Centrally and locally mediated thermoregulatory responses alter subcutaneous oxygen tension

Mild perianesthetic hypothermia decreases resistance to infections. Decreased resistance likely results in part from direct immune inhibition. However, decreased tissue oxygen partial pressure also decreases resistance to infection by impairing oxidative killing by neutrophils and collagen deposition. Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction decreases skin blood flow and may also decrease subcutaneous tissue oxygen tension. Accordingly, we determined the influence of centrally and locally mediated thermoregulatory vasomotion on subcutaneous oxygen tension. We also compared subcutaneous oxygen tension to other potential markers of tissue perfusion: laser Doppler flowmetry and transcutaneous oxygen tension. Arterial oxygen tension was maintained near 325 mm Hg in five volunteers. Control subcutaneous oxygen tension values were recorded after 1 hour of euthermia (no sweating or vasoconstriction). Volunteers were then cooled with a circulating-water mattress positioned under the trunk and legs. After 1.5 hours of cooling sufficient to produce shivering, the right upper arm was covered for 1 hour with a small circulating water blanket set to 40 degrees C while systemic cooling continued. The volunteers were then systematically warmed to produce sweating, and the right arm was locally cooled. There was no correlation among laser Doppler flowmetry, transcutaneous oxygen tension, and subcutaneous oxygen tension. Systemic cooling significantly decreased subcutaneous oxygen tension, but subcutaneous oxygen tension in the right arm returned to control values during local heating. Systemic warming significantly increased subcutaneous oxygen tension, and 1 hour of local cooling failed to fully reverse the increase. These data indicate that thermoregulatory vasoconstriction significantly decreases tissue oxygen availability. Decreased subcutaneous oxygen tension may be one mechanism by which mild perianesthetic hypothermia facilitates development of surgical wound infections.

Mild hypothermia alters propofol pharmacokinetics and increases the duration of action of atracurium

Mild intraoperative hypothermia is common. We therefore studied the effects of mild hypothermia on propofol pharmacokinetics, hepatic blood flow, and atracurium duration of action in healthy volunteers. Six young volunteers were studied on two randomly assigned days, at either 34 degrees C or 37 degrees C. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental, 3 mg/kg, and maintained with 70% N2O and 0.6% isoflurane. Core hypothermia was induced by conductive and convective cooling. On the other study day, normothermia was maintained by a Bair Hugger (Augustine Medical, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN) forced-air warmer. Propofol, 1 mg/kg lean body mass (LBM), then was given, followed by a 4-h infusion at 5 mg.kg-1.h-1. After 2 h, atracurium 0.5 mg/kg was administered as an intravenous bolus. Indocyanine green was administered for estimation of hepatic blood flow. Arterial blood was assayed for propofol and indocyanine green concentration. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM. Results are reported as means +/- SEM. Propofol blood concentrations averaged approximately 28% more at 34 degrees C than at 37 degrees C (P < 0.05). Hepatic blood flow decreased 23% +/- 11% in normothermic volunteers during the propofol infusion, and 33% +/- 11% in hypothermic volunteers (P = not significant). A three-compartment mamillary model fitted the data best. Inclusion of hepatic blood flow change from the prepropofol baseline as a covariate for total body clearance significantly improved the fit. The intercompartmental clearances were decreased in the presence of hypothermia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Thermoregulatory and anesthetic-induced alterations in the differences among femoral, radial, and oscillometric blood pressures

BACKGROUND

A decrease in radial artery blood pressure relative to central arterial blood pressure is commonly associated with the rewarming phase of cardiopulmonary bypass. Decreased hand vascular resistance has been suggested as a possible mechanism. Although decreased blood viscosity due to hemodilution may contribute to decreased hand vascular resistance, thermoregulatory vascular responses to core hyperthermia also may be important.

