An investigation of the mechanisms responsible for acute fluoxetine-induced anxiogenic-like effects in mice

Although selective 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used in the chronic treatment of several anxiety disorders, increased anxiety has been observed in some patients at the beginning of treatment with these compounds. Similar increases in anxiety-related behaviors have been observed in animal studies following a single injection with SSRIs. The mechanism underlying this effect is unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of a variety of psychoactive compounds on the anxiogenic-like activity of fluoxetine. The drugs used included the benzodiazepine diazepam, the 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist buspirone, the 5-HT1A receptor antagonists pindolol and WAY-100635, the non-selective 5-HT2 receptor antagonists methiothepin, mianserin and ritanserin, the non-selective dopamine (DA) receptor antagonist haloperidol, the D1 antagonist SCH23390, the selective D2 antagonist raclopride, the D2/3 agonist quinelorane, the cholecystokininB (CCK(B)) receptor antagonist LY 288513, and the corticotropin-releasing factor1 (CRF1) receptor antagonist CP-154,526. Experiments were performed in the free-exploration test. This model is based on the strong neophobic reactions exhibited by BALB/c mice when confronted simultaneously with a familiar and a novel environment. When administered alone, diazepam (1 and 2 mg/kg), buspirone (1 mg/kg) and mianserin (0.3 mg/kg) produced anxiolytic-like effects as they significantly increased exploratory activity of the novel compartment. In contrast, fluoxetine (20 mg/kg) almost completely suppressed exploration of the novel area. Diazepam reversed the anxiogenic-like as well as the locomotor impairment induced by fluoxetine, while quinelorane blocked only the anxiogenic action of fluoxetine. None of the other compounds was able to counteract this effect. Taken together, these results suggest that dopaminergic mechanisms may underlie, at least in part, the behavioral effects of fluoxetine in the free-exploration test, whereas 5-HT1A 5-HT2, CCK(B) and CRF1 receptors may not be involved primarily in these effects.

Beta-CCT, a selective BZ-omega1 receptor antagonist, blocks the anti-anxiety but not the amnesic action of chlordiazepoxide in mice

The aim of this study was to test further the hypothesis that different benzodiazepine (BZ-omega) receptor subtypes may mediate anxiolytic and amnesic effects of BZ agonists, using the selective BZ-omega1 receptor antagonist beta-CCT (beta-carboline-3-carboxylate t-butyl-ester). Experiments were performed in Swiss mice using the elevated plus-maze anxiety test and two learning tasks - passive avoidance and the radial arm maze. In the elevated plus-maze test, beta-CCT (30 mg/kg, i.p.) completely abolished the increase in open-arm entries induced by the BZ chlordiazepoxide (5mg/kg, i.p.). Chlordiazepoxide decreased retention latency in the passive avoidance step-through procedure, and increased the number of errors in the radial arm maze. These effects were not modified by beta-CCT. Except for a slight, albeit significant, amnesic effect in the passive avoidance test, beta-CCT was devoid of intrinsic activity when administered alone. These results are in agreement with previous studies using selective BZ-omega1 agonists, and thus provide further evidence that BZ-omega1 receptors may be involved in the anxiolytic but not in the amnesic effects of BZ agonists.

Anxiolytic-like effects of meprobamate. Interactions with an opiate antagonist in Swiss and BALB/c mice

Naloxone has previously been shown to block the effects of benzodiazepines in the Swiss but not in the BALB/c strain. We have also reported that naloxone potentiates subeffective doses of benzodiazepines in Swiss mice. In the present studies we first determined whether naloxone could block anxiolytic-like effects of meprobamate in Swiss and BALB/c mice. Then we evaluated if subeffective doses of meprobamate could be potentiated in Swiss as well as in BALB/c mice. The elevated plus-maze test and the light/dark choice procedure were used. The lowest dose of meprobamate with anxiolytic-like effects was 60 mg/kg in the BALB/c mice. This dose was effective in both the plus-maze and in the light/dark choice procedure. In Swiss mice the same dose was effective in the plus-maze, whereas 120 mg/kg was required in the light/dark choice procedure. When an effective dose of meprobamate was combined with naloxone, 10 mg/kg, no blockade of anxiolytic-like effects was obtained in any strain in any procedure. To the contrary, when a subeffective dose of meprobamate was combined with naloxone, 10 mg/kg, an anxiolytic-like effect was obtained in both strains in both procedures. The present series of experiment shows that the ability of naloxone to block anxiolytic-like drug effects do not apply to meprobamate. However, the naloxone-induced potentiation of subeffective doses previously observed after treatment with benzodiazepines or buspirone was present also after treatment with meprobamate. Moreover, although blockade of anxiolytic-like drug effects with naloxone has not been observed in BALB/c mice, potentiation was as evident in that strain as in the Swiss. This suggests that the mechanisms behind naloxone's blockade of anxiolytic-like effects are independent from those behind its potentiation of such effects.

Flumazenil induces benzodiazepine partial agonist-like effects in BALB/c but not C57BL/6 mice

RATIONALE

Some anxiety disorders may be treated in a different way than normal anxiety.

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed at investigating the action of the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist flumazenil, compared to that of the benzodiazepine receptor full agonist chlordiazepoxide, in an animal model of generalised anxiety disorder (the BALB/c mouse).

METHODS

Flumazenil (0.0001, 0.001, 0. 01, 0.1 and 1 mg/kg) or chlordiazepoxide (5 mg/kg) were administered to BALB/c or C57BL/6 mice subjected to the light/dark test, the elevated plus maze or a passive avoidance step-through paradigm.

RESULTS

Chlordiazepoxide and flumazenil (at all doses tested in the elevated plus maze and at the doses of 0.001 and 0.01 mg/kg in the light/dark test) induced a strong anxiolytic effect in BALB/c mice. Flumazenil did not induce anxiolysis in C57BL/6 mice, whatever the behavioral test or the dose used. However, chlordiazepoxide elicited anxiolysis in this strain in both procedures. In the passive avoidance test, chlordiazepoxide was amnesic in both strains but flumazenil had no effect.

CONCLUSION

Flumazenil induces partial agonist-like effects in BALB/c and not in C57BL/6 mice, suggesting a possible benzodiazepine receptor set point shift toward the agonistic direction in some pathological anxiety states such as generalised anxiety disorder.