Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To compare and contrast the use of plain film radiology and computed tomography (CT) scanning in the detection of fish bones at the level of the cricopharyngeus.
STUDY DESIGN
Prospective study of 30 different fish bones placed at the level of the cricopharyngeus in a fresh human cadaver head and neck specimen and imaged using both plain films and CT scans.
METHODS
Thirty different bones from 10 different local species of fish were selected and grouped as small, medium, or large in size. Both plain-film and CT images of the bones were reported by a radiologist as A, easily seen; B, seen on close inspection; or C, not seen. Results were analyzed using McNemar's test.
RESULTS
CT scanning was superior to plain-film radiology in demonstrating the presence of fish bones at the level of the cricopharyngeus (P < .0001, McNemar's test, df = 1 when comparing report type A with B and C).
CONCLUSION
The superior usefulness of CT scans in demonstrating the presence of fish bones lodged at the cricopharyngeus has been clearly shown in this study; therefore we advocated its use in selected cases.
Collapse