Persistent efficacy of doramectin topical solution against induced infestations of Bovicola bovis and Solenopotes capillatus

A study was conducted in two locations, Wyoming and Wisconsin, USA, to evaluate the persistent efficacy of doramectin topical solution at a dose rate of 500 microg/kg body weight against artificially induced infestations of Bovicola bovis and Solenopotes capillatus on cattle. At each location, lice-free beef calves were individually housed and randomly allocated to treatment. Both B. bovis and S. capillatus were transferred from untreated donor animals to doramectin-treated cattle at the end of 35, 63, 91 or 126 day post-treatment periods. Cattle treated with a saline pour-on served as the control. Based on the geometric means of lice counts 2 weeks following transfer, the persistent efficacy of a single treatment with doramectin topical solution against induced infestations of B. bovis was 100.0, 100.0, 99.5, and 100.0% at post-treatment days of 35, 63, 91, and 126, respectively. Persistent efficacy against induced infestations of S. capillatus, for the same intervals, were 100.0, 94.9, 86.3, and 74.9%.

The effectiveness of doramectin pour-on in the control of gastrointestinal nematode infections in cow-calf herds

Two field studies were conducted in the USA to determine the efficacy of a single strategically-timed dose of doramectin pour-on in the control of gastrointestinal nematodosis in beef cow-calf herds and the resultant effects on calf productivity. One study was carried out between May and October 1996 in a spring-calving herd at a site located in Idaho (ID) and the other between January and July 1997 in a fall-calving herd at a site located in Mississippi (MS). In each study, cow-calf pairs were randomly allotted by sex of calf to pastures and one of two treatment groups (doramectin pour-on at the recommended dose rate of 500 microg/kg body weight or untreated control). There were four pasture replicates per treatment at each site. Each pasture contained 12 cow-calf pairs at the ID site and 15 cow-calf pairs at the MS site. Treatment was administered to cows and calves on 21 May 1996 (ID) or 23 January 1997 (MS). Following treatment, cow-calf pairs were assigned to their designated pastures where they remained until the calves were weaned 140 (ID) or 168 (MS) days later. Cow and calf fecal egg counts and calf body weights were recorded on treatment day and then at monthly intervals until study termination. Doramectin treatment reduced nematode egg output in cows and calves over the entire grazing season compared to untreated controls and resulted in calf weight gain improvements of 9.8kg (p=0.295) at the ID site and 17.4kg (p=0.0002) at the MS site.

The effectiveness of a single dose of doramectin pour-on in the control of gastrointestinal nematodes in yearling stocker cattle

Three field studies were conducted to determine the efficacy of a single dose of doramectin pour-on in the control of gastrointestinal nematode infections in yearling stocker calves on pasture. These 140-day studies were carried out between October 1995 and March 1996 in Tennessee (TN), between January and June 1997 in Louisiana (LA), and between May and September 1997 in Wisconsin (WI). Calves with patent nematode infections were equally allocated to treatments (doramectin pour-on, at 500 microg/kg body weight or untreated control) and pastures as randomized complete-block designs (LA and TN studies) or completely at random (WI study). There were six pasture replicates per treatment at each site, with each pasture replicate accommodating six calves at the TN site (36 calves per treatment), five calves at the LA site (30 calves per treatment), and seven calves at the WI site (42 calves per treatment). Fecal samples for nematode egg counts were collected on Day 0, and at 28-day intervals thereafter. Body weights were recorded on Day 0 and at 28-day intervals until study termination. Nematode egg output of the doramectin-treated groups was reduced over the entire grazing period compared to those in the untreated control groups, resulting in average daily weight-gain advantages of 0.055 kg (p < or = 0.05) for the TN study, 0.208 kg (p < or = 0.05) for the LA study, and 0.116 kg (p < or = 0.05) for the WI study.

Digestion, feed intake, and live weight gain by cattle consuming bermudagrass and supplemented with different grains

The objectives of this study were to determine whether type of supplemental cereal grain, with a relatively high level of supplementation, affects feed intake, characteristics of digestion, and live weight gain by cattle consuming bermudagrass (BER). In Exp. 1, five beef steers (423 +/- 22 kg average BW) with cannulas in the rumen and duodenum were used in a Latin square design experiment. Steers consumed BER hay (1.5% BW; 10.1% CP, 75% NDF, and 6% ADL) alone (Control) or with approximately .7% BW (DM) of ground corn (GC), whole corn (WC), ground sorghum grain (SG), or ground wheat (W). At 8 h after supplementation, ruminal pH was lower for W than for Control, WC, and SG (P < .05). True ruminal OM digestion was lowest for SG and highest for W (P < .05; 49.4, 50.7, 51.0, 42.0, and 57.3% for Control, GC, WC, SG, and W, respectively). In Exp. 2, five Holstein steer calves (187 +/- 9 kg average BW) were used in a Latin square design. Bermudagrass hay (9.7% CP, 72% NDF, and 6% ADL) was consumed ad libitum alone (Control) or with approximately 1% BW of grain (same as in Exp. 1). Digestible OM intake was similar among grain treatments. In Exp. 3, 96 crossbred beef steers (256 +/- 2 kg initial BW) grazed BER (clipped forage samples: 13 to 16% CP, 68 to 73% NDF, and 4 to 5% ADL) for 85 d and received the same grain treatments as in Exp. 2 plus a barley (B) treatment. Live weight gain was .47, .84, .80, .68, .81, and .51 kg/d for Control, GC, WC, B, SG, and W, respectively (SE = .028). In conclusion, when growing cattle grazing BER were supplemented once daily with grain at approximately 1.0% BW, grain that degraded in the rumen slowly (GC, WC, and SG) resulted in live weight gain greater than that resulting from grain that degraded rapidly (B and W).

