Small Non-Coding RNAs and Their Role in Locoregional Metastasis and Outcomes in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients

Deregulation of small non-coding RNAs (sncRNAs) has been associated with the onset of metastasis. We evaluated the expression of sncRNAs in patients with early-stage breast cancer, performing RNA sequencing in 60 patients for whom tumor and sentinel lymph node (SLN) samples were available, and conducting differential expression, gene ontology, enrichment and survival analyses. Sequencing annotation classified most of the sncRNAs into small nucleolar RNA (snoRNAs, 70%) and small nuclear RNA (snRNA, 13%). Our results showed no significant differences in sncRNA expression between tumor or SLNs obtained from the same patient. Differential expression analysis showed down-regulation (n = 21) sncRNAs and up-regulation (n = 2) sncRNAs in patients with locoregional metastasis. The expression of SNHG5, SNORD90, SCARNA2 and SNORD78 differentiated luminal A from luminal B tumors, whereas SNORD124 up-regulation was associated with luminal B HER2+ tumors. Discriminating analysis and receiver-operating curve analysis revealed a signature of six snoRNAs (SNORD93, SNORA16A, SNORD113-6, SNORA7A, SNORA57 and SNORA18A) that distinguished patients with locoregional metastasis and predicted patient outcome. Gene ontology and Reactome pathway analysis showed an enrichment of biological processes associated with translation initiation, protein targeting to specific cell locations, and positive regulation of Wnt and NOTCH signaling pathways, commonly involved in the promotion of metastases. Our results point to the potential of several sncRNAs as surrogate markers of lymph node metastases and patient outcome in early-stage breast cancer patients. Further preclinical and clinical studies are required to understand the biological significance of the most significant sncRNAs and to validate our results in a larger cohort of patients.

Clinical Relevance of Tumour-Infiltrating Immune Cells in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy

Currently, therapy response cannot be accurately predicted in HER2-negative breast cancer (BC). Measuring stromal tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) and mediators of the tumour microenvironment and characterizing tumour-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) may improve treatment response in the neoadjuvant setting. Tumour tissue and peripheral blood samples were retrospectively collected from 118 patients, and sTILs were evaluated. Circulating exosomes and myeloid-derived suppressor cells were determined by flow cytometry. TIICs markers (CD4, CD8, CD20, CD1a, and CD68) were assessed immunohistochemically. High sTILs were significantly associated with pathological complete response (pCR; p = 0.048) and event-free survival (EFS; p = 0.027). High-CD68 cells were significantly associated with pCR in triple-negative (TN, p = 0.027) and high-CD1a cells with EFS in luminal-B (p = 0.012) BC. Cluster analyses of TIICs revealed two groups of tumours (C1 and C2) that had different immune patterns and clinical outcomes. An immunoscore based on clinicopathological variables was developed to identify high risk (C1) or low-risk (C2) patients. Additionally, cluster analyses revealed two groups of tumours for both luminal-B and TNBC. Our findings support the association of sTILs with pCR and show an immunological component in a subset of patients with HER2-negative BC. Our immunoscore may be useful for future escalation or de-escalation treatments.

Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine (SPARC) Polymorphisms in Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) expression has been proposed as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for some cancer types, but knowledge about the predictive value of SPARC polymorphisms in the context of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer (BC) is lacking. In 132 HER2-negative BC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we determined polymorphisms in the SPARC gene and analyzed their association with outcome. We also determined SPARC protein expression in tumor tissue. SPARC rs19789707 was significantly associated with response to treatment according to the Miller and Payne system in the breast (multivariate: odds ratio (OR), 3.81; p = 0.028). This association was significant in the subgroup of patients with luminal tumors (univariate: p = 0.047). Regarding survival, two SPARC variants showed significant associations with event-free survival: the rs19789707 variant in the subgroup of luminal A tumors (univariate: p = 0.006), and the rs4958487 variant in the subgroup of luminal B tumors (univariate: p = 0.022). In addition, SPARC rs4958487, rs10065756, and rs12153644 were significantly correlated with SPARC protein expression. Our findings suggest that SPARC polymorphisms could be good predictors of treatment response and survival in BC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially those with luminal tumors.

Prehabilitation in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy to Minimize Musculoskeletal Postoperative Complications and Enhance Recovery (PREOPtimize): A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the effects of a prehabilitation program (PREOPtimize), consisting of Nordic Walking and resistance training exercises plus health education among patients with breast cancer, who are receiving neoadjuvant therapy to enhance postoperative functionality of the affected arm. A secondary aim will be to compare the short-term effects of the intervention on other patient-reported outcome measures.

METHODS

This will be an assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial with a parallel group design conducted at a tertiary hospital. A sample of 64 patients with breast cancer scheduled for surgery and undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be recruited for the trial and randomly allocated to either (1) a prehabilitation program consisting of 2 weekly sessions of 75 minutes of Nordic Walking, muscle strengthening exercises, and health education sessions conducted between the fourth month of treatment and surgery or (2) usual care. Patients in both groups will be assessed at baseline, before surgery, and at 1 and 3 months after surgery. Assessed outcomes include functionality of the affected arm (QuickDash), arm volume, range of motion, handgrip strength, pain, fatigue, functional capacity, physical activity levels, and health-related quality of life. Adherence to the intervention in the prehabilitation group and adverse events will also be recorded.

IMPACT

Prehabilitation for patients affected by breast cancer is rarely implemented in clinical practice. The results obtained with the PREOPtimize trial could show that prehabilitation is a feasible intervention for patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy that might enhance postoperative recovery of upper arm function as well as improve overall physical performance and health-related quality of life.

Circulating miRNA Expression Is Inversely Correlated with Tumor Tissue or Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer Patients

The deregulation of microRNAs (miRNAs) is associated with the various steps of the metastatic process. In addition, circulating miRNAs are remarkably stable in peripheral blood, making them ideal noninvasive biomarkers for disease diagnosis. Here, we performed a proof-of-principle study to determine whether tumor-tissue-derived miRNAs are traceable to plasma in ER-positive early breast cancer patients. We performed RNA-sequencing on 30 patients for whom plasma, sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and tumor tissue were available. We carried out differential expression, gene ontology and enrichment analyses. Our results show that circulating miRNAs are inversely expressed compared with tumor tissue or SLNs obtained from the same patients. Our differential expression analysis shows the overall downregulation of circulating miRNAs. However, the expression of miR-643a-3p and miR-223 was up-regulated in patients with positive SLNs. Furthermore, gene ontology analysis showed the significant enrichment of biological processes associated with the regulation of epithelial cell proliferation and transcriptional regulation commonly involved in the promotion of metastases. Our results suggest the potential role of several circulating miRNAs as surrogate markers of lymph node metastases in early breast cancer patients. Further preclinical and clinical studies are required to understand the biological significance of the most significant miRNAs and to validate our results in a larger cohort of patients.

