WITHDRAWN: A single center experience in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma : the limitations of the surgery-first approach. Critical review of the literature and proposals for practice update

The article has been withdrawn at the request of the authors and editor because of incorrect authorship, which is considered a form of unethical publication. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause.

A single center experience in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma : the limitations of the surgery-first approach. Critical review of the literature and proposals for practice update

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The current standard of care for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is surgery-first followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. We review our single center experience in a PDAC cohort managed by the surgery-first strategy. We then compare our data to those of Belgian and international literature.

PATIENTS METHODS

We reviewed a series of 83 consecutive resectable patients with PDAC, treated by the surgery-first approach in a Belgian Academic Hospital between 2007 and 2013. The outcomes were assessed with univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn according to patient groups.

RESULTS

For the entire population, the median survival (MS) was 18.4 months; the 1-year relapse-free survival was 56%, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 13%. The size of the primary tumor larger than 3 cm (OS, HR = 1.76, p = 0.033) and vascular resection (DFS, HR = 2.1, p = 0.024) were the single independent prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis of this cohort. Only 69% of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, and more than 75% of them demonstrated no chance of survival beyond 3 years because they harbored poor prognostic factors, recognized only postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results and those published in the literature brought to light the limited perspectives of the surgery-first strategy in a population of apparently resectable pancreatic cancers. In comparison, data from reported neo-adjuvant series deserve our interest to bring this strategy upfront in selected patients in the context of close observational monitoring and randomized trials. The actual standard of care for resectable PDAC is surgery-first followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The performance of this strategy relies on the dedicated imaging that does not accurately recognize the limits of the tumor and the high prevalence of adverse prognostic factors. Moreover, pancreatectomy remains associated with high postoperative complication rates and the poor completion of adjuvant therapy. This translates into poor long-term survival figures. In our series the MS was 18.4 months and 5-year OS was 13%. The disease-free survival (DFS) was 15.6 months, 1 and 3-year DFS were 56 and 26%, respectively. The variables that significantly correlated with OS in univariate analysis are tumor size and lymph node involvement. Regarding DFS, vascular resection was the only significant factor. In the multivariate analysis, the only significant factor related to OS remained the tumor size >3 cm in greatest diameter. Vascular resection remained significant for DFS. 31% of the patients did not receive any chemotherapy at all before the 6-month period following resection. The rates of complete resections compared favorably with those of a surgery-first strategy with no excess of operative mortality, complications and early relapse rates. The advantages of a chemotherapy-first approach, eventually combined with chemo-radiotherapy, are to offer higher combined therapy completion rates and improve the level of free resection margins, lymph node involvement and patient selection. The advent of safe, more potent chemotherapy combinations has the potential to further improve survival when administered upfront.

Donor age as a risk factor in donation after circulatory death liver transplantation in a controlled withdrawal protocol programme

BACKGROUND

Results of donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplantation are impaired by graft loss, resulting mainly from non-anastomotic biliary stricture. Donor age is a risk factor in deceased donor liver transplantation, and particularly in DCD liver transplantation. At the authors' institute, age is not an absolute exclusion criterion for discarding DCD liver grafts, DCD donors receive comfort therapy before withdrawal, and cold ischaemia is minimized.

METHODS

All consecutive DCD liver transplantations performed from 2003 to 2012 were studied retrospectively. Three age groups were compared in terms of donor and recipient demographics, procurement and transplantation conditions, peak laboratory values during the first post-transplant 72 h, and results at 1 and 3 years.

RESULTS

A total of 70 DCD liver transplants were performed, including 32 liver grafts from donors aged 55 years or less, 20 aged 56-69 years, and 18 aged 70 years or more. The overall graft survival rate at 1 month, 1 and 3 years was 99, 91 and 72 per cent respectively, with no graft lost secondary to non-anastomotic stricture. No difference other than age was noted between the three groups for donor or recipient characteristics, or procurement conditions. No primary non-function occurred, but one patient needed retransplantation for artery thrombosis. Biliary complications were similar in the three groups. Graft and patient survival rates were no different at 1 and 3 years between the three groups (P = 0.605).

CONCLUSION

Results for DCD liver transplantation from younger and older donors were similar. Donor age above 50 years should not be a contraindication to DCD liver transplantation if other donor risk factors (such as warm and cold ischaemia time) are minimized.

Contribution of donors after cardiac death to the deceased donor pool: 2002 to 2009 University of Liege experience

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we have evaluated the organ procurement and transplantation activity from donors after cardiac death (DCD) at our institution over an 8-year period. Our aim was to determine whether this program influenced transplantation programs, or donation after brain death (DBD) activity.

METHODS

We prospectively collected our procurement and transplantation statistics in a database for retrospective review.

