Analyses of tumor microenvironment in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving immunotherapy (Meet-URO 18 study)

Introduction: The Meet-URO 18 study is a multicentric study of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab in the second-line and beyond, categorized as responders (progression-free survival ≥ 12 months) and non-responders (progression-free survival < 3 months). Areas covered: The current study includes extensive immunohistochemical analysis of T-lineage markers (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD8/CD4 ratio), macrophages (CD68), ph-mTOR, CD15 and CD56 expression on tumor cells, and PD-L1 expression, on an increased sample size including 161 tumor samples (113 patients) compared with preliminary presented data. Responders' tumor tissue (n = 90; 55.9%) was associated with lower CD4 expression (p = 0.014), higher CD56 expression (p = 0.046) and higher CD8/CD4 ratio (p = 0.030). Expert opinion/commentary: The present work suggests the regulatory role of a subpopulation of T cells on antitumor response and identifies CD56 as a putative biomarker of immunotherapy efficacy.

Prognostic Stratification by the Meet-URO Score in Real-World Older Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Receiving Cabozantinib: A Subanalysis of the Prospective ZEBRA Study (Meet-URO 9)

BACKGROUND

The addition of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and bone metastases to the IMDC classification provided by the Meet-URO score, resulted in higher prognostic accuracy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receiving ≥2nd line nivolumab or cabozantinib in 2 retrospective analyses and 1st line nivolumab-ipilimumab in an expanded access programme. Prognostic estimates for older mRCC patients might be key for clinical decision-making.

METHODS

The outcome of real-world older (≥70 years) mRCC patients treated with any line cabozantinib within the multicenter observational prospective ZEBRA (Meet-URO 9) study was analyzed according to the baseline Meet-URO score. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The discriminative ability by Harrell's c-index and calibration were assessed to compare the Meet-URO and IMDC scores.

RESULTS

A total of 104 mRCC patients received cabozantinib as 1st (38%), 2nd (20%), or ≥3rd (41%) line. With a median follow-up of 11.2 months, the median OS (mOS) was of 18.4 months. According to the IMDC score, favorable (15%), intermediate (65%) and poor-risk (19%) patients had a mOS not reached, of 15.6 and 5.7 months respectively (p = .011). According to the Meet-URO score groups, mOS was not reached in both group 1 (10%) and group 2 (25%), while in group 3 (33%), group 4 (25%) and group 5 (8%) mOS was of 13.6, 12.5, and 3.7 months, respectively (p < .001). The discriminative ability of the Meet-URO score was maintained by merging groups 1 to 2 vs. 3 to 4 vs. 5 (p < .001). The Meet-URO score (with either the original 5-group stratification or the modified 3-group one) showed higher accuracy than the IMDC score (c-index of 0.686 and 0.676 vs. 0.622).

CONCLUSION

This analysis confirmed the prognostic accuracy of the Meet-URO score in older mRCC patients treated with cabozantinib and its role as a convenient tool for informing the patient and clinical decisions.

Time to strategy failure and treatment beyond progression in pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients receiving nivolumab: post-hoc analysis of the Meet-URO 15 study

Background

Immunotherapies exhibit peculiar cancer response patterns in contrast to chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Some patients experience disease response after initial progression or durable responses after treatment interruption. In clinical practice, immune checkpoint inhibitors may be continued after radiological progression if clinical benefit is observed. As a result, estimating progression-free survival (PFS) based on the first disease progression may not accurately reflect the actual benefit of immunotherapy.

Methods

The Meet-URO 15 study was a multicenter retrospective analysis of 571 pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receiving nivolumab. Time to strategy failure (TSF) was defined as the interval from the start of immunotherapy to definitive disease progression or death. This post-hoc analysis compared TSF to PFS and assess the response and survival outcomes between patients treatated beyond progression (TBP) and non-TBP. Moreover, we evaluated the prognostic accuracy of the Meet-URO score versus the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) score based on TSF and PFS.

