Do cancer curvivors and metavivors have distinct needs for stress management intervention? Retrospective analysis of a mind-body survivorship program

PURPOSE

Cancer "curvivors" (completed initial curative intent treatment with surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and/or other novel therapies) and "metavivors" (living with metastatic or chronic, incurable cancer) experience unique stressors, but it remains unknown whether these differences impact benefits from mind-body interventions. This study explored differences between curvivors and metavivors in distress (depression, anxiety, worry) and resiliency changes over the course of an 8-week group program, based in mind-body stress reduction, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), and positive psychology.

METHODS

From 2017-2021, 192 cancer survivors (83% curvivors; 17% metavivors) completed optional online surveys of resiliency (CES) and distress (PHQ-8, GAD-7, PSWQ-3) pre- and post- participation in an established clinical program. Mixed effect regression models explored curvivor-metavivor differences at baseline and in pre-post change.

RESULTS

Compared to curvivors, metavivors began the program with significantly more resilient health behaviors (B = 0.99, 95% CI[0.12, 1.86], p = .03) and less depression (B = -2.42, 95%CI[-4.73, -0.12], p = .04), with no other significant differences. Curvivors experienced significantly greater reductions in depression (curvivor-metavivor difference in strength of change = 2.12, 95% CI [0.39, 3.83], p = .02) over the course of the program, with no other significant differences. Neither virtual delivery modality nor proportion of sessions attended significantly moderated strength of resiliency or distress change.

CONCLUSION

Metavivors entering this mind-body program had relatively higher well-being than did curvivors, and both groups experienced statistically comparable change in all domains other than depression. Resiliency programming may thus benefit a variety of cancer survivors, including those living with incurable cancer.

Phase 2 study of response-guided neoadjuvant sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) in patients with localized triple-negative breast cancer: Results from the NeoSTAR trial

512

Background: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a novel antibody-drug conjugate in which the topoisomerase 1 inhibitor SN-38 (active metabolite of irinotecan) is linked to a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the tumor antigen Trop2, is currently approved for treatment of patients (pts) with pre-treated metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). We conducted a phase 2 study evaluating neoadjuvant (NA) SG as upfront therapy for pts with localized TNBC (NCT04230109). The primary objective was to assess pathological complete response (pCR) rate in breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/isN0) with SG. Secondary objectives included assessment of radiological response rate, evaluation of the safety and tolerability (CTCAE v5.0) and event-free survival (EFS). Methods: Patients with localized TNBC (tumor size ≥1cm, or any size if node positive) with no prior treatment were eligible. SG was administered IV on Days 1, 8 of each 21-day cycle at a starting dose of 10 mg/kg for 4 cycles. After 4 cycles, patients with biopsy-proven residual disease, considered as no pCR for primary endpoint, had the option to receive additional NA therapy at the discretion of the treating physician. Radiologic response (US or MRI) was defined by RECIST version 1.1 using a composite response of CR & PR. Standard descriptive statistics were utilized, including 95% binomial confidence intervals for all rates estimated. Results: From 7/14/20 – 8/31/21, 50 pts were enrolled (median age = 48.5; 11 stage I disease, 24 stage II, 11 stage III, 4 unknown; 62% node negative). The majority (98%; n = 49) of pts completed 4 cycles of SG. Overall, the radiological response rate with SG alone was 62% (n = 31, 95% CI 48%, 77%). 26 pts proceeded directly to surgery after SG. Overall, the pCR rate with SG alone was 30% (n = 15/50, 95% CI 18%, 45%). The other 11 pts had RCB-1 (n = 3), RCB-2 (n = 5), and RCB-3 (n = 3) disease, respectively. Of the 24 pts who received additional NA therapy, 6 had a pCR (3 received anthracycline-based regimen, 2 carboplatin/taxane, and 1 docetaxel/cyclophosphamide). Among pts with a germline BRCA mutation (n = 8), 7 proceeded directly to surgery after SG and 6 had a pCR (86%, 95% CI 42%, 99%). The most common AEs with SG were nausea (82%, n = 41), fatigue (78%, n = 39), alopecia (76%, n = 38), neutropenia (58%, n = 29), anemia (36%, n = 18), and rash (48%, n = 24). 6% of pts required dose-reduction. No pts discontinued SG therapy due to disease progression or AEs; 1 discontinued due to minimal response per investigator preference. At the time of data cut-off (1/18/22), no pts experienced disease recurrence. Updated biomarker and EFS results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: In the first neoadjuvant trial in TNBC with an ADC, SG demonstrated single agent efficacy in localized TNBC. Further research on optimal duration of SG as well as NA combination strategies, including immunotherapy, are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT04230109.