METHODS

Seven healthy volunteers were studied. Volunteers first were cooled until thermoregulatory vasoconstriction was evident. Next, each was warmed until intense sweating developed. After a cool-down period, general anesthesia was induced with propofol and N2O. Femoral artery pressure (a surrogate for central arterial pressure) and radial artery and oscillometric (brachial artery) pressures were compared during each of six defined thermoregulatory and anesthetic study conditions. To determine the effect of hand vascular resistance on blood pressure differences, measurements were compared before and after occlusion of hand blood flow. Upper-extremity blood flow was evaluated by forearm and fingertip plethysmography and laser Doppler flowmetry.

RESULTS

Forearm, fingertip, and cutaneous blood flow increased significantly during warming and were maximal during intense sweating. During thermoregulatory vasoconstriction, femoral, radial, and oscillometric mean blood pressures were similar. In contrast, radial artery mean pressure was 5 +/- 1 mmHg less than femoral artery mean pressure and 12 +/- 8 mmHg less than oscillometric mean pressure during intense sweating. Hand compression reduced these differences. The contour of the radial artery pressure waveform was dramatically altered by thermoregulatory and anesthetic conditions. Radial artery systolic pressure exceeded both femoral artery and oscillometric systolic pressures during vasoconstriction but was less than these during intense sweating. Hand compression reestablished the exaggerated radial artery systolic pressure during all study conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Thermoregulatory and anesthetic-induced alterations in upper-extremity blood flow substantially influence the relations among femoral artery, radial artery, and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.

Thermoregulatory thresholds during epidural and spinal anesthesia

BACKGROUND

There are significant physiologic differences between spinal and epidural anesthesia. Consequently, these two types of regional anesthesia may influence thermoregulatory processing differently. Accordingly, in volunteers and in patients, we tested the null hypothesis that the core-temperature thresholds triggering thermoregulatory sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering are similar during epidural and spinal anesthesia.

METHODS

Six male volunteers participated on three consecutive study days: epidural or spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned on the 1st and 3rd days (approximately T10 level); no anesthesia was given on the 2nd day. On each day, the volunteers were initially warmed until they started to sweat, and subsequently cooled by central venous infusion of cold fluid until they shivered. Mean skin temperature was kept constant near 36 degrees C throughout each study. The tympanic membrane temperatures triggering a sweating rate of 40 g.m-2.h-1, a finger flow less than 0.1 ml/min, and a marked and sustained increase in oxygen consumption (approximately 30%) were considered the thermoregulatory thresholds for sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering, respectively. Twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to receive epidural (n = 10) or spinal (n = 11) anesthesia for knee and calf surgery (approximately T10 level). As in the volunteers, the shivering threshold was defined as the tympanic membrane temperature triggering a sustained increase in oxygen consumption.

RESULTS

The thresholds and ranges were similar during epidural and spinal anesthesia in the volunteers. However, the sweating-to-vasoconstriction (inter-threshold) range, the vasoconstriction-to-shivering range, and the sweating-to-shivering range all were significantly increased by regional anesthesia. The shivering thresholds in patients assigned to epidural and spinal anesthesia were virtually identical.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparable sweating, vasoconstriction, and shivering thresholds during epidural and spinal anesthesia suggest that thermoregulatory processing is similar during each type of regional anesthesia. However, thermoregulatory control was impaired during regional anesthesia, as indicated by the significantly enlarged inter-threshold and sweating-to-shivering ranges.

Epidural anesthesia impairs both central and peripheral thermoregulatory control during general anesthesia

BACKGROUND

The authors tested the hypotheses that: (1) the vasoconstriction threshold during combined epidural/general anesthesia is less than that during general anesthesia alone; and (2) after vasoconstriction, core cooling rates during combined epidural/general anesthesia are greater than those during general anesthesia alone. Vasoconstriction thresholds and heat balance were evaluated under controlled circumstances in volunteers, whereas the clinical importance of intraoperative thermoregulatory vasoconstriction was evaluated in patients.

