Bronchoalveolar lavage in suspected COVID-19 cases with a negative nasopharyngeal swab: a retrospective cross-sectional study in a high-impact Northern Italy area

COVID-19 diagnosis relies on molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2 via nasopharyngeal swab in the presence of suggestive clinical, radiological and laboratory findings. Since bronchoalveolar lavage liquid (BAL) collected during fibrobronchoscopy may increase test sensitivity compared to nasopharyngeal swabs, it was performed during the 2020 pandemic in clinically or radiologically suspected cases. Our aim was to determine whether clinical features, chest computed tomography (CT) findings or laboratory tests may predict patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 at BAL after a negative nasopharyngeal swab. We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study with multivariable analysis of suspected patients who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 at BAL after at least one negative nasopharyngeal swab. Univariable logistic regression for odds ratio and multivariate models was calculated to determine clinical, radiological and laboratory predictors. 32/198 (16%) patients had BAL positive for SARS-CoV-2, while 65/198 tested positive for other pathogens at BAL. Of the 32 patients positive for COVID, 4 had a coinfection at BAL, being thus positive both for COVID as well as for another pathogen while the remaining 105 patients were negative for COVID and other pathogens at BAL. COVID-19 patients had more often highly suggestive CT findings, higher number of involved lobes, more often ground glass opacity of more than 50% of lung parenchyma, and less frequently other radiologically suspected infections. At multivariate model, temperature also predicted BAL positivity. The procedure was well tolerated-with only one desaturation episode-while no healthcare worker was infected. In conclusion, when nasopharyngeal swabs are negative but there is clinical or imaging suspicion of COVID-19, BAL represents a complementary diagnostic tool, particularly in conjunction with suggestive/more extensive lung involvement at CT scan. The procedure did not carry increased risks for patients nor for operators, while allowing to free hospital resources, avoiding unnecessary isolations.

Impact of active cancer on COVID-19 survival: a matched-analysis on 557 consecutive patients at an Academic Hospital in Lombardy, Italy

BACKGROUND

The impact of active cancer in COVID-19 patients is poorly defined; however, most studies showed a poorer outcome in cancer patients compared to the general population.

METHODS

We analysed clinical data from 557 consecutive COVID-19 patients. Uni-multivariable analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors of COVID-19 survival; propensity score matching was used to estimate the impact of cancer.

RESULTS

Of 557 consecutive COVID-19 patients, 46 had active cancer (8%). Comorbidities included diabetes (n = 137, 25%), hypertension (n = 284, 51%), coronary artery disease (n = 114, 20%) and dyslipidaemia (n = 122, 22%). Oncologic patients were older (mean age 71 vs 65, p = 0.012), more often smokers (20% vs 8%, p = 0.009), with higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (13.3 vs 8.2, p = 0.046). Fatality rate was 50% (CI 95%: 34.9;65.1) in cancer patients and 20.2% (CI 95%: 16.8;23.9) in the non-oncologic population. Multivariable analysis showed active cancer (HR_active: 2.26, p = 0.001), age (HR_age>65years: 1.08, p < 0.001), as well as lactate dehydrogenase (HR_LDH>248mU/mL: 2.42, p = 0.007), PaO2/FiO2 (HR_continuous: 1.00, p < 0.001), procalcitonin (HR_PCT>0.5ng/mL: 2.21, p < 0.001), coronary artery disease (HR_yes: 1.67, p = 0.010), cigarette smoking (HR_yes: 1.65, p = 0.041) to be independent statistically significant predictors of outcome. Propensity score matching showed a 1.92× risk of death in active cancer patients compared to non-oncologic patients (p = 0.013), adjusted for ICU-related bias. We observed a median OS of 14 days for cancer patients vs 35 days for other patients.

CONCLUSION

A near-doubled death rate between cancer and non-cancer COVID-19 patients was reported. Active cancer has a negative impact on clinical outcome regardless of pre-existing clinical comorbidities.

PL2.2 Pembrolizumab (PEM) in recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG)patients with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR): an observational study

BACKGROUND

Pem, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, demonstrated to be activein various neoplasms with MMRd. No data exists about its efficacy in MMRdglioma patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MMRd HGG relapsed after receiving RT and CT weretreated with Pem. MMR status was analyzed by immunohistochemistry,including the MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 markers. MMR deficiency wasdefined as presence of a weak (wMMRd) or absent (aMMRd) signal atimmunohistochemistry for at least one MMR protein. Other inclusion criteriawere: ECOG PS 0–2, histologically confirmed gliomas, dexamethasone ≤4 mg.Pem was administrated at 200 mg every 3 weeks until progression disease orunacceptable toxicity. Tumor response was evaluated by brain MRI every 10 weeksaccording to the RANO criteria. OS and PFS were evaluated by Kaplan-Meiercurves. CTCAE v4.0 was used for toxicity.

