Peripartal management of dichorial twin pregnancy in a bicornuate bicollis uterus: a case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The management of a pregnancy in a bicornuate uterus is particularly challenging. A bicornuate uterus is a rare occurrence and a twin pregnancy in a bicornuate uterus even more rare. These pregnancies call for intensive diagnostic investigation and interdisciplinary care.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report on a 27-year-old European woman patient (gravida I, para 0) with a simultaneous pregnancy in each cavity of a bicornuate bicollis uterus after embryo transfer. The condition was confirmed by hysteroscopy and laparoscopy. Several unsuccessful in vitro fertilization (IVF) attempts had been performed earlier before embryo transfer in each cornus. After a physiological course of pregnancy with differential screening at 12 + 6 weeks and 22 + 0 weeks of gestation, the patient presented with therapy-resistant contractions at 27 + 2 weeks. This culminated in the uncomplicated spontaneous delivery of the leading fetus and delayed spontaneous delivery of the second fetus.

DISCUSSION

Only 16 cases of twin pregnancy in a bicornuate unicollis uterus have been reported worldwide and only 6 in a bicornuate bicollis uterus. The principal risks in such pregnancies are preterm labor, intrauterine growth restriction, malpresentation and preeclampsia. These typical risk factors of a twin pregnancy are greatly potentiated in the above mentioned setting.

CONCLUSION

A twin pregnancy in the presence of a uterine malformation is rare and difficult to manage. These rare cases must be collected and reported in order to work out algorithms of monitoring and therapy as well as issue appropriate recommendations for their management.

Best Practice Guideline - DEGUM Recommendations on Breast Ultrasound

Alongside mammography, breast ultrasound is an important and well-established method in assessment of breast lesions. With the "Best Practice Guideline", the DEGUM Breast Ultrasound (in German, "Mammasonografie") working group, intends to describe the additional and optional application modalities for the diagnostic confirmation of breast findings and to express DEGUM recommendations in this Part II, in addition to the current dignity criteria and assessment categories published in Part I, in order to facilitate the differential diagnosis of ambiguous lesions.The present "Best Practice Guideline" has set itself the goal of meeting the requirements for quality assurance and ensuring quality-controlled performance of breast ultrasound. The most important aspects of quality assurance are explained in this Part II of the Best Practice Guideline.

Best Practice Guideline - DEGUM Recommendations on Breast Ultrasound

For many years, breast ultrasound has been used in addition to mammography as an important method for clarifying breast findings. However, differences in the interpretation of findings continue to be problematic 1 2. These differences decrease the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound after detection of a finding and complicate interdisciplinary communication and the comparison of scientific studies 3. In 1999, the American College of Radiology (ACR) created a working group (International Expert Working Group) that developed a classification system for ultrasound examinations based on the established BI-RADS classification of mammographic findings under consideration of literature data 4. Due to differences in content, the German Society for Ultrasound in Medicine (DEGUM) published its own BI-RADS-analogue criteria catalog in 2006 3. In addition to the persistence of differences in content, there is also an issue with formal licensing with the current 5th edition of the ACR BI-RADS catalog, even though the content is recognized by the DEGUM as another system for describing and documenting findings. The goal of the Best Practice Guideline of the Breast Ultrasound Working Group of the DEGUM is to provide colleagues specialized in senology with a current catalog of ultrasound criteria and assessment categories as well as best practice recommendations for the various ultrasound modalities.

How to perform shear wave elastography. Part II

Recently a series of papers was introduced describing on "how to do" certain techniques. More specifically we published on how to perform strain imaging using the transcutaneous and endoscopic ultrasound approach and shear wave elastography (SWE). In the first part we describe how to optimize the examination technique, discussing normal values, pitfalls, artefacts and specific tips for applying SWE to specific organs (liver, breast, thyroid, salivary glands) as part of a diagnostic US examination. In part II, the use of SWE in the pancreas, spleen, kidney, prostate, scrotum, musculoskeletal system, lymph nodes and future developments are discussed.

How to perform shear wave elastography. Part I

We recently introduced a series of papers describing how to do certain techniques. This article is the first part of a review of shear wave elastography (SWE). It reports the principles and interpretation of the technique and describes how to optimize it. Normal values, pitfalls and artefacts for the examination of liver, breast. thyroid and salivary gland with shear wave elastography are presented. The manuscript provides specific tips for applying SWE as part of a diagnostic US examination.

The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Elastography in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2018

This manuscript describes the use of ultrasound elastography, with the exception of liver applications, and represents an update of the 2013 EFSUMB (European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology) Guidelines and Recommendations on the clinical use of elastography.