The value of sentinel lymph-node biopsy in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To conduct a systematic review to analyse the performance of the sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB) in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy, compared to axillary lymph-node dissection.

METHODS

The more relevant databases were searched. Main outcomes were false-negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph-node identification rate (SLNIR), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. We conducted meta-analyses when appropriate.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included. The pooled FNR was 0.14 (95% CI 0.11-0.17), the pooled SLNIR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.86-0.92), NPV was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87), and summary accuracy was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.94). SLNB performed better when more than one node was removed and double mapping was used.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB can be performed in women with a node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy. It has a better performance when used with previous marking of the affected node and with double tracer.

Effector Mechanisms of CD8+ HLA-DR+ T Cells in Breast Cancer Patients Who Respond to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Simple Summary

This study contributes to the characterization of CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cell mediated-mechanisms involved in the anti-tumor response in breast cancer patients who respond to neoadyuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Cultures with plasma from responder (R), but not from non-responder (NR), patients increased the intracellular production of cytotoxic molecules and pro-inflammatory cytokines in CD8+HLA-DR+ T cells. However, the addition of neutralizing anti-IFN-γ or anti-IL-12 antibodies to cultures with plasma from R patients decreased this effector function on CD8+HLA-DR+ T cells. These results suggest the presence of soluble factors in the plasma of R patients inducing the effector function of CD8+HLA-DR+ T cells.

Abstract

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTLs) activation is an independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer (BC) patients. Here, we go deeper into the function of CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells from NACT treated HER2 negative BC patients. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cell percentage was increased in NACT responder (R) compared to non-responder (NR) patients. R patients with ER-/PR- hormone receptors had the highest CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cell frequencies, while no differences were found when patients were classified according to cancer stage or menopause status. Interestingly, the cytotoxicity and production of anti-tumor cytokines were enhanced when CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells from healthy donors were cultured with plasma from R, but not from NR patients. The induced anti-tumor profile of CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells was associated with plasmatic IL-12 and IFN-γ levels, increased cytokines in R patients. IL-12 or IFN-γ neutralization decreased cytotoxic activity and TNF-α production by cultured CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells in R plasma presence. All these data suggest that an effective response to NACT in BC patients is associated with increased IL-12 or IFN-γ levels involved in the induction of cytotoxic and pro-inflammatory mechanisms in CD8+ HLA-DR+ T cells.

Associations With Definitive Outcomes and Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs at the Time of Marketing Approval and in the Postmarketing Period

BACKGROUND

Most anticancer drugs are approved by regulatory agencies based on surrogate measures. This article explores the variables associated with overall survival (OS), quality of life (QoL), and substantial clinical benefit among anticancer drugs at the time of approval and in the postmarketing period.

METHODS

Anticancer drugs approved by the FDA between January 2006 and December 2015 and with postmarketing follow-up until April 2019 were identified. We evaluated trial-level data supporting approval and any updated OS and/or QoL data. We applied the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) and the ASCO Value Framework (ASCO-VF) to initial and follow-up studies.

RESULTS

We found that 58 drugs were approved for 96 indications based on 96 trials. At registration, approval was based on improved OS in 39 trials (41%) and improved QoL in 16 of 45 indications (36%). Postmarketing data showed an improvement in OS for 28 of 59 trials (47%) and in QoL for 22 of 48 indications (46%). At the time of approval, 25 of 94 (27%) and 26 of 80 scorable trials (33%) met substantial benefit thresholds using the ESMO-MCBS and ASCO-VF, respectively. In the postmarketing period, 37 of 69 (54%) and 35 of 65 (54%) trials met the substantial benefit thresholds. Drugs with companion diagnostics and immune checkpoint inhibitors were associated significantly with substantial clinical benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the time of approval, more anticancer drugs showed improved OS and QoL and met the ESMO-MCBS or ASCO-VF thresholds for substantial benefit over the course of postmarketing time. However, only approximately half of the trials met the threshold for substantial benefit. Companion diagnostic drugs and immunotherapy seemed to be associated with greater clinical benefit.

Circulating microRNAs in Early Breast Cancer Patients and Its Association With Lymph Node Metastases

MicroRNAs have emerged as important regulators of the metastatic process. In addition, circulating miRNAs appear to be surprisingly stable in peripheral blood making them ideal noninvasive biomarkers for disease diagnosis. Here, we performed a proof-of-principle study to investigate the expression profile of circulating miRNAs and their association with the metastatic lymph node status in early breast cancer patients. Sentinel lymph node status was detected by one-step nucleic acid (OSNA) analysis. We performed RNA-sequencing in 16 plasma samples and validated the results by qPCR. Gene Ontology term enrichment and KEGG pathway analyses were carried out using DAVID tools. We found16 differentially expressed miRNAs (q < 0.01) in patients with positive SLNs. Fourteen miRNAs were down-regulated (miR-339-5p, miR-133a-3p, miR-326, miR-331-3p, miR-369-3p, miR-328-3p, miR-26a-3p, miR-139-3p, miR-493-3p, miR-664a-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-323b-3p, miR-1307-3p and miR-423-3p) and 2 were up-regulated (miR-101-3pand miR-144-3p). Hierarchical clustering using differentially expressed miRNAs clearly distinguished patients according to their lymph node status. Gene ontology analysis showed a significant enrichment of biological processes associated with the regulation of the epithelial mesenchymal transition, cell proliferation and transcriptional regulation. Our results suggest the potential role of several circulating miRNAs as surrogate markers of lymph node metastases in early breast cancer patients. Further validation in a larger cohort of patients will be necessary to confirm our results.

Long-Term Cardiac Safety and Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Elderly Patients or Prone to Cardiotoxicity and Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Final Results of the Multicentre Phase II CAPRICE Study

Background

The CAPRICE trial was designed to specifically evaluate neoadjuvant pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in elderly patients or in those with other cardiovascular risk factors in whom conventional doxorubicin was contraindicated. The primary analysis of the study showed a pathological complete response (pCR) of 32% and no significant decreases in LVEF during chemotherapy. Here, we report important secondary study objectives: 5-year cardiac safety, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS).

Methods

In this multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial, elderly patients or those prone to cardiotoxicity and high risk stage II-IIIB breast cancer received PLD (35 mg/m²) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m²) every 4 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by paclitaxel for 12 weeks as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) monitorization, electrocardiograms and cardiac questionnaires were performed at baseline, during treatment and at 9, 16, 28 and 40 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was pCR and 5-year cardiac safety, DFS, BCSS and OS were also analyzed.

Results

Between Oct 2007, and Jun 2010, 50 eligible patients were included. Median age was 73 (35-84) years, 84% were older than 65; 64% of patients suffered from hypertension, and 10% had prior cardiac disease. Most of tumors (88%) were triple negative. No significant decreases in LVEF were observed. The mean baseline LVEF was 66.6% (52-86) and after a median follow-up of 5 years, mean LVEF was 66 (54.5-73). For intention to treat population, 5-year DFS was 50% (95% CI 40.2-68.1) and 5-year OS was 56% (95%CI 41.2-68.4). There were 8 non-cancer related deaths, achieving a 5 years BCSS of 67.74% (CI 95%:54.31%- 81.18%).