Results

Overall, 571 mRCC patients were included in the analysis. Median TSF was 8.6 months (95% CI: 7.0 - 10.1), while mPFS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.7 - 8.5). TBP patients (N = 93) had significantly longer TSF (16.3 vs 5.5 months; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (34.8 vs 17.9 months; p < 0.001) but similar PFS compared to non-TBP patients. In TBP patients, a median delay of 9.6 months (range: 6.7-16.3) from the first to the definitive disease progression was observed, whereas non-TBP patients had overlapped median TSF and PFS (5.5 months). Moreover, TBP patients had a trend toward a higher overall response rate (33.3% vs 24.3%; p = 0.075) and disease control rate (61.3% vs 55.5%; p = 0.31). Finally, in the whole population the Meet-URO score outperformed the IMDC score in predicting both TSF (c-index: 0.63 vs 0.59) and PFS (0.62 vs 0.59).

Conclusion

We found a 2-month difference between mTSF and mPFS in mRCC patients receiving nivolumab. However, TBP patients had better outcomes, including significantly longer TSF and OS than non-TBP patients. The Meet-URO score is a reliable predictor of TSF and PFS.

Apalutamide-induced lichenoid reaction in a patient with non-metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Apalutamide is an oral selective androgen receptor inhibitor, approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (M0 CRPC) at high risk of developing metastases and for patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate (mHSPC) in association with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In the registration studies, skin reactions were reported among the most common side effects and as an adverse event of special interest.

CASE REPORT

Apalutamide-induced rash includes a wide spectrum of different types of skin reactions, but few cases reports and case series have described this adverse event. Here, we report an M0 CRPC patient who experienced a rare skin adverse event, a lichenoid reaction.

MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME

After 4 months of therapy with apalutamide, the patient reported dorsal pricking and dry skin. Lichenoid reaction was confirmed histologically and its correlation to the drug was demonstrated after pursuing a multidisciplinary approach.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is one of the first cases of Apalutamide-related lichenoid reaction and this clinical case showed the relevance of a multidisciplinary management when assessing drug-related adverse events. A broader knowledge of the spectrum of drug-related reactions would allow for a better diagnosis and therapy management by both physicians and patients.

Characterization of Tumor and Immune Tumor Microenvironment of Primary Tumors and Metastatic Sites in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Based on Response to Nivolumab Immunotherapy: Preliminary Results from the Meet-URO 18 Study

BACKGROUND

Prognostic and predictive factors for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immunotherapy are highly warranted, and the immune tumor microenvironment (I-TME) is under investigation.

METHODS

The Meet-URO 18 was a multicentric retrospective study assessing the I-TME in mRCC patients treated with ≥2nd-line nivolumab, dichotomized into responders and non-responders according to progression-free survival (≥12 months and ≤3 months, respectively). The primary objective was to identify differential immunohistochemical (IHC) patterns between the two groups. Lymphocyte infiltration and the expressions of different proteins on tumor cells (CD56, CD15, CD68, and ph-mTOR) were analyzed. The expression of PD-L1 was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 116 tumor tissue samples from 84 patients (59% were primary tumors and 41% were metastases) were evaluated. Samples from responders (N = 55) were significantly associated with lower expression of CD4+ T lymphocytes and higher levels of ph-mTOR and CD56+ compared with samples from non-responders (N = 61). Responders also showed a higher CD3+ expression (p = 0.059) and CD8+/CD4+ ratio (p = 0.084). Non-responders were significantly associated with a higher percentage of clear cell histology and grading.

CONCLUSIONS

Differential IHC patterns between the tumors in patients who were responders and non-responders to nivolumab were identified. Further investigation with genomic analyses is planned.

