1
|
Kittle AM, Bukombe JK, Sinclair ARE, Mduma SAR, Fryxell JM. Where and when does the danger lie? Assessing how location, season and time of day affect the sequential stages of predation by lions in western Serengeti National Park. J Zool (1987) 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A. M. Kittle
- Department of Integrative Biology University of Guelph Guelph ON Canada
| | - J. K. Bukombe
- Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute Arusha Tanzania
| | - A. R. E. Sinclair
- Biodiversity Research Centre University of British Columbia Vancouver BC Canada
| | | | - J. M. Fryxell
- Department of Integrative Biology University of Guelph Guelph ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
|
3
|
Hopcraft JGC, Mduma SAR, Borner M, Bigurube G, Kijazi A, Haydon DT, Wakilema W, Rentsch D, Sinclair ARE, Dobson A, Lembeli JD. Conservation and economic benefits of a road around the Serengeti. Conserv Biol 2015; 29:932-936. [PMID: 25711283 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2014] [Accepted: 05/28/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- J Grant C Hopcraft
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom.
- Frankfurt Zoological Society, P.O. Box 14935, Arusha, Tanzania.
| | - Simon A R Mduma
- Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, P.O. Box 661, Arusha, Tanzania
| | - Markus Borner
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom
- Frankfurt Zoological Society, P.O. Box 14935, Arusha, Tanzania
| | - Gerald Bigurube
- Frankfurt Zoological Society, P.O. Box 14935, Arusha, Tanzania
| | - Alain Kijazi
- Tanzania National Parks, P.O. Box 3134, Arusha, Tanzania
| | - Daniel T Haydon
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom
| | | | - Dennis Rentsch
- Frankfurt Zoological Society, P.O. Box 14935, Arusha, Tanzania
| | - A R E Sinclair
- Centre for Biodiversity Research, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Andrew Dobson
- Eno Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544-1003, U.S.A
| | - James Daudi Lembeli
- Parliamentary Committee on Land, Natural Resources and Environment, Tanzania, P.O. Box 1065, Kahama, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Byrom AE, Nkwabi AJK, Metzger K, Mduma SAR, Forrester GJ, Ruscoe WA, Reed DN, Bukombe J, Mchetto J, Sinclair ARE. Anthropogenic stressors influence small mammal communities in tropical East African savanna at multiple spatial scales. Wildl Res 2015. [DOI: 10.1071/wr14223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Context Protection of natural ecosystems undoubtedly safeguards ecological communities, with positive benefits for ecosystem processes and function. However, ecosystems are under threat from anthropogenic stressors that reduce the resilience both of component species and the system as a whole. Aims To determine how anthropogenic stressors (land use and climate change) could impact the diversity and resilience of a small mammal community in the greater Serengeti ecosystem, an East African savanna comprising Serengeti National Park (SNP) and adjacent agro-ecosystems, at local (SNP) and Africa-wide geographic scales. Methods We recorded small mammal species in 10 habitats in the greater Serengeti ecosystem, including the agro-ecosystem, over 48 years (1962–2010). We calculated richness and diversity for each habitat type, and used an index of similarity to quantify differences in the community among habitats. Species accumulation curves were also generated for each habitat type. Key results We recorded 40 species of small mammals in the greater Serengeti ecosystem. At the local scale, restricted habitat types in SNP (each <1% of the total area) made a disproportionately large contribution to diversity. Agro-ecosystems had lower richness and were less likely to contain specialist species. At regional and Africa-wide scales, local endemics were less likely to be recorded in the agro-ecosystem (57% species loss) compared with those with regional (33% loss) or Africa-wide (31%) geographic distributions. Conclusions At the local scale, the variety of habitats in SNP contributed to overall diversity. However, the ability to maintain this diversity in the adjacent agro-ecosystem was compromised for localised endemics compared with species with Africa-wide ranges. Land use intensification adjacent to SNP and projected changes in rainfall patterns for East Africa under global climate scenarios may compromise the future resilience of the small mammal community in this tropical savanna ecosystem. Implications The loss of rare or specialised species from protected areas and human-modified ecosystems could be mitigated by: (1) increasing habitat complexity and maintaining specialist habitats in the agro-ecosystem; and (2) creating buffers at the boundary of protected natural ecosystems that accommodate regime shifts in response to climatic change. These measures would increase the resilience of this coupled human–natural savanna ecosystem.
