Volume reduction with surgery for ICH: when is it effective? Analysis of the CT scans from the STICH II trial

BACKGROUND

The surgical trial of lobar intracerebral haemorrhage (STICH II) was a randomised controlled trial evaluating early surgical removal of a clot. This paper investigates volume change in both arms of the trial with respect to Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) groups.

METHODS

Patients randomised into STICH II had an initial diagnostic CT and a second CT 5 days after randomisation. Each scan was anonymously assessed by at least two central readers. An analysis of agreement between the two readers was conducted using kappa tests and intraclass correlation. The change in volume in both the early surgery (ES) and the initial conservative treatment (ICT) arms were analysed with respect to the six-month GOSE outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 597 patients randomised in the trial there were 582 pre-randomisation scans and 566 5-day scans available for analysis of agreement. There was good agreement between the assessors for the radiological inclusion criteria including volume (ICC = 0.87) and this was better than the agreement between the assessor and local investigator (ICC = 0.73). There were 526 patients with two scans available for analysis of change in volume measurement. The median percentage change in volume for the ES group was a reduction of 92.4% (IQR 75.6%, 99.0%) while for the ICT group, in which some cases crossed over to delayed surgery, it was only 5.7% (IQR 16.4% increase, 29.5% reduction). ES patients with almost complete removal (99-100%) had the best outcome with only 30% dead or lower severely disabled. For the ICT group outcome was related to the final volume: the smaller the final volume the better the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis provides evidence for central assessments of scans in exploratory analyses and further information regarding the potential advantage of early and more complete clot removal on outcome in ICH and should inform the planning of future trials.Clinical trials registration: ISRCTN22153967.

Evaluation of Outcomes Among Patients With Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension Treated With Decompressive Craniectomy vs Standard Medical Care at 24 Months: A Secondary Analysis of the RESCUEicp Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Trials often assess primary outcomes of traumatic brain injury at 6 months. Longer-term data are needed to assess outcomes for patients receiving surgical vs medical treatment for traumatic intracranial hypertension.

Objective

To evaluate 24-month outcomes for patients with traumatic intracranial hypertension treated with decompressive craniectomy or standard medical care.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Prespecified secondary analysis of the Randomized Evaluation of Surgery With Craniectomy for Uncontrollable Elevation of Intracranial Pressure (RESCUEicp) randomized clinical trial data was performed for patients with traumatic intracranial hypertension (>25 mm Hg) from 52 centers in 20 countries. Enrollment occurred between January 2004 and March 2014. Data were analyzed between 2018 and 2021. Eligibility criteria were age 10 to 65 years, traumatic brain injury (confirmed via computed tomography), intracranial pressure monitoring, and sustained and refractory elevated intracranial pressure for 1 to 12 hours despite pressure-controlling measures. Exclusion criteria were bilateral fixed and dilated pupils, bleeding diathesis, or unsurvivable injury.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a decompressive craniectomy with standard care (surgical group) or to ongoing medical treatment with the option to add barbiturate infusion (medical group).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was measured with the 8-point Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (1 indicates death and 8 denotes upper good recovery), and the 6- to 24-month outcome trajectory was examined.

Results

This study enrolled 408 patients: 206 in the surgical group and 202 in the medical group. The mean (SD) age was 32.3 (13.2) and 34.8 (13.7) years, respectively, and the study population was predominantly male (165 [81.7%] and 156 [80.0%], respectively). At 24 months, patients in the surgical group had reduced mortality (61 [33.5%] vs 94 [54.0%]; absolute difference, -20.5 [95% CI, -30.8 to -10.2]) and higher rates of vegetative state (absolute difference, 4.3 [95% CI, 0.0 to 8.6]), lower or upper moderate disability (4.7 [-0.9 to 10.3] vs 2.8 [-4.2 to 9.8]), and lower or upper severe disability (2.2 [-5.4 to 9.8] vs 6.5 [1.8 to 11.2]; χ27 = 24.20, P = .001). For every 100 individuals treated surgically, 21 additional patients survived at 24 months; 4 were in a vegetative state, 2 had lower and 7 had upper severe disability, and 5 had lower and 3 had upper moderate disability, respectively. Rates of lower and upper good recovery were similar for the surgical and medical groups (20 [11.0%] vs 19 [10.9%]), and significant differences in net improvement (≥1 grade) were observed between 6 and 24 months (55 [30.0%] vs 25 [14.0%]; χ22 = 13.27, P = .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

At 24 months, patients with surgically treated posttraumatic refractory intracranial hypertension had a sustained reduction in mortality and higher rates of vegetative state, severe disability, and moderate disability. Patients in the surgical group were more likely to improve over time vs patients in the medical group.

Trial Registration

ISRCTN Identifier: 66202560.

Intracerebral Hemorrhage Volume Reduction and Timing of Intervention Versus Functional Benefit and Survival in the MISTIE III and STICH Trials

BACKGROUND

The extent of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) removal conferred survival and functional benefits in the minimally invasive surgery with thrombolysis in intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE) III trial. It is unclear whether this similarly impacts outcome with craniotomy (open surgery) or whether timing from ictus to intervention influences outcome with either procedure.

OBJECTIVE

To compare volume evacuation and timing of surgery in relation to outcomes in the MISTIE III and STICH (Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Hemorrhage) trials.

METHODS

Postoperative scans were performed in STICH II, but not in STICH I; therefore, surgical MISTIE III cases with lobar hemorrhages (n = 84) were compared to STICH II all lobar cases (n = 259) for volumetric analyses. All MISTIE III surgical patients (n = 240) were compared to both STICH I and II (n = 722) surgical patients for timing analyses. These were investigated using cubic spline modeling and multivariate risk adjustment.

RESULTS

End-of-treatment ICH volume ≤28.8 mL in MISTIE III and ≤30.0 mL in STICH II had increased probability of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0 to 3 at 180 d (P = .01 and P = .003, respectively). The effect in the MISTIE cohort remained significant after multivariate risk adjustments. Earlier surgery within 62 h of ictus had a lower probability of achieving an mRS 0 to 3 at 180 d with STICH I and II (P = .0004), but not with MISTIE III. This remained significant with multivariate risk adjustments. There was no impact of timing until intervention on mortality up to 47 h with either procedure.

CONCLUSION

Thresholds of ICH removal influenced outcome with both procedures to a similar extent. There was a similar likelihood of achieving a good outcome with both procedures within a broad therapeutic time window.

Thrombolysis for Evacuation of Intracerebral and Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Guide to Surgical Protocols With Practical Lessons Learned From the MISTIE and CLEAR Trials

BACKGROUND

Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation (MISTIE) procedure was recently tested in a large phase III randomized trial showing a significant probability of functional benefit in those cases that reached the goal hematoma evacuation of ≤15 mL residual (or ≥70% removal). Benefit of thrombolysis was also identified in cases with large intraventricular hemorrhage, and achieving at least 85% volume reduction in the Evaluating Accelerated Resolution of Intraventricular Hemorrhage (CLEAR) III trial.

OBJECTIVE

To protocolize steps in the MISTIE and CLEAR procedures in order to maximize hematoma evacuation and minimize complications.

METHODS

We articulate data-driven lessons and expert opinions surrounding the factors of patient selection, catheter placement, and dosing, which impacted safety and surgical performance in the MISTIE and CLEAR trials.

