Biomarker analysis beyond angiogenesis: RAS/RAF mutation status, tumour sidedness, and second-line ramucirumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma from RAISE-a global phase III study

Background

: Second-line treatment with ramucirumab+FOLFIRI improved overall survival (OS) versus placebo+FOLFIRI for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) [hazard ratio (HR)=0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.98, P = 0.022]. Post hoc analyses of RAISE patient data examined the association of RAS/RAF mutation status and the anatomical location of the primary CRC tumour (left versus right) with efficacy parameters.

Patients and methods

Patient tumour tissue was classified as BRAF mutant, KRAS/NRAS (RAS) mutant, or RAS/BRAF wild-type. Left-CRC was defined as the splenic flexure, descending and sigmoid colon, and rectum; right-CRC included transverse, ascending colon, and cecum.

Results

RAS/RAF mutation status was available for 85% of patients (912/1072) and primary tumour location was known for 94.4% of patients (1012/1072). A favourable and comparable ramucirumab treatment effect was observed for patients with RAS mutations (OS HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.71-1.04) and patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type tumours (OS HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.64-1.14). Among the 41 patients with BRAF-mutated tumours, the ramucirumab benefit was more notable (OS HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.25-1.13), although, as with the other genetic sub-group analyses, differences were not statistically significant. Progression-free survival (PFS) data followed the same trend. Treatment-by-mutation status interaction tests (OS P = 0.523, PFS P = 0.655) indicated that the ramucirumab benefit was not statistically different among the mutation sub-groups, although the small sample size of the BRAF group limited the analysis. Addition of ramucirumab to FOLFIRI improved left-CRC median OS by 2.5 month over placebo (HR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.97); median OS for ramucirumab-treated patients with right-CRC was 1.1 month over placebo (HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.75-1.26). The treatment-by-sub-group interaction was not statistically significant for tumour sidedness (P = 0.276).

Conclusions

In the RAISE study, the addition of ramucirumab to FOLFIRI improved patient outcomes, regardless of RAS/RAF mutation status, and tumour sidedness. Ramucirumab treatment provided a numerically substantial benefit in BRAF-mutated tumours, although the P-values were not statistically significant.

ClinicalTrials.gov number

NCT01183780.

Analysis of angiogenesis biomarkers for ramucirumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer from RAISE, a global, randomized, double-blind, phase III study

Background

The phase III RAISE trial (NCT01183780) demonstrated that the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor (VEGFR)-2 binding monoclonal antibody ramucirumab plus 5-fluororuracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo + FOLFIRI as second-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment. To identify patients who benefit the most from VEGFR-2 blockade, the RAISE trial design included a prospective and comprehensive biomarker program that assessed the association of biomarkers with ramucirumab efficacy outcomes.

Patients and methods

Plasma and tumor tissue collection was mandatory. Overall, 1072 patients were randomized 1 : 1 to the addition of ramucirumab or placebo to FOLFIRI chemotherapy. Patients were then randomized 1 : 2, for the biomarker program, to marker exploratory (ME) and marker confirmatory (MC) groups. Analyses were carried out using exploratory assays to assess the correlations of baseline marker levels [VEGF-C, VEGF-D, sVEGFR-1, sVEGFR-2, sVEGFR-3 (plasma), and VEGFR-2 (tumor tissue)] with clinical outcomes. Cox regression analyses were carried out for each candidate biomarker with stratification factor adjustment.

Results

Biomarker results were available from >80% (n = 894) of patients. Analysis of the ME subset determined a VEGF-D level of 115 pg/ml was appropriate for high/low subgroup analyses. Evaluation of the combined ME + MC populations found that the median OS in the ramucirumab + FOLFIRI arm compared with placebo + FOLFIRI showed an improvement of 2.4 months in the high VEGF-D subgroup [13.9 months (95% CI 12.5-15.6) versus 11.5 months (95% CI 10.1-12.4), respectively], and a decrease of 0.5 month in the low VEGF-D subgroup [12.6 months (95% CI 10.7-14.0) versus 13.1 months (95% CI 11.8-17.0), respectively]. PFS results were consistent with OS. No trends were evident with the other antiangiogenic candidate biomarkers.

Conclusions

The RAISE biomarker program identified VEGF-D as a potential predictive biomarker for ramucirumab efficacy in second-line mCRC. Development of an assay appropriate for testing in clinical practice is currently ongoing.

