic procedures. Embolization of the prostatic arteries may be offered in the event of a contraindication or refusal of surgery for prostates with a volume>80cm³. Prostatic uretral lift is an alternative in patients interested in preserving their ejaculatory function and with a prostate volume<70cm³ without a middle lobe. Aquablation and Rezum™ are under evaluation and should be offered in research protocols.

CONCLUSION

Major changes in surgical management of BPO have occurred and aim at reducing morbidity and improving quality of life of patients.

Complications following intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin treatment for bladder cancer: a case series of 22 patients

BACKGROUND

Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy is an effective and widely used treatment for superficial bladder carcinoma. Local complications are frequent whereas systemic complications are rare but can be serious, and their management is not well known.

METHODS

We describe retrospectively the records of 22 patients treated in 3 infectious disease departments, for complications related to intravesical BCG therapy as treatment of bladder cancer.

RESULTS

All the patients were male, with a median age of 68 years (range 56-88). Complications occurred after a median of 5 instillations (range 1-11) and were observed within 24 h following BCG instillation for 14 patients. Common symptoms were fever (n = 20), impaired general condition (n = 14), and shortness of breath (n = 7). Six patients had a systemic septic reaction leading to transfer into the intensive care unit for five of them. Lung infiltration was the most frequent presentation (n = 11). Mycobacterium bovis was isolated from only two patients, but histology showed the presence of a granuloma in nine patients. Antimycobacterial treatment was initialized in 17 patients; the outcome was favorable in 16 patients, with a median length of symptoms resolution of 22.5 days (range 5-425 days). Eleven patients received corticosteroids in addition to specific treatment and had a more rapid improvement. One patient died with disseminated BCGitis proved by biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications following intravesical BCG therapy are rare but can be severe and fatal. Histology seems to be the method that contributes most in confirmation of the diagnosis. Antimycobacterial therapy is effective, and probably more efficient when combined with corticosteroids, but the regimen and duration of the treatment are not standardized.

[Evaluation of the impact of CTMH guidelines on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia]

INTRODUCTION

The French guidelines on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have been published in 2012 by the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of these guidelines on the BPH management by French urologists.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A questionnaire has been distributed by email to 1141 urologists members of the French Association of Urologists in November 2013.

RESULTS

We collected 222 responses (response rate: 19%). The guidelines have been read by 73% of the urologists. The guidelines were followed most of the time by 76% of them, 11% followed them systematically and 4.5% did not follow them. The new terminology was used by 28 to 52% according to the items. The symptoms were evaluated by the IPSS score (33%), by interrogatory alone (64%) or by neither of them (3%). Prostate volume was not systematically taken for account in the treatment strategy by 57% of the urologists. Sexual function was assessed systematically by 28% of the urologists, 11% used a questionnaire (IIEF: 92%). PSA was tested respectively by 70 and 51% of the urologists at the initial evaluation and the follow-up. After introduction of a monotherapy, 56% of the urologists evaluated the efficacy at 3 months.

CONCLUSION

The French guidelines for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) by the LUTS committee of the French Urological Association were well known and used by French urologists. Some improvements can be expected for the use of the IPSS score, the evaluation of the sexual function, and the use of the new terminology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

[Results of an investigation by questionnaire into interest in neuro-urology of urology residents]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the interest borne towards neuro-urology within the community of the urology residents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January and May 2009, all urology residents received an anonymous questionnaire by e-mail estimating their interest for neuro-urology. The analyzed data were: epidemiologic data; participation in theoretical learning and training courses practices; interest and investment in the speciality; opinion on the current formation. The qualitative variables were compared by the chi-2 test. P values <0,05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

The rate of answer was 45,3 %. The middle age was 28,7+/-2,3 years. Ninety-two (70,7 %) of the 130 urologist residents questioned wished to exert full-time or divided in a hospital structure. They were 40 % to have a multidisciplinary neuro-urology staff, and 80 % were in a service which dealt with suffering patients of neurological bladder. The percentage of urologist residents interested by neuro-urology was 69,2 %, and 61,5 % of them wished to practice this activity in their future exercise. This wish was significantly higher for those resulting from the ENC (p<0,05), for those wishing to exert at the hospital (p<0,01) and for those who practice urology at a level of expertise in neuro-urology (p<0,01). The theoretical and practical teaching of neuro-urology were considered as being insufficient for respectively 73,9 % and 64,2 % of the urologist residents. In contrast, the average note allotted to the neuro-urology module of the ECU was of 7,47 out of 10.

CONCLUSION

Neuro-urology seems to be particularly attractive for the urologist residents, and many wished to integrate it in their future exercise. The motivation was more important for those who wished to carry out a career in hospital. Even if the quality of the teaching was very noted, their modalities were considered to be insufficient by most of them.