RESULTS

Modifiable factors to maximize evacuation efficiency include optimizing catheter placement and pursuing aggressive dosing to achieve treatment goals, while strictly adhering to the safety steps as articulated in the respective trials. Prognostic factors that are viewed as nonmodifiable include greater initial intracerebral hemorrhage volume with irregular shape, smaller intraventricular bleeds, and the uncommon but consequential development of new bleeding during the dosing period despite strict protocol adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeon education in this tutorial is aimed at maximizing the benefit of the MISTIE and CLEAR procedures by reviewing case selection, safety steps, treatment objectives, and technical nuances. Key lessons include stability imaging, etiology screening, and technical adherence to the protocol in order to achieve defined thresholds of evacuation.

Surgical Performance Determines Functional Outcome Benefit in the Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation (MISTIE) Procedure

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery procedures, including stereotactic catheter aspiration and clearance of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator hold a promise to improve outcome of supratentorial brain hemorrhage, a morbid and disabling type of stroke. A recently completed Phase III randomized trial showed improved mortality but was neutral on the primary outcome (modified Rankin scale score 0 to 3 at 1 yr).

OBJECTIVE

To assess surgical performance and its impact on the extent of ICH evacuation and functional outcomes.

METHODS

Univariate and multivariate models were used to assess the extent of hematoma evacuation efficacy in relation to mRS 0 to 3 outcome and postulated factors related to patient, disease, and protocol adherence in the surgical arm (n = 242) of the MISTIE trial.

RESULTS

Greater ICH reduction has a higher likelihood of achieving mRS of 0 to 3 with a minimum evacuation threshold of ≤15 mL end of treatment ICH volume or ≥70% volume reduction when controlling for disease severity factors. Mortality benefit was achieved at ≤30 mL end of treatment ICH volume, or >53% volume reduction. Initial hematoma volume, history of hypertension, irregular-shaped hematoma, number of alteplase doses given, surgical protocol deviations, and catheter manipulation problems were significant factors in failing to achieve ≤15 mL goal evacuation. Greater surgeon/site experiences were associated with avoiding poor hematoma evacuation.

CONCLUSION

This is the first surgical trial reporting thresholds for reduction of ICH volume correlating with improved mortality and functional outcomes. To realize the benefit of surgery, protocol objectives, surgeon education, technical enhancements, and case selection should be focused on this goal.

Abstract WMP103: Comparative Impact of Extent of Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage Removal on Outcome in the MISTIE III and STICH II Trials

Introduction: The Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation Phase III trial (MISTIE III) concluded that the extent of hematoma reduction confers a mortality and functional benefit. It is unclear if a minimum extent of evacuation is needed for mortality and functional outcome benefit in lobar cases with MISTIE and with open surgical interventions.

Objective: We analyzed the effect of extent of lobar ICH evacuation on clinical outcome at 180 days after undergoing the MISTIE procedure and open craniotomy, in the context of the MISTIE III and STICH II clinical trials, respectively.

Methods: Patients randomized to the surgical arm with lobar ICH, who underwent the procedure in the MISTIE III trial (n=84) and the STICH II trial (n=266) were analyzed, excluding cases crossing over to surgery. We assessed end of treatment ICH volume on post procedure CT scans and % hematoma evacuation, in relation to survival and likelihood of mRS 0-3. Cubic spline modeling with dichotomized outcome was used to compare the extent of hematoma evacuation on clinical outcome.

Results: End of treatment volume of < 28 mL in lobar ICH MISTIE III patients and < 30 mL in STICH II trial patients showed a significantly increased probability of achieving an mRS of 0-3 at 180 days (p<0.03, p<0.006, respectively). This threshold was achieved in 83.1% of lobar cases undergoing MISTIE and in 92.1% of surgical cases in STICH II. Achieving survival benefit at 180 days trended towards improved probability with further hematoma volume reduction without a threshold value in MISTIE III, and was significant per mL reduction in STICH II (p<0.001). Analysis by percent of hematoma evacuation trended toward better probabilities of survival and improved functional outcome but were not significant.

Conclusion: This analysis confirms that extent of hematoma evacuation is important in attaining the benefits of both minimally invasive and open surgical interventions in non-herniating lobar ICH patients randomized in clinical trials. Extent of ICH evacuation must be considered in the analysis of comparative effectiveness of various techniques and in the design of future trials.

Abstract TP335: Comparative Impact of Timing From Ictus to Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation on Outcome in MISTIE III, STICH I & II Trials

Introduction: Completion of the MISTIE procedure requires a period of hematoma stability before and during hematoma removal and, if necessary, dosing of rtPA which can take days to complete. Early surgery was intended in the STICH I and II trials, yet was performed after varying delays. No previous analysis has evaluated the timing for hematoma removal on outcomes in these trials.

Objective: Determine if time from ictus to completion of hematoma removal may have affected patient outcome in three large surgical clinical trials of ICH evacuation.

Methods: Patients randomized to surgery in the MISTIE III (n=242), STICH I (n=464) and STICH II (n=266) trials who received the procedure were analyzed, excluding cases crossing over to surgery. Time from ictus to end of treatment, defined as 24 hours after last dose in (MISTIE III) or time to craniotomy (STICH I and II), was analyzed in relation to likelihood of survival and functional outcome at 180 days. Cubic spline models with dichotomized outcomes were used.

Results: The probability of achieving an mRS 0-3 increased significantly with longer time until completion of the procedure, up to 83 hours post-ictus, and worsened with longer delays thereafter (p=0.05). Better mRS was also achieved in STICH I patients with longer time until surgical removal, up to 60 hours post-ictus (p=0.0002), but not with longer delays (p=0.49). In STICH II (lobar cases), there was greater likelihood of mRS 0-3 with longer delay after 22 hours post-ictus (p=0.004), but not with earlier surgery (p=0.19). There was no significant benefit in survival, with earlier intervention across modalities and trials. Adjustment by initial hematoma volume further validated that early procedures do not favor survival or achieving a mRS 0-3.

Conclusion: Early hematoma evacuation up to 60-80 hours post-ictus does not increase the probability of survival nor a good functional outcome in non-herniating ICH patients included in clinical trials, likely in view of bleeding instability. This was true in minimally invasive intervention as well as open surgeries.

Surgical Decision Making in Brain Hemorrhage

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background and Purpose—

The STICH (Surgical Trial in Lobar Intracerebral Haemorrhage) I and II trials randomized patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) to early surgery or initial conservative treatment. Both were nonsignificant; possibly because surgery has minimal effect on recovery, or because surgery benefits some and harms others. We introduce a new nonparametric method of analysis. The method is then applied to data from a third trial, STITCH(Trauma) (Surgical Trial in Traumatic Intracerebral Haemorrhage), which addressed a similar surgical question in head-injured patients.

Methods—

Data from 1541 patients from the STICH trials were analyzed using (1) standard meta-analysis of prognosis-based dichotomized outcome and prespecified standard subgroups of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS): 3–8, 9–12, and 13–15; (2) new nonparametric regression of ranked Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale against ranked GCS and ranked volume; and (3) analysis (1) repeated using categories identified by analysis (2).

Results—

Standard meta-analysis showed more favorable outcomes, although nonsignificant, with surgery if presenting GCS was 9–12 (spontaneous ICH odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.48–1.03; P=0.07]; traumatic odds ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.18–1.26; P=0.14]). Ranked analysis showed a similar pattern of results for both spontaneous and traumatic ICH. Surgery was harmful for small lesions with increasing benefit for larger volumes. With GCS, surgery had little effect at either ends of the spectrum but suggested a beneficial effect in the range 10 to 13 (identified graphically). Repeating the meta-analysis with this categorization showed significant benefit for surgery (spontaneous odds ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.51–1.00; P=0.05]; traumatic odds ratio, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.05–0.51; P=0.002]).