Clinical trials registration

NCT01183780.

Cabozantinib in hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a phase 2 placebo-controlled randomized discontinuation study

Background

Cabozantinib, an orally bioavailable inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including MET, AXL, and VEGF receptors, was assessed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as part of a phase 2 randomized discontinuation trial with nine tumor-type cohorts.

Patients and methods

Eligible patients had Child-Pugh A liver function and ≤1 prior systemic anticancer regimen, completed ≥4 weeks before study entry. The cabozantinib starting dose was 100 mg daily. After an initial 12-week cabozantinib treatment period, patients with stable disease (SD) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0 were randomized to cabozantinib or placebo. The primary endpoint of the lead-in stage was objective response rate (ORR) at week 12, and the primary endpoint of the randomized stage was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Among the 41 HCC patients enrolled, the week 12 ORR was 5%, with 2 patients achieving a confirmed partial response (PR). The week 12 disease control rate (PR or SD) was 66% (Asian subgroup: 73%). Of patients with ≥1 post-baseline scan, 78% had tumor regression, with no apparent relationship to prior sorafenib therapy. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response (>50% reduction from baseline) occurred in 9 of the 26 (35%) patients with elevated baseline AFP and ≥1 post-baseline measurement. Twenty-two patients with SD at week 12 were randomized. Median PFS after randomization was 2.5 months with cabozantinib and 1.4 months with placebo, although this difference was not statistically significant. Median PFS and overall survival from Day 1 in all patients were 5.2 and 11.5 months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events, regardless of attribution, were diarrhea (20%), hand-foot syndrome (15%), and thrombocytopenia (15%). Dose reductions were utilized in 59% of patients.

Conclusions

Cabozantinib has clinical activity in HCC patients, including objective tumor responses, disease stabilization, and reductions in AFP. Adverse events were managed with dose reductions.

Trial registration number

NCT00940225.

Ramucirumab combined with FOLFOX as front-line therapy for advanced esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, or gastric adenocarcinoma: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase II trial

BACKGROUND

We report the first randomized, Phase II trial of ramucirumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 monoclonal antibody, as front-line therapy in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients from the USA with advanced esophageal, gastric, or GEJ adenocarcinoma randomly received (1:1) mFOLFOX6 plus ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) or mFOLFOX6 plus placebo every 2 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) with 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.71 (one-sided α = 0.15). Secondary end points included evaluation of response and overall survival (OS); an exploratory ramucirumab exposure-response analysis was undertaken.

RESULTS

Of 168 randomized patients, 52% of tumors were located in the stomach/GEJ and 48% in the esophagus. The trial did not meet the primary end point of PFS [6.4 versus 6.7 months, HR 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.69-1.37)] or the secondary end point of OS (11.7 versus 11.5 months) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Objective response rates (45.2% versus 46.4%) were similar between arms. Most Grade ≥3 toxicities did not differ significantly between arms, yet premature discontinuation of FOLFOX and ramucirumab (for reasons other than progressive disease) was more common among ramucirumab- versus placebo-treated patients. In an exploratory analysis that censored for premature discontinuation, the HR for PFS favored the ramucirumab arm (HR 0.76), particularly in patients with gastric/GEJ cancer. An exploratory exposure-response analysis indicated that patients with higher ramucirumab exposure had longer OS.

CONCLUSION

The addition of ramucirumab to front-line mFOLFOX6 did not improve PFS in the ITT population.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER

NCT01246960.

Safety and effectiveness of bevacizumab treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: final results from the Avastin(®) Registry - Investigation of Effectiveness and Safety (ARIES) observational cohort study

AIMS

The Avastin(®) Registry - Investigation of Effectiveness and Safety (ARIES) observational cohort study (OCS) was designed to prospectively examine outcomes associated with bevacizumab-containing treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a community-based setting, where patient populations are less restricted than those in randomised trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with mCRC who were eligible for bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in first- or second-line treatment were enrolled from November 2006 to September 2008. There were no protocol-specified treatment regimens; the dose and schedule of bevacizumab and chemotherapy were at the treating physician's discretion. The objectives in the ARIES OCS included analyses of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, treatment patterns and safety in each of the first- and second-line treatment cohorts.

