Assessment of protein biomarkers for preoperative differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ovarian tumors

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the diagnostic value of tumor and immune related proteins in the discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses, and between different subgroups of tumors.

METHODS

In this exploratory diagnostic study, 254 patients with an adnexal mass scheduled for surgery were consecutively enrolled at the University Hospitals Leuven (128 benign, 42 borderline, 22 stage I, 55 stage II-IV, and 7 secondary metastatic tumors). The quantification of 33 serum proteins was done preoperatively, using multiplex high throughput immunoassays (Luminex) and electrochemiluminescence immuno-assay (ECLIA). We calculated univariable areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves (AUCs). To discriminate malignant from benign tumors, multivariable ridge logistic regression with backward elimination was performed, using bootstrapping to validate the resulting AUCs.

RESULTS

CA125 had the highest univariable AUC to discriminate malignant from benign tumors (0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.89). Combining CA125 with CA72.4 and HE4 increased the AUC to 0.87. For benign vs borderline tumors, CA125 had the highest univariable AUC (0.74). For borderline vs stage I malignancy, no proteins were promising. For stage I vs II-IV malignancy, CA125, HE4, CA72.4, CA15.3 and LAP had univariable AUCs ≥0.80.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm the dominant role of CA125 for identifying malignancy, and suggest that other markers (HE4, CA72.4, CA15.3 and LAP) may help to distinguish between stage I and stage II-IV malignancies. However, further research is needed, also to investigate the added value over clinical and ultrasound predictors of malignancy, focusing on the differentiation between subtypes of malignancy.

Abstract P2-10-12: How well predict the 2011 St Gallen early breast cancer surrogate phenotypes metastatic survival?

BACKGROUND: The five prognostic surrogate phenotypes, defined by the 2011 St Gallen consensus, predict metastatic relapse following early breast cancer treatment (Brouckaert et al Ann Oncol 2012). It is unknown to what extent these surrogate phenotypes defined on the primary tumor predict metastatic survival (MS) in a cohort of consecutive women with metachronous metastases.

PATIENTS & METHODS: All 4318 patients with primary operable breast cancer, diagnosed between 01–01-2000 and 31–12-2009 and treated in our center were prospectively entered in our institutional database. We included 345 patients with a (distant) metastatic relapse during their follow-up. We observed metastatic survival as the time between the diagnosis of the relapse and death. Tumor subtype was defined according to the 2011 St Gallen recommendations in 5 groups: luminal A (ER+/HER2−, grade 1–2), luminal B1 (ER+/HER2−, grade 3), luminal B2 or luminal-HER2 (ER+/HER2+), HER2-like (ER−/HER2−) and triple-negative. We focused on the value of the primary tumor subtype as a major prognostic determinant, but also assessed age at diagnosis, tumor size, lymph node involvement, tumor subtype, PR-status, primary detection (screening vs. palpation), histology, adjuvant therapy, distant-metastasis free interval (DMFI), first-line metastatic hormonal therapy, recurrence sites (isolate or multiple) and metastasis detection (clinical vs. biochemical).

RESULTS: In our cohort, we recorded a median metastatic survival (MS) of 22.3 months (95% CI: 19.7–25.6) and a 5-year survival probability of 15%. Significant differences in median MS were noted when considering the primary tumor subtype (cf. table).

We observed an independent prognostic effect for multiple recurrence sites (HR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.37–2.32), first-line metastatic hormonal therapy (HR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.18–0.49), DMFI (HR = 0.92 CI 0.85–0.98) and, finally, primary tumor subtype.

Abstract P6-05-05: Triple receptor comparison between primary breast cancer and metachronous or synchronous liver metastasis

Background: Decisions about systemic treatment in women with metastatic breast cancer are currently based on the presence of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR) or Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2 receptors) in the primary tumor. Recently, several studies have reported significant discordances in ER, PR and HER2 status between the primary tumor and metastatic lesions and this may vary by metastatic site. Prognostic implications remain unclear although alterations in ER, PR and/or HER2 can influence metastatic management. This study represents one of the largest studies evaluating how frequent receptor discordances occur in liver metastasis, whether this alters therapeutic options and impacts prognosis.

Patients and methods: 246 breast cancer patients with histological confirmed liver metastasis were analyzed in this retrospective study. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or FISH were used to determine ER, PR and HER2 receptor status. We excluded patients when comparison between receptors of primary tumor and metastasis was impossible due to missing data (n = 85), when liver metastasis did not originate from breast cancer (n = 36) and when pathology was obtained from autopsy specimens (n = 38).

Results: 87 patients had matched tissue samples of primary tumor and liver metastasis with possible comparison of at least one of the receptors. Table 1 summarizes changes in ER, PR, HER2 between primary and metastatic lesion. Discordance in receptor status was associated with shorter time to death (63.3 months) compared to the concordant group (75.5 months).