Conclusions—

The nonsignificant results observed in the STICH trials are because of mixing patients who benefit from surgery with those who are harmed. Patients with a GCS 10–13 or a large ICH are likely to benefit from surgery. Our analysis showed a similar effect on traumatic ICH/contusion data and promises to be a valuable tool.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://www.isrctn.com/. Unique identifiers: ISRCTN19976990 (STITCH), ISRCTN22153967 (STICH II), and ISRCTN19321911 (STITCH[Trauma]).

A randomized 500-subject open-label phase 3 clinical trial of minimally invasive surgery plus alteplase in intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE III)

RATIONALE AND HYPOTHESIS

Surgical removal of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage may reduce secondary destruction of brain tissue. However, large surgical trials of craniotomy have not demonstrated definitive improvement in clinical outcomes. Minimally invasive surgery may limit surgical tissue injury, and recent evidence supports testing these approaches in large clinical trials.

METHODS AND DESIGN

MISTIE III is an investigator-initiated multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 study investigating whether minimally invasive clot evacuation with thrombolysis improves functional outcomes at 365 days compared to conservative management. Patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage clot volume ≥ 30 mL, confirmed by imaging within 24 h ofknown symptom onset,and intact brainstem reflexes were screened with a stability computed tomography scan at least 6 h after diagnostic scan. Patients who met clinical and imaging criteria (no ongoing coagulopathy; no suspicion of aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, or any other vascular anomaly; and stable hematoma size on consecutive scans) were randomized to either minimally invasive surgery plus thrombolysis or medical therapy. The sample size of 500 was based on findings of a phase 2 study.

STUDY OUTCOMES

The primary outcome measure is dichotomized modified Rankin Scale 0-3 vs. 4-6 at 365 days adjusting for severity variables. Clinical secondary outcomes include dichotomized extended Glasgow Outcome Scale and all-cause mortality at 365 days; rate and extent of parenchymal blood clot removal; patient disposition at 365 days; efficacy at 180 days; type and intensity of ICU management; and quality of life measures. Safety was assessed at 30 days and throughout the study.

Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery with thrombolysis in intracerebral haemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE III): a randomised, controlled, open-label, blinded endpoint phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Acute stroke due to supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Open craniotomy haematoma evacuation has not been found to have any benefit in large randomised trials. We assessed whether minimally invasive catheter evacuation followed by thrombolysis (MISTIE), with the aim of decreasing clot size to 15 mL or less, would improve functional outcome in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage.

METHODS

MISTIE III was an open-label, blinded endpoint, phase 3 trial done at 78 hospitals in the USA, Canada, Europe, Australia, and Asia. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with spontaneous, non-traumatic, supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage of 30 mL or more. We used a computer-generated number sequence with a block size of four or six to centrally randomise patients to image-guided MISTIE treatment (1·0 mg alteplase every 8 h for up to nine doses) or standard medical care. Primary outcome was good functional outcome, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3 at 365 days, adjusted for group differences in prespecified baseline covariates (stability intracerebral haemorrhage size, age, Glasgow Coma Scale, stability intraventricular haemorrhage size, and clot location). Analysis of the primary efficacy outcome was done in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, which included all eligible, randomly assigned patients who were exposed to treatment. All randomly assigned patients were included in the safety analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01827046.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 30, 2013, and Aug 15, 2017, 506 patients were randomly allocated: 255 (50%) to the MISTIE group and 251 (50%) to standard medical care. 499 patients (n=250 in the MISTIE group; n=249 in the standard medical care group) received treatment and were included in the mITT analysis set. The mITT primary adjusted efficacy analysis estimated that 45% of patients in the MISTIE group and 41% patients in the standard medical care group had achieved an mRS score of 0-3 at 365 days (adjusted risk difference 4% [95% CI -4 to 12]; p=0·33). Sensitivity analyses of 365-day mRS using generalised ordered logistic regression models adjusted for baseline variables showed that the estimated odds ratios comparing MISTIE with standard medical care for mRS scores higher than 5 versus 5 or less, higher than 4 versus 4 or less, higher than 3 versus 3 or less, and higher than 2 versus 2 or less were 0·60 (p=0·03), 0·84 (p=0·42), 0·87 (p=0·49), and 0·82 (p=0·44), respectively. At 7 days, two (1%) of 255 patients in the MISTIE group and ten (4%) of 251 patients in the standard medical care group had died (p=0·02) and at 30 days, 24 (9%) patients in the MISTIE group and 37 (15%) patients in the standard medical care group had died (p=0·07). The number of patients with symptomatic bleeding and brain bacterial infections was similar between the MISTIE and standard medical care groups (six [2%] of 255 patients vs three [1%] of 251 patients; p=0·33 for symptomatic bleeding; two [1%] of 255 patients vs 0 [0%] of 251 patients; p=0·16 for brain bacterial infections). At 30 days, 76 (30%) of 255 patients in the MISTIE group and 84 (33%) of 251 patients in the standard medical care group had one or more serious adverse event, and the difference in number of serious adverse events between the groups was statistically significant (p=0·012).

INTERPRETATION

For moderate to large intracerebral haemorrhage, MISTIE did not improve the proportion of patients who achieved a good response 365 days after intracerebral haemorrhage. The procedure was safely adopted by our sample of surgeons.

FUNDING

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Genentech.

Attitudes in 2013 to Monitoring Intracranial Pressure for Traumatic Intracerebral Haemorrhage

INTRODUCTION

Recent research has been equivocal regarding the usefulness of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring for traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). We aimed to investigate attitudes of clinicians from as wide an international audience as possible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A SurveyMonkey® questionnaire was distributed to individuals, including members of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons, the European Brain Injury Consortium, the Euroacademia Multidisciplinaria Neurotraumatologica and the neurotrauma committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight participants from at least 25 different countries completed the survey (86 surgeons). ICP was routinely monitored by 76 % and would be monitored by 5 % more if they had equipment. ICP monitoring was valued (0 = not at all important, 10 = critically important) as 10 by 21 % (median = 8; Q1 = 7, Q3 = 9). Responders were aware of 16 trials that investigated the value of ICP monitoring in neurotrauma, including BEST TRIP (n = 35), Rescue ICP (n = 13) and DECRA (n = 8). Other results are discussed.

DISCUSSION

Despite equivocation in the literature, we found that ICP monitoring continues to be routinely performed and is highly valued. Interestingly, only 36 % of responders were aware of the BEST TRIP trial, which found no difference in outcome between patients with a head injury managed with or without ICP monitoring.

Thrombolytic removal of intraventricular haemorrhage in treatment of severe stroke: results of the randomised, multicentre, multiregion, placebo-controlled CLEAR III trial

BACKGROUND

Intraventricular haemorrhage is a subtype of intracerebral haemorrhage, with 50% mortality and serious disability for survivors. We aimed to test whether attempting to remove intraventricular haemorrhage with alteplase versus saline irrigation improved functional outcome.