RESULTS

ARIES enrolled 1550 patients with mCRC receiving first-line therapy with bevacizumab. The median follow-up time was 20.6 months. The median PFS in this cohort was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval 9.8-10.6) and the median overall survival was 23.2 months (95% confidence interval 21.2-24.8). In a separate cohort of 482 patients with second-line mCRC, the median follow-up time was 16.9 months, the median PFS and overall survival from the start of second-line treatment to the end of follow-up was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval 7.2-8.3) and 17.8 months (95% confidence interval 16.5-20.7), respectively. Incidences of known bevacizumab-associated adverse events in ARIES were generally consistent with those previously reported in OCSs and randomised trials.

CONCLUSION

Results from the prospective ARIES OCS add further evidence to support the effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab when added to first- and second-line treatment regimens for patients with mCRC in community treatment settings.

A randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 study of ganitumab or conatumumab in combination with FOLFIRI for second-line treatment of mutant KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Targeted agents presently available for mutant KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are bevacizumab and aflibercept. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of conatumumab (an agonistic monoclonal antibody against human death receptor 5) and ganitumab (a monoclonal antibody against the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor) combined with standard FOLFIRI chemotherapy as a second-line treatment in patients with mutant KRAS mCRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with mutant KRAS metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum refractory to fluoropyrimidine- and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to receive intravenous FOLFIRI plus conatumumab 10 mg/kg (Arm A), ganitumab 12 mg/kg (Arm B), or placebo (Arm C) Q2W. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

In total, 155 patients were randomized. Median PFS in Arms A, B, and C was 6.5 months (HR, 0.69; P = 0.147), 4.5 months (HR, 1.01; P = 0.998), and 4.6 months, respectively; median overall survival was 12.3 months (HR, 0.89; P = 0.650), 12.4 months (HR, 1.27; P = 0.357), and 12.0 months; and objective response rate was 14%, 8%, and 2%. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events in Arms A/B/C included neutropenia (30%/25%/18%) and diarrhea (18%/2%/10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Conatumumab, but not ganitumab, plus FOLFIRI was associated with a trend toward improved PFS. Both combinations had acceptable toxicity.

A randomized phase II study comparing mFOLFOX-6 combined with axitinib or bevacizumab or both in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

485

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors, including axitinib (AG-013736), may be useful in treating patients with mCRC. The goals of this study were to estimate the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety in patients with mCRC treated with mFOLFOX-6 combined with axitinib or bevacizumab or both.

Methods: Patients with mCRC untreated with any systemic chemotherapy >12 months prior to enrollment, ECOG PS 0/1, adequate organ function, and controlled hypertension were eligible for this randomized, open-label, phase II study. Patients receiving prior treatment with antiangiogenic agents or those who were pregnant were ineligible. All patients received standard mFOLFOX-6 treatment and were randomized to receive either axitinib 5 mg (Arm A), or bevacizumab 5 mg/kg (Arm B), or axitinib 5 mg + bevacizumab 2 mg/kg (Arm C). Axitinib was administered orally twice daily. Efficacy was determined by RECIST criteria.

Results: A total of 42, 43, and 41 patients were enrolled in Arms A, B, and C, respectively. The ORR was 29%, 49%, and 39% for Arms A, B, and C, respectively. Median PFS was 315 days, 350 days, and 377 days, with 1-year survival of 72%, 79%, and 80% for Arms A, B, and C, respectively. Discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) were more common in Arm A (36%), than in Arms B (19%) or C (32%). More patients withdrew from Arm A (18%) than from Arms B (5%) or C 12%). The rates of grade 3 AEs were similar across arms, except for hypertension and fatigue which were more common in Arms A (15% and 12%) and C (21% and 29%) compared with Arm B (2% and 12%). Serious AEs were reported by 41%, 40%, and 56% of patients in Arms A, B, and C, respectively; the most common were gastrointestinal disorders (21%, 16%, 15%, respectively).

Conclusions: In combination with mFOLFOX-6 chemotherapy, treatment with axitinib resulted in a lower ORR but comparable survival to bevacizumab and this did not appear to improve significantly in the presence of both agents. This result may have been affected by the higher numbers of discontinuations and withdrawals in Arm A compared with the other 2 arms.

[Table: see text]

Effect of surgeon education on lymphadenectomy in colon cancer

423

Background: The most important determinant of prognosis for localized colon cancer is metastatic lymph node involvement. The American Joint Commission on Cancer and the College of American Pathologists have recommended examination ≥ 12 lymph nodes to ensure adequate staging. We hypothesized that surgeon education would improve the extent of lymphadenectomy in patients being treated for colon cancer. A large community based metropolitan health care system served as a model for testing this hypothesis.

