Systematic Review of Treatment of Beta-Cell Monogenic Diabetes

Background

Beta-cell monogenic forms of diabetes are the area of diabetes care with the strongest support for precision medicine. We reviewed treatment of hyperglycemia in GCK-related hyperglycemia, HNF1A-HNF4A- and HNF1B-diabetes, Mitochondrial diabetes (MD) due to m.3243A>G variant, 6q24-transient neonatal diabetes (TND) and SLC19A2-diabetes.

Methods

Systematic reviews with data from PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase were performed for the different subtypes. Individual and group level data was extracted for glycemic outcomes in individuals with genetically confirmed monogenic diabetes.

Results

147 studies met inclusion criteria with only six experimental studies and the rest being single case reports or cohort studies. Most studies had moderate or serious risk of bias.For GCK-related hyperglycemia, six studies (N=35) showed no deterioration in HbA1c on discontinuing glucose lowering therapy. A randomized trial (n=18 per group) showed that sulfonylureas (SU) were more effective in HNF1A-diabetes than in type 2 diabetes, and cohort and case studies supported SU effectiveness in lowering HbA1c. Two crossover trials (n=15 and n=16) suggested glinides and GLP-1 receptor agonists might be used in place of SU. Evidence for HNF4A-diabetes was limited. While some patients with HNF1B-diabetes (n=301) and MD (n=250) were treated with oral agents, most were on insulin. There was some support for the use of oral agents after relapse in 6q24-TND, and for thiamine improving glycemic control and reducing insulin requirement in SLC19A2-diabetes (less than half achieved insulin-independency).

Conclusion

There is limited evidence to guide the treatment in monogenic diabetes with most studies being non-randomized and small. The data supports: no treatment in GCK-related hyperglycemia; SU for HNF1A-diabetes. Further evidence is needed to examine the optimum treatment in monogenic subtypes.

Systematic review of genotype-stratified treatment for monogenic insulin resistance

Objective

To assess the effects of pharmacologic and/or surgical interventions in monogenic insulin resistance (IR), stratified by genetic aetiology.

Design

Systematic review.

Data sources

PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase, from 1 January 1987 to 23 June 2021.

Review methods

Studies reporting individual-level effects of pharmacologic and/or surgical interventions in monogenic IR were eligible. Individual subject data were extracted and duplicate data removed. Outcomes were analyzed for each affected gene and intervention, and in aggregate for partial, generalised and all lipodystrophy.

Results

10 non-randomised experimental studies, 8 case series, and 21 single case reports met inclusion criteria, all rated as having moderate or serious risk of bias. Metreleptin was associated with lower triglycerides and hemoglobin A1c in aggregated lipodystrophy (n=111), in partial lipodystrophy (n=71) and generalised lipodystrophy (n=41)), and in LMNA , PPARG , AGPAT2 or BSCL2 subgroups (n=72,13,21 and 21 respectively). Body Mass Index (BMI) was lower after treatment in partial and generalised lipodystrophy overall, and in LMNA or BSCL2 , but not PPARG or AGPAT2 subgroups. Thiazolidinedione use was associated with improved hemoglobin A1c and triglycerides in aggregated lipodystrophy (n=13), improved hemoglobin A1c only in the PPARG subgroup (n=5), and improved triglycerides only in the LMNA subgroup (n=7). In INSR -related IR, use of rhIGF-1, alone or with IGFBP3, was associated with improved hemoglobin A1c (n=15). The small size or absence of all other genotype-treatment combinations precluded firm conclusions.

Conclusions

The evidence guiding genotype-specific treatment of monogenic IR is of low to very low quality. Metreleptin and Thiazolidinediones appear to have beneficial metabolic effects in lipodystrophy, and rhIGF-1 appears to lower hemoglobin A1c in INSR-related IR. For other interventions there is insufficient evidence to assess efficacy and risks either in aggregated lipodystrophy or in genetic subgroups. There is a pressing need to improve the evidence base for management of monogenic IR.