Collapse
|
5
|
Hopcraft JGC, Morales JM, Beyer HL, Borner M, Mwangomo E, Sinclair ARE, Olff H, Haydon DT. Competition, predation, and migration: individual choice patterns of Serengeti migrants captured by hierarchical models. ECOL MONOGR 2014. [DOI: 10.1890/13-1446.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
6
|
Byrom AE, Craft ME, Durant SM, Nkwabi AJK, Metzger K, Hampson K, Mduma SAR, Forrester GJ, Ruscoe WA, Reed DN, Bukombe J, Mchetto J, Sinclair ARE. Episodic outbreaks of small mammals influence predator community dynamics in an east African savanna ecosystem. OIKOS 2014. [DOI: 10.1111/oik.00962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Meggan E. Craft
- Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota; 1988 Fitch Ave St Paul MN 55108 USA
| | - Sarah M. Durant
- Inst. of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park; London NW1 4RY UK
- Tanzania Wildlife Research Inst.; PO Box 661 Arusha Tanzania
| | - Ally J. K. Nkwabi
- Tanzania Wildlife Research Inst.; PO Box 661 Arusha Tanzania
- Serengeti Biodiversity Program, Tanzania Wildlife Research Inst.; PO Box 661 Arusha Tanzania
| | - Kristine Metzger
- Beaty Biodiversity Centre, Univ. of British Columbia; Vancouver BC V6T 1Z4 Canada
| | - Katie Hampson
- Boyd Orr Centre for population and Ecosystem Health, Inst. for Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Univ. of Glasgow; Glasgow UK
| | - Simon A. R. Mduma
- Tanzania Wildlife Research Inst.; PO Box 661 Arusha Tanzania
- Serengeti Biodiversity Program, Tanzania Wildlife Research Inst.; PO Box 661 Arusha Tanzania
| | | | | | - Denne N. Reed
- Dept of Anthropology; Univ. of Texas Austin; 1 University Station C3200 Austin TX 78712 USA
| | - John Bukombe
- Tanzania Wildlife Research Inst.; PO Box 661 Arusha Tanzania
- Serengeti Biodiversity Program, Tanzania Wildlife Research Inst.; PO Box 661 Arusha Tanzania
| | - John Mchetto
- Tanzania Wildlife Research Inst.; PO Box 661 Arusha Tanzania
- Serengeti Biodiversity Program, Tanzania Wildlife Research Inst.; PO Box 661 Arusha Tanzania
| | - A. R. E. Sinclair
- Beaty Biodiversity Centre, Univ. of British Columbia; Vancouver BC V6T 1Z4 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sinclair ARE, Metzger KL, Fryxell JM, Packer C, Byrom AE, Craft ME, Hampson K, Lembo T, Durant SM, Forrester GJ, Bukombe J, Mchetto J, Dempewolf J, Hilborn R, Cleaveland S, Nkwabi A, Mosser A, Mduma SAR. Asynchronous food-web pathways could buffer the response of Serengeti predators to El Niño Southern Oscillation. Ecology 2013; 94:1123-30. [PMID: 23858652 DOI: 10.1890/12-0428.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Understanding how entire ecosystems maintain stability in the face of climatic and human disturbance is one of the most fundamental challenges in ecology. Theory suggests that a crucial factor determining the degree of ecosystem stability is simply the degree of synchrony with which different species in ecological food webs respond to environmental stochasticity. Ecosystems in which all food-web pathways are affected similarly by external disturbance should amplify variability in top carnivore abundance over time due to population interactions, whereas ecosystems in which a large fraction of pathways are nonresponsive or even inversely responsive to external disturbance will have more constant levels of abundance at upper trophic levels. To test the mechanism underlying this hypothesis, we used over half a century of demographic data for multiple species in the Serengeti (Tanzania) ecosystem to measure the degree of synchrony to variation imposed by an external environmental driver, the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO). ENSO effects were mediated largely via changes in dry-season vs. wet-season rainfall and consequent changes in vegetation availability, propagating via bottom-up effects to higher levels of the Serengeti food web to influence herbivores, predators and parasites. Some species in the Serengeti food web responded to the influence of ENSO in opposite ways, whereas other species were insensitive to variation in ENSO. Although far from conclusive, our results suggest that a diffuse mixture of herbivore responses could help buffer top carnivores, such as Serengeti lions, from variability in climate. Future global climate changes that favor some pathways over others, however, could alter the effectiveness of such processes in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R E Sinclair
- Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4 Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Creel S, Becker MS, Durant SM, M'Soka J, Matandiko W, Dickman AJ, Christianson D, Dröge E, Mweetwa T, Pettorelli N, Rosenblatt E, Schuette P, Woodroffe R, Bashir S, Beudels-Jamar RC, Blake S, Borner M, Breitenmoser C, Broekhuis F, Cozzi G, Davenport TRB, Deutsch J, Dollar L, Dolrenry S, Douglas-Hamilton I, Fitzherbert E, Foley C, Hazzah L, Henschel P, Hilborn R, Hopcraft JGC, Ikanda D, Jacobson A, Joubert B, Joubert D, Kelly MS, Lichtenfeld L, Mace GM, Milanzi J, Mitchell N, Msuha M, Muir R, Nyahongo J, Pimm S, Purchase G, Schenck C, Sillero-Zubiri C, Sinclair ARE, Songorwa AN, Stanley-Price M, Tehou CA, Trout C, Wall J, Wittemyer G, Zimmermann A. Conserving large populations of lions - the argument for fences has holes. Ecol Lett 2013; 16:1413, e1-3. [DOI: 10.1111/ele.12145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2013] [Revised: 06/03/2013] [Accepted: 06/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Creel
