The impact of time from ILD diagnosis to referral to the transplant center on the probability of inclusion in the transplant waiting list

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant is a therapeutic option for patients with progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine whether time from ILD diagnosis to referral to a transplant center influences the probability of being included in the transplant waiting list.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study including all ILD patients evaluated as lung transplantation (LT) candidates at a lung transplant center between 01/01/2017 and 31/12/2022. The primary endpoint was the probability of being included in the lung transplant waiting list according to the time elapsed from diagnosis to referral to the transplant center.

RESULTS

A total of 843 lung transplant requests were received, of which 367 (43.5%) were associated with ILD. Thirteen patients were excluded because they did not attend the first visit, whereas another 11 were excluded because some information was missing. As a result, our final sample was composed of 343 patients. The median time from diagnosis to referral was 29.4 (10.9 - 61.1) months. The overall probability of inclusion in the waiting list was 29.7%. By time from diagnosis to referral, the probability of inclusion in the waiting list was 48.1% for the patients referred 〈 6 months from diagnosis; 27.5% for patients referred 6 to 24 months from diagnosis; and 25.8% for patients referred 〉 24 months from diagnosis (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Early referral to a lung transplant center seemed to increase the probability of being included in the lung transplant waiting list. Further research is needed in this topic.

Impact of the New Definition of Pulmonary Hypertension on the Prevalence of Primary Graft Dysfunction in Lung Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND & AIM

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) secondary to lung disease (Group-3 PH) is the second leading cause of PH. The role of PH as a risk factor for primary graft dysfunction (PGD) following lung transplant (LT) is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact that the new definition of PH had on the prevalence of PH in patients with advanced lung disease-candidate for LT, and its association with the occurrence of PGD.

METHOD

A retrospective study was performed in all patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation referred for consideration as candidates to LT in a centre between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2022. The baseline and haemodynamic characteristics of patients were analysed, along with the occurrence of PGD and post-transplant course in those who ultimately underwent transplantation.

RESULTS

A total of 396 patients were included. Based on the new 2022 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society definitions, as many as 70.7% of patients met PH criteria. Since the introduction of the 2022 definition, a significant reduction was observed in the frequency of severe Group-3 PH (41.1% vs 10.3%; p<0.001), with respect to the 2015 definition. As many as 236 patients underwent transplantation. None of the variables associated with PH was identified as a risk factor for PGD.

CONCLUSION

The new classification did not have any impact on the prevalence of PGD after transplantation. These results exclude that any significant differences exist in the baseline characteristics or post-transplant course of patients with Group-3 PH vs unclassified PH.

Simplified risk stratification based on cardiopulmonary exercise test: A Spanish two-center experience

A simplified 4-strata risk stratification approach based on three variables is widespread in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) at follow-up. This study aimed to assess the impact of replacing the 6-min walk test (6MWT) with the peak 02 uptake evaluated by the cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) on risk stratification by this scale. We included 180 prevalent patients with PAH from two reference hospitals in Spain, followed up between 2006 and 2022. Patients were included if all the variables of interest were available within a 3-month period on the Spanish Registry of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (REHAP): functional class (FC); NT-proBNP; 6MWT; and CPET. The original 4-strata model (NT-proBNP, 6MWT, FC) identified most patients at low or intermediate-low risk (36.7% and 51.1%, respectively). Notably, the modified scale (NT-proBNP, CPET, FC) improved the identification of patients at intermediate-high risk up to 18.9%, and at high risk up to 1.1% in comparison with the previous 12.2% and 0.0% in the original scale. This new model increased the number of patients correctly classified into higher-risk strata (positive NRI of 0.06), as well as classified more patients without events in lower-risk strata (negative NRI of 0.04). The proposed score showed a slightly superior prognostic capacity compared with the original model (Harrel's C-index 0.717 vs. 0.709). Using O2 uptake instead of distance walked in the 6MWT improves the identification of high-risk patients using the 4-strata scale. This change could have relevant prognostic implications and lead to changes in the specific treatment of PAH.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in Spain: a decade of change

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) treatment has evolved in the last decade. However, there is scarce information on the long-term impact of this progress in a real-life population at a national level. This study was designed to analyze the characteristics of CTEPH patients in Spain over the last decade.

