At what point are we on the way to optimally treat multiple myeloma patients over 75 years of age in 2023?

Several novel drugs for multiple myeloma, including monoclonal and bispecific antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, and newer-generation proteasome inhibitors, have been introduced over the last decade. Based on the results of randomized clinical trials, the drugs have been incorporated into current treatment recommendations, with the most substantial changes observed in patients under the age of 75. However, new therapeutic options have been indirectly proposed for patients over 75, despite the lack of conclusive data from randomized prospective trials. This paper outlines the development of myeloma therapy and summarizes the current treatment recommendations for patients over 75 by systematically reviewing the most crucial studies involving this group of individuals, with a focus on evaluating treatment safety and efficacy. Melphalan-prednisone (MP), bortezomib plus MP (VMP), lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd), and bortezomib plus Rd (VRd) regimens have evolved over the past few years as therapies of choice for the first-line treatment of these patients. A breakthrough came with daratumumab, which increased response rates, extended median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the absence of significantly increased toxicity when added to the above regimens.

Polyclonal immunoglobulin recovery in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma receiving maintenance therapy after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with either carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone or lenalidomide alone: Subanalysis of the randomized phase 3 ATLAS trial

Previous studies suggest that postautologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) recovery of polyclonal immunoglobulin from immunoparesis in patients with multiple myeloma is a positive prognostic marker. We performed a longitudinal analysis of polyclonal immunoglobulin concentrations and unique B-cell sequences in patients enrolled in the phase 3 ATLAS trial that randomized 180 subjects to either carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (KRd) or lenalidomide (R) maintenance. In the KRd arm, standard-risk patients with minimal residual disease negativity after six cycles de-escalated to R alone after cycle 8. One year from the initiation of maintenance at least partial recovery of polyclonal immunoglobulin was observed in more patients on the R arm (58/66, p < 0.001) and in those who de-escalated from KRd to R (27/38, p < 0.001) compared to the KRd arm (9/36). In patients who switched from KRd to R, the concentrations of uninvolved immunoglobulin and the number of B-cell unique sequences increased over time, approaching values observed in the R arm. There were no differences in progression-free survival between the patients with at least partial immunoglobulin recovery and the remaining population. Our analysis indicates that patients receiving continuous therapy after ASCT experience prolonged immunoparesis, limiting prognostic significance of polyclonal immunoglobulin recovery in this setting.

The Real-World Evidence on the Fragility and Its Impact on the Choice of Treatment Regimen in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Multiple Myeloma over 75 Years of Age

Fragility scales are intended to help in therapeutic decisions. Here, we asked if the fragility assessment in MM patients ≥ 75 years old qualified for treatment by the local physician correlates with the choice of treatment: a two- or three-drug regimens. Between 7/2018 and 12/2019, we prospectively enrolled 197 MM patients at the start of treatment from the 13 Polish Myeloma Group centers. The data to assess fragility were prospectively collected, but centrally assessed fragility was not disclosed to the local center. The activity of daily living (ADL) could be assessed in 192 (97.5%) and was independent in 158 (80.2%), moderately impaired in 23 (11.7%), and 11 (5.6%) in completely dependent. Patients with more than three comorbidities made up 26.9% (53 patients). Thus, according to the Palumbo calculator, 43 patients were in the intermediate fitness group (21.8%), and the rest belonged to the frailty group (153, 77.7%). Overall, 79.7% of patients (157) received three-drug regimens and 20.3% (40) received two-drug regimens. In each ECOG group, more than three out of four patients received three-drug regimens. According to the ADL scale, 82.3% of the independent 65.2% of moderately impaired, and 81.8% of the dependent received three-drug regimens. Out of 53 patients with at least four comorbidities, 71.7% received three-drug regimens, and the rest received two-drug regimens. Thirty-four patients from the intermediate fit group (79.0%), and 123 (79.9%) from the frail group received three-drug regimens. Early mortality occurred in 25 patients (12.7%). No one discontinued treatment due to toxicity. To conclude, MM patients over 75 are mainly treated with triple-drug regimens, not only in reduced doses, regardless of their frailty scores. However, the absence of prospective fragility assessment did not negatively affect early mortality and the number of treatment discontinuations, which brings into question the clinical utility of current fragility scales in everyday practice.