METHODS

In this randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multiregional trial (CLEAR III), participants with a routinely placed extraventricular drain, in the intensive care unit with stable, non-traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage volume less than 30 mL, intraventricular haemorrhage obstructing the 3rd or 4th ventricles, and no underlying pathology were adaptively randomly assigned (1:1), via a web-based system to receive up to 12 doses, 8 h apart of 1 mg of alteplase or 0·9% saline via the extraventricular drain. The treating physician, clinical research staff, and participants were masked to treatment assignment. CT scans were obtained every 24 h throughout dosing. The primary efficacy outcome was good functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) of 3 or less at 180 days per central adjudication by blinded evaluators. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00784134.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 18, 2009, and Jan 13, 2015, 500 patients were randomised: 249 to the alteplase group and 251 to the saline group. 180-day follow-up data were available for analysis from 246 of 249 participants in the alteplase group and 245 of 251 participants in the placebo group. The primary efficacy outcome was similar in each group (good outcome in alteplase group 48% vs saline 45%; risk ratio [RR] 1·06 [95% CI 0·88-1·28; p=0·554]). A difference of 3·5% (RR 1·08 [95% CI 0·90-1·29], p=0·420) was found after adjustment for intraventricular haemorrhage size and thalamic intracerebral haemorrhage. At 180 days, the treatment group had lower case fatality (46 [18%] vs saline 73 [29%], hazard ratio 0·60 [95% CI 0·41-0·86], p=0·006), but a greater proportion with mRS 5 (42 [17%] vs 21 [9%]; RR 1·99 [95% CI 1·22-3·26], p=0·007). Ventriculitis (17 [7%] alteplase vs 31 [12%] saline; RR 0·55 [95% CI 0·31-0·97], p=0·048) and serious adverse events (114 [46%] alteplase vs 151 [60%] saline; RR 0·76 [95% CI 0·64-0·90], p=0·002) were less frequent with alteplase treatment. Symptomatic bleeding (six [2%] in the alteplase group vs five [2%] in the saline group; RR 1·21 [95% CI 0·37-3·91], p=0·771) was similar.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with intraventricular haemorrhage and a routine extraventricular drain, irrigation with alteplase did not substantially improve functional outcomes at the mRS 3 cutoff compared with irrigation with saline. Protocol-based use of alteplase with extraventricular drain seems safe. Future investigation is needed to determine whether a greater frequency of complete intraventricular haemorrhage removal via alteplase produces gains in functional status.

FUNDING

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

Trial of Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Intracranial Hypertension

BACKGROUND

The effect of decompressive craniectomy on clinical outcomes in patients with refractory traumatic intracranial hypertension remains unclear.

METHODS

From 2004 through 2014, we randomly assigned 408 patients, 10 to 65 years of age, with traumatic brain injury and refractory elevated intracranial pressure (>25 mm Hg) to undergo decompressive craniectomy or receive ongoing medical care. The primary outcome was the rating on the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E) (an 8-point scale, ranging from death to "upper good recovery" [no injury-related problems]) at 6 months. The primary-outcome measure was analyzed with an ordinal method based on the proportional-odds model. If the model was rejected, that would indicate a significant difference in the GOS-E distribution, and results would be reported descriptively.

RESULTS

The GOS-E distribution differed between the two groups (P<0.001). The proportional-odds assumption was rejected, and therefore results are reported descriptively. At 6 months, the GOS-E distributions were as follows: death, 26.9% among 201 patients in the surgical group versus 48.9% among 188 patients in the medical group; vegetative state, 8.5% versus 2.1%; lower severe disability (dependent on others for care), 21.9% versus 14.4%; upper severe disability (independent at home), 15.4% versus 8.0%; moderate disability, 23.4% versus 19.7%; and good recovery, 4.0% versus 6.9%. At 12 months, the GOS-E distributions were as follows: death, 30.4% among 194 surgical patients versus 52.0% among 179 medical patients; vegetative state, 6.2% versus 1.7%; lower severe disability, 18.0% versus 14.0%; upper severe disability, 13.4% versus 3.9%; moderate disability, 22.2% versus 20.1%; and good recovery, 9.8% versus 8.4%. Surgical patients had fewer hours than medical patients with intracranial pressure above 25 mm Hg after randomization (median, 5.0 vs. 17.0 hours; P<0.001) but had a higher rate of adverse events (16.3% vs. 9.2%, P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

At 6 months, decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic brain injury and refractory intracranial hypertension resulted in lower mortality and higher rates of vegetative state, lower severe disability, and upper severe disability than medical care. The rates of moderate disability and good recovery were similar in the two groups. (Funded by the Medical Research Council and others; RESCUEicp Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN66202560 .).

Surgical Trial In Traumatic intraCerebral Haemorrhage (STITCH): a randomised controlled trial of Early Surgery compared with Initial Conservative Treatment

BACKGROUND

While it is accepted practice to remove extradural (EDH) and subdural haematomas (SDH) following traumatic brain injury, the role of surgery in parenchymal traumatic intracerebral haemorrhage (TICH) is controversial. There is no evidence to support Early Surgery in this condition.

OBJECTIVES

There have been a number of trials investigating surgery for spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage but none for TICH. This study aimed to establish whether or not a policy of Early Surgery for TICH improves outcome compared with a policy of Initial Conservative Treatment.

DESIGN

This was an international multicentre pragmatic parallel group trial. Patients were randomised via an independent telephone/web-based randomisation service.

SETTING

Neurosurgical units in 59 hospitals in 20 countries registered to take part in the study.

PARTICIPANTS

The study planned to recruit 840 adult patients. Patients had to be within 48 hours of head injury with no more than two intracerebral haematomas greater than 10 ml. They did not have a SDH or EDH that required evacuation or any severe comorbidity that would mean they could not achieve a favourable outcome if they made a complete recovery from their head injury.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomised to Early Surgery within 12 hours or to Initial Conservative Treatment with delayed evacuation if it became clinically appropriate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) was measured at 6 months via a postal questionnaire. The primary outcome was the traditional dichotomised split into favourable outcome (good recovery or moderate disability) and unfavourable outcome (severe disability, vegetative, dead). Secondary outcomes included mortality and an ordinal assessment of Glasgow Outcome Scale and Rankin Scale.

RESULTS

Patient recruitment began in December 2009 but was halted by the funding body because of low UK recruitment in September 2012. In total, 170 patients were randomised from 31 centres in 13 countries: 83 to Early Surgery and 87 to Initial Conservative Treatment. Six-month outcomes were obtained for 99% of 168 eligible patients (82 Early Surgery and 85 Initial Conservative Treatment patients). Patients in the Early Surgery group were 10.5% more likely to have a favourable outcome (absolute benefit), but this difference did not quite reach statistical significance because of the reduced sample size. Fifty-two (63%) had a favourable outcome with Early Surgery, compared with 45 (53%) with Initial Conservative Treatment [odds ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35 to 1.21; p = 0.17]. Mortality was significantly higher in the Initial Conservative Treatment group (33% vs. 15%; absolute difference 18.3%; 95% CI 5.7% to 30.9%; p = 0.006). The Rankin Scale and GOSE were significantly improved with Early Surgery using a trend analysis (p = 0.047 and p = 0.043 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first ever trial of surgery for TICH and indicates that Early Surgery may be a valuable tool in the treatment of TICH, especially if the Glasgow Coma Score is between 9 and 12, as was also found in Surgical Trial In spontaneous intraCerebral Haemorrhage (STICH) and Surgical Trial In spontaneous lobar intraCerebral Haemorrhage (STICH II). Further research is clearly warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN 19321911.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 19, No. 70. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Early Surgery versus Initial Conservative Treatment in Patients with Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage (STITCH[Trauma]): The First Randomized Trial

