Effectiveness and safety of mycophenolate mofetil as monotherapy in liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Calcineurin inhibitors (CIs) cause substantial long-term morbidity and mortality among orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) among OLT patients with CI-related side effects.

PATIENTS

Thirty three adult patients, including 29 men and 4 women of mean age 57 years, underwent OLT between 1986 and 2000 under treatment with CIs (28 cyclosporine and five tacrolimus). Mean follow-up after OLT was 59 months. Adverse effects were renal dysfunction in 26, hypertension in 23, and neurotoxicity in two. MMF was added gradually while simultaneously reducing the dosage of CI.

RESULTS

After a mean 15-months follow-up of MMF treatment, CIs had been withdrawn in 28 patients (85%). The mean time from the initiation of MMF and CI withdrawal was 5 months. During the first year of follow-up chronic renal dysfunction improved in 16 of 26 patients (61.6%) accompanied by a decreased serum creatinine and urea and an increase in creatinine clearance. Among 13/23 (56.5%) hypertensive patients, there was a significant decrease in blood pressure or the number of antihypertensive drugs (P<.05). One patient with neurotoxicity improved. Twenty-two patients (66%) displayed adverse events: five rejections (15%) including four acute episodes, controlled by CI re-introduction, and one chronic reaction. The most frequent adverse effects were herpes simplex infection in 10 patients (30%), asthenia in nine (27%), diarrhea in five (15%) and thrombocytopenia in four (12%). Nevertheless, only six patients (19%) required MMF dose reduction, namely, three patients with GI intolerance, two with repeated VHS infections, and one with anemia.

CONCLUSIONS

MMF monotherapy improves renal function and blood pressure levels in more than 50% of patients with chronic renal impairment and hypertension after OLT. Many of the side effects of MMF were mild; it was safe accompanied by a low incidence of rejection reactions.

Is one brachytherapy fraction of 7 Gy similar to more fractions after external beam irradiation in postoperative endometrial carcinoma?

PURPOSE

To determine whether brachytherapy with a single hypofractionated dose of 7 Gy provides the similar vaginal-cuff relapses and safety profile in terms of complications compared to schedules of 2 or 3 fractions of lower doses in patients treated previously with external beam irradiation in postoperative endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS/MATERIAL

From June 2003 to December 2016, 325 patients were treated with 3 different schedules of high-dose-rate brachytherapy after external beam irradiation for postoperative endometrial carcinoma. The patients were divided into 3 groups: Group-1: 125 patients were treated with 3 fractions of 4-6 Gy per fraction (3 fractions/week) between 2003 and 2008; Group-2: 93 patients were treated with 2 consecutive daily fractions of 5-6 Gy between 2008 and 2011; Group-3: 107 patients received a single fraction of 7 Gy between 2011 and 2016. Bladder and rectum complications were assessed using RTOG scores and with the objective scores of LENT-SOMA for the vagina.

STATISTICS

the chi-square test.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up of Groups 1, 2 and 3 was 95, 67 and 51 months, respectively. Three patients in Group-1, 2 in Group-2, 1 in Group-3 developed vaginal-cuff relapse (p = 0.68). No differences were found in late toxicity among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

One single dose of 7 Gy is safe and effective and may be the best treatment schedule with a similar incidence of vaginal-cuff relapses, complications and patient comfort with less hospital attendance.

Chronic toxicity and long-term outcome in intraoperative electron radiotherapy as boost followed by whole-breast irradiation

PURPOSE

The administration of a dose boost to the tumor bed after breast-conserving surgery has proven to reduce local recurrence. Intra-operative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) offers an alternative method to deliver a boost with several advantages, such as direct visualization of the tumor bed, less inter- and intrafraction motion and a reduction in the number of medical appointments. The objective of our study is to assess chronic toxicity and long-term outcome for our patients after IOERT boost.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-six patients treated at our institution between July 2013 and June 2020 with IOERT boost during Breast-Conserving Surgery and consecutive whole breast irradiation were prospectively analyzed. A 10-12 Gy boost was prescribed to 42 patients and 4 patients received a 20 Gy boost. An analysis for overall survival, local relapse and distant progression was performed. Acute and chronic toxicity was assessed by CTCAE 4.0.