Correlation of the immune tumor microenvironment (I-TME) with gene expression profiles as prognostic and predictive factors in patients (pts) with metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immunotherapy (Meet-URO 18 I-TME study)

TPS753

Background: Several studies suggested that response to immunotherapy may be influenced by many factors, including peripheral blood biomarkers, the composition of I-TME and different molecular expression pathways. In mRCC patients, immunotherapy has become part of clinical practice, but the identification of patients most likely to respond to checkpoint inhibitors is still an unmet clinical need. Moreover, there are no validated and clinically applicable gene expression panels as prognostic and/or predictive response biomarkers. To date, three major groups of immune-related gene expression were identified in mRCC: the angiogenesis pathway, the T-effector pathway and the mixed pathway (doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58804-y). Each group of gene expression seems to be responsible for a different type of immune response in the I-TME. However, a significant association with treatment response to immunotherapy has not yet been demonstrated. Methods: The Meet-URO 18 is a multicentric retrospective translational study aimed at identifying distinctive molecular patterns of the I-TME with a prognostic and predictive role in mRCC (primary objective). Pretreated mRCC patients receiving ≥2nd line nivolumab have been divided according to clinical benefit in responders (PFS ≥ 12 months) versus non-responders (PFS ≤ 3 months). Secondary objectives include the correlation between primary tumor and metastases to identify a potential inter-tumor heterogeneity and the correlation with survival and response outcomes. Histological samples of primary tumors and/or metastases have been collected for the transcriptomic analyses together with clinical data of patients from medical records. The transcriptomic characterization of the I-TME of the primary tumor and/or metastases will be performed using the analytical platform "nCounter" of NanoString®, which analyzes the expression of 71 genes involved in angiogenesis, immunomodulation mediated by T-effector response, mechanisms of tumor invasion and mechanisms of calcium channel flows. The gene-panel include a group of 66 genes previously demonstrated to be related in the immune-response in mRCC (doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58804-y) and 5 housekeeping genes (RPS13, PPIA, RPL27, RP2, B-ACT).

Prognostic stratification by the Meet-URO score in a real-world elderly population of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) receiving cabozantinib: A subanalysis of the prospective ZEBRA study (Meet-URO 9)

637

Background: The combination of neutrophil to lymphocyte (NLR), bone metastases and IMDC score in the novel prognostic Meet-URO score has shown a higher prognostic performance than the IMDC score alone in mRCC pts receiving ≥2nd line nivolumab or cabozantinib in two retrospective analyses and 1st line nivolumab-ipilimumab in a real-world prospective study [http://bit.ly/Meet-URO15_score]. Further validation is needed since this score represents an easy prognostic tool for clinical practice with no additional costs. Methods: A real-world analysis of elderly (≥70 yo) mRCC pts treated with any line cabozantinib was conducted in the multicenter observational prospective Zebra study. Baseline Meet-URO score was assessed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the Harrell’s c-index was calculated to compare accuracy of survival prediction of the Meet-URO and IMDC scores. Results: 104 mRCC pts received cabozantinib as 1st (38%), 2nd (20%), 3rd (33%) and 4th (8%) line, with a median follow-up of 11.2 months (mo) and a median overall survival (mOS) of 18.4 mo. According to the IMDC score, favorable- (15%), intermediate- (65%) and poor-risk (19%) pts had a mOS not reached (NR), 15.6 and of 5.7 mo, respectively (p = 0.011). Reclassifying the population according to the Meet-URO score, we observed that group 1 (10%) and group 2 (25%) had both mOS NR, whereas group 3 (33%), group 4 (25%) and group 5 (8%) had a mOS of 13.6, 12.5 and 3.7 mo, respectively (p = 0.001). Moreover, the Meet-URO score maintained its discrimination ability also merging group 1-2 vs 3-4 vs 5 (p < 0.001). NLR < 3.2 was the heaviest component of the score (p < 0.001, mOS 24.8 vs 11.5 mo). The Meet-URO score (using both original with 5 groups and modified with 3 groups) has shown a higher prognostic power than the IMDC score alone (c-index of 0.686 and 0.676 vs 0.622). Conclusions: This analysis confirmed the higher accuracy in survival stratification of the Meet-URO score compared with the IMDC score alone also in a specific population like elderly mRCC pts treated with cabozantinib. NLR was confirmed as a strong prognostic factor with cabozantinib. Further applications of the Meet-URO score in mRCC pts treated with first-line immune-combinations are planned and highly awaited. Clinical trial information: 2018/116/PU .