METHODS

Five volunteers were each evaluated twice. On one of the randomly ordered days, epidural anesthesia (approximately T9 dermatomal level) was induced and maintained with 2-chloroprocaine. On both study days, general anesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane (0.7% end-tidal concentration), and core hypothermia was induced by surface cooling and continued for at least 1 h after fingertip vasoconstriction was observed. Patients undergoing colorectal surgery were randomly assigned to combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia (n = 13) or enflurane alone (n = 13). In appropriate patients, epidural anesthesia was maintained by an infusion of bupivacaine. The core temperature that triggered fingertip vasoconstriction identified the threshold.

RESULTS

In the volunteers, the vasoconstriction threshold was 36.0 +/- 0.2 degrees C during isoflurane anesthesia alone, but significantly less, 35.1 +/- 0.7 degrees C, during combined epidural/isoflurane anesthesia. Cutaneous heat loss and the rates of core cooling were similar 30 min before vasoconstriction with and without epidural anesthesia. In the 30 min after vasoconstriction, heat loss decreased 33 +/- 13 W when the volunteers were given isoflurane alone, but only 8 +/- 16 W during combined epidural/isoflurane anesthesia. Similarly, the core cooling rates in the 30 min after vasoconstriction were significantly greater during combined epidural/isoflurane anesthesia (0.8 +/- 0.2 degrees C/h) than during isoflurane alone (0.2 +/- 0.1 degrees C/h). In the patients, end-tidal enflurane concentrations were slightly, but significantly, less in the patients given combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia (0.6 +/- 0.2% vs. 0.8 +/- 0.2%). Nonetheless, the vasoconstriction threshold was 34.5 +/- 0.6 degrees C in the epidural/enflurane group, which was significantly less than that in the other patients, 35.6 +/- 0.8 degrees C. When the study ended after 3 h of anesthesia, patients given combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia were 1.2 degrees C more hypothermic than those given general anesthesia alone. The rate of core cooling during the last hour of the study was 0.4 +/- 0.2 degrees C/h during combined epidural/enflurane anesthesia, but only 0.1 +/- 0.3 degrees C/h during enflurane alone.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that epidural anesthesia reduces the vasoconstriction threshold during general anesthesia. Furthermore, the markedly reduced rate of core cooling during general anesthesia alone illustrates the importance of leg vasoconstriction in maintaining core temperature.

Absence of nonshivering thermogenesis in anesthetized adult humans

BACKGROUND

Typically, core temperature rapidly decreases after induction of anesthesia, but reaches a stable plateau after several hours. This plateau typically occurs in conjunction with the onset of thermoregulatory vasoconstriction. Decreased heat loss, caused by vasoconstriction, may not be sufficient to establish thermal steady state without a concomitant increase in heat production. Accordingly, the authors tested the hypothesis that nonshivering thermogenesis contributes to thermal steady state during anesthesia. Rewarming from hypothermia is often associated with an afterdrop (a further reduction in core temperature, despite cutaneous warming). Because total body heat content increases during cutaneous warming, heat storage during afterdrop must reflect increased temperature and heat content of the peripheral tissue mass. Thermal balance was measured during rewarming to estimate the thermal capacity of the peripheral tissues.

METHODS

Five volunteers were anesthetized with isoflurane and paralyzed with vecuronium. Oxygen consumption was measured during cooling to a core temperature at least 1 degree C less than that which triggered vasoconstriction. Volunteers were subsequently rewarmed using a circulating-water blanket and forced-air warmer. Oxygen consumption and cutaneous heat flux were measured to assess thermal balance and peripheral tissue heat storage during rewarming.

RESULTS

The core temperature threshold for vasoconstriction was 35.2 +/- 0.8 degrees C. Oxygen consumption decreased 9 +/- 5%/degrees C during active cooling before vasoconstriction and 9 +/- 3%/degrees C after vasoconstriction. After the start of rewarming, core temperature continued to decrease for an additional 32 +/- 8 min. The magnitude of this afterdrop was 0.6 +/- 0.1 degree C. Peripheral tissue heat storage measured from the start of rewarming until the first net increase in core temperature was 144 +/- 60 kcal, which approximately equals 2 h of resting metabolic heat production.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors concluded that nonshivering thermogenesis is not an important thermoregulatory response in adults anesthetized with isoflurane. Afterdrop and delayed core temperature recovery during rewarming reflect the large heat storage capacity of peripheral tissues.