Accuracy of tumor size measurement: comparison of B-mode ultrasound, strain elastography, and 2D and 3D shear wave elastography with histopathological lesion size

BACKGROUND

Predicting the exact extent of a breast tumor is of great importance for oncologic treatment strategies. Different types of elastography can be used as new tools for measuring lesion size.

PURPOSE

To provide evidence regarding the accuracy of tumor size measurement of strain elastography (SE), two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) shear wave elastography (SWE), and conventional B-image ultrasound.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective study, the diameter of 105 malignant breast lesions was measured by SE, 2D and 3D SWE, and B-mode ultrasound. The histopathological lesion size was compared to all imaging-based measuring methods.

RESULTS

The mean lesion size of all breast carcinomas was 1.54 cm. B-mode ultrasound underestimates breast cancer size in 65.7 % of all cases in this study ( P < 0.0001). Mean lesion size was more accurately determined by SE, 2D and 3D SWE compared to B-mode ultrasound. Absolute differences between measured and actual lesion are smaller for B-mode ultrasound (0.26 cm) than for SE (0.41 cm) and 2D and 3D SWE (0.41 cm and 0.44 cm, respectively).

CONCLUSION

B-mode ultrasound allows more accurate lesion size measurement than SE and 2D or 3D SWE but has a significantly higher risk of underestimating tumor size which could lead to incomplete margins during surgery. 3D SWE was not superior to 2D SWE or SE but by trend more precise in predicting the size of invasive lobular carcinoma.

SOFIA: A Novel Automated Breast Ultrasound System Used on Patients in the Prone Position: A Pilot Study on Lesion Detection in Comparison to Handheld Grayscale Ultrasound

Introduction

Most of the currently available automated breast ultrasound systems require patients to be in the supine position. Previous data, however, show a high recall rate with this method due to artifacts. The novel automated breast ultrasound scanner SOFIA scans the breast with the patient in a prone position, resulting in even compression of breast tissue. We present our initial results with this examination method.

Material and Methods

63 patients were analyzed using a handheld B-mode ultrasound. In cases of BI-RADS 1, 2 or 5, a SOFIA scan was performed. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using Cohenʼs kappa. The duration of the scan was measured for both methods.

Results

No BI-RADS 5 lesion was missed with SOFIA. The SOFIA had an additional recall rate of 16.67% compared to B-mode ultrasound. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of SOFIA was 100, 83.33 and 88.89%, respectively. Cohenʼs kappa showed substantial agreement (κ = 0.769) between examiner 1 (B-mode) and examiner 2 (SOFIA). The mean scan duration for the B-mode system and the SOFIA system was 24.21 minutes and 12.94 minutes, respectively. In four cases, D-cup breasts were not scanned in their entirety.

Conclusion

No cancer was missed when SOFIA was used in this preselected study population. The scanning time was approximately half of that required for B-mode ultrasound. The additional unnecessary recall rate was 16.67%. Larger D cup-size breasts were difficult to position and resulted in an incomplete image in four cases.

Comparison of Two Different Ultrasound Devices Using Strain Elastography Technology in the Diagnosis of Breast Lesions Related to the Histologic Results

This study was conducted to provide evidence that elastograms of two different devices and different manufacturers using the same technical approach provide the same diagnoses. A total of 110 breast lesions were prospectively analysed by two experts in ultrasound, using the strain elastography function from two different manufacturers (Hitachi HI-RTE, Hitachi Medical Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany; and Siemens eSie Touch, Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). Results were compared with the histopathologic results. Applying the Bowker test of symmetry, no statistically significant difference between the two elastography functions of these two devices was found (p = 0.120). The Cohen's kappa of k = 0.591 showed moderate strength of agreement between the two elastograms. The two examiners yielded moderate strength of agreement analysing the elastograms (Hitachi HI-RTE, k = 0.478; Siemens eSie Touch, k = 0.441). In conclusion, evidence is provided that elastograms of the same lesion generated by two different ultrasound devices equipped with a strain elastography function do not significantly differ.

Strain Elastography - How To Do It?

Tissue stiffness assessed by palpation for diagnosing pathology has been used for thousands of years. Ultrasound elastography has been developed more recently to display similar information on tissue stiffness as an image. There are two main types of ultrasound elastography, strain and shear wave. Strain elastography is a qualitative technique and provides information on the relative stiffness between one tissue and another. Shear wave elastography is a quantitative method and provides an estimated value of the tissue stiffness that can be expressed in either the shear wave speed through the tissues in meters/second, or converted to the Young's modulus making some assumptions and expressed in kPa. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages and they are often complimentary to each other in clinical practice. This article reviews the principles, technique, and interpretation of strain elastography in various organs. It describes how to optimize technique, while pitfalls and artifacts are also discussed.

