Abstract 2666: Preclinical investigations of concomitant tumor treating fields (TTFields) with cisplatin or paclitaxel for treatment of cervical cancer

Introduction: Cervical cancer is a serious health problem despite the fact it is highly preventable. Early-stage cervical cancer treatment often involves surgery; however advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cases require systemic therapy. Chemotherapy, mainly cisplatin, is the most commonly used systemic therapy for this cancer type. Combination regimens may be needed in the recurrent or metastatic settings, with first-line treatments including cisplatin with paclitaxel. TTFields are electric fields that disrupt cellular processes critical for cancer cell viability and tumor progression. Concomitant treatment with TTFields and cisplatin or paclitaxel has shown benefit in other tumor types. In the current in vitro study, we tested the effectiveness of TTFields for the treatment of cervical cancer, and the possible benefit of applying TTFields together with first-line treatments for cervical cancer.

Methods: Human cervical cancer cell lines - squamous cell carcinoma Ca Ski and SiHa cells, and adenocarcinoma HeLa cells - were treated with TTFields (72 h, 1 V/cm RMS) at frequencies of 100 to 400 kHz, and tested for cell count. For examining the efficacy of TTFields concomitant with cisplatin or paclitaxel, various doses of the drugs were applied together with TTFields (200 kHz), followed by measurements of cell count, colony formation, and apoptosis. Overall effect was defined as the product of percent reductions in cell count and colony formation.

Results: TTFields treatment reduced cell count in all tested cervical cancer cell lines. 200 kHz were found to be effective and were used throughout the experiments. Dose response effects were seen with cisplatin or paclitaxel, and were augmented when TTFields were co-applied to the cells.

Conclusions: These preclinical data suggest that TTFields may be an effective treatment against cervical cancer, and that applying them concomitantly with first-line treatment for this malignancy may provide enhanced effectiveness.

Citation Format: Roni Frechtel-Gerzi, Daria Gerasimova, Einav Zeevi, Inbar Schlachet-Drukerman, Helena Mumblat, Antonia Martinez-Conde, Eyal Dor-On, Itai Tzchori, Adi Haber, Moshe Giladi, Uri Weinberg, Yoram Palti, Greg Palmer, Angeles A. Secord. Preclinical investigations of concomitant tumor treating fields (TTFields) with cisplatin or paclitaxel for treatment of cervical cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2666.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Versus Paclitaxel and Ifosfamide in Patients With Carcinosarcoma of the Uterus or Ovary: An NRG Oncology Trial

PURPOSE

This phase III randomized trial (NCT00954174) tested the null hypothesis that paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) is inferior to paclitaxel and ifosfamide (PI) for treating uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adults with chemotherapy-naïve UCS or ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) were randomly assigned to PC or PI with 3-week cycles for 6-10 cycles. With 264 events in patients with UCS, the power for an overall survival (OS) hybrid noninferiority design was 80% for a null hazard ratio (HR) of 1.2 against a 13% greater death rate on PI with a type I error of 5% for a one-tailed test.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 536 patients with UCS and 101 patients with OCS, with 449 and 90 eligible, respectively. Primary analysis was on patients with UCS, distributed as follows: 40% stage I, 6% stage II, 31% stage III, 15% stage IV, and 8% recurrent. Among eligible patients with UCS, PC was assigned to 228 and PI to 221. PC was not inferior to PI. The median OS was 37 versus 29 months (HR = 0.87; 90% CI, 0.70 to 1.075; P < .01 for noninferiority, P > .1 for superiority). The median progression-free survival was 16 versus 12 months (HR = 0.73; P = < 0.01 for noninferiority, P < .01 for superiority). Toxicities were similar, except that more patients in the PC arm had hematologic toxicity and more patients in the PI arm had confusion and genitourinary hemorrhage. Among 90 eligible patients with OCS, those in the PC arm had longer OS (30 v 25 months) and progression-free survival (15 v 10 months) than those in the PI arm, but with limited precision, these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

PC was not inferior to the active regimen PI and should be standard treatment for UCS.