Conclusion

At 5-year follow-up, this PLD-based NAC regimen continued to be cardiac-safe and effective in a population of very high-risk breast cancer patients. This scheme should be considered as an option in elderly patients or in those with other risks of developing cardiotoxicity.

Trial Registration Number

ClinicalTrials.gov reference NCT00563953.

Circulating leukocyte-platelet complexes as a predictive biomarker for the development of immune-related adverse events in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving anti-PD-(L)1 blocking agents

BACKGROUND

Anti-PD-(L)1 blocking agents can induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can compromise treatment continuation. Since circulating leukocyte-platelet (PLT) complexes contribute to inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, we aimed to analyze the role of these complexes as predictors of irAEs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving anti-PD-(L)1.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-six healthy donors (HD) and 87 consecutive advanced NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 were prospectively included. Percentages of circulating leukocyte-PLT complexes were analyzed by flow cytometry and compared between HD and NSCLC patients. The association of leukocyte-PLT complexes with the presence and severity of irAEs was analyzed.

RESULTS

NSCLC patients had higher percentages of circulating leukocyte-PLT complexes. Higher percentages of monocytes with bound PLT (CD14 + PLT +) were observed in patients who received prior therapies while CD4 + T lymphocytes with bound PLT (CD4 + PLT +) correlated with platelets counts. The CD4 + PLT + high percentage group presented a higher rate of dermatological irAEs while the CD4 + PLT + low percentage group showed a higher rate of non-dermatological irAEs (p < 0.001). A lower frequency of grade ≥ 2 irAEs was observed in the CD4 + PLT + high percentage group (p < 0.05). Patients with CD4 + PLT + low and CD14 + PLT + high percentages presented a higher rate of grade ≥ 3 irAEs and predominantly developed non-dermatological irAEs (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that circulating leukocyte-PLT complexes and the combination of CD4 + PLT + and CD14 + PLT + percentages can be used as a predictive biomarker of the development and severity of irAEs in advanced NSCLC patients receiving anti-PD-(L)1 agents.

MicroRNA-1291 Is Associated With Locoregional Metastases in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Evidence that microRNAs (miRNAs) regulate the various steps of metastasis is increasing. Several studies have looked at the miRNA expression profile in primary breast tumors but few have compared primary tumor and sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis. We correlated the expression of miRNAs with the SLN status and the outcome of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in 60 patients with early breast cancer. We profiled the expression of miRNAs in paired breast tumor samples and SLNs using the NextSeq500 Illumina platform and key findings were validated by qPCR. MultiMiR Bioconductor and Reactome pathways analysis were performed to identify target genes and signaling pathways affected by altered expressed miRNAs. Our results show that nine miRNAs were differentially expressed in tumor tissues (q ≤ 0.05). In tumor samples, a 13.5-fold up-regulation of miR-7641-2 (q < 0.001) and a 2.9-fold down-regulation of miR-1291 (q < 0.001) were associated with tumors with positive SLNs. However, only down-regulation of miR-1291 (q = 0.048) remained significant in paired SLNs samples. Interestingly, a 10.5 up-regulation of miR-1291 in SLNs samples was associated with additional axillary lymph node involvement (q < 0.001). The enrichment analyses showed that canonical and non-canonical WNT pathways and negative regulation of various receptor tyrosine kinases signaling pathways were targets of miR-1291 and supports the role of miR-1291 as a tumor suppressor gene (TSG). Further studies are warranted to investigate the use of miR-1291 as a surrogate biomarker of SLN node metastasis in patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Immune-Related Adverse Events and Corticosteroid Use for Cancer-Related Symptoms Are Associated With Efficacy in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Anti-PD-(L)1 Blockade Agents

Background: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been associated with improved efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving anti-PD-(L)1 blockade agents, while the concurrent use of corticosteroids seems to worsen it. We evaluated outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 blockade agents in relation to the presence of irAEs and the reasons for using corticosteroids: whether for palliative cancer-related reasons or for the management of irAEs. Methods: Clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 blockade agents were calculated with regard to the presence of irAEs and the use of corticosteroids. A landmark analysis was performed to avoid immortal time bias due to the time-dependent nature of irAEs. Results: Out of a total of 267 patients, the 56.9% of patients who experienced irAEs had significantly improved outcomes. In the landmark analysis, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months for patients with irAEs vs. 4.1 months for patients without irAEs (p < 0.001), while median overall survival (OS) was 28.2 vs. 12.5 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Likewise, objective response and disease control rates were significantly higher in patients experiencing irAEs: 48.6 vs. 22.8% and 77.1 vs. 39.6% (p < 0.001), respectively. Median OS was significantly shorter for patients receiving ≥10 mg of prednisone equivalent daily for cancer-related symptoms than for the rest of patients (<10 mg prednisone equivalent daily or for management of irAEs): 6 vs. 15.9 months (p < 0.001). Conclusions: IrAEs were associated with improved efficacy in advanced NSCLC patients when a landmark analysis was applied. Patients receiving corticosteroids had significantly poorer outcomes when they were used for cancer-related symptoms.

Abstract PD10-06: Clinical benefit of breast cancer drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration

Background: The American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Research Committee (ASCO-CRC), the ASCO Value Framework Net Health Benefit score version 2 (ASCO-NHB v2), and the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale version 1.1 (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) are validated tools which quantify the clinical benefit for cancer drugs. Here, we assess the magnitude of clinical benefit of clinical trials supporting breast cancer drug approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Methods: We searched the Drugs@FDA website for breast cancer drug approvals from January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2019. Drug labels and reports of registration trials were reviewed and study characteristics, efficacy, toxicity and quality of life (QoL) outcomes were collected. For each indication, we scored clinical benefit from pivotal trials using the ASCO-CRC for non-curative trials and using the ASCO-NHB v2 and the ESMO-MCBS v1.1 for curative and non-curative intent trials. Substantial clinical benefit was defined as: overall survival (OS) gains of 2.5 or more months and progression-free survival gains of 3 or more months for all cancer types for the ASCO-CRC criteria; pragmatic threshold scores of 45 or greater for the ASCO-NHB v2; and grade of A or B for trials of curative intent and 4 or 5 for those of non-curative intent using ESMO-MCBS v1.1.