RESULTS

The median age was 64.5 years (40-90). The median follow-up was 62 months (4-86). We had no local recurrences but 2 patients (4.3%) presented a distant recurrence. Mean pathological tumor size was 16 mm (6-52). 84.8% (39) of the patients had invasive ductal carcinoma. 52.2% (24) presented histological grade II. 52.2% (24) were Luminal A like, 21.7% (10) Luminal B like, 13% (6) HER2 positive, 13% (6) triple negative. No Grade 3-4 chronic toxicity was observed. Grade 1-2 fibrosis was evidenced in 13% (6) of the patients, 4.3% (2) patients presented fat necrosis, 6.5% (3) presented seroma, 4.3% (2) had localized pain, 2.2% (1) presented localized hematoma and 2.2% (1) presented localized edema.

CONCLUSIONS

IOERT boost in breast cancer treatment during BCS is a safe option with low chronic toxicity. The recurrence rates are comparable to published data and emphasize that IOERT as boost is an effective treatment.

Preliminary results of a vaginal constraint for reducing G2 late vaginal complications after postoperative brachytherapy in endometrial cancer: a prospective analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the preliminary results of the use of 68 Gy EQD2_{(α/β=3 Gy)} as a dose limit to the lowest dose in the most exposed 2 cm³ of the vagina in order to reduce G2 late vaginal problems in postoperative endometrial carcinoma (EC).

Methods

From November 2016 to October 2019, 69 postoperative EC patients receiving vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) ± external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) were prospectively analyzed. The median EBRT dose was 45 Gy (range: 44–50.4 Gy), 1.8−2 Gy/day, 5 fractions(Fr)/week. VBT was administered with the following schedule: 1Fr of 7 Gy after EBRT and 2 daily Fr × 7.5 Gy in exclusive VBT. The dose was prescribed at 0.5 cm from the applicator surface with an active length of 2.5 cm; 56 patients were treated with vaginal cylinders (49–3.5 cm, 6–3 cm, and 1–2.5 cm) and 13 with the colpostat technique. The overall VBT dose was adjusted to meet the vaginal restriction of < 68 Gy EQD2_{(α/β=3 Gy)} at 2 cm³. Late toxicity was prospectively assessed using RTOG scores for bladder and rectum, and the objective LENT-SOMA criteria for vagina.

Results

With a median follow-up of 31.0 months, no vaginal-cuff recurrences were found. Late toxicity: only 1G1(1.4%) rectal toxicity; 21G1(30.4%) and 3G2(4.3%) vaginal complications. Only one (1.4%) of 3 G2 manifested as vaginal shortening.

Conclusions

In postoperative EC patients treated with VBT, only one developed G2 vaginal stenosis with the use of 68 Gy EQD2_{(α/β=3 Gy)} as a dose constraint. These preliminary results seem to indicate the value of this dose limit for reducing G2 vaginal stenosis. Nonetheless, these findings should be confirmed in a larger number of patients with longer follow-up.

[Common places on clinical management of acute renal failure]

Acute renal failure (ARF) is an abrupt decline of renal function, and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) is its more frequent expression. Recent contributions in physiopathological knowledge, specially in post-ischemic ARF, are scarcelly reflected in therapy. Morbidity and mortality due to ARF are very high, mainly in critically ill patients. Prevention and treatment of ATN are based in avoiding nephrotoxicity and renal ischemia. An adequate evaluation of renal risk factors in hospitalized patients is important. Maintaining euvolemia, effective cardiac output and adequate renal perfussion pressure are three paramount factors in ischemia prevention. The best dialytic schedule is not universally accepted. ARF replacement therapy must be flexible, tailoring techniques (IHD, SLED, CRRT) to the clinical situation of patients. There is not a consensus in dialysis dose in ARF. Nevertheless, despite a robust scientific evidence is lacking, some data suggest that a delivered minimum dose of sKtV >1 in IHD or >35 ml/kg/h in CRRT would be beneficial for patient survival.