Selection of Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapy for Early Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update

PURPOSE

The aim of this work is to update key recommendations of the ASCO guideline adaptation of the Cancer Care Ontario guideline on the selection of optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer and adjuvant targeted therapy for breast cancer.

METHODS

An Expert Panel conducted a targeted systematic literature review guided by a signals approach to identify new, potentially practice-changing data that might translate into revised guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The Expert Panel reviewed abstracts from the literature review and identified one article for inclusion that reported results of the phase III, open-label KATHERINE trial. In the KATHERINE trial, patients with stage I to III human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer with residual invasive disease in the breast or axilla after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy were allocated to adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; n = 743) or to trastuzumab (n = 743). Invasive disease-free survival was significantly higher in the T-DM1 group than in the trastuzumab arm (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.64; P < .001), and risk of distant recurrence was lower in patients who received T-DM1 than in patients who received trastuzumab (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.79). Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 190 patients (25.7%) who received T-DM1 and in 111 patients (15.4%) who received trastuzumab.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with pathologic invasive residual disease at surgery after standard preoperative chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy should be offered 14 cycles of adjuvant T-DM1, unless there is disease recurrence or unmanageable toxicity. Clinicians may offer any of the available and approved formulations of trastuzumab, including trastuzumab, trastuzumab and hyaluronidase-oysk, and available biosimilars.Additional information can be found at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.

Phase II study of adjuvant endocrine therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib, for localized ER+/HER2- breast cancer (LEADER)

531

Background: Given the success of CDK 4/6 inhibitors for ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, there is much interest in exploring these agents in early breast cancer to potentially reduce recurrence risk. However, tolerability and adherence are important considerations in the adjuvant setting. We evaluated the tolerability and adherence of adjuvant endocrine therapy with the CDK 4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib, in two different schedules, in a prospective phase II clinical trial. Methods: Eligible patients were those with localized stage I-III ER+ (≥ 10%), HER2- breast cancer who had completed surgery and were on adjuvant endocrine therapy with at least one year or more of treatment remaining. Patients were randomized to receive continuous ribociclib (400 mg daily of 28-day cycle; arm 1) or intermittent ribociclib (600 mg daily on days 1-21 of 28-day cycle; arm 2) for one year, in addition to an aromatase inhibitor (plus GnRH agonist if premenopausal). Toxicities were evaluated using CTCAE version 4.03. Adherence was monitored by review of patient diaries and pill count. Results: Of the 81 patients enrolled, 24 discontinued early. The table shows the current status of the patients based on treatment arm (data cut-off as of 1/31/20; updated results will be presented at meeting). A total of 8 serious adverse events (AEs) have occurred thus far: grade 3 transaminitis (1), grade 4 transaminitis (3), grade 3 colitis (1), grade 3 infection (2), and grade 4 lymphopenia (1). The most common grade 3 or greater AEs leading to study discontinuation thus far were transaminitis (8.6%), neutropenia (2.5%), and fatigue (2.5%). No patients discontinued early due to prolonged QTc. Adherence results will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: Interim results demonstrate that while serious AEs with one year of adjuvant ribociclib are low, a number of patients discontinued adjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitor. Tolerability and adherence patterns will need to be carefully considered with CDK 4/6 inhibitors in the adjuvant setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03285412 . [Table: see text]

Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation in breast adenocarcinoma is associated with elevated levels of serum and urine 2-hydroxyglutarate