The direction dependence of thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during isoflurane/epidural anesthesia in humans

We tested the hypothesis that once thermoregulatory vasoconstriction is triggered at a given core temperature during isoflurane anesthesia, redilation starts at a substantially higher core temperature. To avoid direct perception of cutaneous cooling and warming, we used epidural anesthesia and limited our thermal manipulations to the blocked area. Seven volunteers were anesthetized with isoflurane/epidural anesthesia (approximately T9 dermatomal level). Core hypothermia was induced by surface cooling restricted to the legs. Cooling was continued until fingertip blood flow suddenly decreased (vasoconstriction threshold). The core was then rewarmed by heating the legs until fingertip flow suddenly increased toward initial values (redilation threshold). The difference between the two thresholds defined the direction-dependent hysteresis. Vasoconstriction occurred at 35.2 +/- 0.6 degrees C and vasodilation at 36.2 +/- 0.5 degrees C (P < 0.01, paired t-test); consequently, the hysteresis was 1.0 +/- 0.6 degrees C. The observed hysteresis suggests that thermoregulatory responses during combined isoflurane/epidural anesthesia are not determined simply by instantaneous thermal input to central controllers, but may also depend on the direction of core temperature change.

The effects of preinduction warming on temperature and blood pressure during propofol/nitrous oxide anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Core temperature decreases rapidly after induction of anesthesia, largely because heat is redistributed to peripheral tissues. The hypothesis that warming peripheral tissues before induction of general anesthesia (prewarming) minimizes hypothermia was tested. Because circulating blood volume may be greater during exposure to heat compared to cold, the hypothesis that prewarming decreases the amount of hypotension associated with induction of anesthesia was tested also. Finally, the hypothesis that the difference between direct radial arterial blood pressure and blood pressure measured oscillometrically at the brachial artery depends on thermoregulatory and anesthetic conditions was tested.

METHODS

Each of six volunteers underwent general anesthesia (propofol and nitrous oxide) twice on the same day. Each anesthetic lasted 1 h and was preceded by either 2 h of active warming with forced air or 2 h of passive cooling by exposure to a typical operating room environment. After induction of each anesthetic, volunteers were fully exposed to the ambient environment. Volunteers recovered for 2 h before starting the second preinduction treatment.

RESULTS

Initial tympanic membrane temperatures were similar before each preinduction treatment: 36.7 +/- 0.4 degrees C when volunteers were not warmed and 36.7 +/- 0.6 degrees C when volunteers were warmed. Tympanic membrane temperature did not change during the preinduction period without warming but increased slightly (delta T = 0.4 +/- 0.2 degree C) during warming. After induction of anesthesia, core temperatures decreased to 36.1 +/- 0.4 degree C over 1 h when volunteers were prewarmed but decreased to 34.9 +/- 0.4 degrees C when they were not. Radial arterial systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures were lower before induction of anesthesia when volunteers were warmed compared to when no warming was given. Oscillometric diastolic and mean pressures also were lower during prewarming; however, oscillometric systolic pressure did not differ significantly. Prewarming did not result in less hypotension after induction. Without warming, the difference (radial arterial minus oscillometric) in systolic blood pressure measurements was approximately 17 mmHg. Warming was associated with a reversal of the systolic pressure difference to approximately -6 mmHg. After induction of anesthesia, the differences in systolic and mean pressure measurements became more negative with respect to the preinduction values regardless of preinduction warming treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm our hypothesis that redistribution hypothermia can be minimized by preinduction warming of peripheral tissues. Prewarming decreases blood pressure but does not prevent subsequent hypotension after induction. The difference between radical arterial blood pressure and oscillometric blood pressure depends on thermoregulatory vasomotor changes but also may be influenced by vasodilation associated with administration of propofol and nitrous oxide.

