Gods and monsters: Greek mythology and Christian references in the neurosurgical lexicon

Background:

Myths and religion are belief systems centered around supernatural entities that attempt to explain the observed world and are of high importance to certain communities. The former is a collection of stories that belong to a cultural tradition and the latter are organized faiths that determine codes of ethics, rituals and philosophy. Deities or monstrous creatures in particular act as archetypes instructing an individual’s conduct. References to them in Greek mythology and Christianity are frequently manifested in the modern neurosurgical vernacular.

Methods:

A review of the medical literature was performed using the PubMed and MEDLINE bibliographic databases. Publications from 1875 to 2021 related to neurosurgery or neuroanatomy with the medical subject headings (MeSH) terms mythology, religion, Christianity and Catholicism were reviewed. References pertaining to supernatural beings were classified to either a deity or a monstrosity according to their conventional cultural context.

Results:

Twelve narratives associated with neurosurgery were identified, nine relating to Greek mythology and three associated with the Christian-Catholic faith. Eight accounts concerned deities and the remaining with monstrous creatures.

Conclusion:

This article explores the etymology of commonly utilized terms in daily neurosurgical practice in the context of mythology and religion. They reveal the ingenuity and creativity of early pioneers who strived to understand the brain.

A Morphometric Analysis of Commonly Used Craniometric Approaches for Freehand Ventriculoperitoneal Shunting

BACKGROUND

Ventricular catheter tip position is a predictor for ventriculoperitoneal shunt survival. Cannulation is often performed freehand, but there is limited consensus on the best craniometric approach.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of localizing craniometric entry sites and to identify which is associated with optimal catheter placement.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunting. The approaches were categorized as Kocher's, Keen's, Frazier's and Dandy's points as well as the parieto-occipital point. An accurately sited burr hole was within 10 mm from standard descriptions. Optimal catheter tip position was defined as within the ipsilateral frontal horn.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients were reviewed, and 58% (65/110) of burr holes were accurately sited. Keen's point was the most correctly identified (65%, 11/17), followed by Kocher's point (65%, 37/57) and Frazier's point (60%, 3/5). Predictors for accurate localization were Keen's point (odds ratio 0.3; 95% CI: 01-0.9) and right-sided access (odds ratio 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9). Sixty-three percent (69/110) of catheters were optimally placed with Keen's point (adjusted odds ratio 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01-0.67), being the only independent factor. Thirteen patients (12%) required shunt revision at a mean duration of 10 ± 25 mo. Suboptimal catheter tip position was the only independent determinant for revision (adjusted odds ratio 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01-0.98).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to compare the accuracy of freehand ventricular cannulation of standard craniometric entry sites for adult patients. Keen's point was the most accurately sited and was a predictor for optimal catheter position. Catheter tip location, not the entry site, predicted shunt survival.

Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, pilot trial to investigate safety and efficacy of Cerebrolysin in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Background

There are limited neuroprotective treatment options for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Cerebrolysin, a brain-specific proposed pleiotropic neuroprotective agent, has been suggested to improve global functional outcomes in ischemic stroke. We investigated the efficacy, safety and feasibility of administering Cerebrolysin for SAH patients.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, parallel-group pilot study. Fifty patients received either daily Cerebrolysin (30 ml/day) or a placebo (saline) for 14 days (25 patients per study group). The primary endpoint was a favorable Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) of 5 to 8 (moderate disability to good recovery) at six-months. Secondary endpoints included the modified Ranking Scale (mRS), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score, occurrence of adverse effects and the occurrence of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI).

Results

No severe adverse effects or mortality attributable to Cerebrolysin were observed. No significant difference was detected in the proportion of patients with favorable six-month GOSE in either study group (odds ratio (OR): 1.49; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43–5.17). Secondary functional outcome measures for favorable six-month recovery i.e. a mRS of 0 to 3 (OR: 3.45; 95% CI 0.79–15.01) were comparable for both groups. Similarly, there was no difference in MOCA neurocognitive performance (p-value: 0.75) and in the incidence of DCI (OR: 0.85 95% CI: 0.28–2.59).

Conclusions

Use of Cerebrolysin in addition to standard-of-care management of aneurysmal SAH is safe, well tolerated and feasible. However, the neutral results of this trial suggest that it does not improve the six-month global functional performance of patients.

Clinical trial registration

Name of Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial Registration Number: NCT01787123.

Date of Registration: 8th February 2013.

A rare cause of sciatica discovered during digital rectal examination: case report of an intrapelvic sciatic notch schwannoma

Intrapelvic sciatic nerve schwannomas are rare causes for non-discogenic sciatica. We describe a 44-year-old female who had a palpable mass on digital rectal examination that exhibited a positive Tinel's sign. The schwannoma was excised by a posterior transgluteal approach. Patients with negative spinal imaging should undergo pelvic scanning to rule out these tumors.

Use of the pipeline embolization device to treat recently ruptured dissecting cerebral aneurysms

The Pipeline embolization device (PED) is one of the flow-diverting stents approved for the treatment of unruptured large or wide-necked cerebral aneurysms in 2011(1). Its use has now been extended to the treatment of recently ruptured dissecting cerebral aneurysm, carotid pseudoaneurysm from radiation injury, and blister aneurysms(2,3). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of utilizing the PED as a primary treatment for ruptured dissecting intracranial aneurysms. A single center retrospective review was conducted for all patients primarily treated with PED for acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) from ruptured dissecting cerebral aneurysms between December 2010 and February 2013. Patients were followed up with CT angiogram (CTA) or digital subtraction angiogram (DSA). Eight patients with a total of eight dissecting aneurysms were identified. The mean duration from SAH to treatment was 2.5 days. Six of the aneurysms arose from vertebral arteries and two from the basilar artery. Immediate check-DSA confirmed satisfactory contrast stasis in all eight cases, and complete aneurysmal obliteration was achieved at six months. There were two (25%) procedure-related complications, but no major procedure-related complications, such as thromboembolic events or rebleeding from aneurysm were encountered. The PED is a feasible treatment option for ruptured dissecting cerebral aneurysms in acute phase. According to our experience, using PED as flow-diverters in acute SAH does not significantly increase the complication risks or mortality rate if the antiplatelet regime is carefully monitored. Future studies shall evaluate the optimal antiplatelet regimen for using the PED in the acute phase.