- Department of Ecology; Conservation Biology and Ecology Program; Montana State University; 310 Lewis Hall Bozeman MT 59717 USA
| | - M. S. Becker
- Department of Ecology; Conservation Biology and Ecology Program; Montana State University; 310 Lewis Hall Bozeman MT 59717 USA
- Zambian Carnivore Programme; Box 80 Mfuwe Eastern Province Zambia
| | - S. M. Durant
- Institute of Zoology; Zoological Society of London; Regents Park London NW1 4RY UK
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx Zoo; 2300 Southern Blvd. Bronx NY 10460 USA
| | - J. M'Soka
- Department of Ecology; Conservation Biology and Ecology Program; Montana State University; 310 Lewis Hall Bozeman MT 59717 USA
- Zambia Wildlife Authority; Private Bag 1 Chilanga Zambia
| | - W. Matandiko
- Department of Ecology; Conservation Biology and Ecology Program; Montana State University; 310 Lewis Hall Bozeman MT 59717 USA
- Zambian Carnivore Programme; Box 80 Mfuwe Eastern Province Zambia
| | - A. J. Dickman
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology; The Recanati-Kaplan Centre; University of Oxford; Tubney House Tubney OX13 5QL UK
| | - D. Christianson
- School of Natural Resources and the Environment; University of Arizona; Tucson AZ 85721 USA
| | - E. Dröge
- Zambian Carnivore Programme; Box 80 Mfuwe Eastern Province Zambia
| | - T. Mweetwa
- Zambian Carnivore Programme; Box 80 Mfuwe Eastern Province Zambia
| | - N. Pettorelli
- Institute of Zoology; Zoological Society of London; Regents Park London NW1 4RY UK
| | - E. Rosenblatt
- Department of Ecology; Conservation Biology and Ecology Program; Montana State University; 310 Lewis Hall Bozeman MT 59717 USA
- Zambian Carnivore Programme; Box 80 Mfuwe Eastern Province Zambia
| | - P. Schuette
- Department of Ecology; Conservation Biology and Ecology Program; Montana State University; 310 Lewis Hall Bozeman MT 59717 USA
- Zambian Carnivore Programme; Box 80 Mfuwe Eastern Province Zambia
| | - R. Woodroffe
- Institute of Zoology; Zoological Society of London; Regents Park London NW1 4RY UK
| | - S. Bashir
- Institute of Zoology; Zoological Society of London; Regents Park London NW1 4RY UK
| | - R. C. Beudels-Jamar
- Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences; 29 Vautier str. Bruxelles 1000 Belgium
- CMS Scientific Council, UNEP/CMS; Hermann-Ehlers-Str. 10 Bonn 53113 Germany
| | - S. Blake
- Max Planck Institute for Ornithology; Whitney R. Harris World Ecology Center; Washington University in St. Louis; St. Louis 63130 USA
| | - M. Borner
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine; University of Glasgow; University Avenue Glasgow G12 8QQ UK
| | - C. Breitenmoser
- IUCN/SSC Cat Specialist Group; c/o KORA, Thunstrasse 31 Muri 3074 Switzerland
| | - F. Broekhuis
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology; The Recanati-Kaplan Centre; University of Oxford; Tubney House Tubney OX13 5QL UK
| | - G. Cozzi
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies; Zurich University; Winterthurerstrasse 190 Zürich CH 8057 Switzerland
| | - T. R. B. Davenport
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Tanzania Program; PO Box 922 Zanzibar Tanzania
| | - J. Deutsch
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx Zoo; 2300 Southern Blvd. Bronx NY 10460 USA
| | - L. Dollar
- Big Cats Initiative, National Geographic Society; 1145 17th Street NW Washington DC 20036-4688 USA
- Nicholas School of the Environment; Duke University; Durham North Carolina USA
- Department of Biology; Pfeiffer University; Misenheimer North Carolina 28109 USA
| | - S. Dolrenry
- Lion Guardians; PO Box 15550 Langata 00509 Kenya
| | - I. Douglas-Hamilton
- Save the Elephants; PO Box 54667 Nairobi Kenya
- Department of Zoology; University of Oxford; Oxford OX1 3PS UK
| | - E. Fitzherbert
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology; The Recanati-Kaplan Centre; University of Oxford; Tubney House Tubney OX13 5QL UK
- Chester Zoo; Chester CH2 1LH UK
| | - C. Foley
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Tanzania Program; PO Box 922 Zanzibar Tanzania
| | - L. Hazzah
- Lion Guardians; PO Box 15550 Langata 00509 Kenya
| | - P. Henschel
- Panthera; 8 West 40th Street, 18th Floor New York NY 10018 USA
| | - R. Hilborn
- School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences; University of Washington; Seattle WA 98195 USA
| | - J. G. C. Hopcraft
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine; University of Glasgow; University Avenue Glasgow G12 8QQ UK
| | - D. Ikanda
- Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute; Box 661 Arusha Tanzania
| | - A. Jacobson
- Institute of Zoology; Zoological Society of London; Regents Park London NW1 4RY UK
| | - B. Joubert
- Big Cats Initiative, National Geographic Society; 1145 17th Street NW Washington DC 20036-4688 USA
| | - D. Joubert
- Big Cats Initiative, National Geographic Society; 1145 17th Street NW Washington DC 20036-4688 USA
| | - M. S. Kelly
- Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation; Virginia Tech; 146 Cheatham Hall Blacksburg VA 24061-0321 USA
| | - L. Lichtenfeld
- African People & Wildlife Fund; PO Box 624 Bernardsville NJ 07924 USA
| | - G. M. Mace
- Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment; Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research; University College London; Gower Street London WC1E 6BT UK
| | - J. Milanzi
- Zambia Wildlife Authority; Private Bag 1 Chilanga Zambia
| | - N. Mitchell