Intraparenchymal hemorrhages occur in a proportion of severe traumatic brain injury TBI patients, but the role of surgery in their treatment is unclear. This international multi-center, patient-randomized, parallel-group trial compared early surgery (hematoma evacuation within 12 h of randomization) with initial conservative treatment (subsequent evacuation allowed if deemed necessary). Patients were randomized using an independent randomization service within 48 h of TBI. Patients were eligible if they had no more than two intraparenchymal hemorrhages of 10 mL or more and did not have an extradural or subdural hematoma that required surgery. The primary outcome measure was the traditional dichotomous split of the Glasgow Outcome Scale obtained by postal questionnaires sent directly to patients at 6 months. The trial was halted early by the UK funding agency (NIHR HTA) for failure to recruit sufficient patients from the UK (trial registration: ISRCTN19321911). A total of 170 patients were randomized from 31 of 59 registered centers worldwide. Of 82 patients randomized to early surgery with complete follow-up, 30 (37%) had an unfavorable outcome. Of 85 patients randomized to initial conservative treatment with complete follow-up, 40 (47%) had an unfavorable outcome (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.35, 1.21; p=0.17), with an absolute benefit of 10.5% (CI, -4.4-25.3%). There were significantly more deaths in the first 6 months in the initial conservative treatment group (33% vs. 15%; p=0.006). The 10.5% absolute benefit with early surgery was consistent with the initial power calculation. However, with the low sample size resulting from the premature termination, we cannot exclude the possibility that this could be a chance finding. A further trial is required urgently to assess whether this encouraging signal can be confirmed.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) accounted for 9% to 27% of all strokes worldwide in the last decade, with high early case fatality and poor functional outcome. In view of recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the management of ICH, the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) has updated its evidence-based guidelines for the management of ICH.

METHOD

A multidisciplinary writing committee of 24 researchers from 11 European countries identified 20 questions relating to ICH management and created recommendations based on the evidence in RCTs using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

We found moderate- to high-quality evidence to support strong recommendations for managing patients with acute ICH on an acute stroke unit, avoiding hemostatic therapy for acute ICH not associated with antithrombotic drug use, avoiding graduated compression stockings, using intermittent pneumatic compression in immobile patients, and using blood pressure lowering for secondary prevention. We found moderate-quality evidence to support weak recommendations for intensive lowering of systolic blood pressure to <140 mmHg within six-hours of ICH onset, early surgery for patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score 9-12, and avoidance of corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines inform the management of ICH based on evidence for the effects of treatments in RCTs. Outcome after ICH remains poor, prioritizing further RCTs of interventions to improve outcome.

White matter correlates of cognitive dysfunction after mild traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE

To relate neurophysiologic changes after mild/moderate traumatic brain injury to cognitive deficit in a longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging investigation.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients were scanned an average of 6 days postinjury (range = 1-14 days). Twenty-three patients were rescanned 1 year later. Thirty-three matched control subjects were recruited. At the time of scanning, participants completed cognitive testing. Tract-Based Spatial Statistics was used to conduct voxel-wise analysis on diffusion changes and to explore regressions between diffusion metrics and cognitive performance.

RESULTS

Acutely, increased axial diffusivity drove a fractional anisotropy (FA) increase, while decreased radial diffusivity drove a negative regression between FA and Verbal Letter Fluency across widespread white matter regions, but particularly in the ascending fibers of the corpus callosum. Raised FA is hypothesized to be caused by astrogliosis and compaction of axonal neurofilament, which would also affect cognitive functioning. Chronically, FA was decreased, suggesting myelin sheath disintegration, but still regressed negatively with Verbal Letter Fluency in the anterior forceps.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute mild/moderate traumatic brain injury is characterized by increased tissue FA, which represents a clear neurobiological link between cognitive dysfunction and white matter injury after mild/moderate injury.

Abstract 29: The Surgical Trial in Lobar Intracerebral Haemorrhage - Analysis of Crossover Patients

Background: STICH II was an international multicentre pragmatic randomised parallel group trial to establish whether a policy of early surgery (ES) improved outcome compared to a policy of initial conservative treatment (ICT) for patients with superficial lobar intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). The results of the “intention to treat analysis” have been published and showed a non-significant trend in favour of early surgery. However, as observed in other surgical trials, there was a substantial crossover of patients from the ICT group with 21% having surgery within 14 days of randomisation. This paper investigates these patients and their effect on outcome.

Methods: Patients from the ICT group who underwent surgery within 14 days were identified and compared with patients who continued to receive conservative treatment and with patients randomised to ES. The protocol defined “early surgery” as within 12 hours of randomisation so analyses were also conducted using this definition. Per protocol and treatment received analyses were conducted.

Results: For this analysis there are 285 ICT patients with outcome assessed, 233 had no surgery and 62 patients had surgery within 2 weeks: 23 within 12 hours. Of 297 patients randomised to ES, 278 had surgery within 12 hours. Surgical ICT patients had lower GCS (13 v 14) and larger volumes (54ml v 32ml) of haematoma at randomisation (p<0.0001) than non-surgical ICT. They also showed lower GCS and larger volumes (54ml v 40ml) than per protocol ES patients. Surgical ICT patients were much more likely to have an unfavourable outcome than non-surgical (84% v 63%, p < 0.002). If the surgery was after 12 hours the unfavourable outcome was higher (89%). There were no differences in outcome between per protocol ES and non-surgical ICT but there were major differences in baseline measures between these patients.

Death rates were highest in ICT patients having surgery within 12 hours (48%) compared with later surgery (31%), non-surgical ICT patients (20%) and ES patients (17%).

Conclusions: Patients randomised to conservative treatment who deteriorate and have surgery differ considerably from those that do not deteriorate and from those who are randomised to early surgery. Further work is needed to develop ways of analysing these data.

What does it take to deliver an international neurosurgical trial? Experiences from STICH II

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

When undertaking multicentre randomised controlled trials some obstacles cause a slower than required recruitment rate. This article discusses factors that affected the completion of the international neurosurgical trial STICH II, which took almost 6 years.

METHODS

We reviewed the following factors: recruitment of participating sites, patient recruitment, patient screening, trial fatigue and maintenance of profile and maintenance of quality and standards. We discuss the practical strategies employed by the STICH II team to address these factors and optimise patient recruitment.

CONCLUSION

Although STICH II attained its final recruitment target, it took longer to complete than anticipated. Publishing and sharing the experiences of the STICH II trial team is an important step towards ensuring that other potential neurosurgical triallists are aware of the issues that can slow patient recruitment and strategies that can help to overcome them.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase III study of Clot Lysis Evaluation of Accelerated Resolution of Intraventricular Hemorrhage (CLEAR III)

BACKGROUND

In adults, intraventricular thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) facilitates resolution of intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), reduces intracranial pressure, decreases duration of cerebrospinal fluid diversion, and may ameliorate direct neural injury. We hypothesize that patients with small parenchymal haematoma volumes (<30 cc) and relatively large IVH causing acute obstructive hydrocephalus would have improved clinical outcomes when given injections of low-dose rtPA to accelerate lysis and evacuation of IVH compared with placebo.