Heat loss during surgical skin preparation

BACKGROUND

Hypothermia develops rapidly during the 1st h of anesthesia and results in part from evaporative heat loss during surgical skin preparation. The authors tested the hypothesis that evaporation of skin preparation solution contributes significantly to hypothermia.

METHODS

Five healthy, unanesthetized volunteers were studied in a 22 +/- 0.4 degrees C environment. One thigh of each volunteer was washed for 10 min, using each of the following representative solutions: (1) water; (2) 50% ethanol in water (EtOH/H2O; similar to tincture of iodine); and (3) povidone-iodine gel. Water and EtOH/H2O each were tested at ambient temperature (cold), warmed to 40 degrees C before application (warm), and with radiant heating of the skin, and gel only at ambient temperatures, resulting in seven study states. Heat loss and skin temperatures on the washed thighs were measured using thermal flux transducers, and values compared with the data obtained from the contralateral unwashed thighs. Change in mean body temperature (per 70 kg) due to washing was calculated by integrating measured heat loss over time and multiplying by the specific heat of human tissue. A mathematical model was developed to predict cutaneous heat loss using only skin temperature, independent of the type and temperature of skin-preparation solution or the use of radiant heating during preparation.

RESULTS

Heat loss from the unwashed thigh was approximately 14 kcal/m2 during radiant warming and approximately 39 kcal/m2 without warming. Net heat loss (increment produced by washing) was approximately 30 kcal/m2 with water and gel without radiant warming, but loss was larger with EtOH/H2O than with water under all study conditions. Radiant warming reduced total heat loss (increment produced by washing and environment) during both the EtOH/H2O and water trials, compared with warm or cold EtOH/H2O and water alone. The calculated decreases in mean body temperature per 70 kg ranged from -0.2 to -0.7 degree C/m2. The smallest decrease occurred during radiant warming and washing with water, and the largest decreases during warm or cold EtOH/H2O.

CONCLUSIONS

Heat loss was significantly less with water-based than with alcohol-based solutions. Though heating the solutions and radiant warming decreased heat loss, such loss under each tested condition, even per square meter of washed surface, was small compared to other causes of perioperative hypothermia. Consequently, the authors recommend that efforts to maintain intraoperative normothermia be directed elsewhere.

Leg heat content continues to decrease during the core temperature plateau in humans anesthetized with isoflurane

BACKGROUND

Sufficient hypothermia during anesthesia provokes thermoregulatory responses, but the clinical significance of these responses remains unknown. Nonshivering thermogenesis does not increase metabolic heat production in anesthetized adults. Vasoconstriction reduces cutaneous heat loss, but the initial decrease appears insufficient to cause a thermal steady state (heat production equaling heat loss). Accordingly, the authors tested the hypotheses that: 1) thermoregulatory vasoconstriction prevents further core hypothermia; and 2) the resulting stable core temperature is not a thermal steady state, but, instead, is accompanied for several hours by a continued reduction in body heat content.

METHODS

Six healthy volunteers were anesthetized with isoflurane (0.8%) and paralyzed with vecuronium. Core hypothermia was induced by fan cooling, and continued for 3 h after vasoconstriction in the legs was detected. Leg heat content was calculated from six needle thermocouples and skin temperature, by integrating the resulting parabolic regression over volume.

RESULTS

Core temperature decreased 1.0 +/- 0.2 degrees C in the 1 h before vasoconstriction, but only 0.4 +/- 0.3 degrees C in the subsequent 3 h. This temperature decrease, evenly distributed throughout the body, would reduce leg heat content 10 kcal. However, measured leg heat content decreased 49 +/- 18 kcal in the 3 h after vasoconstriction.

