Mitomycin C and Vinblastine in Anthracycline-resistant Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase Ii Study

The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of mitomycin C and vinblastine in patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer. This single-center, non-randomized trial enrolled 39 patients. Eligible patients must have received at least three chemotherapy regimens with epirubicin or CAF and had treatment failure while on chemotherapy or within 6 months of completing therapy. Treatment consisted of mitomycin C at a starting dose of 8 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinblastine (8 mg/m2, days 1 and 28). The regimen was repeated every 6 weeks with a 20% dose escalation of both drugs after the first cycle in the absence of grade III hematologic or other toxicity. On an intent-to-treat basis, 38 patients were eligible for assessment; 9 (23.7%, 95% confidence interval 1.92-2.45%) achieved a partial response and 13 (34.2%) had stable disease. The median time to disease progression was 6.21 ±4.26 months (range, 1-15; 95% confidence interval, 4.81-7.61), and the median survival was 10.76±7.6 (range, 1-29; 95% confidence interval 8.0-13.1%). Responsive patients had a significantly better survival than those with stable and progressive disease. Treatment was well tolerated. Anemia and neutropenia (grade I-III) developed in 28.9% and 26.3% of the patients, respectively. One patient with grade III granulocytopenia developed fever and infection that required hospitalization. Moderate neurotoxicity, myalgia, constipation, diarrhea and alopecia were observed. No toxic death occurred. Mitomycin C plus vinblastine is an effective and well-tolerated regimen for anthracycline resistant cancer.

Mitoxantrone plus vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer

Vinorelbine and mitoxantrone have both been demonstrated to have significant antitumor activity in patients with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination as second or third line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Fifty-one previously treated patients with MBC were enrolled from October 2001 to May 2004 and 48 were eligible for evaluation. Median age was 59 years (range 33-82) and ECOG performance status was < or =2. Distant sites of metastasis were as follows: liver 64%, bone 49%, lung 36%, lymph nodes 6%, skin 4%, brain 2% and other sites 6%. All patients received vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2), D1+8 and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2) D8 every 21 days for 6 cycles. All eligible patients were analyzed for toxicity and response. Two patients (4%) achieved complete response and 12 (25.5%) partial response. The objective overall response rate was 29.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17 - 45), 9 (19%) patients had stable disease, 17 (36%) had progressive disease and 7 (15%) were non-evaluable. After a median follow up of 18 months, overall survival was 13 months (range 0.8 - 38+) and median time to disease progression was 5 months (range 1 - 32). A total of 280 cycles was delivered. The relative dose intensities of mitoxantrone and vinorelbine were 79% and 77%, respectively. Toxicities (grade III-IV) were as follows: leukopenia 18 (38%), neutropenia 21 (45%), thrombocytopenia 1 (2%), anemia 4 (8.5%), alopecia 2 (4%) and constipation 1 (2%). Febrile neutropenia was recorded in one patient. There were no treatment related deaths. The combination of mitoxantrone and vinorelbine is an effective regimen with manageable toxicity in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer.

Mitoxantrone plus gemcitabine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer

Gemcitabine and mitoxantrone have both shown significant antitumor activity in patients with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination as second or third-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Forty-six previously treated patients with MBC were enrolled from June 2000 to November 2002. Mean age was 56 years and ECOG performance status was < or =2. All patients received mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2, D8 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, D1+8 every 21 days for 6 cycles. There were no complete responders. Objective response was observed in 12 patients (26%), 15 (33%) patients had stable disease, 15 (33%) had progressive disease and 4 (9%) were non-evaluable. At median follow-up of 27.8 months, overall survival was 13.3 months (range 0.6-33.8+) and the median time to disease progression (TTP) was 4.4 months (range 0.2-33.8). Toxicities (grade 3-4) were as follows: leukopenia 18 (39%), neutropenia 19 (41%), thrombocytopenia 4 (8.5%), anemia 6 (13%) and alopecia 1 (2%). Febrile neutropenia was recorded in 2 (4%) patients. There were no treatment related deaths. The authors conclude that the combination of mitoxantrone and gemcitabine is an effective regimen in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Toxicity was manageable.

