COVID-19 Incidence and Death Rates Among Unvaccinated and Fully Vaccinated Adults with and Without Booster Doses During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Emergence - 25 U.S. Jurisdictions, April 4-December 25, 2021

Previous reports of COVID-19 case, hospitalization, and death rates by vaccination status† indicate that vaccine protection against infection, as well as serious COVID-19 illness for some groups, declined with the emergence of the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, and waning of vaccine-induced immunity (1-4). During August-November 2021, CDC recommended§ additional primary COVID-19 vaccine doses among immunocompromised persons and booster doses among persons aged ≥18 years (5). The SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron) variant emerged in the United States during December 2021 (6) and by December 25 accounted for 72% of sequenced lineages (7). To assess the impact of full vaccination with additional and booster doses (booster doses),¶ case and death rates and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were estimated among unvaccinated and fully vaccinated adults by receipt of booster doses during pre-Delta (April-May 2021), Delta emergence (June 2021), Delta predominance (July-November 2021), and Omicron emergence (December 2021) periods in the United States. During 2021, averaged weekly, age-standardized case IRRs among unvaccinated persons compared with fully vaccinated persons decreased from 13.9 pre-Delta to 8.7 as Delta emerged, and to 5.1 during the period of Delta predominance. During October-November, unvaccinated persons had 13.9 and 53.2 times the risks for infection and COVID-19-associated death, respectively, compared with fully vaccinated persons who received booster doses, and 4.0 and 12.7 times the risks compared with fully vaccinated persons without booster doses. When the Omicron variant emerged during December 2021, case IRRs decreased to 4.9 for fully vaccinated persons with booster doses and 2.8 for those without booster doses, relative to October-November 2021. The highest impact of booster doses against infection and death compared with full vaccination without booster doses was recorded among persons aged 50-64 and ≥65 years. Eligible persons should stay up to date with COVID-19 vaccinations.

Integrating bipolar disorder management in primary care

There is growing realization that persons with bipolar disorder may exclusively be seen in primary (general medical) care settings, notably because of limited access to mental health care and stigma in seeking mental health treatment. At least two clinical practice guidelines for bipolar disorder recommend collaborative chronic care models (CCMs) to help integrate mental health care to better manage this illness. CCMs, which include provider guideline support, self-management support, care management, and measurement-based care, are well-established in primary care settings, and may help primary care practitioners manage bipolar disorder. However, further research is required to adapt CCMs to support complexities in diagnosing persons with bipolar disorder, and integrate decision-making processes regarding medication safety and tolerability in primary care. Additional implementation studies are also needed to adapt CCMs for persons with bipolar disorder in primary care, especially those seen in smaller practices with limited infrastructure and access to mental health care.

Does an allergy to fish pre-empt an adverse protamine reaction? A case report and a literature review

The operating theatre exposes patients to myriad potential agents which could result in a life-threatening anaphylactic reaction. Anaesthetic drugs, blood products, and latex are only some of the possible allergens. Reactions are deemed to be anaphylactic when immediate sensitivity is combined with cardiovascular collapse. A patient who had a known allergy to shellfish presented for first time cardiopulmonary bypass. The perfusion team were concerned that there was a realistic possibility that an adverse reaction to protamine could occur. Anaphylactic reactions to protamine in patients allergic to fish have been reported. The anaesthetic team were informed and the necessary precautions taken. We report on the outcome for our patient and also discuss other risk factors and the types of reactions that can result when an adverse reaction to protamine occurs.

OS07.2.A Evaluation of Intraoperative Surgical Adjuncts and Resection of Glioblastoma (ELISAR GB): A UK and Ireland multicentre, prospective observational cohort study

Background

Despite operative and adjuvant therapies, glioblastoma remains incurable, with the extent of resection being one of few treatments that can improve survival. To improve resection, operative adjuncts are used, with neuronavigation and 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) recommended as a standard of care in those aimed for maximal safe resection. Despite the standards, meta-analysis concluded that the impact of 5-ALA on the extent of surgical resection is of low quality due to bias in reporting tumour location and additional image guidance used, factors impacting on extent of resection as well as short-term neurological outcomes being uncertain. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the availability and use of 5-ALA and other adjuncts and compare surgical outcomes of 5-ALA-guided versus non-5-ALA-guided resections.

Material and Methods

A multicenter prospective observational cohort study was conducted across 27 out of 31 available centres in the UK and Ireland from 6 January until 19 March 2020. Inclusion criteria included adults with first diagnosis, supratentorial glioblastoma undergoing resection. Primary outcomes included: i) the availability and use of surgical adjuncts and ii) complete resection of enhancing tissue (CRET). Secondary outcomes included adverse events, new onset of postoperative neurological deficit and post-operative neurological function. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for analysis with a p-value <0.05 deemed significant.

Results

232 consecutive cases were identified. 142/232 cases were aimed for maximal safe resection subsequently divided into 5-ALA-guided (n=92) versus non-5-ALA-guided (n=50) resections. 5-ALA and neuronavigation were available across all centres. Neuronavigation and 5-ALA were used in 91% (n=129/142) and 65% (n=92/142) of cases aimed for maximal safe resection whereas 83% (n=75/90) and 49% (n=44/90) for debulk surgery. 35 unique combinations of surgical adjuncts were used in 232 operations. 5-ALA-guided resection yielded a higher percentage of CRET than without (55% versus 28%, p < 0.01). The two groups showed no difference in adverse events (p=0.98), new onset of neurological deficit (p=0.88) nor neurological function (p=0.7). A logistic regression analysis showed that 5-ALA was an important predictor of CRET regardless of additional adjuncts used (OR 2.4, CI 0.96-5.97, P = 0.05), tumour location and molecular characterisation (OR 3.48, CI 1.61-7.51, P <0.01).

Conclusion

Firstly, we showed that 5-ALA is not always used for glioblastoma aimed for CRET. Secondly, we report a great heterogeneity of adjuncts used for resection, possibly explained by a lack of high-quality evidence and surgeon training. Thirdly we demonstrate that 5-ALA-guided resection leads to higher percentage of CRET regardless of other adjuncts used, tumour location and molecular characterisation.

Mental health in ACOs: missed opportunities and low-hanging fruit

Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) have potential to improve care for chronic conditions through incentives for better performance and bundled payments that promote care coordination. The Chronic Care Model (CCM) is a framework for providing health services for chronic conditions in primary care settings consistent with the organizational and financial goals of ACOs. Integrated mental health care – collaborative care by mental health and primary care providers for selected patients – improves care and is consistent with the Chronic Care Model. However, under the Medicare Shared Savings Program ACOs currently do not specify financial or organizational incentives for providing integrated mental health care through the CCM, leaving a missed opportunity to realize the full potential of ACOs to improve patient outcomes. We describe the rationale for incorporating mental health care into ACOs; how it can benefit consumers, providers, and ACOs; and what health care organizations can do to implement integrated mental health care.