Isolated Progression of Multiple Myeloma into the Extramedullary Plasmacytoma of Dura Mater: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease caused by the uncontrolled proliferation of clonal plasma cells in bone marrow. Extramedullary plasma cell infiltrations may occur at the time of diagnosis but usually arise during systemic disease progression. Central nervous system (CNS) plasmacytomas are extremely rare (less than 1% of patients with MM) and usually occur as a result of systemic disease progression. The frequency of extramedullary progression to CNS without simultaneous systemic progression is not known. Here, we present a challenging case in which local disease progression to CNS occurred without any signs of systemic progression. The extramedullary plasmacytoma originated from the dura mater of the brain mimicking a brain tumor. We review and discuss further treatment options that are available in such rare clinical scenarios in relation to the treatment already undertaken.

Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone or lenalidomide alone as maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma (ATLAS): interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Lenalidomide is a cornerstone of maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after autologous stem-cell transplantation. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide alone in this patient population.

METHODS

This study is an interim analysis of ATLAS, which is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial in 12 academic and clinical centres in the USA and Poland. Participants were aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, completed any type of induction and had stable disease or better, autologous stem-cell transplantation within 100 days, initiated induction 12 months before enrolment, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks of sizes 4 and 6 and a web-based system to receive up to 36 cycles of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (28-day cycles of carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 administered intravenously in cycle one on days 1 and 2 then 36 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 in cycles one to four and 36 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 15, and 16 from cycle five up to 36 [per protocol]; lenalidomide 25 mg administered orally on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 20 mg administered orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) or lenalidomide alone (10 mg administered orally for the first three cycles and then at the best tolerated dose [≤15 mg for 28 days in 28-day cycles]) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as maintenance therapy. After 36 cycles, patients in both treatment groups received lenalidomide maintenance. Randomisation was stratified by response to previous treatment, cytogenetic risk factors, and country. Investigators and patients were not masked to treatment allocation. Patients in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group with no detectable minimal residual disease after cycle six (as per International Myeloma Working Group criteria) and standard-risk cytogenetics were switched to lenalidomide maintenance as of cycle nine. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (defined as all randomly assigned patients). Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This unplanned interim analysis was triggered by the occurrence of 59 (61%) of the expected 96 events for the primary analysis and the results are considered preliminary. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02659293 (active, not recruiting) and EudraCT, 2015-002380-42.

FINDINGS

Between June 10, 2016, and Oct 21, 2020, 180 patients were randomly assigned to receive either carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (n=93) or lenalidomide alone (n=87; intention-to-treat population). The median age of patients was 59·0 years (IQR 49·0-63·0); 84 (47%) patients were female and 96 (53%) were male. With a median follow-up of 33·8 months (IQR 20·9-42·9), median progression-free survival was 59·1 months (95% CI 54·8-not estimable) in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group versus 41·4 months (33·2-65·4) in the lenalidomide group (hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·31-0·86]; p=0·012). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia (44 [48%] in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group vs 52 [60%] in the lenalidomide group), thrombocytopenia (12 [13%] vs six [7%]), and lower respiratory tract infections (seven [8%] vs one [1%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 28 (30%) patients in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group and 19 (22%) in the lenalidomide group. One treatment-related adverse event led to death (respiratory failure due to severe pneumonia) in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group.

INTERPRETATION

This interim analysis provides support for considering carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who completed any induction regimen followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation, which requires confirmation after longer follow-up of this ongoing phase 3 trial.

FUNDING

Amgen and Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb).

A pleiotropic variant in DNAJB4 is associated with multiple myeloma risk

Pleiotropy, which consists of a single gene or allelic variant affecting multiple unrelated traits, is common across cancers, with evidence for genome-wide significant loci shared across cancer and noncancer traits. This feature is particularly relevant in multiple myeloma (MM) because several susceptibility loci that have been identified to date are pleiotropic. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify novel pleiotropic variants involved in MM risk using 28 684 independent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from GWAS Catalog that reached a significant association (P < 5 × 10^-8 ) with their respective trait. The selected SNPs were analyzed in 2434 MM cases and 3446 controls from the International Lymphoma Epidemiology Consortium (InterLymph). The 10 SNPs showing the strongest associations with MM risk in InterLymph were selected for replication in an independent set of 1955 MM cases and 1549 controls from the International Multiple Myeloma rESEarch (IMMEnSE) consortium and 418 MM cases and 147 282 controls from the FinnGen project. The combined analysis of the three studies identified an association between DNAJB4-rs34517439-A and an increased risk of developing MM (OR = 1.22, 95%CI 1.13-1.32, P = 4.81 × 10^-7 ). rs34517439-A is associated with a modified expression of the FUBP1 gene, which encodes a multifunctional DNA and RNA-binding protein that it was observed to influence the regulation of various genes involved in cell cycle regulation, among which various oncogenes and oncosuppressors. In conclusion, with a pleiotropic scan approach we identified DNAJB4-rs34517439 as a potentially novel MM risk locus.