Relationships of body weight, forage composition, and corn supplementation to feed intake and digestion by Holstein steer calves consuming bermudagrass hay ad libitum

Holstein steer calves (101 to 350 kg BW) consumed bermudagrass hay ad libitum without or with supplemental ground corn up to 1.0% of BW. As BW increased, total DMI increased quadratically (-2.459 + .05448 [BW]-.000073 [BW2] + .540 [corn DMI]; R2 = .83, sy.x = .655). Each kilogram of corn DM decreased bermudagrass DMI by .46 kg. Total digestible OM intake (kg) increased with BW and corn supplementation (.314 + .0127 [BW] + .441 [corn OM intake]; R2 = .79, sy.x = .444). Feed intake level accounted for approximately 2.5 times more variability in total digestible OM intake than digestion did. Corn supplementation decreased digestion of bermudagrass NDF (62.50 - 8.468 [corn DMI, % BW]; R2 = .13, sy.x = 8.121), with a similar decrease across BW. Increasing bermudagrass DMI (% of BW) decreased bermudagrass NDF digestion slightly, but variation accounted for was only 33% of that attributable to corn DMI (% of BW). Concentrations of common fiber fractions (NDF, ADF, cellulose, hemicellulose, and ADL) in bermudagrass explained very little variation in feed intake and digestion, indicating considerable influence of other factors. Bermudagrass intake and digestion were not related, and no substantial interactions were observed among steer BW, corn level, and bermudagrass composition.

Sites of digestion in beef steers fed bermudagrass hay and supplemented with high-nitrogen feeds alone or mixed with tallow

Five crossbred beef steers (329 kg) were used in a 5 x 5 Latin square experiment with 14-d periods to determine the effects of supplementation with high-nitrogen (N) feeds alone or mixed with tallow on sites of digestion with a basal diet of bermudagrass hay. Hay was 1.93% nitrogen, 75% neutral detergent fibre and fed at 1.83% of body weight (dry matter; DM). Supplements were basal (B; 105 g DM): 81.8% dried molasses product (DMP) and 18.2% calcium carbonate (CC); soybean meal (S; 942 g DM): 88.0% soybean meal, 9.8% DMP and 2.2% CC; S mixed with 9.8% tallow (SF; 1041 g DM); corn gluten and blood meals (CB; 662 g DM): 62.5% corn gluten meal, 20.8% blood meal, 13.6% DMP and 3.0% CC; CB mixed with 13.2% tallow (CBF; 757 g DM). Total N intake was 117, 185, 187, 174 and 172 g/d, and duodenal N flow was 121, 148, 143, 162 and 169 g/d for B, S, SF, CB and CBF, respectively, being lower for B than for other treatments and higher for supplements with the corn gluten and blood meal mix than for soybean meal (P less than 0.05). Duodenal microbial N flow was 39, 51, 49, 38 and 45 g/d for B, S, SF, CB and CBF, respectively, being greater (P less than 0.05) for supplements with soybean meal than with corn gluten and blood meals. Duodenal flow of feed N was greater (P less than 0.05) with than without high-N feeds and for supplemental corn gluten and blood meals than for soybean meal (78, 90, 86, 117 and 116 g/d for B, S, SF, CB and CBF, respectively). In conclusion, mixing of tallow and high-N feeds did not affect the extent of ruminal N disappearance, and soybean meal supplementation increased duodenal N flow less than did supplementation with corn gluten and blood meals. Increased duodenal N flow with soybean meal was associated with about equal elevations of ruminal outflow of microbial and feed N, whereas the corn gluten-blood meal mix affected the intestinal protein supply by increasing ruminal escape of feed protein.

Feed intake, digestion and digesta characteristics of cattle fed Bermudagrass or orchardgrass alone or with ground barley or corn

Feed intake, digestion and digesta characteristics of cattle fed bermudagrass (BG) or orchardgrass (OG) alone or with supplemental ground corn or barley were determined in two 6 x 6 latin squares with 2 x 3 factorial treatment arrangements. In Exp. 1, beef cows (Hereford, Angus and Hereford-Angus; 452 kg) cannulated in the rumen and duodenum were fed BG (7.9% CP, 79% NDF and 8.7% ADL) or OG (9.8% CP, 79% NDF and 7.2% ADL) hays at 1.2% of BW per day either alone or with added ground barley (.64% BW) or ground corn (.60% BW daily). The increase in microbial OM flow with corn was greater for OG than for BG; corn elevated microbial OM flow more than did barley with OG but less than with BG (forage type x grain source interaction; P less than .10). The increase in total tract OM digestion with grain was greater for BG than for OG (supplementation effect and forage type x supplementation interaction; P less than 05). In Exp. 2, Holstein steers (228 kg) were fed BG and OG hays ad libitum either alone or with addition of either 1.07% of BW per day of barley or 1.00% BW of corn. Total DM intake was 2.19, 3.03 and 2.82% BW for BG and 2.14, 2.80 and 2.52% BW for OG alone or with barley or corn supplements, respectively, being affected by forage type, grain supplementation, grain type and a forage type x grain supplementation interaction (P less than .05). Organic matter digested daily (g/d) was higher for OG than for BG, higher with than without grain and higher for barley than for corn (P less than .05).