Fetal gender and gestational age differentially affect PCSK9 levels in intrauterine growth restriction

BACKGROUND

Maternal and fetal Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations are compromised in intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Generally, LDL-C catabolism is under control of PCSK9 by binding to the LDL-receptor leading to its degradation. Hence, we hypothesized a role for PCSK9 in the modulation of lipid metabolism and placental transport in IUGR.

METHODS

172 women, 70 IUGR and 102 controls were included in the study. Maternal and fetal serum PCSK9 levels and lipid profiles including LDL-C were measured. Placental LDL-receptor and PCSK9 expressions were estimated by tissue microarray immunohistochemistry, and analyzed by two blinded observers using an immunoreactivity score. Non-parametric tests and multivariate regression analyses were used for statistical estimations.

RESULTS

PCSK9 levels in the maternal and fetal compartment independently predicted LDL-C levels (maternal compartment: adjusted R 2 = 0.2526; coefficient b i  = 0.0938, standard error s bi =0.0217, rpartial = 0.4420, t-value = 4.323, p < 0.0001; fetal compartment: adjusted R 2 = 0.2929; b i  = 0.1156, s bi =0.020, rpartial = 0.5494, t-value = 5.81, p < 0.0001). We did not find significant differences in maternal PCSK9 concentrations between IUGR and controls. However, we found lower fetal serum PCSK9 concentrations in IUGR than in controls (IUGR median 137.1 ng/mL (95% CI 94.8-160.0) vs. controls 176.8 (154.6-202.5), p = 0.0005). When subgrouping according to early onset, late onset IUGR, and fetal gender differences remained consistent only for male neonates born before 34 weeks of gestation. In the placenta we found no correlation between PCSK9 and LDL-receptor expression patterns. However, the LDL-receptor was significantly upregulated in IUGR when compared to controls (p = 0.0063).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that PCSK9 play a role in impaired fetal growth by controlling fetal LDL-C metabolism, which seems to be dependent on gestational age and fetal gender. This underlines the need to identify subgroups of IUGR that may benefit from individualized and gender-specific pharmacotherapy in future studies.

Evaluation of real-time tissue sono-elastography in the assessment of 214 breast lesions: limitations of this method resulting from different histologic subtypes, tumor size and tumor localization

Real-time sono-elastography is an ultrasound-based technique used to estimate tissue elasticity. Several publications have reported that this method has the ability to differentiate between malignant and benign breast lesions. However, on the basis of current literature, sono-elastography returned false-negative results in 25% of cases with certain lesions, such as mucinous carcinoma. Our data indicate that elastography has higher specificity (96.5% vs. 84.4%) and lower sensitivity (86.9% vs. 93.9%) than B-mode ultrasound. Our evidence suggests that elastography performs significantly worse in lesions ≥20 mm in diameter (sensitivity = 61.1%, specificity = 97.2%) than in lesions <20 mm in diameter (sensitivity = 92.6%, specificity = 96.2%). Furthermore, elastography returned false-negative results in all cases mucinous carcinoma. Finally, in eight cases we obtained a valid elastogram. Our data indicate that this finding is probably due to tumor depth.

Diagnostic performance and inter-observer concordance in lesion detection with the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS)

Background

Automated whole breast ultrasound scanners of the latest generation have reached a level of comfortable application and high quality volume acquisition. Nevertheless, there is a lack of data concerning this technology. We investigated the diagnostic performance and inter-observer concordance of the Automated Breast Volume Scanner (ABVS) ACUSON S2000™ and questioned its implications in breast cancer diagnostics.

Methods

We collected 100 volume data sets and created a database containing 52 scans with no detectable lesions in conventional ultrasound (BI-RADS®-US 1), 30 scans with benign lesions (BI-RADS®-US 2) and 18 scans with breast cancer (BI-RADS®-US 5).

Two independent examiners evaluated the ABVS data on a separate workstation without any prior knowledge of the patients’ histories.

Results

The inter-rater reliability reached fair agreement (κ=0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.53). With respect to the true category, the conditional inter-rater validity coefficient was κ=0.18 (95% CI: 0.00-0.26) for the benign cases and κ=0.80 (95% CI: 0.61-1.00) for the malignant cases.