Early efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab with chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with follicular lymphoma: A real-world retrospective report of the Polish Lymphoma Research Group

BACKGROUND

The first-line obinutuzumab-based immunochemotherapy improves the outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) compared with rituximab-based regimens. However, infusion-related reactions occur in almost half of patients during the 1st obinutuzumab administration.

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to evaluate the early effectiveness and safety of obinutuzumab-based induction regimens in a real-world setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Outcomes of patients diagnosed with FL and treated with obinutuzumab between January 2020 and September 2021 were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study group included 143 treatment-naïve patients with FL. The median age was 52 years (range: 28-89 years); 45.1% of patients had a high-risk disease as assessed using the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI). Induction chemotherapy included: O-CVP (obinutuzumab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisolone) in 49.0% of patients, O-CHOP (O-CVP plus doxorubicin) in 28.7% and O-BENDA (obinutuzumab, bendamustine) in 22.4%. Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates were 69.9% and 26.5%, respectively. There was no difference in response rates between different regimens (p = 0.309). Maintenance was started in 115 patients (85.2%). In the 1st cycle, obinutuzumab was administered as a single 1000-milligram infusion in 47.9% of patients, whereas in 52.1%, initial infusions were split over 2 days (100 mg/900 mg). Infusion-related reactions were reported only during the 1st administration of obinutuzumab in 9.1% of patients, with a similar incidence in those receiving the total dose on a single day or split over 2 days (p = 0.458). The most common adverse events were hematological. Five patients died from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

CONCLUSION

The early responses to induction regimens and adverse events profile were similar for every type of induction treatment. The infusion-related reactions were rare and limited to the 1st dose of obinutuzumab.

ATLAS: A phase 3 randomized trial of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide alone after stem-cell transplant for multiple myeloma

8001

Background: Treatment following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) remains an area of active investigation. We have shown that extended post-ASCT treatment with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) after KRd induction improved the depth and duration of response (Jasielec et al, Blood 2020), suggesting a benefit of post-ASCT KRd therapy. Here we directly compare that strategy to standard lenalidomide (R) maintenance. Methods: This international open-label phase 3 randomized trial recruited newly-diagnosed MM patients (pts) who received any induction therapy for up to 12 months (mo) followed by single ASCT and achievement of at least stable disease within 100 days afterward. Pts were randomized to receive either KRd or R, stratified by post-transplant response (≥VGPR vs < VGPR) and cytogenetic risk [standard risk (SR) vs high [HR: presence of t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17p)]. Pts randomized to KRd received carfilzomib 36 mg/m2 on days (D) 1,2,8,9,15,16 for 4 cycles (C) then D1,2,15,16 starting C5; R 25 mg D1-21, and dexamethasone 20 mg D1,8,15,22 in 28-day cycles. KRd pts with SR who reached IMWG-defined MRD-negativity after C6 de-escalated therapy to R alone after C8 (KRd- > R); the rest continued KRd through C36 followed by R alone until progression. Pts randomized to R received lenalidomide 10 mg C1-3 and then 15 mg daily. The primary objective was to compare progression free survival (PFS) rate between the two arms. Based on historical PFS rates, a sample size of 180 Pts was calculated to provide 85% power with 2-sided alpha 0.05. Results: 180 pts were enrolled (R n = 87; KRd n = 93) through 10/21/20; data cutoff was 12/31/21. Pt characteristics in the KRd and R arms were balanced for median age (58 vs 59 yrs), >VGPR (88% vs 92%), and HR (23% vs 21%). After 6 cycles, 47% pts in the KRd arm and 29% in the R arm achieved MRD-negativity (p = 0.017). 34 KRd pts eligible for de-escalation converted to R alone after C8 and were analyzed on the KRd arm per intention-to-treat. At median follow-up of 33.8 mo, 23 pts (25%) on the KRd arm and 38 pts (44%) on the R arm progressed; estimated median PFS was 59.0 mo for KRd vs 41.4 mo for R (Hazard Ratio 0.56, logrank p = 0.026). At cutoff, 90% of KRd and 87% of R pts were alive; no deaths were treatment-related. All-grade toxicities were generally comparable between arms. The most common grade 3+ AEs and those of special interest were neutropenia (KRd 47%; R 59%), thrombocytopenia (KRd 13%; R 7%), infections (KRd 15%; R 6%), cardiovascular toxicities (KRd 4%, R 5%), and secondary malignancies (KRd 2, R 2). Conclusions: This is the first randomized phase 3 trial demonstrating superior PFS with extended post-transplant KRd therapy compared to R maintenance. Therefore, MRD/risk-adapted post-ASCT extended KRd treatment may represent a new standard of care. Clinical trial information: NCT02659293.

