Monoclonal antibodies putatively identifying porcine B cells

Comparison was made of the binding of 38 test and three standard monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to B cells from various pig lymphoid tissues by flow cytometry (FCM) and immunohistochemistry. Some mAbs were also tested on B cells from foetal pig tissues. Twenty of the new mAbs bound, though to variable degrees, to porcine B cells but only three were given cluster assignations: C35 (#147) and BB6-11C9 (#167) were assigned to wCD21 and 2F6/8 (#057) was assigned to SWC7.

Efficient infection of cells in culture by type O foot-and-mouth disease virus requires binding to cell surface heparan sulfate

Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) enters cells by attaching to cellular receptor molecules of the integrin family, one of which has been identified as the RGD-binding integrin alpha(v)beta3. Here we report that, in addition to an integrin binding site, type O strains of FMDV share with natural ligands of alpha(v)beta3 (i.e., vitronectin and fibronectin) a specific affinity for heparin and that binding to the cellular form of this sulfated glycan, heparan sulfate, is required for efficient infection of cells in culture. Binding of the virus to paraformaldehyde-fixed cells was powerfully inhibited by agents such as heparin, that compete with heparan sulfate or by agents that compete for heparan sulfate (platelet factor 4) or that inactivate it (heparinase). Neither chondroitin sulfate, a structurally related component of the extracellular matrix, nor dextran sulfate appreciably inhibited binding. The functional importance of heparan sulfate binding was demonstrated by the facts that (i) infection of live cells by FMDV could also be blocked specifically by heparin, albeit at a much higher concentration of inhibitor; (ii) pretreatment of cells with heparinase reduced the number of plaques formed compared with that for untreated cells; and (iii) mutant cell lines deficient in heparan sulfate expression were unable to support plaque formation by FMDV, even though they remained equally susceptible to another picornavirus, bovine enterovirus. The results show that entry of type O FMDV into cells is a complex process and suggest that the initial contact with the cell surface is made through heparan sulfate.

Clinical signs and humoral immune response in horses following equine herpesvirus type-1 infection and their susceptibility to equine herpesvirus type-4 challenge

A group of three horses was experimentally infected with equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) and showed clinical signs characterised by a biphasic febrile response, leucopenia and cell associated viraemia accompanied by virus shedding from the nasopharynx. A second exposure to the virus 18 days later resulted in the isolation of virus from the nasopharynx of one horse. This and a further group of three EHV-1 seropositive horses were subsequently infected with equine herpesvirus type 4 (EHV-4) 147 days after the initial EHV-1 infection and virus was shed from the nasopharynx in the absence of clinical disease. Following the first EHV-1 infection, virus specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) was present by day 5 and remained high until the second exposure at day 18 at which point levels decreased. In contrast, EHV-1 specific IgG, detected at day 6 peaked at day 18, after which time levels remained high. Virus neutralising antibodies and antibodies able to mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity were present by day 10. The immune response to EHV-1 is discussed with reference to the disease.

Studies on glycoprotein 13 (gp13) of equid herpesvirus 1 using affinity-purified gp13, glycoprotein-specific monoclonal antibodies and synthetic peptides in a hamster model

Hamsters were immunized with either an affinity-purified preparation of equid herpesvirus 1 (EHV-1) glycoprotein 13 (gp13) or synthetic peptides representing three sequences within the homologous glycoprotein of EHV-4, resulting in the production of anti-peptide (in the case of peptide-immunized animals) or antivirus antibodies. The sera from gp13-immunized hamsters contained antibodies which showed virus-neutralizing activity and complement-mediated antibody lysis of EHV-1-infected target cells. These hamsters were protected from EHV-1 challenge. The characteristics of a panel of anti-gp13 monoclonal antibodies (P28, P17, 14H7, 16E4 and 16H9) were assessed both in vivo and in vitro. 16E4 and P28 showed high levels of complement-mediated neutralization of virus, complement-mediated lysis of virus-infected target cells and passive protection of hamsters. Furthermore, epitope mapping studies demonstrated that this glycoprotein contains a neutralizing epitope recognized by EHV-1-immune horse serum. The data imply that gp13 has potential as a candidate antigen for a molecular vaccine.

Analysis of the roles of bluetongue virus outer capsid proteins VP2 and VP5 in determination of virus serotype

Analyses of reassortant and parental strains of BTV serotypes 3 and 10, in serum neutralization tests, confirmed the major role of outer capsid protein VP2 in determination of virus serotype and its involvement in serum neutralization. However, a reassortant BTV strain (R70), containing protein VP5 derived from BTV 3 and VP2 derived from BTV 10, cross-neutralized with both parental virus strains (BTV 3 and BTV 10). It is concluded that VP5 also plays some part in serotype determination of these virus isolates, as analyzed by serum-neutralization, but its role may be less significant than that of VP2.

A reassessment of the dual vaccine against rinderpest and contagious bovine pleuropneumonia

In the light of the recent outbreaks of rinderpest in Africa a further assessment of the efficacy of the simultaneous inoculation of rinderpest virus vaccine and contagious bovine pleuropneumonia vaccine was undertaken. Groups of cattle were inoculated with a dual preparation of rinderpest vaccine virus and Mycoplasma mycoides subspecies mycoides or M mycoides alone. These groups were then challenged with M mycoides, first unsuccessfully by an in-contact challenge method and then by subcutaneous challenge. All animals were examined clinically after challenge for evidence of contagious bovine pleuropneumonia and serologically for rinderpest virus and M mycoides mycoides antibodies. There was no evidence that the serological response to the dual vaccine was in any way less than that to either agent given alone and no clinical disease was detected in these animals after in-contact challenge. However, after subcutaneous challenge, the dual vaccinated groups reacted similarly to an unvaccinated control group and unlike the group vaccinated only with M mycoides. This would indicate that the rinderpest virus component of the dual vaccine interfered with the ability of the M mycoides component to induce a fully effective immune response. In the pan African rinderpest campaign the use of the dual vaccine in areas where contagious bovine pleuropneumonia occurs should be carefully considered; in areas where the disease does not occur it is contraindicated.

Virulence of bluetongue virus for British sheep

A South African isolate of bluetongue virus type 3 was inoculated intradermally into three different breeds of British sheep under conditions designed to test its virulence in animals under stress. All animals inoculated developed a pyrexia and viraemia followed by clinical evidence of bluetongue disease. Marked alterations in serum enzyme levels, in particular of creatine phosphokinase, lactate dehydrogenase and aldolase occurred in the more severely affected animals. Nine out of the 12 inoculated animals subsequently died. No major differences in response could be detected in the different breeds of sheep nor in the stressed compared with the unstressed groups. The virulence of this bluetongue virus isolate was thereby confirmed and its potential risk to the British sheep industry. Consequently, stringent import regulations must be maintained to prevent its entry into Britain.

Serial inoculation of sheep with two bluetongue virus types

Groups of sheep inoculated with bluetongue virus type 4 were challenged at various intervals after inoculation (from seven to 70 days) with bluetongue virus type 3. Examination of the clinical and serological response showed that animals were protected from challenge with a second bluetongue virus for up to 14 days after the inoculation of the first virus type. An adoptive transfer experiment in monozygotic sheep involving both antibody and T lymphocytes was carried out. Only partial protection was observed against heterologous virus challenge, indicating that although the T cell response has a cross-protective component, antibody is not involved. These observations indicate that current vaccination procedures should be reappraised, particularly in terms of revaccination with multiple bluetongue virus type.