Executive functions after orbital or lateral prefrontal lesions: neuropsychological profiles and self-reported executive functions in everyday living

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the effects of chronic focal lesions to the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) or orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) on neuropsychological test performance and self-reported executive functioning in everyday living.

METHODS

Fourteen adults with OFC lesions were compared to 10 patients with LPFC injuries and 21 healthy controls. Neuropsychological tests with emphasis on measures of cognitive executive function were administered along with the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions (BRIEF-A) and a psychiatric screening instrument.

RESULTS

The LPFC group differed from healthy controls on neuropsychological tests of sustained mental effort, response inhibition, working memory and mental switching, while the BRIEF-A provided more clinically important information on deficits in everyday life in the OFC group compared to the LPFC group. Correlations between neuropsychological test results and BRIEF-A were weak, while the BRIEF-A correlated strongly with emotional distress.

CONCLUSIONS

It was demonstrated that LPFC damage is particularly prone to cause cognitive executive deficit, while OFC injury is more strongly associated with self-reported dysexecutive symptoms in everyday living. The study illustrates the challenge of identifying executive deficit in individual patients and the lack of strong anatomical specificity of the currently employed methods. There is a need for an integrative methodological approach where standard testing batteries are supplemented with neuropsychiatric and frontal-specific rating scales.

ERP indices of resource allocation difficulties in mild head injury

This study examined the hypothesis that distractibility is a characteristic sequela of mild closed head injury (MHI). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) was used to study whether comorbid stress-related symptoms are associated with behavioral and electrophysiological indexes of attention. Event-related potentials (ERPs) and performance (reaction time, accuracy) were studied in patients with MHI (n = 20), patients with frontal lesions (n = 14), and healthy controls (n = 20) during a three-tone oddball task. Participants were instructed to detect rare target (2000 Hz) tones, and to withhold responding to equally rare distractor (500 Hz) tones and frequently occurring standard (1000 Hz) tones. All groups distinguished the two classes of deviants as indicated by the larger P3 amplitude to target relative to distractor tones. This indicates that the group with MHI was capable of differential allocation of attentional resources to target and non-target events. However, impaired performance and attenuated ERP amplitudes to both classes of deviants relative to patients with frontal lesions and controls, suggest limited availability, or expenditure of the resources needed for adequate task performance. In the group with MHI, both P3 amplitude and reaction time (RT) were significantly related to subjectively reported distress. The difference in RT disappeared, whereas the P3 amplitude differences between the patient groups remained when adjusting for level of distress.

Peripubertal GnRH and testosterone co-treatment leads to increased familiarity preferences in male sheep

Chronic gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) treatment is effective for the medical suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in situations like central precocious puberty and gender dysphoria. However, its administration during the peripubertal period could influence normal brain development and function because GnRH receptors are expressed in brain regions that regulate emotions, cognition, motivation and memory. This study used an ovine model to determine whether chronic peripubertal GnRHa-treatment affected the developmental shift from preference of familiarity to novelty. Experimental groups included Controls and GnRHa-treated rams. To differentiate between effects of altered GnRH signaling and those associated with the loss of sex steroids, a group was also included that received testosterone replacement as well as GnRHa (GnRHa + T). Preference for a novel versus familiar object was assessed during 5-min social isolation at 8, 28 and 46 weeks of age. Approach behavior was measured as interactions with and time spent near the objects, whereas avoidance behavior was measured by time spent in the entrance zone and attempts to escape the arena via the entry point. Emotional reactivity was measured by the number of vocalizations, escape attempts and urinations. As Control and GnRHa-treated rams aged, their approach behaviors showed a shift from preference for familiarity (8 weeks) to novelty (46 weeks). In contrast, relative to the Controls the GnRHa + T rams exhibited more approach behaviors towards both objects, at 28 and 46 weeks of age and preferred familiarity at 46 weeks of age. Vocalisation rate was increased in GnRHa treated rams in late puberty (28 weeks) compared to both Control and GnRHa + T rams but this effect was not seen in young adulthood (46 weeks). These results suggest that the specific suppression of testosterone during a developmental window in late puberty may reduce emotional reactivity and hamper learning a flexible adjustment to environmental change. The results also suggest that disruption of either endogenous testosterone signalling or a synergistic action between GnRH and testosterone signalling, may delay maturation of cognitive processes (e.g. information processing) that affects the motivation of rams to approach and avoid objects.

Subjective versus objective sleep in men with Klinefelter syndrome

OBJECTIVES

To investigate sleep among men with Klinefelter syndrome (KS).

METHOD

We compared the sleep domains latency, disturbance, and efficiency in 30 men with KS (M age = 36.7 years, SD = 10.6) to 21 age-matched non-KS controls (M age = 36.8 years, SD = 14.4). Actigraphs were used to objectively measure sleep across 7 days and nights. Participants also completed a sleep diary over the same period, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).

RESULTS

The mean correlation between the objective and subjective sleep measures was lower for the KS sample (M r = .15) than for controls (M r = .34). Sleep disturbance was significantly larger in the KS sample, as measured by actigraphy (p = .022, d = 0.71) and the PSQI (p = .037, d = 0.61). In regression models predicting sleep domains from KS status, age, educational level, vocational status, IQ, and mental health, KS status was not a significant predictor. Higher age was associated with more actigraphy-measured sleep disturbance. Higher educational level and being employed were associated with better sleep efficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep disturbance may be a particular problem for men with KS and should be measured with complimentary methods.

ERP indicators of disturbed attention in mild closed head injury: a frontal lobe syndrome?

The purpose of the study was to examine the hypothesis that distractibility is a fundamental characteristic of mild closed head injury (MHI). The claim that cognitive symptoms in MHI are due to a mild type of frontotemporal injury was also investigated. Cognitive event-related potentials (ERPs), accuracy and reaction time to target stimuli in a dichotic listening paradigm, and neuropsychological test results were studied in patients with MHI (N = 15), patients with verified frontal lobe damage (N = 10), and healthy controls (N = 13). Information processing reflecting target detection (N2, P3b) and sustained selective attention (processing negativity) was studied. The MHI and frontal patients did not differ on behavioral measures, except that the MHI group had significantly longer reaction times to target stimuli in the ERP task. Both patient groups had deviant ERPs compared with controls, but their ERP patterns differed in important respects. Contrary to expectations, the MHI patients had the most abnormal ERPs. They showed significantly smaller N2 and Nd amplitudes than frontal patients and controls, indicating that the mediating cognitive mechanisms were not equivalent in MHI and frontal injury. The data suggest that MHI patients allocated less processing resources to the task than either the control subjects or the patients with frontal lobe damage.