Intraoral voice recording-towards a new smartphone-based method for vocal rehabilitation

After laryngectomy, a new voice is needed. We present the first steps in the development of a smartphone-based method. A microphone is placed in the mouth to record the pseudo-whispering voice of laryngectomized patients. This recording is analyzed by voice recognition software followed by voice synthesis. Eventually, this will be performed on a smartphone. We placed a microphone at 10 different places inside and outside the mouth (two in front of the mouth (at 2 and 20 cm), five on the palate and three on the lower jaw) and made voice recordings in eight healthy men. These recordings were analyzed by voice recognition software. The text generated by the software was compared with the original text. Over all positions, the correct detection of words recorded in the mouth was 19.3% vs. 75.2% (p = 0.01) outside the mouth. In the mouth, recording taken on the maxilla (22.8%) was much better than on the mandible (13.5%) (p = 0.01). The optimum position for a microphone on the maxilla was at the highest point of the palate with 31.9% correct word identification there (p = 0.028). Further investigations have to be undertaken with forthcoming development of smartphone processing power and with development of a smartphone-based voice recognition application.

[Inpatient vs. outpatient costs analysis of septumplasty in Germany]

The septumplasty is realized inpatient and outpatient in different countries. Caused by the pressure of reduction of expenses there is the question of the economic benefit if done outpatient in Germany. A comparison of the inpatient and outpatient gratification will be done. There is a yearly potential of cost reduction of 180 million euro, if the operation would be done as an outpatient procedure. From the hospital view actual there is no economical recommendation doing an outpatient septumplasty caused by the poor outpatient remuneration. That's why an adjustment of the outpatient remuneration should be done. Actual there is no medical or economical recommendation doing the septumplasty as an outpatient procedere.

[The costs for different voice prostheses depending on the lifetime]

Voice prostheses are available in different types of architecture und from different producers. Especially the ones with antifungal properties are characterized by a high pricing. The aim of this paper is to check, whether these prices are reflected by the prosthesis life time.A Benchmarking with usage of mean lifetime and prosthesis costs. Comparing Provox 1, Provox 2, Provox Vega, Provox ActiValve, ESKA-Herrmann, Blom Singer Classic, Phonax, Blom Singer Advantage.The voice prosthesis Provox 1 offers the best price-lifetime-ratio (1.0). It's 6.7-times higher than the one of the Provox ActiValve (0.15). In addition, the classic prostheses Provox 2 (0.53), Blom Singer Classic (0.54) and ESKA-Herrmann (0.72) offer a good ratio compared to Provox 1, too.The mean lifetime of the voice prostheses do not reflect the pricing. The Provox 1 offers the best ratio and should be used as a reference in pricing the prostheses.