A randomized phase II evaluation of weekly gemcitabine plus pazopanib versus weekly gemcitabine alone in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Angiogenesis inhibition is a valuable strategy for ovarian cancer (EOC). Pazopanib (paz) is a potent small molecular inhibitor of VEGF-1, -2, -3, PDGFR, c-kit, and has activity as a single agent in ovarian cancer. We designed a trial to assess the benefit of adding paz to gemcitabine (gem) in patients with recurrent EOC.

METHODS

An open-label, randomized, multi-site, phase 2 trial was conducted (NCT01610206) including patients with platinum resistant or sensitive disease, ≤ 3 prior lines of chemotherapy, and measurable/evaluable disease. Patients were randomly assigned to weekly gem 1000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle, with or without paz 800 mg QD, stratified by platinum sensitivity and number of prior lines (1 vs 2 or 3). The primary endpoint was PFS.

RESULTS

148 patients were enrolled 2012-2017. Median age was 63 years (30-82); 60% were platinum resistant; median surveillance was 13 months (0.4-54 months). Median PFS was 5.3 (95% CI, 4.2-5.8) vs 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.1-4.1) in the gem arm. The PFS effect was most pronounced in the platinum resistant group (5.32 vs 2.33 months Tarone-Ware p < 0.001). There was no difference in OS. Overall RR (PR 20% vs 11%, Chi-squre p = 0.02) and DCR (80% vs 60%, Chi-square p < 0.001) were higher in the combination. High grade AEs in the combination arm included ≥ Grade 3: hypertension (15%), neutropenia (35%), and thrombocytopenia (12%).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of paz to gem enhanced anti-tumor activity; those with platinum-resistant disease derived the most benefit from combination therapy, even in the setting of receiving prior bevacizumab.

Quality of life is significantly associated with survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: An ancillary data analysis of the NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG-0218) study

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate association between baseline quality of life (QOL) and changes in QOL measured by FACT-O TOI with progression-free disease (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

Patients enrolled in GOG-0218 with completed FACT-O TOI assessments at baseline and at least one follow-up assessment were eligible. Baseline FACT-O TOI scores were sorted by quartiles (Q1-4) and outcomes compared between Q1 and Q2-4 with log-rank statistic and multivariate Cox regression adjusting for age, stage, post-surgical residual disease size, and performance status (PS). Trends in FACT-O TOI scores from baseline to the latest follow-up assessment were evaluated for impact on intragroup (Q1 or Q2-4) outcome by log-rank analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1152 eligible patients, 283 formed Q1 and 869 formed Q2-4. Mean baseline FACT-O TOI scores were 47.5 for Q1 vs. 74.7 for Q2-4 (P<0.001). Q1 compared to Q2-4 had worse median OS (37.5 vs. 45.6months, P=0.001) and worse median PFS (12.5 vs. 13.1months, P=0.096). Q2-4 patients had decreased risks of disease progression (HR 0.974, 95% CI 0.953-0.995, P=0.018), and death (HR 0.963, 95% CI 0.939-0.987, P=0.003) for each five-point increase in baseline FACT-O TOI. Improving versus worsening trends in FACT-O TOI scores were associated with longer median PFS (Q1: 12.7 vs. 8.6months, P=0.001; Q2-4: 16.7 vs. 11.1months, P<0.001) and median OS (Q1: 40.8 vs. 16months, P<0.001; Q2-4: 54.4 vs. 33.6months, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline FACT-O TOI scores were independently prognostic of PFS and OS while improving compared to worsening QOL was associated with significantly better PFS and OS in women with EOC.

Prior breast cancer and tamoxifen exposure does not influence outcomes in women with uterine papillary serous carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes in women diagnosed with uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) who have had (UPSCBR+) or have not had (UPSCBR-) an antecedent history of breast cancer and to correlate their outcomes to prior tamoxifen exposure.