Methods: 906 patients comprising AJCC stage I (n=265), stage II (n=304), and stage III (n=337) colon cancers were evaluated. Surgical approach was either open (n=567), laparoscopic (n=310), or unknown (n=29). Lymphadenectomy results obtained from post-operative pathology reports were tracked across four separate time periods: era 1 (1/1/02-1/31/04), era 2 (1/1/05-1/31/06), and era 3 (1/1/07-1/31/07). Results were then compared against a study endpoint measurement of 2008, era four.

Results: Upon analysis and comparison of individual era results, a significant improvement in lymphadenectomy (percentage of patients with ≥12 nodes harvested) was noted for all AJCC stages (p-values compare era 4 versus era 1): I (34.2% vs. 59% vs. 65% vs. 69%, P=0.0001), II (62% vs. 76% vs. 90% vs. 91%, P=0.0004), and III (55% vs. 72% vs. 84% vs. 86%, P<0.0001; see table). Surgical approach was not a significant factor. Neither age nor sex was significant.

Conclusions: Through physician education, we were able to increase awareness of optimal staging practice for lymphadenectomy in colon cancer. This resulted in significantly improved patient outcomes within a large metropolitan health care system.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Pooled safety results from SPIRITT: A multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase II study of FOLFIRI with panitumumab (pmab) or bevacizumab (bev) as second-line treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

477

Background: Pmab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) approved as monotherapy in pts with chemorefractory mCRC. Many pts with mCRC who have progressed on a bev-containing regimen receive second-line bev + chemotherapy despite the lack of prospective, randomized data supporting this approach. A phase III study recently showed that pmab + second-line FOLFIRI improved progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with wild-type (WT) KRAS tumors vs chemotherapy alone. This study was amended after enrollment began to focus hypothesis testing on the WT KRAS population and is evaluating the safety and efficacy of pmab + FOLFIRI vs bev + FOLFIRI in pts who received first-line therapy with an oxaliplatin-based regimen + bev.

Methods: This is a randomized, phase II, open-label study in pts with mCRC with disease progression or intolerability after ≥ 4 doses of first-line oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy + bev. Pts are randomized 1:1 to receive either 6 mg/kg pmab Q2W + FOLFIRI or bev (given at institutional standard dose Q2W) + FOLFIRI. Tx is administered until disease progression (PD), death, or withdrawal from study. The primary endpoint is PFS in patients with WT KRAS tumors. Other endpoints include objective response rate, overall survival, safety, and patient-reported outcomes.

Results: At the time of data cutoff, 216 of 277 planned pts were enrolled. 175 (81%) pts discontinued study tx and 39 (18%) pts remain on tx. Any grade adverse events (AEs) were reported in 197 (92%) pts. 38 (18%) pts had AEs that led to withdrawal from tx or study. Serious AEs were reported in 66 (31%) pts and included gastrointestinal disorders (13%), infections and infestations (8%), respiratory disorders (7%), and metabolism and nutrition disorders (7%). Fatal AEs were reported in 18 (8%) pts of which 9 (4%) were related to disease progression.

Conclusions: The aggregate safety profile is consistent with expected toxicities of FOLFIRI in combination with an anti-EGFR or an anti-VEGF targeted therapy in second-line mCRC. Detailed pooled safety results will be presented at the meeting.

[Table: see text]

Phase I study of dasatinib in combination with capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab followed by an expanded cohort in previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer

513

Background: SRC is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase involved in normal and tumor cell signaling functions including cell proliferation, angiogenesis and survival. Dasatinib (D) is a potent inhibitor of SRC kinase activity. Preclinical data suggests the addition of D to standard chemotherapy agents for colon cancer may increase anti-tumor activity. We evaluated D in combination with capecitabine (C), oxaliplatin (O) and bevacizumab (B) in a phase I dose escalation study followed by an expanded cohort in 1st line colorectal.

Methods: For dose escalation, eligible patients had advanced solid tumors with adequate organ and bone marrow function and no increased risk for class-related toxicities. B and O were given intravenously, and C and D were orally administered; cycle length was 21 days. C was dosed at 850 mg/m2 on days 1-14; O was dosed at 130 mg/m2 and B was dosed at 7.5 mg/kg on day one of each cycle. D was dosed at 50 mg twice daily in cohort one and 70 mg once daily in cohort -1. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed in cycle 1.