RESULTS

among 167 glioma patients, we found 22 MMRd gliomas. 12 PTS were treated with Pem: 8 wMMRd and 4 aMMRd. According to Bethesda criteria, allPTS had microsatellite stability. Tumor histologies included 5 anaplasticastrocytoma, 1 anaplastic oligodendroglioma, 6 glioblastoma (GBM). MSH2deficiency was found in 6 cases, MSH6 deficiency in 9 cases, PMS2 and MLH1deficiency in 2 cases. Median number of prior line of chemotherapy was 1 (range 1–5). Stable disease (SD) was reported in 4 PTS (33%); 8 PTS showedprogressive disease (PD). PTS with anaplastic gliomas showed a statisticallysignificant association with SD (p=0.03, OR=3); all GBM PTS reported PD; status of MMRd (weak/absent), IDH (mutated/wild-type), MSH2 and MLH6(deficient/proficient) were not associated with SD. Median follow up was 14.7 ms. OS was 5.6 ms (95% CI 0.1–13.8), PFS 2.4 ms (95% CI 1.8–2.9). OS was 2.8 ms and 5.6 ms (p=0.9), PFS was 1.8 ms and 3.1 ms (p=0.5) in PTS with wMMRd and aMMRd. PTS reporting SD and PD had PFS of 7.4 ms (95% CI 4.6–10.2) and 1.8 ms (95% CI 0.2–3.4), p=0.002; OS was “not reached” and 2.8 ms in PTS having SD vs PD (p=0.04). Grade ≥3 adverse eventswere reported in 8% of PTS.

CONCLUSION

a subgroup of recurrent MMRd HGG might benefit from Pem,especially anaplastic gliomas. There was a trend for a longer PFS and OS in PTS with aMMRd. Analyses for identifying additional molecular predictive factors is ongoing.

P05.08 High-grade gliomas and immunotherapeutic early phase clinical trials: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Patients with high-grade gliomas (HGGs) have historically been excluded from immunotherapeutic early-phase clinical trials (ieCTs) due to unavailability of serial bioptic sampling, the frequent need of corticosteroids, concerns regarding activity of immunotherapy in central nervous system, and rapid clinical deterioration.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of all recurrent HGG patients enrolled in ieCTs at Humanitas Cancer Center Phase I Unit between 2014 and 2019. Disease control rate (DCR) according to RANO criteria, six-months progression-free and overall survival (PFS-6; OS-6), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), were evaluated. A control-cohort (CC) of patients treated with standard treatments (temozolomide, fotemustine, lomustine and procarbazine, bevacizumab) matched (1:1) for sex, age, line of treatment, MGMT methylation status, and IDH mutational status, was selected for comparison. A series of clinical parameters with an established prognostic value for patients with solid tumors treated into ieCTs were correlated with survivals through an univariate analysis. These include: use of steroids, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin, total protein.

RESULTS

Five among the 23 ieCTs conducted at our Phase I Unit allowed inclusion of HGG patients. 25 patients were enrolled in the experimental cohort (EC): 22 (88%) glioblastoma, 3 (12%) anaplastic astrocytoma. Median age was 50 years (range 25–71); 16 patients (64%) were men, 9 (36%) women; 17 pts (68%) required steroid therapy, with a median baseline dexamethasone dose of 2 mg (range 1–6). The median number of prior systemic therapies was 1 (range 1–2). Twelve patients (48%) received monotherapies (anti PD-1, anti CSFR-1, anti TGF-ß, anti cereblon), 13 (52%) combination regimens (anti PD-L1 + anti CD38, anti PD-1 + anti CSFR-1). DCR was 40% (1 CR + 2 PR + 7 SD) and 37% (9 SD), in EC and CC, respectively. Four patients (16%) in EC had grade ≥3 TRAEs (1 neutropenia, 1 pneumonia, 2 hepatitis). With a median follow-up of 14 months PFS-6 were 35% and 16% (p=0.075), in EC and CC respectively, while OS-6 was significantly improved in the EC (82% vs 44%, p=0.004). In our small series, none of clinical factors resulted prognostic.

CONCLUSION

Survival outcomes of ourHGG patients treated into ieCTs compared very favorably with a matched CC. Inclusion of HGGs patients into ieCTs should be strongly encouraged. Identification of clinical factors to select who may benefit from ieCTs still remains crucial.

Multipin peptide synthesis at the micromole scale using 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate grafted polyethylene supports

The multipin peptide synthesis procedure has been adapted to allow the synthesis of peptides at micromole loadings. The original solid pin support was replaced with a detachable crown-shaped polyethylene support with an increased surface area. In addition, the polyethylene crowns were radiation-grafted with 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate monomer instead of acrylic acid to yield hydroxy functionalized supports with a larger concentration of polymer and hence a larger peptide capacity. Fmoc-beta-Alanine was directly esterified to the HEMA hydroxy groups with subsequent addition of a diketopiperazine-forming handle for peptide attachment. Peptides varying in length from 10 to 25 residues were assembled at a number of loadings from 1.0 to 2.2 mumol. Purity of peptides at all loadings was equal to, and in some instances superior to, that achieved on conventional solid-phase supports.

Regulation of melanocyte stimulating hormone action at the receptor level: discontinuous binding of hormone to synchronized mouse melanoma cells during the cell cycle

Melanocyte stimulating hormone coupled to Sepharose effects an increase in tryosinase (EC 1.14.18.1; monophenol monoxygenase) activity of cultivated mouse melanoma cells. Synchronized cells are found to respond to melanocyte stimulating hormone only in the G2 phase of the cell cycle, although their response to cyclic AMP is independent of position in the cell cycle. The binding of (125)I-labeled melanocyte stimulating hormone occurs predominantly in G2. These observations are satisfied by a model in which the hormone can activate adenylate cyclase (EC 4.6.1.1) by binding to a melanocyte stimulating hormone receptor only in G2; the events distal to cyclic AMP production can occur throughout the cell cycle.