Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with earlier discharge from physiotherapy and reduced length-of-stay compared to conventional navigated techniques

INTRODUCTION

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has been used to improve intraoperative accuracy to restore patient's anatomy and joint kinematics. It is not yet known whether robotic systems provide significant benefits over established navigation techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients underwent robotic-assisted UKA (RA-UKA) over a 14-month period. Length of operation, transfusion requirements, time to discharge, range-of-motion and analgesia requirements were compared to a similar cohort of 31 patients who had received UKA using computer-assisted surgery (CAS-UKA).

RESULTS

All patients in the RA-UKA and CAS-UKA groups underwent surgery without conversion to conventional techniques. Both cohorts were similar apart from mean BMI (RA-UKA-group 28.5 vs 32.2; p < 0.05). There was a higher percentage of females in the CAS-UKA group (68% vs 45%, p = 0.12). Minor complication rates were the same in both groups (4/31, 12.9%). Mean operating time was longer in the RA-UKA group (104.8 vs 85.6 min; p < 0.001). No patients required post-operative transfusion in either group and there was no significant difference in haemoglobin level drop or analgesia requirements at any time point. Patients in the RA-UKA group achieved straight leg raise without lag sooner (23 vs 37.5 h; p = 0.004) and demonstrated increased range-of-motion on discharge (81.4° vs 64.5°; p < 0.001). Patients in the RA-UKA group were discharged from physiotherapy services earlier than the CAS-UKA group (42.5 vs 49 h; p = 0.02) and discharged from hospital significantly sooner (46 vs 74 h; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

RA-UKA is safe and reproducible, comparable to traditional navigation. Patients undergoing RA-UKA achieve straight leg raise and discharge from physiotherapy sooner than with navigation alone.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III (Therapeutic) Retrospective Cohort Study.

Routine neonatal postextubation chest physiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To test the effects of a neonatal postextubation programme on the incidence of postextubation collapse and adverse outcomes.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was carried out at the Mater Mothers' Hospital, Brisbane. Mechanically ventilated infants were randomized into one of two groups, physiotherapy group--which involved a regimen of chest wall percussion and oropharyngeal suctioning and control group - which involved suctioning without the percussion unless indicated. Chest X-rays were taken at 6 h and at 24 h postextubation. The primary outcome measure was postextubation collapse as determined by a paediatric radiologist blinded to the group allocation.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-seven neonates were enrolled in the trial between 1997 and 1999. After an interim analysis, the trial was stopped early. No statistically significant difference was shown in the rate of postextubation collapse (15 of 87 (17.2%) physiotherapy group and 17 of 86 (19.8%) control group (P = 0.85)). No differences were shown between the groups in the number of apnoeic or bradycardic events, duration of requirement for supplemental oxygen or the need for re-intubation within 24 h postextubation.

CONCLUSION

The results of this trial suggest that a routine neonatal postextubation chest physiotherapy programme for all infants is not indicated. There was no evidence that chest physiotherapy is associated with any adverse outcomes.