METHODS

The Clot Lysis Evaluation of Accelerated Resolution of Intraventricular Hemorrhage III trial is an investigator-initiated, phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the use of external ventricular drainage (EVD) combined with intraventricular injection of rtPA to EVD plus intraventricular injection of normal saline (placebo) for the treatment of IVH. Patients with known symptom onset within 24 h of the computed tomography scan confirmed IVH and third or fourth ventricle obstruction, with or without supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage volume <30 cc, who require EVD are screened with a computed tomography scan at least six hours after EVD placement and, if necessary, at consecutive 12-h intervals until stabilization of any intracranial bleeding has been established. Patients who meet clinical and imaging criteria (no ongoing coagulopathy and no suspicion of aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, or any other vascular anomaly) will be randomized to either intraventricular rtPA or placebo.

RESULTS

The primary outcome measure is dichotomized modified Rankin Scale 0-3 vs. 4-6 at 180 days. Clinical secondary outcomes include additional modified Rankin Scale dichotomizations at 180 days (0-4 vs. 5-6), ordinal modified Rankin Scale (0-6), mortality and safety events at 30 days, mortality at 180 days, functional status measures, type and intensity of intensive care unit management, rate and extent of ventricular blood clot removal, and quality of life measures.

Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral haematomas (STICH II): a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

The balance of risk and benefit from early neurosurgical intervention for conscious patients with superficial lobar intracerebral haemorrhage of 10-100 mL and no intraventricular haemorrhage admitted within 48 h of ictus is unclear. We therefore tested the hypothesis that early surgery compared with initial conservative treatment could improve outcome in these patients.

METHODS

In this international, parallel-group trial undertaken in 78 centres in 27 countries, we compared early surgical haematoma evacuation within 12 h of randomisation plus medical treatment with initial medical treatment alone (later evacuation was allowed if judged necessary). An automatic telephone and internet-based randomisation service was used to assign patients to surgery and initial conservative treatment in a 1:1 ratio. The trial was not masked. The primary outcome was a prognosis-based dichotomised (favourable or unfavourable) outcome of the 8 point Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) obtained by questionnaires posted to patients at 6 months. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN22153967.

FINDINGS

307 of 601 patients were randomly assigned to early surgery and 294 to initial conservative treatment; 298 and 291 were followed up at 6 months, respectively; and 297 and 286 were included in the analysis, respectively. 174 (59%) of 297 patients in the early surgery group had an unfavourable outcome versus 178 (62%) of 286 patients in the initial conservative treatment group (absolute difference 3·7% [95% CI -4·3 to 11·6], odds ratio 0·86 [0·62 to 1·20]; p=0·367).

INTERPRETATION

The STICH II results confirm that early surgery does not increase the rate of death or disability at 6 months and might have a small but clinically relevant survival advantage for patients with spontaneous superficial intracerebral haemorrhage without intraventricular haemorrhage.

FUNDING

UK Medical Research Council.

Surgical management of acute subdural haematomas: current practice patterns in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland

INTRODUCTION

Uncertainty remains as to the role of decompressive craniectomy (DC) for primary evacuation of acute subdural haematomas (ASDH). In 2011, a collaborative group was formed in the UK with the aim of answering the following question: "What is the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy, in comparison with craniotomy for adult patients undergoing primary evacuation of an ASDH?" The proposed RESCUE-ASDH trial (Randomised Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for patients Undergoing Evacuation of Acute Subdural Haematoma) is a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group randomised trial of DC versus craniotomy for adult head-injured patients with an ASDH. In this study, we used an online questionnaire to assess the current practice patterns in the management of ASDH in the UK and the Republic of Ireland, and to gauge neurosurgical opinion regarding the proposed RESCUE-ASDH trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire survey of full members of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons and members of the British Neurosurgical Trainees Association was undertaken between the beginning of May and the end of July 2012.

RESULTS

The online questionnaire was answered by 95 neurosurgeons representing 31 of the 32 neurosurgical units managing adult head-injured patients in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. Forty-five percent of the respondents use primary DC in at least 25% of patients with ASDH. In addition, of the 22 neurosurgical units with at least two Consultant respondents, only three units (14%) showed intradepartmental agreement regarding the proportion of their patients receiving a primary DC for ASDH.

CONCLUSION

The survey results demonstrate that there is significant uncertainty as to the optimal surgical technique for primary evacuation of ASDH. The fact that the majority of the respondents are willing to become collaborators in the planned RESCUE-ASDH trial highlights the relevance of this important subject to the neurosurgical community in the UK and Ireland.

Multimodality treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations

BACKGROUND

Many arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can be treated with one modality, but with increasing complexity a combination of techniques, including surgical excision, embolization, and radiosurgery, may be beneficial. The 2 senior authors' experience in the multimodal management of AVMs from 1980-2008 is reported, including the results in all patients with rehemorrhage while awaiting treatment or after partial initial treatment has begun. The series contains a disproportionately high number of Spetzler-Martin grade IV and V lesions, owing to the nature of the referral practice.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively. Only patients who were managed until treatment options were exhausted were included; this entailed either treatment to the point of AVM obliteration or inability to treat further using any or all modalities. Patients who presented with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in extremis in whom the AVM was excised during the first operation were also included.

RESULTS

Of the 290 patients, 265 underwent treatment, and 25 were managed conservatively. An unruptured AVM was present in 48% of patients. Cure was achieved in 233 (88%) of treated patients. Cure was achieved in 25 of 37 patients undergoing radiosurgery only, 56 of 57 undergoing surgery, 100 of 101 undergoing embolization and microsurgical excision, 20 of 34 undergoing embolization alone, 12 of 17 undergoing embolization and radiosurgery, 5 of 5 undergoing surgery and radiosurgery, and 14 of 14 patients undergoing all 3 modalities. Spetzler-Martin grade was found to correlate negatively with cure (P < 0.001). There was a good outcome in 210 patients (72%), moderate disability in 40 patients (14%), severe disability in 22 patients (8%), vegetative state in 1 patient, and 17 patients (6%) died. There was a favorable outcome (no or only moderate deficits) in 93% of patients with Spetzler-Martin grade I-III lesions. The outcome was favorable in 13 of 25 patients (52%) having no treatment, 32 of 37 (86%) having radiosurgery only, 30 of 34 (88%) having embolization only, 54 of 57 (95%) having surgery only, 87 of 101 (86%) having embolization and surgery, 16 of 17 (94%) having embolization and radiosurgery, 5 of 5 (100%) having surgery and radiosurgery, and 13 of 14 (93%) having all 3 modalities. These outcomes included morbidity from initial presenting symptoms, from treatment, and from rehemorrhage. Good recovery was more likely in patients who were treated with surgery as one of the treatments (P = .025). Considering only new deficits related to treatment, 9 patients (3%) incurred severe neurologic deficits, 11 patents died after treatment, 2 patients died of postoperative hematomas, and 6 died of rehemorrhage from residual AVM. Increasing age, Spetzler-Martin grade, and rehemorrhage were correlated with a poorer Glasgow Outcome Scale score (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest a higher risk of hemorrhage after partial obliteration of AVM. One should ascertain an acceptably high likelihood of complete obliteration before embarking on treatment. Using a multimodality approach, the authors were able to cure 92% of treated Spetzler-Martin grade I-IV lesions but only 53% of treated Spetzler-Martin grade V lesions. A major neurologic deficit, disabling to the patient, was incurred in 3% of cases, and 11 patients died.