CONCLUSIONS

These data thus indicate that thermoregulatory vasoconstriction produces a clinically important reduction in the rate of core cooling. This core temperature plateau resulted, at least in part, from sequestration of metabolic heat to the core which allowed core temperature to remain nearly constant, despite a continually decreasing body heat content.

Thermoregulatory responses to hyperthermia during isoflurane anesthesia in humans

The authors tested the hypotheses that isoflurane anesthesia increases the threshold for sweating but minimally decreases the gain (sensitivity) or maximum intensity of this response and that thermoregulatory responses to hyperthermia are similar in anesthetized men and women. Sweating in response to core hyperthermia was studied in five men and five women during 0, 0.8, and 1.2% end-tidal isoflurane anesthesia. Thigh sweating was quantified by measuring gas flow, relative humidity, and temperature passing over a known surface area. The distal esophageal temperature triggering sweating was considered the sweating threshold, and gain was defined as the core temperature increment required to increase sweating rate from 25 to 75% of maximum observed intensity. The sweating threshold increased linearly with isoflurane concentration from 36.6 +/- 0.1 to 38.1 +/- 0.1 degrees C in the men and from 37.1 +/- 0.3 to 38.3 +/- 0.2 degrees C in the women. The thresholds were significantly higher in women than in men. Gain and maximum sweating intensities were similar at each anesthetic concentration and in men and women. These data indicate that isoflurane anesthesia significantly increases the threshold triggering thermoregulatory sweating but that gain and maximum sweating rate are relatively well preserved.

Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during propofol/nitrous oxide anesthesia in humans: threshold and oxyhemoglobin saturation

To determine the thermoregulatory effects of propofol and nitrous oxide, we measured the threshold for peripheral vasoconstriction in seven volunteers over a total of 13 study days. We also evaluated the effect of vasoconstriction on oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2). Anesthesia was induced with an intravenous bolus dose of propofol (2 mg/kg), followed by an infusion of 180 micrograms.kg-1 x min-1 for 15 min, and maintained with 60% nitrous oxide and propofol (80-160 micrograms.kg-1 x min-1). Central and skin surface temperatures and SpO2 (using two different pulse oximeters) were measured continuously; plasma propofol concentrations and arterial PO2 were measured at 15-min intervals. Volunteers were cooled with a circulating water blanket until definitive peripheral vasoconstriction was detected. The tympanic membrane temperature triggering vasoconstriction was considered the thermoregulatory threshold. Vasoconstriction developed on seven study days during propofol/nitrous oxide anesthesia at a central temperature of 33.3 +/- 1.0 degrees C (mean +/- SD) and plasma propofol concentration of 3.9 +/- 1.1 micrograms/mL. The thresholds during anesthesia were significantly lower than those during the control period (36.7 +/- 0.3 degrees C), but the correlation between plasma propofol concentrations and vasoconstriction thresholds was poor. On the remaining six study days, vasoconstriction did not develop despite central temperatures ranging from 32.1 to 32.7 degrees C. Corresponding propofol concentrations were 4.1-10.9 micrograms/mL. These data suggest that anesthesia with propofol, in typical clinical concentrations, and 60% nitrous oxide substantially inhibits thermoregulatory vasoconstriction. Vasoconstriction increased SpO2 by approximately 2% without a significant concomitant change in PO2. The observed increase in SpO2 probably reflects decreased transmission of arterial pulsations to venous blood in the finger.

Painful stimulation minimally increases the thermoregulatory threshold for vasoconstriction during enflurane anesthesia in humans