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx Zoo; 2300 Southern Blvd. Bronx NY 10460 USA
- Conservation Programmes, Zoological Society of London; Regents Park London NW1 4RY UK
| | - M. Msuha
- Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute; Box 661 Arusha Tanzania
| | - R. Muir
- Africa Programme, Frankfurt Zoological Society Africa Regional Office; Serengeti National Park; Serengeti Tanzania
| | | | - S. Pimm
- Nicholas School of the Environment; Duke University; Durham North Carolina USA
- Department of Biology; Pfeiffer University; Misenheimer North Carolina 28109 USA
| | - G. Purchase
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx Zoo; 2300 Southern Blvd. Bronx NY 10460 USA
- Conservation Programmes, Zoological Society of London; Regents Park London NW1 4RY UK
| | - C. Schenck
- Frankfurt Zoological Society; Bernhard-Grzimek-Allee 1 Frankfurt 60316 Germany
| | - C. Sillero-Zubiri
- Department of Zoology; IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group Wildlife Conservation Research Unit; The Recanati-Kaplan Centre; University of Oxford; Tubney House Tubney OX13 5QL UK
| | - A. R. E. Sinclair
- Beaty Biodiversity Research Centre; University of British Columbia; 6270 University Boulevard Vancouver V6T 1Z4 Canada
| | | | - M. Stanley-Price
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology; The Recanati-Kaplan Centre; University of Oxford; Tubney House Tubney OX13 5QL UK
- IUCN/SSC Species Conservation Planning Sub-committee; Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland Switzerland
| | - C. A. Tehou
- Coordonnateur WAP/UNOPS Bénin; B.P. 527 Cotonou, République Bénin
| | - C. Trout
- African People & Wildlife Fund; PO Box 624 Bernardsville NJ 07924 USA
| | - J. Wall
- Laboratory for Advanced Spatial Analysis; Department of Geography; University of British Columbia; 1984 West Mall Vancouver BC V6T 1Z2 Canada
| | - G. Wittemyer
- Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology; Colorado State University; Fort Collins Colorado 80523 USA
| | - A. Zimmermann
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology; The Recanati-Kaplan Centre; University of Oxford; Tubney House Tubney OX13 5QL UK
- Chester Zoo; Chester CH2 1LH UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
1. More than 75 years have passed since W.C. Allee proposed that breakdowns in sociality may shift animal populations to inverse density dependence at small sizes and thereby hasten spirals to extinction. Despite decades of attention, empirical evidence of this 'Allee effect' in wild populations remains scarce. 2. Here, we report on findings from a multi-year study of the population ecology and behaviour of the critically endangered Vancouver Island marmot (Marmota vancouverensis) and present quantitative evidence of an Allee effect and highlight the mechanisms that drive it. 3. The V.I. marmot is a large, social rodent endemic to Vancouver Island, Canada, and its population has declined by 80-90% since the 1980s. The species currently is represented in the wild by roughly 200 individuals. 4. This study compared characteristics of contemporary V.I. marmots (2002-2005) with (i) animals in the same population at an earlier time period (1973-1975) and (ii) congeners. Specifically, data on time allocation, social activity and ranging behaviour of animals in colonies in the late stages of decline were compared with historical data collected from colonies under more stable demographic conditions. 5. We found that contemporary V.I. marmots had home ranges that were 10-60x larger than historic animals and congeners, interacted with conspecifics at 10% of the historic rate, devoted 10x more time to anti-predator vigilance, and abandoned the bi-modal activity patterns previously described for this and other marmot species. Contemporary marmots also showed an 86% decline in feeding rate, and entered hibernation on average 20 days later than animals in historic populations. 6. Combined with results showing reduced per capita survival and reproduction in contemporary marmots, these findings suggest a strong role for Allee effects in the current plight of the Vancouver Island marmot. A positive link between aspects of fitness and population size emphasizes the need to identify threshold colony sizes and densities necessary to promote recovery. We discuss this and other implications of this species' social 'meltdown'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin S Brashares
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Arcese P, Jongejan G, Sinclair ARE. Behavioural Flexibility in a Small African Antelope: Group Size and Composition in the Oribi (Ourebia ourebi, Bovidae). Ethology 2010. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1995.tb01085.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
11
|