Combining the assessments of examiner 1 and examiner 2, the diagnostic accuracy (AC), sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) for the experimental ABVS were AC = 79.0% (95% CI: 67.3-86.1), SE = 83.3% (95% CI: 57.7-95.6) and SP = 78.1% (% CI: 67.3-86.1), respectively.

However, after the ABVS examination, there were a high number of requests for second-look ultrasounds in up to 48.8% of the healthy women due to assumed suspicious findings in the volume data.

In an exploratory analysis, we estimated that an ABVS examination in addition to mammography alone could detect a relevant number of previously occult breast cancers (about 1 cancer in 300 screened and otherwise healthy women).

Conclusions

The ABVS is a reliable imaging method for the evaluation of the breast with high sensitivity and a fair inter-observer concordance. However, we have to overcome the problem of the high number of false-positive results. Therefore, further prospective studies in larger collectives are necessary to define standard procedures in image acquisition and interpretation. Nevertheless, we consider the ABVS as being suitable for integration into breast diagnostics as a beneficial and reliable imaging method.

Ultrasound real-time elastography can predict malignancy in BI-RADS®-US 3 lesions

Background

Lesions of the breast that are classified BI-RADS^®-US 3 by ultrasound are probably benign and observation is recommended, although malignancy may occasionally occur.

In our study, we focus exclusively on BI-RADS^®-US 3 lesions and hypothesize that sonoelastography as an adjunct to conventional ultrasound can identify a high-risk-group and a low-risk-group within these patients.

Methods

A group of 177 breast lesions that were classified BI-RADS^®-US 3 were additionally examined with real-time sonoelastography. Elastograms were evaluated according to the Tsukuba Elasticity Score. Pretest and posttest probability of disease (POD), sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) and likelihood-ratios (LR) were calculated. Furthermore, we analyzed the false-negative and false-positive cases and performed a model calculation to determine how elastography could affect the proceedings in population screening.

Results

In our collection of BI-RADS^®-US 3 cases there were 169 benign and eight malignant lesions. The pretest POD was 4.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.1–9.0). In patients with a suspicious elastogram (high-risk group), the posttest POD was significantly higher (13.2%, p = 0.041) and the positive LR was 3.2 (95% CI: 1.7–5.9). With a benign elastogram (low-risk group), the posttest POD decreased to 2.2%. SE, SP, PPV and NPV for sonoelastography in BI-RADS^®-US 3 lesions were 62.5% (95% CI: 25.9–89.8), 80.5% (95% CI: 73.5–86.0), 13.2% (95% CI: 5.0–28.9) and 97.8% (95% CI: 93.3–99.4), respectively.

Conclusions

Sonoelastography yields additional diagnostic information in the evaluation of BI-RADS^®-US 3 lesions of the breast. The examiner can identify a low-risk group that can be vigilantly observed and a high-risk group that should receive immediate biopsy due to an elevated breast cancer risk.

P2-10-07: Triple-Negative Breast Cancer May Have Ultrasonographic Features Mimicking Nonmalignant Lesions

Background

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is known to have unique molecular, clinical and pathologic characteristics. Histological studies illustrate high mitotic counts, geographic necrosis, pushing borders of invasion, and stromal lymphocytic response. These growth patterns may also affect the appearance of TNBC in ultrasound.

Our study evaluates the ultrasonographic features of TNBC according to the ACR BI-RADS®-US classification system and compares these features with non-TNBC.

Materials and methods: Data of 385 consecutive breast cancer cases were collected from our hospital database. Digitally recorded ultrasound images were available for 292 patients. These images were interpreted according to the BI-RADS® system by an examiner blinded to the patients’ characteristics and histological results. The ultrasonographic features of TNBC (n=45) and non-TNBC (n=247) were compared using Fisher's exact test.

Results: TNBC was more common in younger patients and exhibited higher tumor grades and more advanced tumor stages. Focusing on the ultrasound features, TNBC was more likely to exhibit round or oval shape (35.5% versus 25.9% in non-TNBC) and the margin of TNBC was more frequently described as microlobulated (48.9% versus 37.7% in non-TNBC) instead of angular or spiculated. In TNBC the echogenic halo was significantly less often observed (46.7% versus 64.4% in non-TNBC, p=0.0302) and we found less architectural distortions (65.5% versus 84.3% in non-TNBC, p=0.0341). Regarding the posterior acoustic features, an enhancement was significantly more often observed in TNBC (26.7% versus 13.0% in non-TNBC, p=0.0391).