Combined response of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma to immunotherapy: a case report

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved the therapeutic scenario of many different advanced malignancies and could be an effective treatment strategy in synchronous or metachronous tumors. The authors describe the clinical case of a patient who experienced a long-lasting response of his metastatic renal cell carcinoma and an optimal response of his locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to immunotherapy. The systemic treatment was chosen based on a literature review of several clinical reports, since there was no prospective study on anti-PD-1 blockade activity in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma when the patient started the treatment. This clinical case supports the growing evidence for immunotherapy as a valid treatment option across different types of advanced tumors.

The prognostic value of the previous nephrectomy in pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving immunotherapy: a sub-analysis of the Meet-URO 15 study

BACKGROUND

Nephrectomy is considered the backbone of managing patients with localized and selected metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The prognostic role of nephrectomy has been widely investigated with cytokines and targeted therapy, but it is still unclear in the immunotherapy era.

METHODS

We investigated the Meet-URO-15 study dataset of 571 pretreated mRCC patients receiving nivolumab as second or further lines about the prognostic role of the previous nephrectomy (received in either the localized or metastatic setting) in the overall population and according to the Meet-URO score groups.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent nephrectomy showed a significantly reduced risk of death (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.32-0.60, p < 0.001) with a longer median overall survival (OS) (35.9 months vs 12.1 months), 1-year OS of 71.6% vs 50.5% and 2-years OS of 56.5% vs 22.0% compared to those who did not. No significant interaction between nephrectomy and the overall five Meet-URO score risk groups was observed (p = 0.17). It was statistically significant when merging group 1 with 2 and 3 and group 4 with 5 (p = 0.038) and associated with a longer OS for the first three prognostic groups (p < 0.001), but not for groups 4 and 5 (p = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests an overall positive impact of the previous nephrectomy on the outcome of pretreated mRCC patients receiving immunotherapy. The clinical relevance of cytoreductive nephrectomy, optimal timing and patient selection deserves further investigation, especially for patients with Meet-URO scores of 1 to 3, who are the once deriving benefit in our analyses. However, that benefit is not evident for IMDC poor-risk patients (including the Meet-URO score groups 4 and 5) and a subgroup of IMDC intermediate-risk patients defined as group 4 by the Meet-URO score.

Early primary tumor response in metastatic RCC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors-based combinations

349

Background: 25-30% of renal cell carcinoma presents with metastases (mRCC) at diagnosis. The activity of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-combinations on the primary tumor (PT) is debated. Patients and Methods: mRCC patients (pts) with PT who received first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N/I) or pembrolizumab plus axitinib (P/A) were included. We investigated the early primary tumor response (EPTR) at the first radiological assessment. Results: 73 pts were included. The median early reduction of the PT longest diameter was 12.4% with P/A versus 6.2% with N/I (p = 0.42). We evaluated if the type of EPTR could affect the metastases response. Among pts with PT stable disease (SD), 8.3% had metastatic disease progression (PD) with P/A and 34.8% with N/I. Early PT partial response (PR) was associated with no metastatic PD with both N/I and P/A. The 2 pts with PT PD had also metastatic PD to P/A. Of the 3 PT with PD to N/I, 1 had metastatic SD and 2 PD. In the overall population, of the 94.1% without PT progression (PR+SD), 47.5% had metastatic PR, 35.6% SD, 16.9% PD. Conclusions: ICIs-combinations achieved an early PT PR in about 10-20%, without any complete responses. Only a small percentage of PT had an early PD, mainly associated with metastatic PD. However, among those PT without an early progression, metastatic PR can be achieved in approximately 50% of cases.[Table: see text]