Results: We identified 28 pivotal trials supporting the approval of 18 individual drugs for 24 indications. Among the 28 trials, 6 (21%) were in the curative setting and 22 (79%) in the palliative setting. At the time of approval, only 2 trials (7%) reported improvement in OS and only 4 trials (14%) a significant improvement in QoL. ASCO-CRC, ASCO-NHB v2 and ESMO-MCBS v1.1 scores were applied in the palliative setting to 19, 20 and 22 trials respectively, and ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS v1.1 in the curative setting in 4 and 5 trials respectively. Among included trials in advanced disease, 15 (79%), 9 (45%) and 5 (23%), trials met the thresholds established by the ASCO-CRC, ASCO-NHB v2 and ESMO-MCBS v1.1 respectively. Among trials with curative intent, 1 (25%) and 4 (80%) trials met the thresholds established by the ASCO-NHB v2 and ESMO-MCBS v1.1 respectively.

Conclusion: In patients with metastatic breast cancer, most FDA approval trials do not meet the ASCO-NHB v2 and ESMO-MCBS v1.1 thresholds for substantial clinical benefit. Although most palliative trials reported a substantial clinical benefit according ASCO-CRC framework only 2 of them (7%) supported drug approvals based on an OS benefit. In patients with early breast cancer, low agreement observed between the ASCO-NHB v2 and ESMO-MCBS v1.1 suggest that the respective frameworks may require additional refinement to accurately capture substantial clinical benefit in the curative setting.

Citation Format: J. Carlos Tapia, Consolación Molto, Aida Bujosa, Arnoud J Templeton, Agustí Barnadas, Eithan Amir, Ariadna Tibau. Clinical benefit of breast cancer drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-06.

BOMET-QoL-10 questionnaire for breast cancer patients with bone metastasis: the prospective MABOMET GEICAM study

Background

Bone metastasis (BM) is the most common site of disease in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. BM impacts health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We tested prospectively the psychometric properties of the Bone Metastasis Quality of Life (BOMET-QoL-10) measure on MBC patients with BM.

Methods

Patients completed the BOMET-QoL-10 questionnaire, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and a self-perceived health status item at baseline and at follow-up visits. We performed psychometric tests and calculated the effect size of specific BM treatment on patients´ HRQoL.

Results

Almost 70% of the 172 patients reported symptoms, 23.3% experienced irruptive pain, and over half were receiving chemotherapy. BOMET-QoL-10 proved to be a quick assessment tool performing well in readability and completion time (about 10 min) with 0–1.2% of missing/invalid data. Although BOMET-QoL-10 scores remained fairly stable during study visits, differences were observed for patient subgroups (e.g., with or without skeletal-related events or adverse effects). Scores were significantly correlated with physician-reported patient status, patient-reported pain, symptoms, and perceived health status. BOMET-QoL-10 scores also varied prospectively according to changes in pain intensity.

Conclusions

BOMET-QoL-10 performed well as a brief, easy-to-administer, useful, and sensitive HRQoL measure for potential use for clinical practice with MBC patients.

Trial registration

NCT03847220. Retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (February the 20th 2019).

Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Capecitabine After Standard Neo-/Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (GEICAM/2003-11_CIBOMA/2004-01)

PURPOSE

Operable triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) have a higher risk of relapse than non-TNBCs with standard therapy. The GEICAM/2003-11_CIBOMA/2004-01 trial explored extended adjuvant capecitabine after completion of standard chemotherapy in patients with early TNBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were those with operable, node-positive—or node negative with tumor 1 cm or greater—TNBC, with prior anthracycline- and/or taxane-containing chemotherapy. After central confirmation of TNBC status by immunohistochemistry, patients were randomly assigned to either capecitabine or observation. Stratification factors included institution, prior taxane-based therapy, involved axillary lymph nodes, and centrally determined phenotype (basal v nonbasal, according to cytokeratins 5/6 and/or epidermal growth factor receptor positivity by immunohistochemistry). The primary objective was to compare disease-free survival (DFS) between both arms.

RESULTS

Eight hundred seventy-six patients were randomly assigned to capecitabine (n = 448) or observation (n = 428). Median age was 49 years, 55.9% were lymph node negative, 73.9% had a basal phenotype, and 67.5% received previous anthracyclines plus taxanes. Median length of follow-up was 7.3 years. DFS was not significantly prolonged with capecitabine versus observation [hazard ratio (HR), 0.82; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.06; P = .136]. In a preplanned subgroup analysis, nonbasal patients seemed to derive benefit from the addition of capecitabine with a DFS HR of 0.53 versus 0.94 in those with basal phenotype (interaction test P = .0694) and an HR for overall survival of 0.42 versus 1.23 in basal phenotype (interaction test P = .0052). Tolerance of capecitabine was as expected, with 75.2% of patients completing the planned 8 cycles.

CONCLUSION

This study failed to show a statistically significant increase in DFS by adding extended capecitabine to standard chemotherapy in patients with early TNBC. In a preplanned subset analysis, patients with nonbasal phenotype seemed to obtain benefit with capecitabine, although this will require additional validation.

Broad consensus on the optimal sequence for the systemic treatment of metastatic breast cancer: results from a survey of Spanish medical oncologists

Objective: The aim of this survey conducted by 20 leading Spanish oncologists was to analyze the concurrence between Spanish clinical practice and the recently published definition of the optimal sequence for the systemic treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) according to patient profiles.

Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was developed, divided into five sections comprising 34 specific questions related to sequential treatments, plus three additional general questions. Respondents were asked to justify negative answers. Participants were recruited randomly by invitation out of a total of 619 oncologists. The questionnaire was sent and collected via e-mail between October 2015 and May 2016. A total of 191 completed questionnaires were received.

Results: Overall, 70% of oncologists would keep the three patient profiles exactly as proposed (hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative, HER2-positive, and triple negative breast cancer). Affirmative answers to questions regarding treatment sequences for these patient profiles (1–34) ranged from 77.8–99.5%, with an average of 90.9% of oncologists being in agreement with the recommended sequential treatments. The lowest degree of consensus was observed for endocrine treatments in pre-menopausal women and for chemotherapy options in hormone-resistant patients, whilst the highest degree of consensus was reached for targeted therapies in HER2-positive patients and for endocrine therapy in post-menopausal women. In their comments, participants revealed a number of economic constraints that prevented them from implementing some of the best treatment options.

Conclusions: In conclusion, despite the complexity of MBC treatment, there is general agreement on the optimal treatment sequences.

Abstract P6-18-17: Ribociclib + letrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (aBC) with no prior endocrine therapy (ET) for ABC: CompLEEment-1 trial, preliminary results from Spanish population

Background: The phase III Monaleesa-2, Monaleesa-3 and Monaleesa-7 trials have shown significantly improved PFS for the combination ribociclib + ET vs ET + placebo in pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2–, first and second line aBC. The Compleement-1 trial is a phase IIIb, single-arm, open-label, international study to assess the safety and efficacy of ribociclib + letrozole in men and women who have not received prior ET for HR+, HER2– ABC [J Clin Oncol 36, 2018 (suppl; abstr 1056)].

