Species dependence for binding of small molecule agonist and antagonists to the C5a receptor on polymorphonuclear leukocytes

This study investigated the receptor binding affinities of a C5a agonist and cyclic antagonists for polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) isolated from human, sheep, pig, dog, rabbit, guinea pig, rat and mouse. The affinities of the two small molecule antagonists, F-[OPdChaWR] and AcF-[OPdChaWR], and the agonist, YSFKPMPLaR, revealed large differences in C5a receptor (C5aR) affinities between species. The antagonists bound to human, rat and dog PMNs with similar high affinities, but with lower affinities to PMNs from all other species. The C5a agonist also bound with varying affinities between species, but showed a different affinity profile to the antagonists. In contrast, recombinant human C5a had similar affinity for PMNs of all species investigated. The low correlation between the affinities of the antagonists and the agonist between species either suggests that different receptor residues are important for distinguishing between agonist/antagonist binding, or that the agonist and antagonist peptides bind to two distinct sites within the C5aR.

A new small molecule C5a receptor antagonist inhibits the reverse-passive Arthus reaction and endotoxic shock in rats

C5a is implicated as a pathogenic factor in a wide range of immunoinflammatory diseases, including sepsis and immune complex disease. Agents that antagonize the effects of C5a could be useful in these diseases. We have developed some novel C5a antagonists and have determined the acute anti-inflammatory properties of a new small molecule C5a receptor antagonist against C5a- and LPS-induced neutrophil adhesion and cytokine expression, as well as against some hallmarks of the reverse Arthus reaction in rats. We found that a single i.v. dose (1 mg/kg) of this antagonist inhibited both C5a- and LPS-induced neutropenia and elevated levels of circulating TNF-alpha, as well as polymorphonuclear leukocyte migration, increased TNF-alpha levels and vascular leakage at the site of immune complex deposition. These results indicate potent anti-inflammatory activities of a new C5a receptor antagonist and provide more evidence for a key early role for C5a in sepsis and the reverse Arthus reaction. The results support a role for antagonists of C5a receptors in the therapeutic intervention of immunoinflammatory disease states such as sepsis and immune complex disease.

Human Rh monoclonal antibodies: assessment of functional activity by chemiluminescence and RhD antibody quantitation

In vitro cellular assays have been described which are capable of evaluating the interactions between sensitised red cells and monocyte or K cells. The chemiluminescence assay (CL) has several advantages over other cellular assays used to assess functional activity. The CL assay unlike the ADCC assays does not require the use of radioisotopes and therefore can be easily integrated into the work of a Reference Serology laboratory. The CL assay is an objective test and not labour intensive which is the main criticism of the monocyte monolayer assay. Seventy-four monoclonal anti-Ds and 29 other Rh specificities have been evaluated by a CL assay. The use of the chemiluminescent response produced by erythrophagocytosis of sensitised red cells has been shown to correlate well with the in vivo response to red cells sensitized with polyclonal IgG antibodies. This study aimed at investigating whether the CL assay could identify and differentiate monoclonal antibodies that are capable of eliciting a response from human monocytes. Poor correlation was obtained between the CL assay results and anti-D quantitation (r = 0.236). The chemiluminescence assay discriminated between anti-D's with high quantitation levels but low predicted functional activity and anti-Ds of low quantitation levels which produced elevated CL responses. Only 3 of the 29 non-Rh D specificities tested produced a response in the CL assay emphasising the importance of specificity in the functional activity of monoclonal antibodies. The demonstration of significant differences in the functional capabilities of monoclonal antibodies has important implications for reviewing the possible use of monoclonal anti-D preparations for Rh immune prophylaxis and highlights the requirement for factors other than the antibody concentration to be examined.