Comparison of conventionally fractionated and hypofractionated schedule for post-prostatectomy salvage radiotherapy: Early results from non-randomized observational study

e551

Background: Data on hypofractionated radiotherapy in definitive treatment of prostate cancer are maturing; however, limited information is available for hypofractionated radiotherapy after prostatectomy. We aimed to compare hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy in salvage setting for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 106 patients with proven PSA recurrence treated to the prostate bed. Patients were non-randomly, in a alternating fashion, subjected to either 52.5 Gy in 20 fractions of 2.625 Gy over 4 weeks (N = 57, hypofractionated group) or 66 Gy in 33 fractions of 2 Gy over 6.5 weeks (N = 49, conventionally fractionated group). There was no statistically significant difference in pathologic T-stage and Gleason score distribution between the groups. In the conventionally fractionated group there were more patients with positive margins (p = 0.01), more prevalent concomitant hormonal therapy (50.9% vs 61.2%, p = 0.001), but less long-term hormonal therapy (21.4% vs 81%, p < 0.001), compared to hypofractionated group. Median follow-up was 20 months (range 6-36 months). Failure (PSA nadir+0.2) rates between the groups were compared using Cox proportional hazards model. Radiation-related side-effects were assessed using RTOG scoring scale. Results: At this early point, 13 patients (22.8%), and 6 patients (12.2%) experienced treatment failure in the hypofractionated group and conventionally fractionated group, respectively (HR 3.1, 95%CI (1.5-6.3)). More late grade 2 gastrointestinal and genitourinary side-effects were observed in conventionally fractionated group (4.1% vs 1.8%, and 2% vs 0%, p = 0.01, respectively). No grade 3 toxicities were observed. Conclusions: More initial biochemical failures were observed in hypofractionated group compared to conventionally fractionated group. However, baseline heterogeneity between the groups and short follow-up preclude any causal observation of differential efficacy between these two schedules. Randomized phase II trial is planned to prospectively compare these two regimens.

PRIMARY FIBROSARCOMA OF THE THYROID GLAND: CASE REPORT

Due to progressive dyspnea, a male patient aged 59 underwent medical examination in 2003 in a local hospital. Neck ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of a suspect lesion in the thyroid gland revealed the presence of a malignant neoplasm, i.e. mesenchymal tumor. Immunocytochemistry for epithelial membrane antigen, chromogranin A and leukocyte common antigen (CD45) was negative, while vimentin and S-100 were positive. The patient was referred to a university hospital center, where further oncologic work-up was done. Neck ultrasound revealed a tumor in the left lobe of the thyroid, with extension to the aortic arch. After repeated FNAB, cytologic diagnosis of primary thyroid fibrosarcoma was established. Due to the locally advanced and consequently inoperable disease, primary radiotherapy to the neck region (64 Gy in 32 fractions) was applied, followed by 6 cycles of chemotherapy with doxorubicin. After completion of therapy, computed tomography scan demonstrated significant regression of primary disease, but it was still not amenable to surgical treatment. Thus, the decision of the oncology board was active surveillance of the patient. During 9-year follow up, no signs of progression or activity of the disease were found.

Sunitinib-induced thyrotoxicosis - a not so rare entity

BACKGROUND/AIM

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sunitinib malate is nowadays a standard first-line treatment option for patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and clinical course of thyrotoxicosis in our cohort of patients treated with sunitinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of all patients treated with first-line sunitinib for mRCC at our Institution between November 2008 and March 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Thyroid function was assessed after every 2 cycles of therapy, during the 2 weeks off period.

RESULTS

Out of the 62 included patients, hypothyroidism has developed during therapy in 12 patients (19%) and it was preceded by thyrotoxicosis in 2 (3.2%).

CONCLUSION

Sunitinib-induced thyrotoxicosis (SIT), a not so rare entity, was followed by hypothyroidism. The patterns of occurrence and possible significance of SIT, as predictive marker of better treatment response to sunitinib, need to be validated in further studies.