Can endosonographers evaluate on-site cytologic adequacy? A comparison with cytotechnologists

BACKGROUND

On-site determination of cytologic adequacy increases the accuracy of EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA); however, on-site cytotechnologists are not available to all endosonographers. We hypothesize that experienced endosonographers can accurately assess whether an on-site FNA specimen is adequate.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of on-site cytopathology interpretation of EUS-FNA specimens by comparing endosonographers with a cytotechnologist.

DESIGN

Prospective double-blind controlled trial.

SETTING

Academic medical center with a high-volume EUS practice.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients undergoing EUS-FNA of lymph nodes or pancreas tumors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 3 endosonographers and 1 cytotechnologist for interpretation of cytologic specimen adequacy and diagnosis compared with a criterion standard of a board-certified cytopathologist.

RESULTS

There were 59 lymph node, 49 pancreas, and 9 liver specimens (117 total). For determination of adequacy, none of the endosonographers were statistically equivalent to the cytotechnologist (P=.004). For determination of suspicious/malignant versus benign specimens, all 3 endosonographers were inferior (P<.001) to the cytotechnologist.

LIMITATIONS

This study represents a small group of trained endosonographers in a high-volume practice and may not be applicable to other settings. The sample size does not allow an accurate evaluation of different biopsy sites (eg, pancreas vs lymph node).

CONCLUSIONS

Even trained endosonographers have variable and, in some cases, inferior abilities to interpret on-site cytologic adequacy compared with cytotechnologists.

EUS in the management of the patient with dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus is the most important risk factor in the development of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Barrett's esophagus is generally regarded as the most significant complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Adenocarcinoma occurs more frequently in the setting of high-grade dysplasia. The prognosis of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is strongly correlated with the stage of disease. The prognosis of late stage disease is extremely poor. Cure may be achieved when disease is found at an early stage. Esophagectomy has been the definitive treatment of limited stage adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. The morbidity and mortality rate for esophagectomy is high. Therefore, alternative endoscopic methods for curative treatments have gained popularity. The two main endoscopic therapies, photodynamic therapy and endoscopic mucosal resection, are both effective when applied to early-stage disease. Traditional evaluation of the patient with Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia includes esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD) with biopsy and computed tomography of the chest. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has gained popularity in the evaluation of the patient with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia because it is the only imaging technique capable of delineating the separate histologic layers of the gastrointestinal tract. The principal role of EUS in evaluating patients with Barrett's-associated dysplasia is to identify patients who may be candidates for endoscopic ablative (endoscopic mucosal resection, photodynamic therapy) therapies. EUS has been shown to be superior to computed tomography (including high resolution spiral CT) or magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging in patients with high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma. This review of the literature summarizes the ability of EUS to evaluate patients with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia.

Sleep patterns of cyclic parenteral nutrition, a pilot study: are there sleepless nights?

BACKGROUND

Cyclic home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is 1 of the few medical therapies given during normal nocturnal sleep hours, and it is possible that infusion may alter normal sleep patterns. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the sleep patterns of 5 patients receiving HPN.

METHODS

An Epworth sleep questionnaire was completed and wrist Actigraph data were collected before admission to the sleep laboratory. Formal overnight polysomnography was then preformed for 3 consecutive nights. The first night served as the acclimatization period. On the second and third nights, patients were randomized to receive either no infusion or infusion of their standard parenteral nutrition. Results were reported as the median and range and were compared with historical aged-matched controls.

RESULTS

Five patients (3 women and 2 men) with a mean age of 61 years (40 to 73 years) were studied. Patients had been HPN-dependent for a median of 23 months (4 to 60 months). Patients were receiving HPN because of short bowel syndrome (2), chronic pancreatitis (2), and intestinal pseudoobstruction (1). A 1.5-liter HPN formula, infused over 10 hours, included approximately 25 kcal/kg/d with 30% lipid and 1.0 to 1.5 g/kg/d of protein. All solutions included multiple trace elements and standard multivitamins. During total parenteral nutrition (TPN) infusion, the percent of sleep efficiency was higher than without infusion, 81% versus 72%. Sleep efficiency in age-matched controls was approximately 88%. Sleep latency was longer in patients compared with controls, and longer in patients during infusion than without infusion, 35 versus 28 minutes. During TPN infusion, the percent of stage-1 (2%), stage-2 (52%), slow-wave (24%) and random eye movement (REM) sleep (21%) was similar to values during the night without infusion. Controls had lower slow-wave and REM times. The median Epworth sleep score was 3, which is the normal reported range.

CONCLUSIONS

Although sleep quality is reduced in patients receiving HPN compared with aged-matched controls, sleep quality does not seem to be negatively effected by cyclic HPN infusion.