Rare anti-VEGFR therapy-induced toxicity and long-term response to immunotherapy in a rare non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma patient

Advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) has a poor prognosis and clinical data on the therapeutic options currently available, including immunotherapy, are generally limited highlighting an unmet clinical need. Moreover, the onset of rare adverse events raises the need of a better therapeutic management of limited treatment options. We report the clinical case of a 63-year-old man with the diagnosis of metastatic mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma, a rare nccRCC, with sarcomatoid differentiation who developed two episodes of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) to first-line sunitinib. It appeared after 5 months the start of the targeted therapy and reappeared at the reintroduction of the therapy. PRES is a rare and unusual adverse event to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) therapies, which is characterized by acute neurological disorders along with typical changes on neurological imaging, especially MRI. Moreover, this rare histotype of RCC experienced a long-term response to immunotherapy which is lasting more than 2 years. This clinical case is interesting for its rarity as a rare neurological adverse event developed twice in a rare type of RCC which also experienced an unusual long-term benefit to immunotherapy.

Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review of the Current Evidence

In recent years, the treatment landscape of urothelial carcinoma has significantly changed due to the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which are the standard of care for second-line treatment and first-line platinum-ineligible patients with advanced disease. Despite the overall survival improvement, only a minority of patients benefit from this immunotherapy. Therefore, there is an unmet need to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers or models to select patients who will benefit from ICIs, especially in view of novel therapeutic agents. This review describes the prognostic and predictive role, and clinical readiness, of clinical and tumour factors, including new molecular classes, tumour mutational burden, mutational signatures, circulating tumour DNA, programmed death-ligand 1, inflammatory indices and clinical characteristics for patients with urothelial cancer treated with ICIs. A classification of these factors according to the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation currently indicates both a prognostic and predictive value for ctDNA and a prognostic relevance only for concomitant medications and patients' characteristics.

Feasibility of multiple immunoexpression assay for immune tumor micrornvironment (I-TME) on matched metastatic and primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) for patient prognostication and predictiveness to immunotherapy (preliminary analyses of the Meet URO 18 study)

e16545

Background: The Meet-URO 18 study is ongoing to assess the prognostic role of I-TME in advanced RCC patients treated with ≥second line nivolumab divided into two cohorts according to clinical benefit [progression-free survival ≥ 12 and ≤ 3 months]. We primarily assessed the feasibility of multiple antibody testing related to I-TME on matched metastases and primary tumor. Methods: Immunohistochemical analyses were used for the TME assessment of T-lineage (CD3, CD4, CD8), FOXP-3, granulocytes (CD15), macrophage-lineage (CD68), natural killer (NK)-cells (CD56), tumor cells (TCs) (CD56), B-lineage (CD20) and phosphorylated mTOR (phmTOR). TCs were quantitatively assessed for CD15, CD56 and phmTOR positivity. For T-, B- and CD68 cells within TC nests, the number of immunoreactive cells were counted with a microscopic field of x200 (0.933 mm2). Results: Overall, 42 tumor tissue samples (primary tumors, metastases) were available and for 17 patients both metastatic and primary tumor tissues were assessable for matched analyses. Among these patients, 12 had clear cell, 1 papillary and 4 mucinous tubular and spindle cell histotype according to WHO 2016 classification. Intratumoral T/CD8 cells ranged from 32 to >400 spots (mean 240; >400 in 7 samples) and intratumoral T/CD4 cells from 4 to >400 spots (mean 168; >400 in 5 samples). Nine samples showed absence of phmTOR expression, while 8 ranged from 10% to 90% of positive TCs. We did not observe countable NK-cells, whereas CD56 was visible in 5 samples (mean 55% of positive TCs). Intratumoral CD68 cells ranged from 34 to >400 spots (mean 175, >400 in 3 patients). Agreement of CD15 method of reporting granulocytic presence was high, thus only CD15 neoplastic expression was reported and ranged from 12% to 55% (mean 30%) in 15 patients. TME multiple analysis resulted equally clustered in 8 patients (<20% variability of single immuno-test) whereas the remaining 9 patients showed significant differences as percentage of immuno-tissue expression in at least one of the 5 immuno-indicators (T/CD8-CD4, C15, CD68, CD56, phmTOR). The remaining 8 samples of patients without matched analyses were used to test the feasibility of multiple analyses; among all antibodies exclusion of the CD20 and FOXP-3 final evaluation was needed, due to technical standardization. According to the 5 immuno-indicators, double-triple positive or penta-positive TME indicators may be identified and graded. Conclusions: Providing multiple immunoexpression platforms on a single specimen may be used as routine workflow. Profiling I-TME, especially CD56, CD15 on TCs and CD68 cells and phmTOR, deserves investigation with extensive control groups. A validation cohort will be tested at tissue level and in correlation with peripheral blood markers.