Hopcraft JGC, Olff H, Sinclair ARE. Herbivores, resources and risks: alternating regulation along primary environmental gradients in savannas. Trends Ecol Evol 2009; 25:119-28. [PMID: 19767121 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 174] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2009] [Revised: 07/30/2009] [Accepted: 08/10/2009] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Herbivores are regulated by predation under certain environmental conditions, whereas under others they are limited by forage abundance and nutritional quality. Whether top-down or bottom-up regulation prevails depends both on abiotic constraints on forage availability and body size, because size simultaneously affects the risk of predation of herbivores and their nutritional demands. Consequently, ecosystems composed of similar species can have different dynamics if they differ in resource supply. Here, we use large herbivore assemblages in African savanna ecosystems to develop a framework that connects environmental gradients and disturbance patterns with body size and trophic structure. This framework provides a model for understanding the functioning and diversity of ecosystems in general, and unifies how top-down and bottom-up mechanisms depend on common underlying environmental gradients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Grant C Hopcraft
- Community and Conservation Ecology, University of Groningen, PO Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Of fundamental interest in conservation ecology are the regulatory mechanisms that maintain communities. We document a mechanism that maintains forests in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania, and the destabilization when disturbance opens forest canopy. Forest birds, by consuming seeds, protected them from beetle attack. Consumption increased the germination rate and the density of seedlings and recruits, which was sufficient to maintain the forest. Opening of the canopy resulted in loss of birds, increased beetle attack, and loss of germination. Thus, frugivorous birds are necessary for the maintenance of forests. Their absence could have resulted in the observed forest decline since 1966.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory J Sharam
- Biodiversity Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Graeme Caughley produced substantial advances in our understanding of interactions between large mammalian herbivores and the environments they occupy. The strength of his work lay in the logical approach to answering fundamental questions. While his life work contributed to our understanding of animal population dynamics, it is in the application of his research and ideas that we have greatly advanced the science of conservation biology. Two central legacies of Caughley’s lifelong work are that an understanding of basic science leads to more appropriate management, and that underlying assumptions must be explicitly stated and tested. By arguing that efficient management of ecosystems requires an understanding of the underlying mechanisms, he moved forward the application of basic research to management. Future advances in wildlife conservation must focus on three aspects: (1) the rules for stability in ecosystems, and how humans cause instability; (2) the decline in native habitats, mostly from agriculture, and how to renew and reconstruct them while expanding threatened populations; and (3) how to breed species in captivity, and then reintroduce them as a last line of defence.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mwangomo EA, Hardesty LH, Sinclair ARE, Mduma SAR, Metzger KL. Habitat selection, diet and interspecific associations of the rufous-tailed weaver and Fischer’s lovebird. Afr J Ecol 2008. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2007.00903.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
15
|
Abstract
1. Ecosystems have higher-order emerging properties that can affect the conservation of species. We identify some of these properties in order to facilitate a better understanding of them. 2. Nonlinear, indirect effects of food web interactions among species can produce counterintuitive changes in populations. 3. Species differ in their roles and linkages with other species in the system. These roles are a property of the system. Such differences in roles influence how we conserve individual species. 4. Ecosystems operate at a multitude of interacting spatial and temporal scales, which together structure the system and affect the dynamics of individual populations. 5. Disturbance also structures an ecosystem, producing both long-term slow changes and sudden shifts in ecosystem dynamics. 6. Ecosystems therefore can have multiple states, determined both by disturbance regimes and biotic interactions. Conservation should recognize a possible multiplicity of natural states while avoiding aberrant (human-induced) states. 7. Ecosystem processes are influenced by the composition of the biota they contain. Disturbances to the biota can distort processes and functions, which in turn can endanger individual species. 8. The goal of ecosystem conservation is the long-term persistence of the biota in the system. There are two paradigms: community-based conservation (CBC) and protected area conservation. Both have their advantages but neither is sufficient to protect the biota on its own. 9. CBC is required to conserve the majority of the world's biota not included in protected areas. However, current CBC methods favour a few idiosyncratic species, distort the species complex, and ignore the majority. More comprehensive methods are required for this approach to meet the goal of ecosystem conservation. 10. Protected areas are essential to conserve species unable to coexist with humans. They also function as ecological baselines to monitor the effects of humans on their own ecosystems. 11. However, protected areas suffer from loss of habitat through attrition of critical areas. Thus, renewal (addition) of habitat is required in order to achieve the long-term persistence of biota in functioning ecosystems. Identification of minimum habitat areas and restoration of ecosystems become two major priorities for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R E Sinclair