Discussion: TNBC and non-TNBC seem to have different ultrasonographic features. This can be explained by the unique pathologic profile of this breast cancer subtype. As some of the distinct ultrasound criteria of TNBC are associated with benign masses, TNBC may mimic nonmalignant lesions. Being familiar with these features can avoid false-negative classification of TNBC.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-10-07.

[Diagnostic value of strain ratio measurement in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions]

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the strain ratio measurement of breast lesions, to calculate the diagnostic value and to provide practically oriented recommendations concerning execution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

117 breast lesions in 98 patients were included in the study. All lesions were examined by B-mode ultrasound and elastography using strain ratio measurement. The preinterventional findings of the different methods were compared to the final histopathological results. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and the diagnostic accuracy were calculated for each method.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the strain ratio of malignant (mean 6.50; sd 3.03; 95 %-CI 5.68 - 7.33) and benign (mean 1.79; sd 3.83; 95 %-CI 0.92 - 2.75) lesions. The strain ratio showed a sensitivity of 92.6 % (95 %-CI 82.1 - 97.9) and a specificity of 95.2 % (95 %-CI 86.7 - 99.0). The positive and negative predictive values were 94.3 % and 93.7 %. B-mode ultrasound achieved a sensitivity of 94.4 % (95 %-CI 84.6 - 98.8) and a specificity of 87.3 % (95 %-CI 76.5 - 94.3). The positive and negative predictive values were 86.4 % and 94.8 %.

CONCLUSION

Strain ratio measurement of breast lesions is a standardized fast method for analyzing the stiffness inside the examined areas. Used as an additional tool to B-mode ultrasound, it helps to increase the specificity of the examination.

Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography

PURPOSE

Hitachi real-time tissue elastography (HI-RTE) is an ultrasound technique that facilitates the estimation of tissue elasticity. Our study evaluates whether sonoelastography improves the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a multicenter approach sonoelastography of focal breast lesions was carried out in 779 patients with subsequent histological confirmation. We present data from 3 study centers (Berlin, Bielefeld, Homburg/Saar) focusing on the sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP) and the positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of sonoelastography. In addition we performed an analysis of the diagnostic performance, expressed by the pretest and posttest probability of disease (POD), in BI-RADS®-US 3 or 4 lesions as these categories can imply both malignant and benign lesions and a more precise prediction would be a preferable aim.

RESULTS

Sonoelastography demonstrated an improved SP (89.5 %) and an excellent PPV (86.8 %) compared to B-mode ultrasound (76.1 % and 77.2 %). Especially in dense breasts ACR III-IV, the SP was even higher (92.8 %). In BI-RADS-US 3 lesions, a suspicious elastogram significantly modified the POD from 8.3 % to a posttest POD of 45.5 %. In BI-RADS-US 4 lesions, we found a pretest POD of 56.6 %. The posttest POD changed significantly to 24.2 % with a normal elastogram and to 81.5 % with a suspicious elastogram.

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrates that the complementary use of sonoelastography definitely improves the performance in breast diagnostics. Finally we present a protocol of how sonoelastography can be integrated into our daily practice.

Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Initial data suggest that elastography can improve the specificity of ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. The aim of this study was to compare elastography and B-mode ultrasound to determine whether the calculation of strain ratios (SRs) can further improve the differentiation of focal breast lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 227 women with histologically proven focal breast lesions (113 benign, 114 malignant) were included at two German breast centers. The women underwent a standardized ultrasound procedure using a high-end ultrasound system with a 9-MHz broadband linear transducer. B-mode scans and sonoelastograms were analyzed by two experienced readers using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria. SRs were calculated from a tumor-adjusted region of interest (mean color pixel density) and a comparable region of interest placed in the lateral fatty tissue. Sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values were calculated for SRs (receiver-operating characteristic analysis).

RESULTS

The women had a mean age of 54 years (range, 19-87 years). The mean lesion diameter was 1.6 +/- 0.9 cm. Sensitivity and specificity were 96% and 56% for B-mode scanning, 81% and 89% for elastography, and 90% and 89% for SRs. An SR cutoff value of 2.45 (area under the curve, 0.949) allowed significant differentiation (P < .001) of malignant (mean, 5.1 +/- 4.2) and benign (mean, 1.6 +/- 1.0) lesions. The quantitative method of SR calculation was superior to subjective interpretation of sonoelastograms and B-mode scans, with a positive predictive value of 89% compared to 68% and 84% for the other two methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Calculation of SRs contributes to the standardization of sonoelastography with high sensitivity and allows significant differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions with higher specificity compared to B-mode ultrasound but not elastography.