Immunotherapy retreatment: case report, review of the literature and proposal for the definition of different scenarios

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have improved the treatment landscape of different tumors and one of the emerging issues is the reintroduction of immunotherapy after discontinuation. Scarce evidence is currently available and different definitions have been used. The case of a patient with pretreated advanced urothelial cancer, who responded to immunotherapy retreatment after long-term benefit from the previous course, is reported. Based on a review of the different clinical scenarios, a definition of immunotherapy retreatment was proposed, as rechallenge or reintroduction, based on the reasons of discontinuation of the previous course. Clinical factors potentially associated with clinical benefit from immunotherapy retreatment are discussed, even though ad hoc studies are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of the different immunotherapy retreatment strategies.

The Prognostic Role of Baseline Metabolic Tumor Burden and Systemic Inflammation Biomarkers in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radium-223: A Proof of Concept Study

Over the last years has emerged the urgent need for the identification of reliable prognostic biomarkers able to potentially identify metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients most likely to benefit from Radium-223 (Ra-223) since baseline. In the present monocentric retrospective study, we analyzed the prognostic power of systemic inflammation biomarkers and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (FDG-PET)-derived parameters and their potential interplay in this clinical setting. The following baseline laboratory parameters were collected in 59 mCRPC patients treated with Ra-223: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic inflammation index (SII), while maximum Standardized Uptake Value, Metabolic Tumor Volume (MTV), and Total Lesion Glycolysis (TLG) were calculated in the 48 of them submitted to baseline FDG-PET. At the univariate analysis, NLR, dNLR, MTV, and TLG were able to predict the overall survival (OS). However, only NLR and MTV were independent predictors of OS at the multivariate analysis. Additionally, the occurrence of both increased NLR and MTV at baseline identified mCRPC patients at higher risk for lower long-term survival after treatment with Ra-223. In conclusion, the degree of systemic inflammation, the quantification of the metabolically active tumor burden and their combination might represent potentially valuable tools for identifying mCRPC patients who are most likely to benefit from Ra-223. However, further studies are needed to reproduce these findings in larger settings.

Gender-specific aspects related to type of fertility preservation strategies and access to fertility care

Survivorship is an area of paramount importance to be addressed as early as possible after cancer diagnosis by all health care providers. On this regard, cancer care in young patients often poses several age-related considerations among which fertility and pregnancy-related issues have a crucial role. According to the available guidelines on the topic, all patients with cancer diagnosed during their reproductive years should be provided a proper oncofertility counselling before starting anticancer treatments. This is an important step in order to inform patients about the potential treatment-induced gonadotoxicity and the available strategies for fertility preservation so that they can be referred as early as possible to fertility specialists if potentially interested in these options.In this manuscript, we aim to provide an up to date overview on the available efficacy and safety data with the main strategies for fertility preservation in male and female cancer patients in order to help optimising the oncofertility counselling performed by healthcare providers involved in cancer care and dealing with young patients. In male patients with cancer, sperm cryopreservation is the standard technique for fertility preservation. Oocyte/embryo cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation and temporary ovarian suppression with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy are the main options in female patients with cancer.A multidisciplinary management building a strong network between fertility and oncology/haematology units is crucial to properly address fertility care in all young patients with cancer, at both diagnosis and during oncologic follow-up. Discussing fertility and pregnancy-related issues with young patients with cancer has to be considered mandatory nowadays keeping in mind that returning to a normal life (including the possibility to have a family and to live with as few side effects as possible) should be considered an important ambition in cancer care in the 21st century .

