Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom

AIM

To evaluate the real-world comparative effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness, from a UK National Health Service perspective, of natalizumab versus fingolimod in patients with rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RES-RRMS).

METHODS

Real-world data from the MSBase Registry were obtained for patients with RES-RRMS who were previously either naive to disease-modifying therapies or had been treated with interferon-based therapies, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate, or teriflunomide (collectively known as BRACETD). Matched cohorts were selected by 3-way multinomial propensity score matching, and the annualized relapse rate (ARR) and 6-month-confirmed disability worsening (CDW6M) and improvement (CDI6M) were compared between treatment groups. Comparative effectiveness results were used in a cost-effectiveness model comparing natalizumab and fingolimod, using an established Markov structure over a lifetime horizon with health states based on the Expanded Disability Status Scale. Additional model data sources included the UK MS Survey 2015, published literature, and publicly available sources.

RESULTS

In the comparative effectiveness analysis, we found a significantly lower ARR for patients starting natalizumab compared with fingolimod (rate ratio [RR] = 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.73) or BRACETD (RR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.42-0.53). Similarly, CDI6M was higher for patients starting natalizumab compared with fingolimod (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.55) and BRACETD (HR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.16-1.85). In patients starting fingolimod, we found a lower ARR (RR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.80) compared with starting BRACETD, but no difference in CDI6M (HR = 1.17; 95% CI, 0.91-1.50). Differences in CDW6M were not found between the treatment groups. In the base-case cost-effectiveness analysis, natalizumab dominated fingolimod (0.302 higher quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] and £17,141 lower predicted lifetime costs). Similar cost-effectiveness results were observed across sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

This MSBase Registry analysis suggests that natalizumab improves clinical outcomes when compared with fingolimod, which translates to higher QALYs and lower costs in UK patients with RES-RRMS.

Renal Artery Denervation Due to Refractory Hypertension in a Patient After Kidney Transplantation-3 Years of Observation: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension is prevalent in most patients after renal transplantation, and it is the main factor contributing to cardiovascular diseases that cause death of a significant number of these patients. Up to 95% of patients after transplantation have hypertension, and among them are patients with refractory hypertension. Elevated blood pressure is one of the causes of deterioration of transplant function and may accelerate transplant loss.

CASE REPORT

We present the first case in the world of a patient (who was 61 years old) in whom denervation of native renal arteries was performed after renal transplantation (2004). The patient was suffering from uncontrolled refractory hypertension. Antihypertensive therapy was used but the effect was not satisfactory. The patient received amlodipine, bisoprolol, clonidine, furosemide, and doxazosin in high doses. Clinical assessments with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring revealed a predominant blood pressure 149/96 with incidents of hypertensive crises. High blood pressure is a cardiovascular risk factor and it also has a significant influence on transplant failure, which was the reason for performing the denervation. The procedure was carried out through the femoral artery with the use of a 6F guiding catheter. During a 3-year observation, significant decreases in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring systolic and diastolic blood pressures were observed after the procedure (149/96 mm Hg vs 134/91 mm Hg before and after the denervation, respectively). There was a significant regression of left ventricle mass (577 g before denervation vs 470 g after 3 years). The functioning of the renal transplant became stable after 3 years of observation (38 mL/min before denervation and 38 mL/min after 3 years).

CONCLUSIONS

The first case in the world of a renal transplant patient who had denervation of native renal arteries has demonstrated a positive effect in controlling blood pressure over a 3-year observation. Three years after denervation, a reduction of heart hypertrophy and stabilization of renal function were noted. The presented case shows that denervation of native renal arteries denervation may be successful and safe in kidney transplant recipients.

Histopathological Relevance of Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor in Renal Transplant Biopsy

The occurrence of anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) antibodies is thought to be a risk factor for transplant injury, but the relationship of AT1R to graft loss in renal transplantation has not been assessed. The aim of our study was to evaluate the expression of AT1R and its relationship with graft loss in patients who had a renal transplant biopsy for cause.

METHODS

AT1R immunoreactivity was analyzed in 170 renal transplant biopsies. Immunohistochemical evaluation of AT1R expression was performed on 4 μm-thick paraffin sections mounted on silanized slides. AT1R expression was analyzed in 5 compartments: 1. glomeruli, 2. renal blood vessels (small and intermediate arteries), 3. peritubular capillaries, 4. tubular epithelium, and 5. interstitium based on a 3-step scale.

RESULTS

Initially we checked 170 consecutive samples of biopsies for the immunoreactivity of the AT1R. The study finally included 118 renal transplant patients in 1-year observation after the biopsy. The renal allograft biopsy was performed between 6 days and 24 years after transplantation and the diagnosis was based on Banff criteria. We observed positive immunostaining of AT1R in tubular epithelium in 26.3% (42/118) of patients. A total of 7 patients had staining assessed as 2 and 35 as 1. One year post-biopsy graft loss in the AT1R (+) patients was 35.7 % (15/42) compared to 14.5% (11/76) in the AT1R (-) group (P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of AT1R in tubular epithelium of the biopsy for cause was associated with significantly higher graft loss. The relevance of AT1R should be considered for better transplant immunological risk assessment.

Intra-peritoneal injection of polyclonal anti-interferon alpha antibodies cross the blood brain barrier and neutralize interferon alpha

The central nervous system (CNS) is known to be an immunologically privileged organ in the body largely because the blood brain barrier (BBB) prevents the flow of large molecules, proteins, and cells from crossing into the CNS from the periphery. These restrictive properties of the BBB have made it difficult to treat CNS diseases. In this study, mice were infected intracranially (i.c.) with Sindbis virus (SV) and then treated either i.c. or intraperitoneally (i.p.) with neutralizing antibodies against interferon alpha (IFNalpha). SV infected control mice received i.p. saline. Antibodies against mouse IFNalpha were detected in the brain tissue of mice that received i.p. and i.c. injections of the antibody. ELISA analysis showed that both i.c. and i.p. antibody treated mice had significantly decreased levels of IFNalpha in the brain tissue. Also, mice that received IFNalpha neutralizing antibodies showed decreased presence of protein kinase R (PKR) measured by immunohistochemical densitometry, indicating the antibody successfully inhibited IFNalpha. The data shows that antibodies are capable of crossing the BBB and inhibiting IFNalpha, indicating that it is possible to target molecules of interest in the CNS with peripheral antibody treatment.