Mutations in the IDH1 and IDH2 (isocitrate dehydrogenase) genes have been discovered across a range of solid-organ and hematologic malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia, glioma, chondrosarcoma, and cholangiocarcinoma. An intriguing aspect of IDH-mutant tumors is the aberrant production and accumulation of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), which may play a pivotal oncogenic role in these malignancies. We describe the first reported case of an IDH1 p.R132L mutation in a patient with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast adenocarcinoma. This patient was initially treated for locally advanced disease, but then suffered a relapse and metastasis, at which point an IDH1-R132 mutation was discovered in an affected lymph node. The mutation was subsequently found in the primary tumor tissue and all metastatic sites, but not in an uninvolved lymph node. In addition, the patient's serum and urine displayed marked elevations in the concentration of 2-HG, significantly higher than that measured in six other patients with metastatic HR+ breast carcinoma whose tumors were found to harbor wild-type IDH1. In summary, IDH1 mutations may impact a rare subgroup of patients with breast adenocarcinoma. This may suggest future avenues for disease monitoring through noninvasive measurement of 2-HG, as well as for the development and study of targeted therapies against the aberrant IDH1 enzyme.

Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers: clinical risk factors and pathologic features

INTRODUCTION

Most breast cancers that occur in women with germline BRCA1 mutations are estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) and also typically lack expression of progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 overexpression. We undertook a study to assess the clinical factors that predict for an estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers and to characterize the pathologic features of these tumors.

METHODS

Clinical characteristics of BRCA1 carriers with 58 ER+ and 114 ER- first invasive breast cancers were compared. Pathologic features of BRCA1 ER+ cancers were compared to those of BRCA1 ER- cancers and to age-matched ER+ sporadic cancers.

RESULTS

BRCA1 carriers aged > or = 50 at diagnosis of first invasive breast cancer were more likely to have an ER+ cancer compared to those aged < 50 (57% vs 29%, P = 0.005). ER+ BRCA1 cancers were less likely than ER- BRCA1 cancers to have "BRCA-associated" features such as high mitotic activity, geographic necrosis/fibrotic focus, and pushing margins (RR 0.06, 0.22, 0.24; P < 0.001, 0.02, 0.03 respectively). When compared to sporadic ER+ cancers, ER+ BRCA1 cancers were more often of invasive ductal type (RR 2.4, P = 0.03), with a high mitotic rate (RR 5.0, P = 0.006) and absent or mild lymphocytic infiltrate (RR 10.2, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

BRCA1 carriers who are older at first breast cancer diagnosis are more likely to have ER+ tumors than younger BRCA1 carriers. These ER+ cancers appear pathologically "intermediate" between ER- BRCA1 cancers and ER+ sporadic breast cancers raising the possibility that either some ER+ BRCA1 cancers are incidental or that there is a unique mechanism by which these cancers develop.

A feasibility study of low-dose, prolonged oral topotecan in patients with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal serous cancer who have attained a complete clinical response following platinum-based chemotherapy

To determine the tolerability of oral maintenance topotecan when administered to patients with advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal serous cancers who have achieved a complete clinical response after first-line platinum-based therapy. Oral topotecan was given at a starting dose of 0.4 mg/m(2)/dose, twice a day (BID) for 21 consecutive days out of 28 days. The dose was subsequently increased to 0.5 mg/m(2)/dose, twice a day as tolerated. If the patient experienced toxicities during cycle 1 or subsequent cycles, doses were delayed and/or reduced. The lowest dose allowed on protocol was 0.3 mg/m(2)/dose twice daily. Thirteen patients were enrolled in the study, representing a total of fifty-nine cycles of oral topotecan. The starting dose of 0.4 mg/m(2) by mouth (PO) BID for 21 days was generally difficult for patients to tolerate, usually due to progressive anemia and fatigue, and a dose reduction to 0.3 mg/m(2) was necessary in 10/13 patients. A median of six cycles was administered, although 6 of 13 patients could not tolerate the planned 6 cycles due to toxicity. Hematologic toxicity was the most common side effect, although there were no episodes of febrile neutropenia. Diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic side effect, occurring in 8 of 13 patients. Six patients were removed from the study prior to completing the planned six cycles of therapy, after receiving a median number of 2.5 cycles of treatment. This dose and schedule of oral topotecan does not appear to be feasible in this patient population.