An update on oral cavity cancer: epidemiological trends, prevention strategies and novel approaches in diagnosis and prognosis

In the UK, the incidence of oral cavity cancer continues to rise, with an increase of around 60% over the past 10 years. Many patients still present with advanced disease, often resulting in locoregional recurrence and poor outcomes, which has not changed significantly for over four decades. Changes in aetiology may also be emerging, given the decline of smoking in developed countries. Therefore, new methods to better target prevention, improve screening and detect recurrence are needed. High-throughput 'omics' technologies appear promising for future individual-level diagnosis and prognosis. However, given this is a relatively rare cancer with significant intra-tumour heterogeneity and variation in patient response, reliable biomarkers have been difficult to elucidate. From a public health perspective, implementing these novel technologies into current services would require substantial practical, financial and ethical considerations. This may be difficult to justify and implement at present, therefore focus remains on early detection using new patient-led follow-up strategies. This paper reviews the latest evidence on epidemiological trends in oral cavity cancer to help identify at risk groups, population-based approaches for prevention, in addition to potential cutting-edge approaches in the diagnosis and prognosis of this disease.

858 Transoral Robotic Surgery: Comparing the Geography of Research Publications with The Global Burden of Disease

Introduction

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is increasingly used for the resection of oropharyngeal tumours. It is unclear if there is equitable access to this innovative technique worldwide, specifically in areas of greatest need. This study aimed to map the geographic distribution of publications on TORS and compare this to global disease burden.

Method

Systematic searches identified all studies of TORS from inception to 2018. The country of origin of each study was identified. The incidence and age standardised rate (ASR) of oropharyngeal cancer for each country was obtained from The Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) database. World Bank classifications of countries by income level were obtained.

Results

A total of 132 studies were identified. The majority (96%) were published in high-income countries, 2% in lower-middle, and 2% in upper-middle income countries. Eighty-nine were published in the USA, the country with the second-highest incidence of oropharyngeal cancer worldwide (13% of total), but 20th by ASR. The greatest incidence was in India (21%), however this was the source of only 2% of studies. Of the ten countries with the highest incidence, eight were represented in published studies, in comparison to four of the top 10 by ASR.

Conclusions

There is evident disparity in the geographical distribution of published studies of TORS. This disparity may represent unequal access to surgical technologies, or a lack of evaluation of the technology in different healthcare settings. This may impact the generalisability of research findings. Equitable access to novel surgical technologies is ethical and can help address global disease burden.