Methods: 526 patients with HR+, HER2– ABC, ≤1 line of prior CT, and no prior ET for aBC were enrolled in the Compleement-1trial in Spain from April 2017 to January 2018. Patients received ribociclib (600 mg/day, 3 weeks on/1 week off) + letrozole (2.5 mg/day); men and premenopausal women received concomitant goserelin (3.6 mg subcutaneous implant every 28 days). The primary objective was safety and tolerability. Here we report on a sub-analysis from the Spanish population of Compleement-1 trial including baseline characteristics and early safety results for the first patients enrolled who completed at least 56 days of follow-up or discontinued before the cut-off date (3rd Oct 2017).

Results: One hundred fifty four patients constituted the analytical cohort for this sub-analysis. Demographics and baseline characteristics: median age was 52 years (range 24-82); 1% of patients were male, 31.8% female pre-menopausal and 67.5% female post-menopausal; 44.2% vs 38.3% of patients had visceral disease vs bone only disease; 49.9% patients had ≥2 metastatic sites; and 34.4% of patients presented as de novo stage IV. The median exposure for study treatment was 1.8 months (range 0.8-1.8). The grade 3/4 events reported &gt;1% included neutropenia (50%), increased GGT levels (3.2%), leukopenia (1.3%), and increased ALT (1.3%). QTcF prolongation &gt;480ms based on ECG data was reported in 1.2% patients. Median dose intensity for ribociclib was 600mg/day (range 476.5-600); 11% of patients required one dose reduction (8.4% due to AEs), 59.7% had at least one dose interruption (57.1% due to AEs) and 9.7% were permanently discontinued (4.5% due to AEs).

Conclusions: Preliminary safety results from this Compleement-1 sub-analysis including Spanish population are consistent with previous data presented from Monaleesa-2, Monaleesa-3, Monaleesa-7 and Compleement-1. These data support the predictable and manageable safety profile of ribociclib in combination with letrozole. Clinical trial information: NCT02941926

Citation Format: Salvador J, Ciruelos EM, Prat A, Jiménez-Rodríguez B, de la Cruz L, Martínez N, Villanueva Vázquez R, de Toro R, Antón A, Moreno F, Alvarez I, Gavila J, Quiroga V, Vicente E, de la Haba J, González-Santiago S, Díaz N, Barnadas A, Cantos Sánchez de Ibargüen B, Delgado JI, Bellet M, Gimeno A, Sanz S, Martin M. Ribociclib + letrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (aBC) with no prior endocrine therapy (ET) for ABC: CompLEEment-1 trial, preliminary results from Spanish population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-18-17.

Abstract GS2-04: Efficacy results from CIBOMA/2004-01_GEICAM/2003-11 study: A randomized phase III trial assessing adjuvant capecitabine after standard chemotherapy for patients with early triple negative breast cancer

Background: Triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) have a greater risk of relapse than non-TNBC. New therapeutic approaches are needed for these patients (pts). CIBOMA/2004-01_GEICAM/2003-11 is a multinational, randomized phase III trial exploring adjuvant capecitabine (X) after completion of standard treatment in early TNBC pts.

Materials and Methods: Patients with operable, node-positive (or node-negative with tumor size ≥ 1 cm), centrally confirmed hormone receptor-negative, HER2-negative early BC, who had received 6–8 cycles (cy) of standard anthracycline and/or taxane-containing chemotherapy or 4 cy of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (for node-negative disease) in the (neo)adjuvant setting, were eligible. Patients were randomized to either 8 cy of X (1,000 mg/m2 bid, days 1–14, every 3 weeks) or observation. Stratification factors included center, prior taxane-based therapy, number of involved axillary lymph nodes and phenotype (basal vs non-basal, according to cytokeratins 5/6 and/or EGFR positivity). The primary objective was to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) between both treatment arms, and secondary objectives included the comparison in terms of 5-year DFS, overall survival (OS) and safety. Assuming a 30% risk reduction in DFS rate at 5 years (from 64.7% to 73.7%, hazard ratio 0.70) with 80% power and a two-tailed log-rank test at 0.05, 834 evaluable pts were needed. 876 pts had to be finally enrolled considering a drop-out rate of 5%.

Results: Recruitment of 876 pts from 8 countries was completed in September 2011. Median age was 49 years; 68.5% of pts were postmenopausal, 55.5% were lymph node negative, 71.7% had a basal phenotype, 67.5% received chemotherapy based on anthracyclines and taxanes. Median follow-up was 7.3 years (range 0.0 to 11.1). DFS was not significantly prolonged with X vs observation (hazard ratio (HR) 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63 to 1.06; P=0.1353). Five-year DFS was 79.6% (95% CI, 75.8% to 83.4%) with X and 76.8% (95% CI, 72.7% to 80.9%) with observation. OS was not statistically different between treatment arms (HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.28; P=0.6228). In subgroup analysis for DFS, we found no statistically significant interaction between X treatment and different subgroups, with the exception of basal vs non-basal phenotypes (basal HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.32, P=0.8620; non-basal HR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.86, P=0.0101; interaction P=0.0357). Similar results were found for OS (basal HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.77, P=0.3684; non-basal HR 0.48, 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.91, P=0.0205; interaction P=0.0155). 75.2% of pts completed 8 cy of X, with a median relative dose intensity of 86.3%. Grade (G) 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were observed in 40.4% of pts in X arm. In 9.6% of pts the AEs were related with X. Hand-foot syndrome was the most common AE in X arm (G3 on 18.8% of pts).

Conclusions: In our study, the addition of adjuvant X after standard (neo) adjuvant anthracycline and/or taxane-containing chemotherapy was not associated with a statistically significant improvement of DFS or OS compared to observation in pts with early TNBC. However, in a subgroup analysis a significant DFS and OS improvement was observed with X in pts with non-basal phenotype.

Sponsor: CIBOMA.

Citation Format: Martín M, Barrios CH, Torrecillas L, Ruiz-Borrego M, Bines J, Segalla J, Ruiz A, García-Sáenz JA, Torres R, de la Haba J, García E, Gómez HL, Llombart A, Rodríguez de la Borbolla M, Baena JM, Barnadas A, Calvo L, Pérez-Michel L, Ramos M, Castellanos J, Rodríguez-Lescure A, Cárdenas J, Vinholes J, Martínez de Dueñas E, Godes MJ, Seguí MA, Antón A, López-Álvarez P, Moncayo J, Amorim G, Villar E, Reyes S, Sampaio C, Cardemil B, Escudero MJ, Bezares S, Carrasco E, Lluch A. Efficacy results from CIBOMA/2004-01_GEICAM/2003-11 study: A randomized phase III trial assessing adjuvant capecitabine after standard chemotherapy for patients with early triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-04.

Abstract P5-12-03: Genome copy number entropy as predictor of response for neoadjuvant therapy in early breast cancer

Background

Copy Number Alterations (CNAs) represent changes in the copy number of genomic segments of somatic cells due to chromosomal instability. CNAs include gene amplifications or deletions and can be involved in tumorigenesis. We analyzed CNAs data in pre- and post-treatment (ttm) tumors from patients (pts) with early breast cancer (BC) in the neoadjuvant trials GEICAM/2006-03 and GEICAM/2006-14, with the aim to identify CNAs in particular genomic regions (genetic entropy) associated with treatment response.