Burning Questions in the Oncofertility Counseling of Young Breast Cancer Patients

The improved prognosis of breast cancer patients makes survivorship issues an area of crucial importance. In this regard, an increased attention is needed toward the development of potential anticancer treatment-related long-term side-effects, including gonadal failure and infertility in young women. Therefore, fertility preservation and family planning are crucial issues to be addressed in all young women of reproductive age with newly diagnosed cancer. Despite a growing availability of data on the efficacy and safety of fertility preservation options and the fact that conceiving after prior history of breast cancer has become more accepted over time, there are still several gray zones in this field so that many physicians remain uncomfortable to deal with these topics. The purpose of this review is to answer some of the most controversial questions frequently asked by patients during their oncofertility counseling, in order to provide a detailed and up-to-date overview on the evidence available in this field to physicians involved in the care of young women with breast cancer.

Baseline and early change of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (bNLR and ΔNLR) as prognostic factors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with nivolumab: Preliminary results of the Meet-URO 15 (I-BIO-REC) study

752

Background: Biomarkers to select mRCC patients most likely to benefit to immune-checkpoint inhibitors are still needed. The ongoing retrospective multicentre Meet-URO 15 (I-BIO-REC) study evaluates the prognostic role of peripheral blood cells in mRCC patients treated with nivolumab. Methods:The primary endpoint of the study was median overall survival (mOS) according to bNLR. Complete blood count was collected at the first four cycles of nivolumab. NLR was defined as the ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte (cutoff = 3) and ΔNLR the difference between NLR at 2nd cycle and bNLR (median used as cutoff = 0.3). Here we reported preliminary analyses on bNLR and DNLR. Results: From May 2016 to January 2019 189 patients started nivolumab as 2nd (62%), 3rd (25%) and > 3rd (13%) line. Median age was 69 years, 67% were male and 87% had clear cell histology. Baseline IMDC group was favorable in 26%, intermediate in 63% and poor in 11%. Lymph-nodes, visceral and bone metastases were present in 55%, 92% and 37%. mOS and progression-free survival (PFS) were 30.5 months and 9.5 months. Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 28% and 57%. bNLR was available in 162 patients: bNLR < 3 (52%) correlated with statistically significant longer PFS [11.5 vs 5.6 months; HR 1.61 (1.09-2.39), p = 0.017] and OS [NR vs 22.4 months; HR 2.61 (1.53-4.46), p < 0.001], with similar ORR (32% vs 32%) but higher DCR (66% vs 55%) compared to NLR ≥ 3. ΔNLR was available in 136 patients: ΔNLR < 0.3 (50%) correlated with statistically significant longer PFS [17.1 vs 8.5 months; HR 1.57 (1.02-2.43) p = 0.04] and OS [medians not reached; HR 1.91 (1.04-3.51) p = 0.038], with similar ORR (39% vs 32%) but higher DCR (73% vs 56%) compared to ΔNLR ≥ 0.3. Univariate and multivariate analyses adjusted for IMDC group, line of therapy and metastatic sites, confirmed the statistically significant correlation between ΔNLR with PFS and OS and NLR with OS but not with PFS. Conclusions: Preliminary analyses of our study showed a prognostic role of bNLR and early ΔNLR in mRCC patients treated with nivolumab.