Impact of providing booklets about chemotherapy to newly presenting patients with cancer: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There has been limited research examining the efficacy of providing written information to cancer patients in southern and eastern European countries. This study investigated the impact of a booklet about chemotherapy on patient satisfaction, quality of life (QoL) and emotional distress, and assessed booklet use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 145 Greek cancer outpatients prior to commencing chemotherapy completed a questionnaire and were randomized to receive (n = 72) or not receive (n = 73) the booklet. All patients completed the second questionnaire before the following cycle of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. Experimental group patients reported being significantly more satisfied with the information received and care overall than those in the control group, felt significantly more and better informed, and perceived the information received as being clearer and detailed. The intervention produced no benefits in terms of anxiety, depression or QoL. The booklet was read by almost all patients and to a great extent by significant others. The majority considered the booklet useful to read and helpful in recalling chemotherapy-related information.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results provide further evidence on the efficacy of information-giving interventions in societies where disclosure of information to cancer patients still remains controversial.

Carboplatin plus gemcitabine in patients with inoperable or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a phase II multicenter study by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

In the present phase II multicenter study, we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were treated with gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin at an AUC of 4 on day 8 of a 3-week cycle, for a total of six cycles. Primary end points were response rate and clinical benefit; secondary end points were, survival, time to progression (TTP) and toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were enrolled in the study, 47 of whom were eligible for treatment. The median age was 63 years (range 34-76) and the median Karnofsky performance status (PS) was 80%. Patients received a median of six cycles (range 1-11). Among 35 patients evaluable for response, eight (17%) achieved partial response; 15 (32%) and 12 (25%) patients had stable and progressive disease, respectively. The median overall survival was 7.4 months; the median TTP was 4.4 months and the 1-year survival was 28%. The observed clinical benefit response was remarkable. After the second cycle of chemotherapy, 21 of 31 (68%) patients experienced pain improvement and reduced analgesic consumption. At the same time, 35% and 56% of our patients significantly improved their Karnofsky PS and weight, respectively. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were hematological, including 8% anemia, 6% neutropenia and 13% thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine plus carboplatin is a moderately active treatment for patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. This regimen has an acceptable toxicity profile and provides a significant clinical benefit, and hence warrants further investigation.

Oxaliplatin-Induced Acute-Onset Thrombocytopenia, Hemorrhage and Hemolysis

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin is a novel platinum derivative with established anti-tumor activity in colorectal cancer. Acute-onset hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia associated with this drug have rarely been reported and some of these cases have been severe or even fatal.

CASE REPORT

This case report describes a patient who developed fever, chills, abdominal and back pain as well as sudden-onset severe thrombocytopenia, upper gastrointestinal bleeding and hemolysis immediately after treatment with oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer. The reaction appeared during the 14th cycle of chemotherapy. Corticosteroids and antihistamines were administered together with platelet transfusions. Over the next 2 days platelet count improved and the syndrome abated. The patient was discharged 4 days later. Furthermore, the reaction was accompanied by a strongly positive Coombs test and increased TNF-alpha and IL-10 serum levels which returned to normal following anti-inflammatory drug administration.

CONCLUSION

Physicians should be aware of the possibility of acute hematological emergencies following oxaliplatin administration.

Irinotecan and vinorelbine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. A phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of irinotecan plus vinorelbine every 2 weeks in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients with advanced NSCLC, refractory or resistant to platinum derivatives, were treated on an out-patient basis with irinotecan 150 mg/m2 intravenous (i.v.) and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15. Chemotherapy was repeated every 4 weeks. The response was evaluated every two cycles.

RESULTS

On an intent-to-treat analysis, 6 patients (14.6%) [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.57% to 29.17%] achieved partial response (PR), 15 (36.6%) stable disease (SD) and 20 (48.8%) progressive disease (PD). The median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 4.9 months (range 0.17-15.5 months), the median survival time was 7.8 months (range 0.9 to 19.6 months) and the 1-year survival rate was 37%. Symptomatic benefit response including improvement of performance status (PS), dyspnea, anorexia and fatigue, cessation of hemoptysis, fever and reduction of cough and pain was seen in 10 to 42% of patients. No patient experienced grade 3/4 anemia. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2 (5%) patients. Five patients (12%) developed grade 3/4 neutropenia and 5 (12%) had neutropenic fever that required hospitalization, but was successfully treated with antibiotics and G-CSF support. One patient (2%) developed grade 4 fatigue and was withdrawn. Other grade 3/4 adverse events included diarrhea (n = 3; 2 required hospitalization), alopecia (n = 5) and neurotoxicity (n = 1). Six patients required a dose reduction.