Methods

GEICAM/2006-03 (NCT00432172) HER2-negative pts were selectively treated according to clinical subtypes: triple negative (TN) pts were treated with standard anthracycline/taxane -based chemotherapy (AT-CT) +/- carboplatin, while luminal patients were randomized to AT-CT vs. hormonotherapy; GEICAM/2006-14 (NCT00841828) HER2+ pts received AT-CT plus anti-HER2 therapy.Shallow-whole genome Illumina sequencing DNA data from 204 paraffin-embedded tumors (100 pre- and 104 post-ttm) were segmented to obtain CNAs and recurrent altered genomic regions were defined. We used Wilcoxon test to analyze the frequency of altered regions and logistic regression analyses to explore their association with tumor response, in terms of pathological complete response (pCR) in breast and axilla. Validation of altered genes associated with therapy response was performed in the microarray gene expression-based Hatzis dataset (GSE25066) from pts receiving neoadjuvant AT-CT (1).

Results

A total of 672 regions covering the whole genome were identified upon analysis of CNAs data. Regions were categorized according to their alteration status as amplified, normal and lost. Comparative analysis of alterations revealed 11 regions significantly different (p&lt;0.05) in pre- vs post-ttm tumors. Logistic regression analysis showed that in pre-ttm tumors specific alterations of 8 regions localized in 3 different genomic loci (11q12, 16q22 and 21q22) were significantly associated with pCR (p&lt;0.05). Independent analyses of CNAs data with “CGH regions” and “GISTIC2.0” tools confirmed the special relevance of 2 of these 8 regions (#653 and #654), amplified in the locus 21q22.12. This locus contains 20 genes whose expression was tested in Hatzis dataset (1) (GSE25066): the analysis showed that overexpression of 5 of these 20 genes (CHAF1B, CBR1, CBR3, RCAN1 and SLC5A3) turned out to be significantly higher in the cohort of pts who reached pCR, in agreement with our findings. Some of these genes have already been described as proliferation markers (CHAF1B) or involved in treatment response (CBR1) in BC. Other genes related to BC in this genomic region are the transcription factor RUNX1 and the Lysine Methyltransferase SETD4.

Conclusions

According to our results, neoadjuvant therapy can modulate genomic aberrations landscape in BC. Our data suggest that amplification of specific genes in the genomic locus (21q22.12) is involved in the neoadjuvant therapy response in early BC.

(1): Hatzis et al., JAMA 2011, 305(18) 1873-81

Citation Format: Alba E, Rueda OM, Lluch A, Albanell J, Chin S-F, Chacón JI, Calvo L, De la Haba-Rodriguez J, Bermejo B, Ribelles N, Sánchez-Rovira P, Plazaola A, Barnadas A, Cirauqul B, Ramos M, Arcusa A, Carrasco E, Herranz J, Chiesa M, Caballero R, Santonja A, Rojo F, Caldas C. Genome copy number entropy as predictor of response for neoadjuvant therapy in early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-03.

The combined use of EFS, GPX2, and SPRR1A expression could distinguish favorable from poor clinical outcome among epithelial-like head and neck carcinoma subtypes

BACKGROUND

We aimed at identifying molecular markers predictive of clinical outcome in patients with head and neck cancer based on the expression profile of cells showing epithelial-like (EL) or mesenchymal-like (ML) phenotypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the association between EL and ML cells and migration, drug resistance, or tumor growth. The differential gene expression profile between cell types was used to build a model to stratify patients according to survival.

RESULTS

EL cells were sensitive to cisplatin and cetuximab, showed low migration, and generated squamous differentiated tumors in mouse. A differential 93-gene expression signature between ML and EL cells was used to build a three-gene (EFS, GPX2, and SPRR1A) survival model by analyzing the RNA-seq data of the TCGA-HNSC project. Its prognostic value was confirmed in two independent cohorts.

CONCLUSION

EFS, GPX2, and SPRR1A are prognostic markers able to distinguish clinical outcome among subtypes sharing an EL phenotype.

Effect of serpinE1 overexpression on the primary tumor and lymph node, and lung metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Serpin Family E Member 1 (SerpinE1) overexpression associates with poor clinical outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. This study analyzed the role of serpinE1 in HNSCC dissemination.

METHODS

We studied the phenotypic characteristics and dissemination of HNSCC cells overexpressing serpinE1 using an orthotopic model and the association between serpinE1 overexpression and clinicopathological variables in patients included in The Cancer Genome Atlas database.

RESULTS

SerpinE1 overexpression increased proliferation, tumor budding, and the stromal component, while inhibiting apoptosis in primary tumors. It also enhanced the affectation and metastatic growth in lymph nodes, and the dispersion and growth of metastatic foci in the lung. High serpinE1 expression was associated with larger tumor size, undifferentiated tumors, lymph node metastasis, extracapsular spread, and the presence of perineural and angiolymphatic invasion.

CONCLUSION

SerpinE1 overexpression promotes tumor aggressiveness and metastatic dissemination to lymph nodes and lung consistently with its association with poor outcome in HNSCC patients.

Pathological Response and Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Carboplatin plus Docetaxel

PURPOSE

Prognostic value of pathologic complete response (pCR) and extent of pathologic response attained with anthracycline-free platinum plus taxane neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unknown. We report recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) according to degree of pathologic response in patients treated with carboplatin plus docetaxel NAC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One-hundred and ninety patients with stage I-III TNBC were treated with neoadjuvant carboplatin (AUC6) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2) every 21 days × 6 cycles. pCR (no evidence of invasive tumor in breast and axilla) and Residual cancer burden (RCB) were evaluated. Patients were followed for recurrence and survival. Extent of pathologic response was associated with RFS and OS using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Median age was 51 years, and 52% were node-positive. pCR and RCB I rates were 55% and 13%, respectively. Five percent of pCR patients, 0% of RCB I patients, and 58% of RCB II/III patients received adjuvant anthracyclines. Three-year RFS and OS were 79% and 87%, respectively. Three-year RFS was 90% in patients with pCR and 66% in those without pCR [HR = 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14-0.62; P = 0.0001]. Three-year OS was 94% in patients with pCR and 79% in those without pCR (HR = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.63; P = 0.001). Patients with RCB I demonstrated 3-year RFS (93%) and OS (100%) similar to those with pCR. On multivariable analysis, higher tumor stage, node positivity, and RCB II/III were associated with worse RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant carboplatin plus docetaxel yields encouraging efficacy in TNBC. Patients achieving pCR or RCB I with this regimen demonstrate excellent 3-year RFS and OS without adjuvant anthracycline.