Update on the Surgical Trial in Lobar Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH II): statistical analysis plan

BACKGROUND

Previous studies had suggested that the outcome for patients with spontaneous lobar intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) and no intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) might be improved with early evacuation of the haematoma. The Surgical Trial in Lobar Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH II) set out to establish whether a policy of earlier surgical evacuation of the haematoma in selected patients with spontaneous lobar ICH would improve outcome compared to a policy of initial conservative treatment. It is an international, multi-centre, prospective randomised parallel group trial of early surgery in patients with spontaneous lobar ICH. Outcome is measured at six months via a postal questionnaire.

RESULTS

Recruitment to the study began on 27 November 2006 and closed on 15 August 2012 by which time 601 patients had been recruited. The protocol was published in Trials (http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/12/1/124/). This update presents the analysis plan for the study without reference to the unblinded data. The trial data will not be unblinded until after follow-up is completed in early 2013. The main trial results will be presented in spring 2013 with the aim to publish in a peer-reviewed journal at the same time.

CONCLUSION

The data from the trial will provide evidence on the benefits and risks of early surgery in patients with lobar ICH.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN: ISRCTN22153967.

Surgical trial in traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (STITCH(Trauma)): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Intracranial hemorrhage occurs in over 60% of severe head injuries in one of three types: extradural (EDH); subdural (SDH); and intraparenchymal (TICH). Prompt surgical removal of significant SDH and EDH is established and widely accepted. However, TICH is more common and is found in more than 40% of severe head injuries. It is associated with a worse outcome but the role for surgical removal remains undefined. Surgical practice in the treatment of TICHs differs widely around the world. The aim of early surgery in TICH removal is to prevent secondary brain injury. There have been trials of surgery for spontaneous ICH (including the STICH II trial), but none so far of surgery for TICH.

Methods/Design

The UK National Institutes of Health Research has funded STITCH(Trauma) to determine whether a policy of early surgery in patients with TICH improves outcome compared to a policy of initial conservative treatment. It will include a health economics component and carry out a subgroup analysis of patients undergoing invasive monitoring. This is an international multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Patients are eligible if: they are within 48 h of injury; they have evidence of TICH on CT scan with a confluent volume of attenuation significantly raised above that of the background white and grey matter that has a total volume >10 mL; and their treating neurosurgeon is in equipoise.

Patients will be ineligible if they have: a significant surface hematoma (EDH or SDH) requiring surgery; a hemorrhage/contusion located in the cerebellum; three or more separate hematomas fulfilling inclusion criteria; or severe pre-existing physical or mental disability or severe co-morbidity which would lead to poor outcome even if the patient made a full recovery from the head injury.

Patients will be randomized via an independent service. Patients randomized to surgery receive surgery within 12 h. Both groups will be monitored according to standard neurosurgical practice. All patients have a CT scan at 5 days (+/−2 days) to assess changes in hematoma size. Follow-up is by postal questionnaire at 6 and 12 months. The recruitment target is 840 patients.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN19321911

Increased expression of fatty acid binding protein 4 and leptin in resident macrophages characterises atherosclerotic plaque rupture

OBJECTIVE

Resident macrophages play an important role in atheromatous plaque rupture. The macrophage gene expression signature associated with plaque rupture is incompletely defined due to the complex cellular heterogeneity in the plaque. We aimed to characterise differential gene expression in resident plaque macrophages from ruptured and stable human atheromatous lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed genome-wide expression analyses of isolated macrophage-rich regions of stable and ruptured human atherosclerotic plaques. Plaques present in carotid endarterectomy specimens were designated as stable or ruptured using clinical, radiological and histopathological criteria. Macrophage-rich regions were excised from 5 ruptured and 6 stable plaques by laser micro-dissection. Transcriptional profiling was performed using Affymetrix microarrays. The profiles were characteristic of activated macrophages. At a false discovery rate of 10%, 914 genes were differentially expressed between stable and ruptured plaques. The findings were confirmed in fourteen further stable and ruptured samples for a subset of eleven genes with the highest expression differences (p < 0.05). Pathway analysis revealed that components of the PPAR/Adipocytokine signaling pathway were the most significantly upregulated in ruptured compared to stable plaques (p = 5.4 × 10(-7)). Two key components of the pathway, fatty-acid binding-protein 4 (FABP4) and leptin, showed nine-fold (p = 0.0086) and five-fold (p = 0.0012) greater expression respectively in macrophages from ruptured plaques.

CONCLUSIONS

We found differences in gene expression signatures between macrophages isolated from stable and ruptured human atheromatous plaques. Our findings indicate the involvement of FABP4 and leptin in the progression of atherosclerosis and plaque rupture, and suggest that down-regulation of PPAR/adipocytokine signaling within plaques may have therapeutic potential.

Individual patient data subgroup meta-analysis of surgery for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

By 2010 there had been 14 published trials of surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage reported in systematic reviews or to the authors, but the role and timing of operative intervention remain controversial and the practice continues to be haphazard. This study attempted to obtain individual patient data from each of the 13 studies published since 1985 to better define groups of patients that might benefit from surgery.

METHODS

Authors of identified published articles were approached by mail, e-mail, and at conferences and invited to take part in the study. Data were obtained from 8 studies (2186 cases). Individual patient data included patient's age, Glasgow Coma Score at presentation, volume and site of hematoma, presence of intraventricular hemorrhage, method of evacuation, time to randomization, and outcome.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis indicated that there was improved outcome with surgery if randomization was [corrected] undertaken within 8 hours of ictus (P=0.003), or the volume of the hematoma was 20 to 50 mL (P=0.004), or the Glasgow Coma Score was between 9 and 12 (P=0.0009), or the patient was aged between 50 and 69 years (P=0.01). In addition, there was some evidence that more superficial hematomas with no intraventricular hemorrhage might also benefit (P=0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that surgery is of benefit if undertaken early before the patient deteriorates. This work identifies areas for further research. Ongoing studies in subgroups of patients such as the Surgical Trial in Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage (STICH II) will confirm whether these interpretations can be replicated.

Surgical trial in lobar intracerebral haemorrhage (STICH II) protocol

BACKGROUND

Within the spectrum of spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage there are some patients with large or space occupying haemorrhage who require surgery for neurological deterioration and others with small haematomas who should be managed conservatively. There is equipoise about the management of patients between these two extremes. In particular there is some evidence that patients with lobar haematomas and no intraventricular haemorrhage might benefit from haematoma evacuation. The STICH II study will establish whether a policy of earlier surgical evacuation of the haematoma in selected patients will improve outcome compared to a policy of initial conservative treatment.

METHODS/DESIGN

An international multicentre randomised parallel group trial. Only patients for whom the treating neurosurgeon is in equipoise about the benefits of early craniotomy compared to initial conservative treatment are eligible. All patients must have a CT scan confirming spontaneous lobar intracerebral haemorrhage (≤1 cm from the cortex surface of the brain and 10-100 ml in volume). Any clotting or coagulation problems must be corrected and randomisation must take place within 48 hours of ictus. With 600 patients, the study will be able to demonstrate a 12% benefit from surgery (2p < 0.05) with 80% power.Stratified randomisation is undertaken using a central 24 hour randomisation service accessed by telephone or web. Patients randomised to early surgery should have the operation within 12 hours. Information about the status (Glasgow Coma Score and focal signs) of all patients through the first five days of their trial progress is also collected in addition to another CT scan at about five days (+/- 2 days). Outcome is measured at six months via a postal questionnaire to the patient. Primary outcome is death or severe disability defined using a prognosis based 8 point Glasgow Outcome Scale. Secondary outcomes include: Mortality, Rankin, Barthel, EuroQol, and Survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN: ISRCTN22153967.