Results: Dose escalation is complete with 10 subjects evaluable for toxicity and 11 subjects evaluable for efficacy. Two DLTs were observed out of 5 evaluable subjects in cohort one. Six evaluable subjects were enrolled in the -1 cohort with 1 DLT. Possible grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, anorexia, diarrhea, fatigue, anemia, hypophosphatemia, hyponatremia and grade 5 GI-perforation. One non-treatment related death was due to disease progression. D-related nausea and fatigue were responsive to low dose oral steroids; fluid retention was responsive to diuretics. Of 10 subjects evaluable for efficacy, 1 subject had a partial response (PR), 2 had a minor response (MR), and 4 had stable disease (SD). Four subjects had disease control (PR, MR, or SD) ≥ 6 months.

Conclusions: D in combination with C, O and B is well-tolerated with a toxicity profile similar to standard C, O and B.The recommended phase II dose is C at 850 mg/m2 on days 1-14, O at 130 mg/m2 and B at 7.5 mg/kg on day one of each cycle, and D at 70 mg once daily. Enrollment in the expanded cohort of 1st line colorectal is ongoing.

[Table: see text]

Similarities in treatment (Tx) patterns and clinical outcomes (CO) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) initially treated with FOLFOX/BV or FOLFIRI/BV: Results from ARIES, a bevacizumab (BV) observational study

480

Background: COs associated with varying Tx patterns in mCRC pts are poorly understood because patterns diverge from the randomized trials (RCT). The RCTs of BV (Avastin) plus chemotherapy (CT) in mCRC pts continued BV until progressive disease (PD), even if CT was stopped/changed. Some RCTs of BV+CT in mCRC show ∼50% of pts stopping Tx early for reasons other than PD with possible lessening of benefit. It is unclear if this is due to use of a particular CT regimen or other practice pattern. While the beneficial effect of post-PD BV Tx has been shown in ARIES (HR 0.52 BBP vs No BBP) [A Cohn, ASCO 2010], the effect of stopping BV or CT before PD is unclear. ARIES, a community based observational study with a large cohort of 1st line BV-treated mCRC pts, will assess the COs associated with different 1st line Tx patterns (BV and CT) based on real world practice.

Methods: ARIES enrolled mCRC pts receiving first- or second-line CT+BV. No Tx regimens or assessments are protocol specified. Data are collected prospectively at baseline (BL) and quarterly. Analyses included first-line pts with PD. Tx patterns of pts initially treated with FOLFOX/BV or FOLFIRI/BV are described and preliminary COs (PFS and OS) are estimated from K-M curves. Tx duration is calculated from enrollment date.

Results: As of 2/5/10, 1,548 first-line mCRC pts enrolled (median follow up = 21 m); 1,133 pts had PD. Of 1,133 pts with PD, most had FOLFOX/BV (63%) or FOLFIRI/BV (16%) as first CT. BL characteristics were similar, but the FOLFOX/BV group had more stage 4 pts (74%). Main reasons for stopping BV include AE, max benefit achieved and CT holiday. Tx patterns and COs are in the table.

Conclusions: ARIES first-line mCRC pts treated with FOLFOX/BV or FOLFIRI/BV had similar Tx patterns and COs despite the common opinion that they may differ in tolerability and possibly effectiveness. Additional analyses will assess the impact of stopping BV and/or CT before PD.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Results from panitumumab (pmab) regimen evaluation in colorectal cancer to estimate primary response to treatment (PRECEPT): Second-line treatment with pmab and FOLFIRI by tumor KRAS status