METHODS

We prospectively collected epidemiological, clinical, and prognostic data from CTEPH patients consecutively included in the Spanish REHAP registry from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2018. We evaluated differences over time, establishing 2013 as the reference date for analysis. Propensity scores for interventional treatment were calculated using a multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 1019 patients were included; 659 (64.4%) were evaluated at a national CTEPH center. Overall, 350 patients (34.3%) were selected for surgery and 97 (9.6%) for percutaneous treatment. Patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2012 died more frequently than those diagnosed from 2013 onward (HR, 1.83; 95%CI, 1.07-3.15; P=.027). Within the subgroup of patients adjusted by propensity score, baseline pulmonary vascular resistance and the 6-minute walk test distance also determined the outcome (HR, 1.24; 95%CI, 1.15-1.33; P=.011; and HR, 0.93; 95%CI, 0.90-0.97; P=.001, respectively). High survival rates were found in patients who underwent an invasive procedure (pulmonary endarterectomy or balloon pulmonary angioplasty).

CONCLUSIONS

CTEPH diagnosis and prognosis have consistently improved in the last decade. Baseline disease severity determines the risk profile. Patients who undergo pulmonary endarterectomy or balloon pulmonary angioplasty have better outcomes.

Long-term survival of lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease associated with connective tissue diseases: a study of 26 cases from a referral centre

OBJECTIVES

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a leading cause of mortality in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD). Lung transplantation has become a viable option for patients with end-stage CTD-ILD. However, patients with CTD are often considered suboptimal candidates for lung transplantation because of concerns of worse outcomes. We assessed post-transplant survival of patients with CTD-ILD compared to patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

METHODS

Medical records of patients who underwent lung transplantation for CTD-ILD at a single referral centre for lung transplantation in Northern Spain between 1998 and 2018 were reviewed. This cohort was compared with patients with IPF (group-matched for age ±3.3 years, transplant year and use of basiliximab induction previous to transplant). Cumulative survival rates after transplantation were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

We studied 26 patients with CTD-ILD and 26 patients with IPF. The underlying diseases of CTD-ILD patients were rheumatoid arthritis (n=9), scleroderma (n=6), Sjögren's syndrome (n=4), ANCA-associated vasculitis (n=3), anti-synthetase syndrome (n=2), and dermatomyositis, systemic lupus erythematosus (1 each). Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. CTD-ILD patients experienced acute graft rejection less commonly than those with IPF (32.0% vs. 62.5%; p=0.032). However, a non-statistically significant increased frequency of chronic graft rejection was observed in CTD-ILD patients (20.0% vs. 8.3%; p=0.417). In this regard, the 5-year cumulative survival rates after transplantation was reduced in CTD-ILD (42.4% vs. 65.8%) but the difference did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.075).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term post-transplant survival in Northern Spanish patients with CTD-ILD is reduced compared with IPF.

Real-life experience of inhaled iloprost for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: Insights from the Spanish REHAP registry

INTRODUCTION

REHAP is a voluntary, observational Spanish registry of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. We analyzed the experience (use and effectiveness) with inhaled iloprost (inh-ILO) in real-life conditions during a 3-year period.

METHODS

Patients included were those with PAH ≥14 years recruited during 1998-2016 who had received inh-ILO. Variables were collected at the beginning of treatment (0 ± 3 months) and 12 ± 3/36 ± 6 months follow-up. Effectiveness was assessed in the intent-to-treat population as changes in functional class and/or physical performance and transplant-free survival from the beginning of treatment. Stopping inh-ILO-related survival was also assessed. Subanalyses included treatment strategy (first-line therapy -monotherapy or upfront combination- or sequential therapy) and risk of clinical worsening/death.

RESULTS

Inh-ILO was the most frequently used prostanoid in Spain, rendering 267 patients eligible for analysis. Median age was 54 years; 61% were WHO FC III. Sixty (23%) patients started inh-ILO as monotherapy, 27 (10%) as upfront combination and 180 (67%) sequentially. At 3-year follow-up significant clinical improvements were observed; however, transplant-free survival rate was 54%, being poorer in patients at high risk (63% vs. 85% in low risk patients; P < 0.001) and similar in the three treatment strategies. Only 25% patients remained on inh-ILO. Three-year after stopping inh-ILO-related survival rate was 24.7%.

CONCLUSION

Data from the REHAP collected during 3 years shows that inh-ILO has low effectiveness independently of the treatment strategy used, with a 3-year survival rate of 54% despite significant clinical improvements, probably due to the use in high-risk patients. Discontinuation rate was as high as 75%.