CONCLUSION

The combination of irinotecan plus vinorelbine administered every 2 weeks demonstrated rather low activity in advanced NSCLC patients who had previously failed platinum-based chemotherapy, but it was well-tolerated and was associated with increased 1-year survival rate and improvement in cancer related symptoms.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) and paclitaxel in locally advanced breast cancer: a phase II study by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

To determine the activity and safety of the combination of paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter phase II study. Thirty-five newly diagnosed patients with locally advanced breast cancer were included in the study. Histological or cytological diagnosis was necessary for inclusion. Median age was 54 years (range 26-73 years). Fifteen patients were premenopausal and 20 postmenopausal. Paclitaxel was administered at a dose of 175 mg/m(2) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 35 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for six cycles.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients (71%) responded. Six (17%) had a complete response, 19 (54%) had a partial response, four remained stable, two progressed and four were not evaluated for response due to discontinuation of chemotherapy. Three patients had a pathologically complete response. A total of 173 cycles were administered. The primary toxicity observed was skin toxicity. Grade 3 skin toxicity was noted in four patients (11%). Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) grade 3 was experienced by three (9%). Two patients presented with PPE and skin toxicity. Hematological toxicities included grade 3 leukopenia in four patients (3%). Other grade 3 toxicities were uncommon and included only alopecia in 29 patients (83%). Grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity was not observed in any patient. Dose reduction was necessary in seven patients; in six due to skin toxicity and in one due to neutropenia. Four patients discontinued treatment due to skin toxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and paclitaxel was active in locally advanced breast cancer. The primary toxicity was cutaneous toxicity and it was manageable.

Vinblastine and interferon-gamma combination with and without 13-cis retinoic acid for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Results of two phase II clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is firstly to determine the response rates and toxicity of two regimens containing vinblastine (VBL) in combination with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) in the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and secondly to evaluate the additional efficacy of 13-cis retinoic acid (13-CRA) in RCC.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients were included in the first trial (Trial 1) and 40 in the second one (Trial 2). The therapy given in Trial 1 consisted of VBL 0.15 mg/kg i.v. every 2 weeks and IFN-gamma 100 microg s.c. 3 times weekly. In Trial 2, the therapy consisted of the same two drugs, in the same doses, plus oral 13-CRA 40 mg/day.

RESULTS

In Trial 1 there were 3 (10.3%) patients with complete response, 3 (10.3%) patients with partial response, 8 (27.6%) patients with stable disease and 15 (51.7%) patients with progressive disease. In Trial 2, there was no complete response, however, 3 (7.5%) patients had partial response. Additionally, 15 (37.5%) patients maintained stable disease and 14 (35%) patients had progressive disease. In Trial 1, the median survival was 12.56 months (95% CI, 6.8-18.3, range 0.59-42.49) and the median time to progression was 3.21 months (95% CI, 1.7-4.7, range 0.03-42.49). In Trial 2, the median survival was 9.54 months (95% CI, 5.9-13.1, range 0.43-24.1) and the median time to progression was 3.9 months (95% CI, 0.8-7, range 0.26-24.1). In Trial 1, granulocytopenia grade 3 and 4 appeared in 5 (17.2%) patients and anaemia grade 3 in 1 (3.4%) patient. In Trial 2, there were grade 3 toxicities, as granulocytopenia in 5 (12.5%) patients, anemia in 4 (10.0%) patients, stomatitis in 3 (7.5%) patients, fatigue/malaise in 3 (7.5%) patients and 1 (2.5%) had diarrhea. No toxic deaths occurred in both studies.

CONCLUSION

The use of IFN-gamma does not enhance the low response of VBL-based chemotherapy. The additional administration of 13-CRA with the combination of VBL and IFN-gamma does not add to the efficacy of this combination in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. New active agents are needed to treat patients with this disease.

Gemcitabine and docetaxel as second-line chemotherapy for patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma who fail prior paclitaxel plus platinum-based regimens

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for patients with recurrent nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remain limited as a result of poor activity of older agents after platinum-based therapy. In the current Phase II study, the authors evaluated the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with recurrent NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC (Stage IIIB-IV), a World Health Organization performance status (PS) < or = 2, prior paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy, and unimpaired hematopoietic and organ function were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered as follows: gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) was administered on Days 1 and 8 followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on Day 8, and this regimen was recycled every 21 days. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was administered on Days 10-14 or until the patient achieved a white blood cell count > or = 5000/microL.