4067^

Background: Pmab, a fully human antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is indicated as monotherapy for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Mutation status of KRAS in mCRC tumors has recently been shown to predict response to anti-EGFR antibody therapies. The effect of KRAS tumor status on the efficacy of second-line pmab + FOLFIRI was evaluated in this prospective analysis. Methods: Patients (pts) were enrolled in this phase 2, open-label, single-arm study after failure of first-line treatment with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy + bevacizumab. Pts with unresectable, measurable disease; ECOG status 0/1; with tumor samples available for KRAS testing were eligible. Pts received pmab 6 mg/kg + FOLFIRI Q2W until disease progression or intolerability. Tumor assessments were performed at wks 8, 16, 24, 32, and Q12W thereafter. DNA extracted from fixed tumor sections was used to determine KRAS status by real-time PCR. Efficacy (objective response, progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]) and safety were evaluated by KRAS status. Results: In an interim analysis (May 2008) of 115 pts who had received ≥ 1 dose of pmab, 109 pts had known KRAS status (59% had tumors with wild-type [WT] KRAS, 41% had mutant [MT] KRAS tumors), and 102 pts had the opportunity to have their first tumor assessment. Efficacy outcomes by KRAS status are shown ( Table ). Pmab-related AEs were reported in 93% of pts; 87 pts (76%) had ≥ grade 3 AEs (related and unrelated). Most common AEs were skin-related toxicities (86% of pts), diarrhea (72%), and nausea (53%); there was no evidence that incidence of AEs was related to KRAS status. Conclusions: In interim analyses, numerical differences in PFS and OS in favor of pts with WT KRAS were observed. Pmab had a safety profile consistent with other FOLFIRI + pmab trials. Final efficacy and safety data will be presented.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and Exceptions

In compliance with the guidelines established by the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:519–521) and the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), ASCO strives to promote balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor through disclosure of financial and other interests, and identification and management of potential conflicts. According to the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy, the following financial and other relationships must be disclosed: employment or leadership position, consultant or advisory role, stock ownership, honoraria, research funding, expert testimony, and other remuneration (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:520). The ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy disclosure requirements apply to all authors who submit abstracts to the Annual Meeting.

For clinical trials that began accrual on or after April 29, 2004, ASCO's Policy places some restrictions on the financial relationships of principal investigators (J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24[3]:521). If a principal investigator holds any restricted relationships, his or her abstract will be ineligible for placement in the 2009 Annual Meeting unless the ASCO Ethics Committee grants an exception. Among the circumstances that might justify an exception are that the principal investigator (1) is a widely acknowledged expert in a particular therapeutic area; (2) is the inventor of a unique technology or treatment being evaluated in the clinical trial; or (3) is involved in international clinical oncology research and has acted consistently with recognized international standards of ethics in the conduct of clinical research. NIH-sponsored trials are exempt from the Policy restrictions. Abstracts for which authors requested and have been granted an exception in accordance with ASCO's Policy are designated with a caret symbol (^) in the Annual Meeting Proceedings.

For more information about the ASCO Conflict of Interest Policy and the exceptions process, please visit www.asco.org/conflictofinterest .

DN101–004: A multicenter, open label, dose ranging study of DN-101 and docetaxel in patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after platinum-based chemotherapy

7685

Background: DN-101 is a high-dose oral formulation of calcitriol, the most potent natural ligand of vitamin D receptor. Calcitriol has various anti-neoplastic effects on malignant cells and increases activity of cytotoxic agents, including taxanes. DN-101 in combination with docetaxel was associated with improved survival in a phase II study in androgen-independent prostate cancer and ASCENT 2, a phase III confirmatory study is underway. The objective of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of DN-101 in combination with docetaxel in advanced NSCLC patients (pts). Methods: Eligible pts had Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC that progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy, ECOG = 1, and measurable disease by RECIST criteria. DN-101 was administered on day 1 in doses of 45 (n=5), 75 (n=4), 135 (n=3), or 180 μg (n=53) in the q21d group, or 180 μg on day 1, followed by 45 (n=5), 90 (n=4), or 180 μg (n=12) on days 8 and 15 in the q7d group. Docetaxel (75 mg/m2 BSA) was given on day 2 q21d for all pts. Results: A total of 86 pts were treated. No unexpected toxicities were reported with DN-101. Grade 3/4 (G3/4) toxicities and fatal adverse events (AEs) were consistent with the reported toxicity of docetaxel alone. Stomatitis (0% in q7d, 9% in q21d) and G3/4 asthenia and fatigue (5% in q7d, 14% in q21d) were less frequent on DN-101 compared to published reports on docetaxel. No pt on DN-101 q21d developed hypercalcemia while 2 pt on DN-101 q7d (180 μg cohort) developed G3/4 hypercalcemia. Three fatal AEs included 2 on DN-101 q21d (1 lung infiltration, 1 pneumonitis) and 1 on DN-101 q7d (intestinal perforation). The ORR was 5.9% (CI 0.1%, 28.7%) and 6.6% (1.8%, 15.9%), median PFS 14.1 (6.0, 20.0) and 11.6 (8.4, 17.4) weeks, median OS 8.8 (7.1, NA) and 6.9 (5.5, 9.7) months, and 1 year survival rate 40% (15.2%, 64.8%) and 31% (18.9%, 42.2%) for the q7d and q21d group, respectively. Conclusions: DN-101 in combination with docetaxel is well-tolerated in advanced NSCLC. The observation of improved PFS, OS, and 1 year survival with weekly DN-101 administration supports further investigation.