Real-world data on the efficacy and safety of weekly oral vinorelbine in breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracycline or taxane-based regimens

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral weekly vinorelbine 60 mg/m² for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in patients previously treated with anthracyclines or taxanes in routine clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients were enrolled in a prospective multicentre study conducted in Spain. Women ≥ 18 years of age with locally advanced breast cancer who were not candidates for surgical treatment with a radical intention or patients with stage IV disease, and who had received a prior taxane or anthracycline regimen were eligible for participation.

RESULTS

Median age was 67 years. Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI 2.5-4.9), median overall survival 10 months (95% CI 6.6-13.5), and overall response rate and clinical benefit rate were 29.1% and 49.1%, respectively. Main grade 3 and 4 toxicities were neutropenia 9.1%, febrile neutropenia 3.6% and constipation 3.6%. In total, 86% of the patients received complete treatment without delays or dose reduction. Moreover, HER2-positive patients who received oral vinorelbine concomitantly with trastuzumab showed better response (complete response: HER2-positive 14.3% vs. HER2-negative 0%; partial response: HER2-positive 42.9% vs. HER2-negative 25.6%; p = 0.008), better disease control rate (HER2-positive 100% vs. HER2-negative 46.2%; p = 0.011), and better values for the remaining analysed variables than HER2-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides real-world data on the use of oral weekly vinorelbine, which proves an effective and well-tolerated regimen for MBC patients previously treated with taxanes or anthracyclines. Patients with HER2-positive disease could also benefit from this treatment in combination with trastuzumab.

Relevance of CYP3A4*20, UGT1A1*37 and UGT1A1*28 variants in irinotecan-induced severe toxicity

Severe irinotecan-induced toxicity is associated with UGT1A1 polymorphisms. However, some patients develop side-effects despite harbouring a normal UGT1A1 genotype. As CYP3A4 is also an irinotecan-metabolizing enzyme, our study aimed to elucidate the influence of the CYP3A4*20 loss-of-function allele in the toxicity profile of these patients. Three-hundred and eight metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with an irinotecan-containing chemotherapy were studied. The presence of CYP3A4*20, UGT1A1*37 and UGT1A1*28 alleles was tested. Associations between these genetic variants and toxicity were evaluated. UGT1A1*28 was significantly associated with severe diarrhoea, neutropenia and asthenia (P = 0.002, P = 0.037 and P = 0.041, respectively). One patient with the UGT1A1*28/*37 genotype presented with grade IV neutropenia and lethal septic shock. One heterozygous UGT1A1 (*1/*28) patient also carried the CYP3A4*20 allele but did not develop toxicity. We confirm that UGT1A1*37 and UGT1A1*28 are associated with severe toxicity and suggest that the CYP3A4*20 allele does not play a role in irinotecan-induced toxicity.

Role of cooperative groups and funding source in clinical trials supporting guidelines for systemic therapy of breast cancer

Introduction

Clinical research is conducted by academia, cooperative groups (CGs) or pharmaceutical industry. Here, we evaluate the role of CGs and funding sources in the development of guidelines for breast cancer therapies.

Results

We identified 94 studies. CGs were involved in 28 (30%) studies while industry either partially or fully sponsored 64 (68%) studies. The number of industry funded studies increased over time (from 0% in 1976 to 100% in 2014; p for trend = 0.048). Only 10 (11%) government or academic studies were identified. Studies conducted by GCs included a greater number of subjects (median 448 vs. 284; p = 0.015), were more common in the neo/adjuvant setting (p < 0.0001), and were more often randomized (p = 0.018) phase III (p < 0.0001) trials. Phase III trial remained significant predictor for CG-sponsored trials (OR 7.1 p = 0.004) in a multivariable analysis. Industry funding was associated with higher likelihood of positive outcomes favoring the sponsored experimental arm (p = 0.013) but this relationship was not seen for CG-sponsored trials (p = 0.53).

Materials and Methods

ASCO, ESMO, and NCCN guidelines were searched to identify systemic anti-cancer therapies for early-stage and metastatic breast cancer. Trial characteristics and outcomes were collected. We identified sponsors and/or the funding source(s) and determined whether CGs, industry, or government or academic institutions were involved. Chi-square tests were used for comparison between studies.

Conclusions

Industry funding is present in the majority of studies providing the basis for which recommendations about treatment of breast cancer are made. Industry funding, but not CG-based funding, was associated with higher likelihood of positive outcomes in clinical studies supporting guidelines for systemic therapy.

Abstract P6-15-06: SOLTI-0702 CAPRICE: Final results of a phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly or cardiotoxicity-prone patients with high-risk breast cancer: 5-year overall survival disease free survival and late cardiac safety

Background:

Anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for high-risk breast cancer. However, conventional anthracyclines are not commonly used in elderly patients or those patients prone to cardiotoxicity and there is a potential risk leaving them undertreated. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) has comparable efficacy, but significantly less cardiotoxicity than conventional anthracyclines. We conducted a phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of a neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) based on PLD and paclitaxel (PTX) in this group of patients. The pathological complete response, breast conservative surgery (BCS) and safety data at a 35-month follow-up were published (Gil-Gil et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015). Here we present the final analysis of 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and cardiac safety after 60 months of follow-up.

Methods:

Fifty patients with stage II (48%) and III (52%) breast cancer (seven cases were T4d) and with at least one risk factor for developing cardiotoxicity were included. NC schedule: PLD 35 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 4 weeks for four cycles, followed by 80 mg/m2 weekly PTX for 12. Median age was 73 years old (84% were older than 65 years). Forty-eight (96%) of tumors were triple negative (TN). Secondary objectives included 5-year DFS, 5year OS and cardiac safety measured by a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), electrocardiogram (ECG) anda cardiac questionnaire performed every 3 months during the first year, every 6 months year 2-3 and every 12 months year 4-5 of follow-up.

Results: Forty-eight patients (96%) completed the 4 cycles of PLD plus CPM, while only 26 patients (52%) could complete the 12 weeks of PTX. Forty-six patients (92%) underwent surgery. After surgery: 27 patients received radiotherapy, 2 letrozole and 1 trastuzumab. The 5-year OS was 56% (95% CI 41.2-68.4) and the 5-year DFS was 54.4% [95% CI: 38.3-67.9].No significant decrease in LVEF was seen (mean baseline LVEF was 66.6 (52-86) and mean LVEF after 60 months was 66 (54.5-73). Four patients (8%) developed cardiotoxicity (in 2 cases G3). There were 5 non-cancer deaths (10%): 3 during treatment (all in patients &gt; 80 years: a sudden death one month after surgery, a haemorrhagic stroke 30 days after completing chemotherapy and a non-neutropenic pneumonia); and 2 during follow-up (1 Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and 1 intestinal ischemia).

Conclusions:

PLD followed by PTX as NC was feasible in a fragile population of patients who were not candidates for conventional doxorubicin. The 5 year DFS and 5 year OS in elderly patients with bulky TN tumors were similar tothe reported in the literature. This regimen could be an option for the neoadjuvant treatment of cardiotoxicity-prone patients or elderly patients who present high-risk breast cancer.