RESULTS

Of 43 patients who were entered on the study, 41 patients were evaluable for response, and all were evaluable for toxicity. The median patient age was 63 years (range, 47-70 years), the median PS was 1 (range, 0-2), there were 38 male patients, and there were 5 female patients. Four patients had Stage IIIA disease, 17 patients had Stage IIIB disease, and 22 patients had Stage IV disease. Histologies included 19 patients with adenocarcinoma, 18 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, and 3 patients with large cell carcinoma. Metastatic sites included lymph nodes in 28 patients, bone in 6 patients, liver in 5 patients, brain in 5 patients, lung nodules in 8 patients, adrenals in 7 patients, and other sites in 3 patients. All patients had received prior paclitaxel plus platinum-based treatment; 28 patients had received prior paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin. Objective responses were partial response (PR) in 14 of 43 patients [33%; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 18.5-46.6%], stable disease (SD) in 16 of 43 patients (37%; 95% CI, 22.8-51.6%), and progressive disease (PD) in 13 of 43 patients (30%; 95% CI, 16.3-43.7%). The median time to disease progression was 6 months (range, 1.0-20.0+ months), and the median survival was 8.5 months (range, 1.5-20.0+ months). The 1-year survival rate was 28%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was experienced by 53% of patients (30% Grade 4), with 14% of patients experiencing febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was experienced by 7% of patients (no Grade 4), whereas other Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities were never encountered.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel is active and is well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC who have failed prior taxane plus platinum chemotherapy. This regimen represents a tolerable and effective combination to apply in the palliative treatment of patients with recurrent NSCLC.

An out-patient second-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A phase II study of the Hellenic co-operative Oncology Group

Thirty-nine patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, refractory or resistant to platinum or taxanes derivatives were treated on an out-patient basis with vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 intravenous (I.V.) on days 1 and 8 followed by gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 l.V. on days 1 and 8. Chemotherapy was repeated every 3 weeks. The patients were evaluated for response every two cycles of treatment. All 39 patients were assessable for toxicity and 35 were assessable for response. On an intent to treat analysis, only 1 (2.6%) patient achieved a partial response (PR) (95% CI 0.09% to 17.6%); fourteen patients (35.9%, 95% CI 29.45% to 67.4%) had stable disease (SD) and 24 (61.5%) had progressive disease (PD). The median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 4.7 months (range 0.13 to 18.9 months), the median survival time was 7.3 months (range 0.6 to 18.9 months) and the 1-year survival rate was 35%. Clinical benefit response including improvement of PS, dyspnea and anorexia, pain and cough reduction and cessation of hemoptysis and fever was observed in 10% to 50% of patients. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred only in 2 (5.2%) patients. Five patients experienced febrile neutropenia, which was successfully treated with G-CSF and broad-spectrum antibiotics. No patient experienced grade 3/4 anaemia or thrombocytopenia. One patient experienced grade 4 fatigue and stopped the treatment. Nausea / vomiting, fatigue, neurotoxicity, diarrhea and fever were mild in the majority of patients and did not result in any clinically significant problem. There were no treatment-related deaths. In conclusion, the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine showed low objective response rate in patients previously treated with CDDP/taxanes-containing regimens. This regimen was relatively well-tolerated and was associated with prolonged 1-year survival and improvement in cancer related symptoms. To validate these findings a randomized trial of gemcitabine and vinorelbine versus taxotere or best supportive care is required.

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer chemotherapy: a randomized trial of two active regimens (MVP and PE)

The treatment of advanced or metastatic NSCLC remains a controversial issue and cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is by far the most common treatment. Two of these cisplatin-based standard combinations, MVP and PE, were compared in this study in order to evaluate their response rates and survival times. Eighty-five previously untreated NSCLC patients were randomly selected to receive either MVP or PE and 72 of these patients were eligible for evaluation for response rate and survival. Response rates for MVP were: CR 11%, PR 35%, SD 19% and PD 35% and for PE: CR 0%, PR 26%, SD 22% and PD 52%. The median survival time was 9.7 months for MVP and 6.9 months for PE. Both schedules were well tolerated. The administration of MVP in advanced NSCLC resulted in superior response rates and survival times over those produced by PE.