Changing trends in endosonography: linear imaging and tissue are increasingly the issue

The indications and uses of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) are expanding. The role of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is considered an essential aspect of EUS practice. A significant change in the indications and technology used for EUS has occurred. This study was designed to compare the use of radial, linear, and miniprobe endosonography equipment during a 10-year period in a single, large, EUS practice. A retrospective review of an EUS experience at a single high-volume center was performed. In this single-center experience, there has been an increase in the volume of EUS and EUS-FNA. For luminal cancer-staging cases, the radial echoendoscope is the predominant scope used for examination and has not changed significantly. In contrast, for pancreaticobiliary and mediastinal indications, the use of the linear array echoendoscope alone has increased and currently is the preferred scope for examination (33% vs. 76%, P < 0.001; 46% vs. 96%, P < 0.001). In these cases requiring EUS-FNA, the use of the linear array scope alone has increased from 17% to 73%. In this single-center experience, EUS has shifted from an imaging technology to an image-guided biopsy and therapeutic technology. The use of the linear array EUS alone has increased, especially in the evaluation of pancreatobiliary and mediastinal disease and when fine-needle aspiration is performed.

The role of surveillance endoscopy and endosonography after endoscopic ablation of high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma of the esophagus

Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or early carcinoma treated with surgery or photodynamic therapy (PDT) is at risk of recurrence. The efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for surveillance after PDT is unknown. Our objective was to determine if EUS is superior to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and/or CT scan for surveillance of BE neoplasia after PDT. The study was designed as a retrospective review with the setting as a tertiary referral center. Consecutive patients with BE with HGD or carcinoma in situ treated with PDT were followed with EUS, CT scan and EGD with jumbo biopsies every 1 cm at 3, 4, or 6-month intervals. Exclusion criteria was < 6 months of follow up and/or < 2 EUS procedures. Main outcome measurements were residual or recurrent disease discovered by any method. Results showed that 67/97 patients met the inclusion criteria (56 men and 11 women). Median follow-up was 16 months. Recurrent or residual adenocarcinoma (ACA) was detected in four patients during follow-up. EGD with random biopsies or targeted nodule biopsies detected three patients. EUS with endoscopic mucosal resection of the nodule confirmed T1 recurrence in one of these three. In the fourth patient, CT scan revealed perigastric lymphadenopathy and EUS-FNA (fine needle aspiration) confirmed adenocarcinoma. There were two deaths, one related to disease progression and one unrelated. The rate of recurrent/persistent ACA after PDT was 4/67 = 6%. EUS did not detect disease when EGD and CT were normal. Limitations of this study include non-blinding of results and preferential status of non-invasive imaging (CT) over EUS. Our experience suggests that EUS has little role in the surveillance of these patients, unless discrete abnormalities are found on EGD or cross-sectional imaging.

Endoscopic Ultrasound for Thoracic Malignancy: A Review

Accurate cancer staging is critical in providing the most appropriate therapy for patients with lung cancer. The decision to attempt a curative surgery or avoid an unnecessary surgery is dependent on accurate staging. In the case of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the most important parameters for optimal treatment and prognosis are the presence of cancer spread to the lymph nodes within the mediastinum and to distant organs. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become an important tool for the assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes and in some cases, distant organ metastases, because of its minimally invasive access to these sites through a transesophageal, transgastric, or transduodenal approach. The capability of performing fine needle aspiration (FNA) has greatly improved the accuracy and acceptability of EUS for lung cancer staging. This review will outline the basic principals of EUS-guided lung cancer staging and EUS-FNA techniques and outline the indications and contraindications to EUS staging of thoracic malignancy.

An exploratory phase I trial of immunochemoradiotherapy in locally advanced and borderline resectable (LA/BR) pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC)

174

Background: The primary aim of this exploratory trial was to determine the feasibility and safety of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with combinatorial immunotherapy in LA or BR PC. Methods: 10 patients (pts) with untreated, LA (n=6) or BR (n=4) biopsy-proven PC received gemcitabine (GEM) in combination with telomerase peptide vaccine (GV1001) and sargramostim (GM-CSF) both by intradermal injection. Tadalafil was taken once daily throughout the course of therapy for myeloid derived suppressor cell inhibition. The 2nd month of treatment included external beam radiation therapy (50.4 Gy, 28 fractions) and concurrent twice-weekly GEM 50 mg/m2. Disease response was assessed at 12 weeks. Following recovery from either concurrent CRT or resection, 8 weeks of GV1001 + GM-CSF, tadalafil and GEM completed treatment. Peripheral blood was analyzed by quantitative multiparameter whole blood flow cytometry of immune cell subtypes. Samples were also cryo-preserved for future analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) populations and ELISPOT analysis of antigen-specific T cell numbers. Tumor resection specimens were sectioned for immunohistological analysis of macrophage and T cell infiltration. Results: 9 of 10 pts completed therapy to assess response. Grade (Gr) 3-4 hematologic adverse events (AE) were observed during CRT. Immune-related AE were infrequent and mild. 3 of 4 pts with BR disease and 1 with initial LA (unresectable) disease achieved R0 resection. No unanticipated surgical complications were observed. Changes in monocytes and granulocytes occurred throughout treatment and may correlate with clinical benefit. At least 50% reduction in serum CA19-9 was observed in 8 pts. Partial response (n=2) or stable disease (n=7) was achieved in 9 pts. Conclusions: Combinatorial immunotherapy concurrent with GEM-based CRT is feasible and appears safe in LA or BR PC. Initial biochemical responses as well as disease control were observed in the majority of pts. Preliminary immune correlative data suggest a relationship between hematopoietic populations and clinical response.