Patient-Reported Outcomes of Rectal Cancer Patients Treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac within the MOMENTUM Study

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

With the 1.5 MR-Linac, planning target volume (PTV) margins for the treatment of rectal cancer can be reduced by 1/3 compared to conventional radiotherapy techniques. This allows better sparing of surrounding tissues, potentially resulting in less toxicity and greater patient comfort. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after rectal cancer treatment on a 1.5T MR-Linac have not yet been reported. Through international collaboration, the 'Multi-OutcoMe EvaluatioN of radiation Therapy Using the MR-Linac (MOMENTUM)' registry provides the unique opportunity to study these outcomes in a relatively large patient cohort. The aim of this study is to assess PROs of rectal cancer patients treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac within MOMENTUM.

MATERIALS/METHODS

An international, prospective, observational cohort study was performed, including all patients with rectal cancer who were treated with 25 Gy in five fractions on an MR-Linac in three institutions located in the Netherlands (2019-2022). Patient-reported outcomes were measured using the general EORTC QLQ-C30 and colorectal cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaires. Scores were calculated according to the EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. A high score for a functional scale represents a high functioning level, while a high score for a symptom scale represents a high symptomatology level. Outcomes were measured at regular time points (i.e., at baseline and after three, 6 and 12 months follow-up). Patients who underwent tumor resection were censored at the date of surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 152patients were included, with a median follow-up of 17 (interquartile range [IQR] 11-27) months. Of these, six patients (4%) had American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage I disease, 11 patients (7%) stage II, 85 patients (56%) stage III, and 12 patients (8%) stage IV. A total of 87 patients (57%) reached three months follow-up without surgery, 60 patients (39%) six months, and 40 patients (26%) twelve months. At six months follow-up, 25/132 patients (19%) had received additional chemotherapy. The median global health score was 83 (interquartile range [IQR] 67-83) at baseline, 75 (IQR 58-83) at three months, 75 (IQR 58-83) at six months and 83 (IQR 83-100) at twelve months. In most QLQ-C30 domains, functional and symptom scores deteriorated during the first six months after treatment, but returned to or exceeded baseline scores at 12 months. Overall, treatment resulted in improved QLQ-CR29 scores after 12 months follow-up. Most frequently reported symptoms were blood and mucus in stool, urinary frequency, stool frequency and anxiety.

CONCLUSION

This study presents patient-reported outcomes in the currently largest cohort of patients with rectal cancer who received treatment on a 1.5T MR-Linac. Overall, treatment resulted in improved symptom management, and stabilized or improved quality of life outcomes after twelve months of follow-up.

Impact of dose-escalated chemoradiation on quality of life in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: two year follow-up of the randomized RECTAL-BOOST trial

BACKGROUND

Dose-escalated chemoradiation (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) did not result in higher complete response rates, but initiated more tumor regression in the randomized XXXXX trial (Clinicaltrials.gov XXXXX). This study compared patient reported outcomes (PROs) between patients who received dose-escalated CRT (5 × 3Gy boost + CRT) or standard CRT for two years following randomization.

METHODS

Patients with LARC, participating in the XXXXX trial, filled out EORTC QLQ-C30 and CR29 questionnaires on quality of life (QoL) and symptoms at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months following start of treatment. Between-group differences in functional QoL domains were estimated using a linear mixed-effects model and expressed as effect size (ES). Symptom scores were compared using Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Patients treated with dose-escalated CRT (boost group, n=51) experienced a significantly stronger decline in global health at 3 and 6 months (ES -0,4 and ES -0,4), physical functioning at 6 months (ES -1,1), role functioning at 3 and 6 months (ES -0,8 and ES -0,6) and social functioning at 6 months (ES -0,6) compared to patients treated with standard CRT (control group, n=64). The boost group reported significantly more fatigue at 3 and 6 months (83% vs. 66% resp. 89% vs. 76%), pain at 3 and 6 months (67% vs. 36% resp. 80% vs. 44%) and diarrhea at 3 months (45% vs. 29%) compared to the control group. From 12 months onwards, QoL and symptoms were similar between groups, apart from more blood/mucus in stool in the boost group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with LARC, dose-escalated CRT resulted in a transient deterioration in global health, physical, role, and social functioning and more pain, fatigue and diarrhea at 3 and 6 months following start of treatment compared to standard CRT. From 12 months onwards, the impact of dose-escalated CRT on QoL largely resolved.

Population-based study of morbidity risk associated with pathological complete response after chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer

Background

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer may induce a pathological complete response (pCR) but increase surgical morbidity due to radiation-induced fibrosis. In this study the association between pCR and postoperative surgical morbidity was investigated.

Methods

Patients in the Netherlands with rectal cancer who underwent nCRT followed by total mesorectal excision between 2009 and 2017 were included. Data were stratified into patients who underwent resection with creation of a primary anastomosis and those who had a permanent stoma procedure. The association between pCR and postoperative morbidity was investigated in univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

Results

pCR was observed in 976 (12·2 per cent) of 8003 patients. In 3472 patients who had a primary anastomosis, the presence of pCR was significantly associated with surgical complications (122 of 443 (27·5 per cent) versus 598 of 3029 (19·7 per cent) in those without pCR) and anastomotic leak (35 of 443 (7·9 per cent) versus 173 of 3029 (5·7 per cent) respectively). Multivariable analysis also showed associations between pCR and surgical complications (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1·53, 95 per cent c.i. 1·22 to 1·92) and pCR and anastomotic leak (adjusted OR 1·41, 1·03 to 2·05). Of 4531 patients with a permanent stoma, surgical complications were observed in 120 (22·5 per cent) of 533 patients with a pCR, compared with 798 (20·0 per cent) of 3998 patients with no pCR (adjusted OR 1·17, 0·94 to 1·46).

Conclusion

Patients with a pCR in whom an anastomosis was created were at increased risk of developing an anastomotic leak.