Generalized autonomic stimulation enhances hemodynamic responses and may, in a similar fashion, facilitate thermoregulatory responses. We thus tested the hypothesis that painful stimulation increases the central temperature threshold for vasoconstriction during general anesthesia. Healthy volunteers were anesthetized with 1.3% end-tidal enflurane on 2 separate days. On 1 day (randomly assigned), painful stimulation was produced by tetanic electrical stimulation. On the other day, electrical stimulation was not given. Significant thermoregulatory vasoconstriction was defined as a forearm-fingertip skin-surface temperature gradient exceeding 4 degrees C. The distal esophageal temperature triggering significant vasoconstriction was considered the thermoregulatory threshold. The threshold was 35.5 +/- 0.8 degrees C during electrical stimulation and 35.1 +/- 0.6 degrees C without stimulation (P = 0.050, 95% confidence interval for the difference = 0-0.7 degree C). These data suggest that thresholds determined in nonsurgical volunteers will be slightly (but not clinically significantly) less than those in operative patients. Similarly, intraoperative vasoconstriction thresholds likely will be slightly less when surgical pain is prevented by simultaneous regional or local analgesia.

Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction during isoflurane anesthesia minimally decreases cutaneous heat loss

The authors tested the extent to which thermoregulatory vasoconstriction decreases cutaneous heat loss during isoflurane anesthesia. Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction was provoked by central hypothermia in five nonsurgical volunteers given isoflurane anesthesia. Peripheral arteriovenous shunt flow was quantified using forearm-fingertip skin-surface temperature gradients and volume plethysmography. Capillary blood flow on the chest was evaluated using laser Doppler flowmetry. The central temperature triggering peripheral vasoconstriction (the thermoregulatory threshold) was 34.6 +/- 0.4 degrees C. Central body temperature decreased less than or equal to 0.2 degrees C in the period from 1 h preceding onset of significant vasoconstriction until 1.5 h afterward. Chest skin-surface blood flow decreased 21% during the period from 2 h before to 1 h after significant fingertip vasoconstriction. In contrast, fingertip blood flow decreased approximately 50-fold in the same period. The correlation between fingertip blood flow and skin-temperature gradient was excellent. Total heat loss decreased approximately 26% (25.3 +/- 3.9 W) in the period from 2 h before significant peripheral vasoconstriction to 1 h afterward. Loss from the arms and legs (upper arm, lower arm, thigh, and calf) decreased approximately 24% in the same period. Heat loss from the trunk and head decreased only 14%; in contrast, loss from the hands and feet decreased approximately 57%. There were no clinically important changes in blood pressure or heart rate during vasoconstriction, but oxyhemoglobin saturation (measured by pulse oximetry) increased slightly. These data suggest that thermoregulatory vasoconstriction only minimally decreases cutaneous heat loss.

Physiologic responses to mild perianesthetic hypothermia in humans

To evaluate physiologic responses to mild perianesthetic hypothermia, we measured tympanic membrane and skin-surface temperatures, peripheral vasoconstriction, thermal comfort, and muscular activity in nine healthy male volunteers. Each volunteer participated on three separate days: 1) normothermic isoflurane anesthesia; 2) hypothermic isoflurane anesthesia (1.5 degrees C decrease in central temperature); and 3) hypothermia alone (1.5 degrees C decrease in central temperature) induced by iced saline infusion. Involuntary postanesthetic muscular activity was considered thermoregulatory when preceded by central hypothermia and peripheral cutaneous vasoconstriction. Tremor was considered normal shivering when electromyographic patterns matched those produced by cold exposure in unanesthetized individuals. During postanesthetic recovery, central temperatures in hypothermic volunteers increased rapidly when residual end-tidal isoflurane concentrations were less than or equal to 0.3% but remained 0.5 degree C less than control values throughout 2 h of recovery. All volunteers were vasodilated during isoflurane administration. Peripheral vasoconstriction occurred only during recovery from hypothermic anesthesia, at end-tidal isoflurane concentrations of less than approximately 0.4%. Spontaneous tremor was always preceded by central hypothermia and peripheral vasoconstriction, indicating that muscular activity was thermoregulatory. Maximum tremor intensity during recovery from hypothermic anesthesia occurred when residual end-tidal isoflurane concentrations were less than or equal to 0.4%. Three patterns of postanesthetic muscular activity were identified. The first was a tonic stiffening that occurred in some normothermic and hypothermic volunteers when end-tidal isoflurane concentrations were approximately 0.4-0.2%. This activity appeared to be largely a direct, non-temperature-dependent effect of isoflurane anesthesia. In conjunction with lower residual anesthetic concentrations, stiffening was followed by a synchronous, tonic waxing-and-waning pattern and spontaneous electromyographic clonus, both of which were thermoregulatory. Tonic waxing-and-waning was by far the most common pattern and resembled that produced by cold-induced shivering in unanesthetized volunteers; it appears to be thermoregulatory shivering triggered by hypothermia. Spontaneous clonus resembled flexion-induced clonus and pathologic clonus and did not occur during hypothermia alone; it may represent abnormal shivering or an anesthetic-induced modification of normal shivering. We conclude that among the three patterns of muscular activity, only the synchronous, tonic waxing-and-waning pattern can be attributed to normal thermoregulatory shivering.

Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction decreases cutaneous heat loss

To determine the extent to which thermoregulatory vasoconstriction decreases heat loss to the environment, we measured regional heat flux, average skin temperature, and tympanic membrane temperature before and after thermoregulatory vasoconstriction in five minimally clothed volunteers maintained in a 30.8 +/- 0.1 degrees C environment. Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction was induced by central venous infusion of cooled fluid. Peripheral cutaneous blood flow was evaluated with venous-occlusion volume plethysmography and skin-surface temperature gradients. Laser Doppler flowmetry was used to measure vasoconstriction in centrally located skin. This model mimics the common clinical situation in which patients in a warm environment are centrally cooled by administration of cold intravenous fluids or by lavage of internal cavities with cold fluids. Tympanic membrane temperature decreased 1.5 +/- 0.3 degrees C in the first 15 min after the cold fluid infusion was started and remained approximately 1 degrees C below control values during the rest of the study. Average skin-surface temperature decreased slowly to approximately 0.7 degrees C below control. Flow in capillaries of centrally distributed skin, determined with laser Doppler flowmetry, decreased only approximately 40%. Total heat flux, and flux from the arms and legs decreased approximately 25% (15.5 +/- 0.3 W). Heat loss from the trunk and head decreased only 17%, whereas, loss from the hands and feet (10.5% of the body surface area) decreased approximately 50%. All measured values decreased significantly following vasoconstriction (P less than 0.01). Therefore, thermoregulatory vasoconstriction in a thermoneutral environment appears to decrease cutaneous loss of metabolic heat approximately 25%.

Skin-surface warming: heat flux and central temperature

The authors determined the efficacy of four postoperative warming devices by measuring cutaneous and tympanic membrane temperatures, and heat loss/gain using 11 thermocouples and ten thermal flux transducers in five healthy, unanesthetized volunteers. Overall thermal comfort was evaluated at 5-10 min intervals using a 10-cm visual analog scale. The warming devices were: 1) a pair of 250-W infrared heating lamps mounted 71 cm above the abdomen; 2) the Thermal Ceiling MTC XI UL (500 W) set on "high" and mounted 56 cm above the volunteer; 3) a 54-by-145-cm circulating-water blanket set to 40 degrees C placed over the volunteer; and 4) the Bair Hugger forced air warmer with an adult-sized cover set on "low" (approximately 33 degrees C), "medium" (approximately 38 degrees C), and "high" (approximately 43 degrees C). Following a 10-min control period, each device was placed over the volunteer and activated for a 30-min period. All devices were started "cold" and warmed up during the study period. The Bair Hugger set on "medium" decreased heat loss more than each radiant warming device and as much as the circulating-water blanket. All methods reached maximum efficacy within 20 min. Set on "high," the Bair Hugger increased skin-surface temperature more than the circulating-water blanket. The Bair Hugger (all settings) and the water blanket raised skin temperature more than the radiant heaters. The circulating-water blanket was the most effective device for heating an optimally placed transducer on the chest (directly under and parallel to the radiant heat sources, and touching the water and Bair Hugger blankets).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)