Citation Format: Gil-Gil M, Bellet M, Morales S, Barnadas A, Manso L, Morilla Ruiz I, Azaro A, Ciruelos Gil E, Garcia Martínez E, Marínez N, Melé M, Soler T, Villagrasa P, Pernas S. SOLTI-0702 CAPRICE: Final results of a phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly or cardiotoxicity-prone patients with high-risk breast cancer: 5-year overall survival disease free survival and late cardiac safety [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-15-06.

Nab-Paclitaxel in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Defining the Best Patient Profile

Around 40% of patients with breast cancer will present with a recurrence of the disease. Chemotherapy is recommended for patients with recurrent hormone-independent or hormone-refractory breast cancer and almost all patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receive chemotherapy during their medical history. Nanoparticle albuminbound (nab)-paclitaxel is a solvent-free, 130-nanometer particle formulation of paclitaxel. Nab-paclitaxel can be administered to all patients for whom the treatment choice is a taxane. In this review, 6 patient profiles for which nabpaclitaxel may be particularly useful are described and analyzed: (i) as first-line treatment of MBC, (ii) as second-line treatment of MBC after oral chemotherapy, (iii) after a standard taxane, (iv) as third-line treatment after a standard taxane and oral chemotherapy, (v) for patients with HER2-positive MBC and (vi) for patients with intolerance to standard taxanes. Nab-paclitaxel is a rational treatment choice for patients with MBC in different settings, as well as for those with prior exposure to a standard taxane.

Abstract OT1-04-05: A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of radium-223 dichloride with exemestane and everolimus in patients with HER2-negative, hormone receptor–positive breast cancer and bone metastases

Background: Treatment options for bone-dominant metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are limited. Radium-223, a first-in-class α emitter with a targeted antitumor effect on bone metastases (mets), was well tolerated and reduced bone biomarker levels in a phase 2 study in patients with bone-dominant MBC (Coleman et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014). In patients with HER2- estrogen receptor+ (ER+) bone-dominant MBC, everolimus + exemestane (EVE+EXE) improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus EXE alone. Radium-223 combined with EVE+EXE may improve outcomes in patients with HER2- ER+ bone-dominant MBC; this trial will evaluate efficacy and safety of radium-223 versus placebo in these patients (NCT02258451).

Trial design: Patients are randomized to receive (1:1) radium-223 (50 kBq/kg [55 kBq/kg after National Institute of Standards and Technology update] IV) or placebo × 6 cycles q 4 wk + EXE (25 mg PO q d) + EVE (10 mg PO q d) plus best supportive care. EXE+EVE continues until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Stratification is by geographic region (EU/N America vs Asia), prior hormone therapy (1 vs ≥ 2), and presence of visceral disease (yes vs no).

Eligibility criteria: Eligible patients are pre- or postmenopausal with HER2- ER+ MBC and have ≥ 2 bone mets or have soft tissue and/or visceral mets. Patients must have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, ≥ 1 prior line of hormone therapy for MBC, and 1-2 prior skeletal-related events; be on bisphosphonates or denosumab; and have an ECOG score of 0-1. Patients must have had no past or current need for chemotherapy for MBC, no unresolved spinal cord compression, and no prior EVE treatment.

Specific aims: The primary end point is symptomatic skeletal event–free survival (SSE-FS). Secondary end points are overall survival; times to opiate use, pain progression, and cytotoxic chemotherapy; radiologic PFS; and safety. Safety and efficacy are assessed every 4 weeks. Long-term safety is assessed until study termination.

Statistical methods: Assuming a 1-sided α of 0.1, 90% power, ∼ 160 SSE-FS events will be required for the analysis. Efficacy will be analyzed by a stratified log-rank test. Safety analysis will be descriptive.

Present and target accrual: Estimated enrollment is ∼ 311 patients. Currently, 74 patients are randomized.

Contact Oana Petrenciuc, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, oana.petrenciuc@bayer.com, for more information.

Citation Format: Rugo HS, Drumea KC, Campone M, Barnadas A, Petrenciuc O, Zhang A, Li R, Coleman RE. A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of radium-223 dichloride with exemestane and everolimus in patients with HER2-negative, hormone receptor–positive breast cancer and bone metastases [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-04-05.

Enhanced cell migration and apoptosis resistance may underlie the association between high SERPINE1 expression and poor outcome in head and neck carcinoma patients

High SERPINE1 expression is a common event in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); however, whether it plays a role in determining clinical outcome remains still unknown. We studied SERPINE1 as a prognostic marker in two HNSCC patient cohorts. In a retrospective study (n = 80), high expression of SERPINE1 was associated with poor progression-free (p = 0.022) and cancer-specific (p = 0.040) survival. In a prospective study (n = 190), high SERPINE1 expression was associated with poor local recurrence-free (p = 0.022), progression-free (p = 0.002) and cancer-specific (p = 0.006) survival. SERPINE1 expression was identified as an independent risk factor for progression-free survival in patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy or radiotherapy (p = 0.043). In both patient cohorts, high SERPINE1 expression increased the risk of metastasis spread (p = 0.045; p = 0.029). The association between SERPINE1 expression and survival was confirmed using the HNSCC cohort included in The Cancer Genome Atlas project (n = 507). Once again, patients showing high expression had a poorer survival (p < 0.001). SERPINE1 over-expression in HNSCC cells reduced cell proliferation and enhanced migration. It also protected cells from cisplatin-induced apoptosis, which was accompanied by PI3K/AKT pathway activation. Downregulation of SERPINE1 expression had the opposite effect. We propose SERPINE1 expression as a prognostic marker that could be used to stratify HNSCC patients according to their risk of recurrence.

CKMT1 and NCOA1 expression as a predictor of clinical outcome in patients with advanced-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We studied the association between the expression of a subset of previously identified genes and clinical outcome in patients with head and neck cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) the expression of 89 genes in tumor biopsies from stage III to IVa/b chemotherapy treated patients (n = 46). Two additional cohorts analyzed by RNAseq (The Cancer Genome Atlas [TCGA] project; n = 371) or immunohistochemistry (IHC; n = 73) were used to validate results.

RESULTS

Thirty genes were associated with local-recurrence or progression-free survival. The best multi-gene decision-tree model to predict local recurrence included nuclear receptor coactivator 1 (NCOA1) and serum-amyloid A2 (SAA2) expression, whereas the best model to predict disease recurrence included creatine kinase mitochondrial 1 (CKMT1) and metal-regulatory transcription factor 1 (MTF1). Both models were associated with cancer-specific survival. Results were confirmed analyzing the RNAseq data included in the TCGA project. CKMT1 and NCOA1 were identified as independent risk factors for survival in an independent cohort analyzed by immunohistochemistry.

CONCLUSION

CKMT1 and NCOA1 expression has prognostic significance in advanced-stage head and neck carcinoma. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1392-E1403, 2016.