[Table: see text]

Cryodestruction of hepatic tumors

Cryodestruction of hepatic tumors is done by freezing the tumor and an appropriate amount of surrounding normal tissue in situ. The goal is complete destruction of malignant tissue. Local and systemic host mechanisms activated by the cold injury complete the process. Resorption of devitalized tissue and stabilization of the residual scar occurs during the ensuing months. Immune factors may contribute to the long-term process of cryodestruction although such effects are inconstant and ill defined. The purpose of this overview is to delineate the mechanisms of cryodestruction, briefly summarize clinical results and discuss the technique for treatment of hepatic tumors.

Multiple splenic lymphoid cell subpopulations regulate H-2 antigen expression on teratocarcinoma cells in vivo

Undifferentiated murine 402AX teratocarcinoma cells do not express MHC antigens when passaged in vitro or in vivo in genetically susceptible host mice. When passaged in vivo in genetically resistant mice, however, the tumor cells become H-2b antigen positive regardless of the H-2 haplotype of the resistant host mouse. The present studies use monoclonal anti-H-2b antibodies to corroborate these earlier findings, which were performed with conventional antisera. Previous studies have established that host bone marrow plus lymphoid cells from resistant primed donors regulate tumor cell H-2b antigen expression. Using bone marrow and mature lymphoid cell reconstitution techniques, the present studies indicate that splenic Ig- cells from genetically resistant host mice are the most efficient lymphoid cell subpopulation in tumor cell H-2b antigen induction. Ig+ spleen cells also reconstitute the capacity to induce teratocarcinoma cell H-2 antigens but are less effective than Ig- spleen cells. Tumor cell H-2 antigen induction in C57BL/6 beige mice is impaired compared to C57BL/6 hosts, which suggests that host NK cells may also be involved in tumor cell H-2 antigen induction. Reconstitution of lethally irradiated resistant hosts for teratocarcinoma cell H-2 antigen expression requires bone marrow plus resistant primed lymphoid cell subpopulations; bone marrow alone is insufficient. These results indicate that multiple splenic lymphoid cell subpopulations requiring a radiosensitive host environment and/or factor for differentiation regulate teratocarcinoma 402AX H-2b antigen expression in vivo in genetically resistant mice.

Multiple splenic lymphoid cell subpopulations regulate H-2 antigen expression on teratocarcinoma cells in vivo

Undifferentiated murine 402AX teratocarcinoma cells do not express MHC antigens when passaged in vitro or in vivo in genetically susceptible host mice. When passaged in vivo in genetically resistant mice, however, the tumor cells become H-2b antigen positive regardless of the H-2 haplotype of the resistant host mouse. The present studies use monoclonal anti-H-2b antibodies to corroborate these earlier findings, which were performed with conventional antisera. Previous studies have established that host bone marrow plus lymphoid cells from resistant primed donors regulate tumor cell H-2b antigen expression. Using bone marrow and mature lymphoid cell reconstitution techniques, the present studies indicate that splenic Ig- cells from genetically resistant host mice are the most efficient lymphoid cell subpopulation in tumor cell H-2b antigen induction. Ig+ spleen cells also reconstitute the capacity to induce teratocarcinoma cell H-2 antigens but are less effective than Ig- spleen cells. Tumor cell H-2 antigen induction in C57BL/6 beige mice is impaired compared to C57BL/6 hosts, which suggests that host NK cells may also be involved in tumor cell H-2 antigen induction. Reconstitution of lethally irradiated resistant hosts for teratocarcinoma cell H-2 antigen expression requires bone marrow plus resistant primed lymphoid cell subpopulations; bone marrow alone is insufficient. These results indicate that multiple splenic lymphoid cell subpopulations requiring a radiosensitive host environment and/or factor for differentiation regulate teratocarcinoma 402AX H-2b antigen expression in vivo in genetically resistant mice.

Diagnostic Value of Gastroscopy

Images