Definition of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as an outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies: proposal of a multidisciplinary research group

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In clinical trials and observational studies there is considerable inconsistency in the use of definitions to describe delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A major cause for this inconsistency is the combining of radiographic evidence of vasospasm with clinical features of cerebral ischemia, although multiple factors may contribute to DCI. The second issue is the variability and overlap of terms used to describe each phenomenon. This makes comparisons among studies difficult.

METHODS

An international ad hoc panel of experts involved in subarachnoid hemorrhage research developed and proposed a definition of DCI to be used as an outcome measure in clinical trials and observational studies. We used a consensus-building approach.

RESULTS

It is proposed that in observational studies and clinical trials aiming to investigate strategies to prevent DCI, the 2 main outcome measures should be: (1) cerebral infarction identified on CT or MRI or proven at autopsy, after exclusion of procedure-related infarctions; and (2) functional outcome. Secondary outcome measure should be clinical deterioration caused by DCI, after exclusion of other potential causes of clinical deterioration. Vasospasm on angiography or transcranial Doppler can also be used as an outcome measure to investigate proof of concept but should be interpreted in conjunction with DCI or functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed measures reflect the most relevant morphological and clinical features of DCI without regard to pathogenesis to be used as an outcome measure in clinical trials and observational studies.

Endovascular stenting of the transverse sinus in a patient presenting with benign intracranial hypertension

The authors present a 37-year-old lady with symptoms and signs suggestive of benign intracranial hypertension (BIH). Routine CT and MRI scans were normal. Further investigations were performed with magnetic resonance venography (MRV) and cerebral venography. These revealed obstruction of the right transverse sinus with high pressure (40 mmHg) proximal to the obstruction and low pressure (15 mmHg) distally. She was treated by transvenous stent deployment with resolution of her symptoms and the bilateral papilloedema. Evaluation of the cerebral venous system with MRV and or with formal cerebral venography should be included in routine investigations of patients with suspected BIH.

Intracranial pressure within a developing intracerebral haemorrhage

We report the time course of intracranial pressure within a developing intracerebral haemorrhage. Simultaneous readings of intracranial pressure were obtained from a contralateral parenchymal monitor and ventricular fluid pressure monitor. This recording demonstrates the existence of large pressure gradients in patients with expanding mass lesions.

Endovascular treatment of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: results of clinical and radiological outcome in Newcastle

The results of endovascular management of anterior communicating artery aneurysms (ACoAA) using Guglielmi Detachable Coils (GDC) are presented. We detail the clinical and radiological features, and postoperative clinical and radiological outcome in a consecutive series of patients. We have prospectively collected comprehensive data on our patients with SAH since 1989. This study reports on patients admitted between January 1990 and December 1998, and focuses on 30 patients who had their ACoAA endovascularly treated. An independent observer (TE) carried out long-term follow-up in January 2002. Statistical analysis was performed to study the relationship between clinical factors, the radiological morphology of aneurysms and the long-term outcome. The age ranged from 25 to 74 years (median: 54) and endovascularly treated ACoAA were more common in women, 19 (63%) compared with men, 11 (37%). Seventy-seven per cent were in good grade (WFNS 1 & 2) before treatment. Three patients rebled before treatment. The aneurysms were less than 10 mm in maximal diameter in 27/30 patients. The follow-up period was from 1 to 53 months (mean 32.5, median 36.6 months). Excellent outcome was recorded for 11 patients (36.7%), good in seven patients (23.3%), fair in three patients (10%) and poor in four cases (13.3%). Five patients had died (mortality 16.7%). Favourable outcome was achieved in younger patients, women, and in those who presented in grades 1 and 2. The long-term radiological follow-up revealed residual necks in 13 patients. Only one has required retreatment and no rebleed has occurred in 3-6 years. This study reports a contemporary experience with the endovascular management of ACoAA. Long-term stability of the coil and good outcome is demonstrated. Endovascular treatment using GDC is an efficient technique for treating acutely ruptured ACoAA with little additional morbidity. The clinical and radiological results are comparable with those in the literature.

The measurement of brain tissue stiffness in-vivo

BACKGROUND

There is considerable interest in surgical decompression as a management strategy (RescueICP) for intractable intracranial hypertension. After such an operation measurements of intracranial pressure (ICP) and thus cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) become less meaningful. Measurements of the biomechanical properties of the brain may be one measure capable of detecting changing status of such patients. However these properties of the brain are neither documented or well understood. We have developed an indentation probe capable of making measurements of human brain stiffness.

METHOD

The device consists of an indenting tip of depth 2 mm and diameter 12 mm surrounded by an annular body of 20 mm diameter. Measurements are made by two load cells, connected through interface electronics to a laptop computer.

FINDINGS

Laboratory measurements show the probe to provide accurate and repeatable measurements over a range of zero to 10N. Inter-operator variability from six healthcare professionals had a coefficient of variance of 8.75%. Measurements obtained during surgery from a patient undergoing tumour resection were towards the lower end of the device's measurable range.

CONCLUSIONS

We have determined that this indentation device has a linear response and that the inter- and intra-operator variability is low. Although the device is still in an early stage of development, preliminary results during intracranial surgery demonstrate that this device is capable of measuring in-vivo tissue stiffness. Further work is required to derive a quantitative "stiffness index" from the two load curves. In addition a standard operation method is required so that consistent and repeatable measurements are made. The device may be of value in assessing patients after decompressive craniectomy.

The accuracy of hospital discharge coding for hemorrhagic stroke

BACKGROUND

Hospital discharge data is used in monitoring stroke epidemiology, and ensuring adequate resource allocation to treatment programs. Previous studies have reported variable accuracy levels for such data. We present the first study assessing the accuracy of International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition (ICD-10) discharge coding for hemorrhagic stroke in England.

METHODS

We identified all patients with a primary diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH; ICD-10 code: I61.x) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH; I60.x) admitted to the Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals from 2002-2007. Positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated through validation with patient notes.

RESULTS

Hospital discharge coding identified 978 ICH and 1169 SAH admissions over the six years. The number of diagnoses verified by patient notes was excellent for both ICH (n = 938) and SAH (n = 1123), with a PPV of 95.9% for ICH (95% confidence interval, CI = 94.5-97.0%) and 96.1%for SAH (95% CI = 94.8-97.0%). The coding errors observed were largely expected, with different types of stroke miscoded as ICH and SAH.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of ICD-10 hospital discharge coding for hemorrhagic stroke was excellent. However further research is needed to find ways to further improve its accuracy.

Intracerebral haemorrhage

Intracerebral haemorrhage is an important public health problem leading to high rates of death and disability in adults. Although the number of hospital admissions for intracerebral haemorrhage has increased worldwide in the past 10 years, mortality has not fallen. Results of clinical trials and observational studies suggest that coordinated primary and specialty care is associated with lower mortality than is typical community practice. Development of treatment goals for critical care, and new sequences of care and specialty practice can improve outcome after intracerebral haemorrhage. Specific treatment approaches include early diagnosis and haemostasis, aggressive management of blood pressure, open surgical and minimally invasive surgical techniques to remove clot, techniques to remove intraventricular blood, and management of intracranial pressure. These approaches improve clinical management of patients with intracerebral haemorrhage and promise to reduce mortality and increase functional survival.