- Centre for Biodiversity Research, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sinclair ARE, Mduma SAR, Hopcraft JGC, Fryxell JM, Hilborn R, Thirgood S. Long-term ecosystem dynamics in the Serengeti: lessons for conservation. Conserv Biol 2007; 21:580-90. [PMID: 17531037 DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00699.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Data from long-term ecological studies further understanding of ecosystem dynamics and can guide evidence-based management. In a quasi-natural experiment we examined long-term monitoring data on different components of the Serengeti-Mara Ecosystem to trace the effects of disturbances and thus to elucidate cause-and-effect connections between them. The long-term data illustrated the role of food limitation in population regulation in mammals, particularly in migratory wildebeest and nonmigratory buffalo. Predation limited populations of smaller resident ungulates and small carnivores. Abiotic events, such as droughts and floods, created disturbances that affected survivorship of ungulates and birds. Such disturbances showed feedbacks between biotic and abiotic realms. Interactions between elephants and their food allowed savanna and grassland communities to co-occur. With increased woodland vegetation, predators' capture of prey increased. Anthropogenic disturbances had direct (hunting) and indirect (transfer of disease to wildlife) effects. Slow and rapid changes and multiple ecosystem states became apparent only over several decades and involved events at different spatial scales. Conservation efforts should accommodate both infrequent and unpredictable events and long-term trends. Management should plan on the time scale of those events and should not aim to maintain the status quo. Systems can be self-regulating through food availability and predator-prey interactions; thus, culling may not be required. Ecosystems can occur in multiple states; thus, there may be no a priori need to maintain one natural state. Finally, conservation efforts outside protected areas must distinguish between natural change and direct human-induced change. Protected areas can act as ecological baselines in which human-induced change is kept to a minimum.
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Sharam G, Sinclair ARE, Turkington R. Establishment of Broad-leaved Thickets in Serengeti, Tanzania: The Influence of Fire, Browsers, Grass Competition, and Elephants1. Biotropica 2006. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00195.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
19
|
Brashares JS, Arcese P, Sam MK, Coppolillo PB, Sinclair ARE, Balmford A. Bushmeat hunting, wildlife declines, and fish supply in West Africa. Science 2004; 306:1180-3. [PMID: 15539602 DOI: 10.1126/science.1102425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 381] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
The multibillion-dollar trade in bushmeat is among the most immediate threats to the persistence of tropical vertebrates, but our understanding of its underlying drivers and effects on human welfare is limited by a lack of empirical data. We used 30 years of data from Ghana to link mammal declines to the bushmeat trade and to spatial and temporal changes in the availability of fish. We show that years of poor fish supply coincided with increased hunting in nature reserves and sharp declines in biomass of 41 wildlife species. Local market data provide evidence of a direct link between fish supply and subsequent bushmeat demand in villages and show bushmeat's role as a dietary staple in the region. Our results emphasize the urgent need to develop cheap protein alternatives to bushmeat and to improve fisheries management by foreign and domestic fleets to avert extinctions of tropical wildlife.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin S Brashares
- Conservation Biology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Warman LD, Forsyth DM, Sinclair ARE, Freemark K, Moore HD, Barrett TW, Pressey RL, White D. Species distributions, surrogacy, and important conservation regions in Canada. Ecol Lett 2004. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00590.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
21
|
Abstract
The theory of regulation in animal populations is fundamental to understanding the dynamics of populations, the causes of mortality and how natural selection shapes the life history of species. In mammals, the great range in body size allows us to see how allometric relationships affect the mode of regulation. Resource limitation is the fundamental cause of regulation. Top-down limitation through predators is determined by four factors: (i). body size; (ii). the diversity of predators and prey in the system; (iii). whether prey are resident or migratory; and (iv). the presence of alternative prey for predators. Body size in mammals has two important consequences. First, mammals, particularly large species, can act as keystones that determine the diversity of an ecosystem. I show how keystone processes can, in principle, be measured using the example of the wildebeest in the Serengeti ecosystem. Second, mammals act as ecological landscapers by altering vegetation succession. Mammals alter physical structure, ecological function and species diversity in most terrestrial biomes. In general, there is a close interaction between allometry, population regulation, life history and ecosystem dynamics. These relationships are relevant to applied aspects of conservation and pest management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R E Sinclair