Risk factors and causes of early mortality in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in a "real-world" study: experiences of the Polish Myeloma Group

INTRODUCTION Despite the progress made in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), approximately 10% to 15% of patients die within the first year of diagnosis. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to determine risk factors of early mortality in patients with newly diagnosed MM treated with new drugs in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter analysis included 197 patients with symptomatic MM, diagnosed between October 2006 and November 2019, with a survival of less than 12 months. RESULTS The median overall survival was 2.5 months. The most common causes of early mortality were infections (35%), MM progression (23.8%), and cardiovascular disease (14.2%). In a multivariable analysis, the Zubrod performance score (P = 0.02), history of cardiovascular disease (P = 0.04), dependence on renal dialysis (P = 0.03), and MM response (P <0.001) were associated with early mortality. CONCLUSIONS Early mortality in MM patients requires further studies. When qualifying patients with newly diagnosed MM for chemotherapy, it is necessary to consider performance status and the history of comorbidities, including cardiovascular diseases.

First-line R-CVP versus R-CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4

R‐CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) and R‐CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone + rituximab) are immunochemotherapy regimens frequently used for remission induction of indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs). Rituximab maintenance (RM) significantly improves progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with complete/partial remission (CR/PR). Here we report the final results of a randomized study comparing R‐CVP to R‐CHOP both followed by RM. Untreated patients in need of systemic therapy with symptomatic and progressive iNHLs including follicular (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), small lymphocytic (SLL), and lymphoplasmacytic (LPL) lymphoma were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive R‐CVP or R‐CHOP for eight cycles or until complete response (CR). All patients with CR/PR (partial response) received RM 375 mg/m² q 2 months for 12 cycles. Primary endpoint was event‐free survival (EFS). Two‐hundred and fifty patients [FL 42%, MZL/MALT 38%, LPL/ Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia (WM) 11%, SLL 9%] were enrolled and randomized (R‐CHOP: 127, R‐CVP: 123). Median age was 56 years (21–85), 44% were male, 90% were in stage III–IV, 43% of FL patients had a Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score ≥3, and 33·4% of all patients had an IPI score ≥3. At the end of induction treatment, the CR/PR rate was 43·6/50·9% and 36·3/60·8% in the R‐CHOP and R‐CVP groups (P = 0·218) respectively. After a median follow‐up of 67, 66, and 70 months, five‐year EFS was 61% vs. 56% (not significant), progression‐free survival (PFS) was 71% vs. 69% (not significant) and overall survival (OS) was 84% vs. 89% in the R‐CHOP vs. the R‐CVP arm respectively. Grade III/IV adverse events (65 vs. 22) occurred in 40 (33·1%) and 18 (15·3%) patients, P = 0·001; neutropenia in 16 (11·6%) and 4 (3·4%) patients, P = 0·017; infection in 14 (10·7%) and 3 (2·5%) patients,; P = 0·011; and a second neoplasm in three versus seven patients., in the R‐CHOP and the R‐CVP groups respectively. This multicentre randomized study with >five‐year follow‐up shows similar outcome in patients with indolent lymphoma in need of systemic therapy treated with R‐CVP or R‐CHOP immunochemotherapy and rituximab maintenance in both arms. The minor toxicity of the R‐CVP regimen makes it a reasonable choice for induction treatment, leaving other active agents like doxorubicin or bendamustin for second‐line therapy.