RESULTS

We observed an increasing trend in potential and actual DCD number. The mean conversion rate turning potential into effective donors was 58.1%. DCD accounted for 16.6% of the deceased donor (DD) pool over 8 years. The mean age for effective DCD donors was 53.9 years (range, 3-79). Among the effective donors, 63.3% (n = 31) came from the transplant center and 36.7% (n = 18) were referred from collaborative hospitals. All donors were Maastricht III category. The number of kidney and liver transplants using DCD sources tended to increase. DCD kidney transplants represented 10.8% of the DD kidney pool and DCD liver transplants made up 13.9% of the DD liver pool over 8 years. The DBD program activity increased in the same time period. In 2009, 17 DCD and 33 DBD procurements were performed in a region with a little >1 million inhabitants.

CONCLUSION

The establishment of a DCD program in our institution enlarged the donor pool and did not compromise the development of the DBD program. In our experience, DCD are a valuable source for abdominal organ transplantation.

[When should we resect colorectal liver metastases?]

6000 new cases of colorectal cancer are diagnosed each year in Belgium. 50% of these patients shall develop liver metastasis. Resection remains the only chance of long term survival and must be considered as an endpoint from the beginning of the treatment. It is the result of a multidisciplinary discussion and a global approach of the disease. It is rarely directly feasible, but there are many techniques which may make it achievable in the end. Today, resection criteria are exclusively technical and neither bad prognosis factors, nor the presence of extra-hepatic metastases should exclude liver resection. This resection must be assessed by a confirmed hepatobiliary surgeon and must be proposed to all patients whatever their age as long as their general state of health is good.

Avoiding blood products during liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a major surgical procedure usually requiring large amount of blood products (red cells, platelets, fresh-frozen plasma). We developed a multidisciplinary transfusion-free protocol for liver transplantation in Jehovah's witnesses who refuse the use of blood products but accept organ transplantation. Between September 1998 and November 2004, 9 of 29 Jehovah's witnesses evaluated for liver transplantation were transplanted after medical preparation. None of these patients received any blood product during the surgical procedure. This experience may be beneficial for the entire liver transplantation population, as excessive transfusion has been linked to increased morbidity and mortality in liver transplantation.

A new technique for combined liver/small intestinal transplantation

The most common application of small bowel transplantation is for the patient with parenteral nutrition-induced liver failure. In this setting, the small intestine is transplanted simultaneously with the liver. We identified three technical problems that we believe contributed to complications in our first eight patients. First, pancreaticoduodenectomy was challenging in the infant donor. Second, the bowel graft was prone to volvulus around the skeletonized donor portal vein. Third, in the pediatric recipient, use of the donor bowel for Roux-en-Y biliary reconstruction was associated with biliary leaks in the early postoperative period. Our surgical technique of liver/small bowel (L/SB) transplantation has evolved since our early experience in 1990. Modifications in the L/SB operation, reported briefly in 1996 and 1997, have led to easier graft preparation and have reduced the incidence of technical complications.

Immunosuppressive effect of combination schedules of brequinar with leflunomide or tacrolimus on rat cardiac allotransplantation

Drug toxicity is one of the major problems in clinical immunosuppression. Combining two immunosuppressants in low or ineffective doses is an attractive strategy if it helps to reduce drug-related toxicity. We examined the immunosuppressive efficacy of brequinar (BQR) in combination with leflunomide (Lef) or tacrolimus (FK) in a heterotopic rat cardiac allotransplantation model. Abdominal heterotopic heart grafts (DA x LEW) were immunosuppressed from the time of transplantation and continued until the ninth posttransplant day (POD) in experiments examining prophylaxis of rejection treatment (PRT). In a separate series of experiments designed to test rescue treatment (RT), immunosuppression was begun on POD 4 and continued for 10 days; transplanted rats were sacrificed the following day intentionally. Cardiac rejection was monitored by palpation and documented by light microscopy. Immunosuppressive drugs (BQR 3 mg/kg and 12 mg/kg; BQR 3 mg/kg + Lef 5 mg/kg; BQR 3 mg/kg + FK 0.5 mg/kg) were given orally by gavage; thrice weekly according to the monotherapy or dual-therapy dosing protocol. Median survival time of the cardiac graft for controls (no treatment) was 5 days. BQR monotherapy 3 mg/kg (low dose) improved graft survival (P = 0.003); graft histology showed moderate acute rejection. BQR monotherapy 12 mg/kg (therapeutic dose) application in the PRT or RT treatment arms of the study design resulted in aortic-graft ruptures and clinical toxicity in each treatment arm due to overimmunosuppression; normal graft morphology was maintained. Successful rescue of rejecting grafts was histologically documented. Combining BQR with Lef or FK in the PRT protocol showed prolonged graft survival in both drug combination groups (median survival time, 14 days; P = 0.009 and 0.014, respectively). Using an identical combination protocol for RT, all grafts achieved a 14-day graft survival; cardiac histology showed reversible moderate acute rejection. BQR given in the presence of Lef or FK not only prevented acute rejection but intercepted it so long as it was administered; grafts were rejected within 4 days of stopping immunosuppression in the PRT study. These combinations using low or subtherapeutic doses may be important for controlling transplant rejection and rescuing ongoing graft rejection. The need for continuing treatment in this strongly allogeneic model is highlighted.