Association of packed red blood cell transfusion and necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of PRBC transfusion and the development of NEC in VLBW preterm infants at a tertiary care neonatal unit.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was performed. All VLBW infants (gestational age ≤32 week and birth weight <1500 g) born between 1999 and 2013 were included. Cases and controls were divided into four groups: (1) Infants who received PRBC transfusion and developed NEC within 48 hours of transfusion; (2) Infants who received PRBC transfusion and did not develop NEC; (3) Infant who developed NEC and did not receive PRBC transfusion; and (4) Infants who neither developed NEC nor received PRBC transfusion. Our primary outcome was the association of PRBC transfusion with the development of severe NEC.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty two VLBW infants were enrolled. The mean birth weight of enrolled infants was 1042 g and a mean gestational age of 28 weeks. The included four groups were not statistically different with regard to baseline important variables. Infants who had NEC and received PRBC transfusion (group 1) had higher incidence of sepsis and severe retinopathy of prematurity. Overall, Infants who received PRBC transfusion had a lower incidence of NEC (OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18,0.84, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

We observed a lower association of PRBC transfusion and severe NEC in VLBW infants. Prospective, randomized well powered studies are needed to confirm our findings.

The effect of second hand smoke in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background

Active tobacco smoking is a well-known risk factor for head and neck malignancy, and strong evidence has associated tobacco as the main carcinogenic factor in squamous cell cancers of this region. Evidence supporting a carcinogenic effect of second-hand smoke (SHS) on head and neck organs in non-smokers was also demonstrated with results consistent with those for active smokers. There is little data on the effects of SHS in patients previously treated for squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the role of SHS on recurrence and survival in treated head and neck cancer patients.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study to examine the association between self-reported SHS exposure and the risk of recurrence and mortality in patients treated for squamous cell cancers of the head and neck in a longitudinal fashion. Patients filled out an exhaustive smoking questionnaire on presentation and abbreviated questionnaires at each follow-up visit, which occurred every 6 months. Primary outcome measures were recurrence, development of a second primary malignancy, and recurrence-free survival. Chi square analysis was used to assess the association between SHS and the primary outcomes. A multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was applied to determine the independent predictors of recurrence. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan Meier modeling were employed to assess the possible relationships between SHS exposure and time to develop the primary outcomes.

Results

Untreated new patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of first primary SCC of the UADT (defined as cancer of the oral cavity, the oropharynx, the hypopharynx, and the larynx) were recruited. Patients seen at The University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) Head and Neck oncology clinic from 1988 to 1996 were considered as cases in this study. One hundred and thirty-five patients were enrolled in the study. The median follow-up time for the sample was 54 months (3.92 years). Complete records were achieved for 92% of patients, thus 124 patients were included in the final analysis. SHS significantly correlated with recurrence and recurrence-free survival. The rate of recurrence was 46% in the group exposed to SHS and 22% in the non-exposed group. Based on multivariate binary logistic regression analysis, SHS exposure was detected as a significant independent predictor for recurrence (HR = 3.00 [95% CI 1.18–7.63]). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients who were not exposed to SHS had a statistically significant longer recurrence-free survival (log-rank P = 0.029). The mean survival for non SHS-exposed patients was 76 [63–89] months versus 54 [45–63] months for those exposed to SHS.

Conclusions

SHS exposure is an independent predictor of recurrence and survival after head and neck cancer treatment. These results support the importance and efforts of reducing smoking at home in in the work-place.

Validation of the Arabic version of the score for allergic rhinitis tool

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common inflammation of the nasal mucosa in response to allergen exposure. We translated and validated the Score for Allergic Rhinitis (SFAR) into an Arabic version so that the disease can be studied in an Arabic population.

OBJECTIVES

SFAR is a non-invasive self-administered tool that evaluates eight items related to AR. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the SFAR questionnaire into Arabic, and assess the validity, consistency, and reliability of the translated version in an Arabic-speaking population of patients with suspected AR.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital in Riyadh.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

The Arabic version of the SFAR was administered to patients with suspected AR and control participants.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Comparison of the AR and control groups to determine the test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the instrument.

RESULTS

The AR (n=173) and control (n=75) groups had significantly different Arabic SFAR scores (P < .0001). The instrument provided satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha value of 0.7). The test-retest reliability was excellent for the total Arabic SFAR score (r =0.836, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate that the Arabic version of the SFAR is a valid tool that can be used to screen Arabic speakers with suspected AR.

LIMITATIONS

The absence of objective allergy testing.

What are parents' perceptions related to barriers in diagnosing swallowing dysfunction in children? A grounded theory approach

OBJECTIVES

Swallowing dysfunction (SwD) is under-reported in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers (OHITs). The identification of parental perceptions of factors that may hinder the diagnosis could help clinicians manage these children in a more expeditious manner. This study investigated the barriers to diagnosing SwD, as reported by the families.

DESIGN

Grounded theory study.

SETTING

This study was performed in a tertiary care paediatric centre in Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Parents of OHITs were recruited using purposeful sampling.

INTERVENTION

We used detailed, semistructured, in-person interviews and the audiotapes and transcriptions were thematically analysed. From the parental insights, we built a framework composed of three themes of barriers.

