Efficacy of combined hypo-fractionated radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 monotherapy in difficult-to-treat advanced melanoma patients

Information on the role of radiotherapy in anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody-treated melanoma patients is limited. We report on a prospective cohort of advanced melanoma patients treated simultaneously with radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 therapy between 01/01/15 and 30/06/16. Tumor evaluations (RECIST 1.1) were performed every 3 months on radiated and non-radiated lesions. Twenty-five advanced melanoma patients (64% AJCC stage IV M1c, 64% on second-line treatment or more, 60% with elevated LDH serum levels) were included. Radiotherapy was performed early (median: 24 days) after the first anti-PD-1 dose in 15 patients with rapidly progressing symptomatic lesion(s) or later (median: 5.4 months) in 10 patients with progressive disease (PD) despite PD-1 blockade. Radiotherapy was limited to one organ in 24 patients and consisted mainly of hypo-fractioned radiotherapy (median dose 26 Gy in 3–5 fractions, 17 patients) or brain radiosurgery (5 patients). Median follow-up after first anti-PD-1 dose was 16.9 m (range 2.7-27.4), with 44% of patients alive at last follow-up. For radiated lesions, rates of complete (CR), partial (PR) responses, stable disease (SD) or PD were 24%, 12%, 24%, and 32%, respectively. For non-radiated lesions, rates of CR, PR, SD, and PD were 20%, 19%, 12%, and 40%, respectively. Responses achieved after radiotherapy for radiated and non-radiated areas were correlated (Pearson correlation r: 0.89, P<0.0001) suggesting an abscopal effect. Five patients with CR remained disease-free after discontinuation of anti-PD-1 for a median of 9.5 months. No unusual adverse event was recorded. Hypo-fractionated radiotherapy may enhance efficacy of anti-PD1 therapy in difficult-to-treat patients. Controlled studies are needed.

Efficacy of combined hypofractionated radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 monotherapy in patients with melanoma

e21008

Background: Information on the role and type of radiotherapy in melanoma pts treated with anti-PD1 is limited. We report a cohort of advanced melanoma pts having received simultaneous hypofractionated radiotherapy and anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Methods: Database search in the prospective database of a referral center with standardized radiotherapy procedures for all pts having received both treatments between 1/1/15-30/6/16. Radiologists performed independent tumor evaluations (RECIST 1.1) every 3 m, both on radiated and non-radiated lesions. Results: 25 pts with inoperable AJCC stage 3-4 melanoma, mean age 60.5 Y. Anti-PD-1 monotherapy was first systemic treatment in only 40% of pts. Median follow-up after onset of anti-PD-1 therapy (83% nivolumab, 17% pembrolizumab) was 13.3 m, with 48% of pts still alive at last follow-up. Radiotherapy was performed either early (within first 3 m of PD-1 blockade) in pts with rapidly progressing symptomatic lesion(s) (60% of pts) or late ( > 3 m) in pts with slow progression or dissociated response (40% of pts). It consisted of 1 weekly radiation during 4-5 w (84% of pts), or 1 gammaknife radiation for cerebral mets (16% of pts). Median delay between onset of PD-1 blockade and radiotherapy was 1.8 m (range 0.5-11 m). For radiated lesions, rates of complete (CR), partial (PR) responses, stabilization (S) or progression (P) were 24%, 8%, 44%, and 28%, respectively. For non-radiated lesions (84% of pts), rates of CR, PR, S, and P were 29%, 19%, 19%, and 33%, respectively. Among pts radiated late for insufficient response to anti-PD-1 monotherapy, CR or PR in non-radiated lesions (i.e. abscopal response) was observed in 56% of pts. Anti-PD-1 therapy could be discontinued in 4 pts with CR, without relapse to date. No unusual adverse event was recorded. Conclusions: Hypofractionated radiotherapy may enhance anti-PD1 monotherapy efficacy in difficult-to-treat pts. Controlled studies are needed.

Liver test abnormalities in patients admitted for severe psoriasis: prevalence and associated risk factors

BACKGROUND

Few epidemiologic data are available regarding biologic liver abnormalities during psoriasis flares.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of biological liver test abnormalities (LTA) in a psoriasis population and the risk factors associated with LTA.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study in four hospital dermatology tertiary care centres included patients admitted for severe psoriasis flare between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2011. During the same period, a control population was selected comprising patients admitted for contact and/or atopic eczema. Data were collected on hospital records and biology software. LTA was defined as serum AST and/or ALT and/or ALP concentration above the upper normal limit (UNL) and/or GGT concentration above 2 UNL. Prevalence of LTA with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was compared between the psoriatic and control populations. Factors associated with LTA at P < 0.05 were considered for the final multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty psoriasis patients and 96 eczema control patients were included. One hundred and fifty-five(64.6%) of the psoriasis patients were male, aged 55 years on average (±17.6); 192 (80.0%) had plaque-type psoriasis (PV) and 52 (21.6%) had localized (n = 32) or generalized (n = 20) pustular psoriasis (PP). Prevalence of LTA was 36% (95% CI, 30-42) in the psoriatic population, significantly higher than in controls (17%, 95% CI 9.5-25). Risk factors independently associated with LTA comprised PV (OR 3.79; 95% CI 1.48-9.65), PP (OR 3.80; 95% CI 1.40-10.25) and previously diagnosed liver disease (underlying hepatic steatosis, viral hepatitis or excessive alcohol consumption) (OR 3.88; 95% CI 2.02-7.45). No association was found with systemic antipsoriatic drug therapies.

CONCLUSION

In severe psoriasis, liver impacting comorbidities and/or specific psoriatic inflammation, the latter mostly in PP cases, more than drug-related liver toxicity, appears to predominantly account for LTA. Clinicians should be aware of this, to avoid unjustified withdrawal of useful systemic drugs.

[Post-radiotherapy care and monitoring of head and neck cancers]

Radiotherapy performed to treat head and neck cancer results in considerable side effects and the patient must be provided with all the necessary information and regular monitoring. From the announcement of the diagnosis, during and after the radiotherapy, the nurse coordinator identifies and assesses the needs, expectations and concerns of the patients. Their role helps to simplify and personalise the care pathway, providing a liaison between the different professionals and offering support for the patient.