- Centre for Biodiversity Research, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
There are many cases where animal populations are affected by predators and resources in terrestrial ecosystems, but the factors that determine when one or the other predominates remain poorly understood. Here we show, using 40 years of data from the highly diverse mammal community of the Serengeti ecosystem, East Africa, that the primary cause of mortality for adults of a particular species is determined by two factors--the species diversity of both the predators and prey and the body size of that prey species relative to other prey and predators. Small ungulates in Serengeti are exposed to more predators, owing to opportunistic predation, than are larger ungulates; they also suffer greater predation rates, and experience strong predation pressure. A threshold occurs at prey body sizes of approximately 150 kg, above which ungulate species have few natural predators and exhibit food limitation. Thus, biodiversity allows both predation (top-down) and resource limitation (bottom-up) to act simultaneously to affect herbivore populations. This result may apply generally in systems where there is a diversity of predators and prey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R E Sinclair
- Centre for Biodiversity Research, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sinclair ARE, Krebs CJ, Fryxell JM, Turkington R, Boutin S, Boonstra R, Seccombe-Hett P, Lundberg P, Oksanen L. Testing hypotheses of trophic level interactions: a boreal forest ecosystem. OIKOS 2003. [DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890213.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
24
|
Abstract
Protected areas as biodiversity benchmarks allow a separation of the direct effects of human impact on biodiversity loss from those of other environmental changes. We illustrate the use of ecological baselines with a case from the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania. We document a substantial but previously unnoted loss of bird diversity in agriculture detected by reference to the immediately adjacent native vegetation in Serengeti. The abundance of species found in agriculture was only 28% of that for the same species in native savannah. Insectivorous species feeding in the grass layer or in trees were the most reduced. Some 50% of both insectivorous and granivorous species were not recorded in agriculture, with ground-feeding and tree species most affected. Grass-layer insect abundance and diversity was much reduced in agriculture, consistent with the loss of insectivorous birds. These results indicate that many species of birds will become confined to protected areas over time. We need to determine whether existing protected areas are sufficiently large to maintain viable populations of insectivorous birds likely to become confined to them. This study highlights the essential nature of baseline areas for assessing causes of change in human-dominated systems and for developing innovative strategies to restore biodiversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R E Sinclair
- Centre for Biodiversity Research, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Population growth rate is determined in all vertebrate populations by food supplies, and we postulate bottom-up control as the universal primary standard. But this primary control system can be overridden by three secondary controls: top-down processes from predators, social interactions within the species and disturbances. Different combinations of these processes affect population growth rates in different ways. Thus, some relationships between growth rate and density can be hyperbolic or even have multiple nodes. We illustrate some of these in marsupial, ungulate and rabbit populations. Complex interactions between food, predators, environmental disturbance and social behaviour produce the myriad observations of population growth in nature, and we need to develop generalizations to classify populations. Different animal groups differ in the combination of these four processes that affect them, in their growth rates and in their vulnerability to extinction. Because conservation and management of populations depend critically on what factors drive population growth, we need to develop universal generalizations that will relieve us from the need to study every single population before we can make recommendations for management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R E Sinclair
- Centre for Biodiversity Research, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jogia MK, Andersen RJ, Parkanyi L, Clardy J, Dublin HT, Sinclair ARE. Crotofolane diterpenoids from the African shrub Croton dichogamus Pax. J Org Chem 2002. [DOI: 10.1021/jo00268a029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
27
|
Affiliation(s)
- K. E. Hodges
- Centre for Biodiversity Research, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4
| | - C. J. Krebs
- Centre for Biodiversity Research, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4
| | - A. R. E. Sinclair