RESULT

Ten parents of OHITs with SwD were interviewed. The children presented with recurrent coughing, choking, cold-like symptoms, recurring/consistent illnesses and feeding difficulties. They were managed with multiple rounds of antibiotics and diagnosed with allergies, asthma or recurrent viral infections before considering SwD. The three emerging themes are false beliefs about SwD among parents and some physicians, parent-related barriers and physician-related barriers. These barriers had severely impacted the parents, impairing work productivity and leading to work-related reprimands and changes in the family dynamics.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that there are several barriers that face the parents of OHITs when seeking a diagnosis of SwD and initiating appropriate management. These barriers likely interact with one another and amplify their effects on the family and the child. A common denominator is a lack of education regarding SwD, its clinical manifestations and the available expertise to manage this condition.

Parent-Reported Outcome Questionnaire for Swallowing Dysfunction in Healthy Infants and Toddlers: Construction and Content Validation

OBJECTIVES

There is limited epidemiological information on swallowing dysfunction (SwD) in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers (OHITs). Cost, invasiveness, expertise, and resources constrain the repeatability and utility of instrumental diagnostic tests. A parent-reported outcomes (PRO) tool has the potential to mitigate these disadvantages. Hence, we set out to develop and validate a novel PRO tool to assess SwD in OHITs.

STUDY DESIGN

A mixed-method study.

SETTING

Tertiary pediatric center.

METHODS

We recruited parents of OHITs with SwD and excluded those with a confounding diagnosis (syndromes or neurological impairment). Interviews were conducted and thematically analyzed to extract the relevant domains and items. A similar analytical method was performed on the reports from a systematic review and literature search. Four verification sessions of parents and experts were conducted to maintain rigor. A panel of experts assessed and established the content validity of the items using a modified Delphi technique.

RESULTS

We achieved information saturation after interviewing 10 parents and generated 7 domains with 72 items. Over the course of 3 rounds of modified Delphi content validation, the domains were reduced to 3 (swallowing, breathing, and illness) containing 21 items; a content validity index of 82.1% was achieved.

CONCLUSION

We validated the content of a new PRO instrument to assess SwD in OHITs. The instrument is composed of 3 primary domains representing 21 items. This tool has the potential to screen for swallowing dysfunction and can assess management outcomes specifically for this population at a community level.

Systematic review of validated parent-reported questionnaires assessing swallowing dysfunction in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers

OBJECTIVES

There has been increasing interest in the management of oropharyngeal swallowing dysfunction (SwD). Its prevalence, particularly in otherwise healthy infants and toddlers (OHITs), is underappreciated. As the standard diagnostic tests are either invasive or scarce, valid parent-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires could play a pivotal role in the understanding and managing SwD in this group. This article reviewed the literature on PRO questionnaires pertaining to SwD in OHITs.

DATA SOURCE

A librarian searched Prospero, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, HaPI, CINAHL, and SCOPUS until February 2021 using the MeSH terms for deglutition and screening methods.

REVIEW METHOD

Questionnaires that examined disease-specific or eating and feeding concerns or difficulties were excluded. Two reviewers independently identified PRO questionnaires for SwD that were used in OHITs and extracted the author names, publication year, questionnaire name, the studied population, and the reported psychometric assessments. A quality assessment was performed based on consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) and updated criteria for good measurement properties.

RESULTS

Of the 3488 screened articles, we identified only two questionnaires, the pediatric version of the Eating Assessment Tool (PEDI-EAT-10) and the PRO questionnaire for Swallowing Dysfunction in OHITs. The PEDI-EAT-10 authors assessed the validity and reliability on children with cerebral palsy. However, concerns were identified regarding the developmental process and the internal structure validity. The PRO questionnaire for SwD in OHITs meets criteria but has not yet been validated in the population of interest nor its psychometric properties assessed.

CONCLUSION

Two instruments were identified. The PED-EAT-10 exhibits methodological flaws, while Edmonton PRO questionnaire for SwD in OHITs awaits construct validation and could fill the current knowledge gap.

Systematic Review of Granulomatous Invasive Fungal Sinusitis Management

Objectives

Granulomatous invasive fungal sinusitis (GIFS) affects immunocompetent individuals. There is ongoing debate over whether surgery, antifungal medication, or a combined approach is the best treatment. This article summarizes reports about GIFS and its management.

Methods

Eight search engines, gray literature, and review articles were searched. Two independent reviewer groups screened the eligibility of articles. An independent reviewer solved disagreements. Exclusion criteria included non-English language reports, papers with unavailable full-texts, reviews, publications before 1980, and studies lacking information about GIFS management.

Results

Of the 279 identified articles, 41 studies were included (n = 89 patients). Sinonasal GIFS with skull-base/intracranial extension was associated with an increase in mortality (p = 0.002, OR = 14.083; 95% CI = 1.753-113.157). Treatment was associated with an 87.2% remission rate (p < 0.001, OR = 7.818; 95% CI = 4.502-13.576); a combined medical and surgical approach had a 74.2% recovery rate. Of surgical interventions, the highest recovery rates were associated with endoscopic debulking (52.5%), extensive surgical debulking (32.5%), and open sinonasal approach (15%, p = 0.132). The utilization of voriconazole was associated with higher recovery rates, but this was not significant (76.9 vs. 56%, p = 0.548).

Conclusion

Sinonasal GIFS with skull-base/intracranial extension is associated with higher mortality rates. The superiority of the endoscopic debulking and voriconazole protocol in managing these cases warrants further investigation.

Level of Evidence

Level 4.