- Centre for Biodiversity Research, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Larter NC, Sinclair ARE, Ellsworth T, Nishi J, Gates CC. Dynamics of reintroduction in an indigenous large ungulate: the wood bison of northern Canada. Anim Conserv 2000. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00115.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
29
|
Affiliation(s)
- A. R. E. Sinclair
- A. R. E. Sinclair, Donald Ludwig, and Colin W. Clark are at the Centre for Biodiversity Research, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Donald Ludwig
- A. R. E. Sinclair, Donald Ludwig, and Colin W. Clark are at the Centre for Biodiversity Research, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Colin W. Clark
- A. R. E. Sinclair, Donald Ludwig, and Colin W. Clark are at the Centre for Biodiversity Research, 6270 University Boulevard, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, V6T 1Z4, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
32
|
|
33
|
Wilmshurst JF, Fryxell JM, Farm BP, Sinclair ARE, Henschel CP. Spatial distribution of Serengeti wildebeest in relation to resources. CAN J ZOOL 1999. [DOI: 10.1139/z99-088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
We investigated the spatial distribution of radio-marked wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) in the Serengeti ecosystem in relation to the distribution of their food resources, comparing patterns in the wet and dry seasons and at local and landscape spatial scales. A mechanistic model of ruminant energy optimization predicted that wildebeest should maximize energy intake on swards 3 cm high and maintain energy balance on swards between 3 and 10 cm high. At the ecosystem scale, wildebeest preferred short and intermediate-height grass of moderate greenness during both the wet and dry seasons. This was consistent with the model prediction which suggests that large-scale movements by wildebeest are motivated, at least partially, by an energy-maximizing strategy. At the local scale, however, wildebeest showed spatial selectivity only on the basis of grass greenness, not on grass height. This differed from model expectations and may have resulted from wildebeest exploiting ephemeral green flushes of grass caused by localized rainfall in their movement radius. According to these results, the influence of other nutritional or behavioural factors on wildebeest distributions is not rejected, yet they suggest the potentially important role of an energy intake maximizing strategy on movement patterns. Our findings show that wildebeest movements are broadly similar to those of other large herbivores that migrate in response to resource gradients.
Collapse
|
34
|
|
35
|
|
36
|
Deutsch JC, Sinclair ARE, Arcese P. Serengeti II: Dynamics, Management and Conservation of an Ecosystem. J Appl Ecol 1996. [DOI: 10.2307/2404970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
37
|
Ginsberg J, Sinclair ARE, Arcese P. Serengeti II: Dynamics, Management and Conservation of an Ecosystem. J Anim Ecol 1996. [DOI: 10.2307/5794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
38
|
|
39
|
Boutin S, Krebs CJ, Boonstra R, Dale MRT, Hannon SJ, Martin K, Sinclair ARE, Smith JNM, Turkington R, Blower M, Byrom A, Doyle FI, Doyle C, Hik D, Hofer L, Hubbs A, Karels T, Murray DL, Nams V, O'Donoghue M, Rohner C, Schweiger S. Population Changes of the Vertebrate Community during a Snowshoe Hare Cycle in Canada's Boreal Forest. OIKOS 1995. [DOI: 10.2307/3545676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
40
|
|
41
|
Abstract
In Australia, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is a generalist predator of European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and a range of small to medium-sized native species. The available evidence suggests that foxes are capable of regulating rabbits in semi-arid environments but their role in the population dynamics of other prey species is not clear.
A series of models, and associated experimental tests, that compare the effects of predation on primary and secondary prey species are described. The models are appropriate to the time scale of prey dynamics and differ from recent predator–prey models that focus on predator dynamics. These ideas are discussed for the fox and several of its prey species in Australia.
Collapse
|
42
|
Sinclair ARE, Gosline JM, Holdsworth G, Krebs CJ, Boutin S, Smith JNM, Boonstra R, Dale M. Can the Solar Cycle and Climate Synchronize the Snowshoe Hare Cycle in Canada? Evidence from Tree Rings and Ice Cores. Am Nat 1993; 141:173-98. [DOI: 10.1086/285468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
43
|
|
44
|
|
45
|
Sinclair ARE, Olsen PD, Redhead TD. Can Predators Regulate Small Mammal Populations? Evidence from House Mouse Outbreaks in Australia. OIKOS 1990. [DOI: 10.2307/3545150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
46
|
Sinclair ARE, Krebs CJ, Smith JNM, Boutin S. Population Biology of Snowshoe Hares. III. Nutrition, Plant Secondary Compounds and Food Limitation. J Anim Ecol 1988. [DOI: 10.2307/5093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
47
|
|
48
|
Smith JNM, Krebs CJ, Sinclair ARE, Boonstra R. Population Biology of Snowshoe Hares. II. Interactions with Winter Food Plants. J Anim Ecol 1988. [DOI: 10.2307/4778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
49
|
|
50
|
Krebs CJ, Gilbert BS, Boutin S, Sinclair ARE, Smith JNM. Population Biology of Snowshoe Hares. I. Demography of Food-Supplemented Populations in the Southern Yukon, 1976-84. J Anim Ecol 1986. [DOI: 10.2307/4427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|