METHODS

Data were collected for women diagnosed with UPSC at two academic institutions between January 1997 and July 2012. Patient demographics, tumor histology, stage, and treatments were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups: those with and without a personal history of breast cancer. Within the UPSCBR+ cohort, we identified those with a history of tamoxifen use. Cox regression modeling was used to explore associations between selected covariates of interest and the time-to-event outcomes of PFS and OS.

RESULTS

Of 323 patients with UPSC, 46 (14%) were UPSCBR+. Of these, 15 (33%) had a history of tamoxifen use. UPSCBR+ patients were older than UPSCBR- (median years, 72 vs. 68, p=0.004). UPSCBR+ women showed no significant difference in PFS or OS compared to UPSCBR- (p=0.64 and p=0.73 respectively), even after controlling for age (p=0.15 and p=0.48 respectively). Within the UPSCBR+ cohort, there was no difference in PFS or OS with or without tamoxifen exposure (p=0.98 and p=0.94 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in PFS or OS between the UPSCBR+ and UPSCBR- cohorts. We did not demonstrate significant OS or PFS differences in women who took tamoxifen prior to their endometrial cancer diagnosis. These findings have implications for counseling, and should be encouraging to women who are facing their second cancer diagnosis.

The role of immune checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of ovarian cancer

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized treatment of multiple cancers and has bolstered interest in this treatment approach. So far, emerging clinical data show limited clinical efficacy of these agents in ovarian cancer with objective response rates of 10–15% with some durable responses. In this review, we present emerging clinical data of completed trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors and review ongoing studies. In addition we examine the current knowledge of the tumor microenvironment of ovarian cancers with a focus on the significance of PD-L1 expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes on predicting response to immune checkpoint blockade. We evaluate approaches to improve treatment outcomes through the use of predictive biomarkers and patient selection. Finally, we review management considerations including immune related adverse events and response criteria.

Abstract IA41: Standard of care and clinical disparities in epithelial ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer afflicts approximately 204,000 women worldwide, with ∼125,000/year deaths. In the United States more than 22,000 new cases of ovarian cancer diagnosed with over 14,000 disease-related deaths.[1] The standard of care in ovarian cancer includes expedient access to the health care system, consultation with a gynecologic oncologist, surgical intervention, and multiagent platinum-based chemotherapy. Prognostic factors for improved survival in women with ovarian cancer include younger age; early stage; low-grade and serous histology; good performance status; disease biology (BRCA1 and 2 mutation carriers have a better prognosis); and low volume of residual disease at the time of cytoreductive surgery. In contrast, African-American race, low socioeconomic status (SES), geographic location, and insurance status have been associated with worse survival and increased probability of not receiving appropriate standard of care treatment.[2-7] These differences in ovarian cancer outcomes linked to race, social, and economic factors indicate that health care disparities exist in the treatment of this gynecologic cancer.

In this presentation, we will (1) review the standard of care for epithelial ovarian cancer treatment, (2) discuss the variables affecting the outcome for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, (3) describe the factors contributing to healthcare disparities, and (4) discuss the evidence for clinical disparities in epithelial ovarian cancer care and outcomes. Causes of healthcare disparities are complex and include differences in race/ethnicity, SES, insurance status, education level, geographic location, culture, healthcare system factors (adherence to treatment guidelines, and access to care), and disease biology.[2-7]

The following are highlighted in this presentation:

Population-based studies have demonstrated that African-American women are at increased risk of ovarian cancer death compared to non-Hispanic Caucasian women.Population-based studies have demonstrated that African-American women are less likely to undergo site-specific surgery or surgical staging for ovarian cancer compared to Caucasian women.African-American women were less likely to seek care at high-volume hospitals or be operated on by high-volume surgeons.African-American women and those with Medicaid/Medicare payer status are less likely to receive standard of care therapy based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.Geographic location away from a high-volume hospital is associated with increased risk of non-adherent ovarian cancer care.Geographic barriers to standard treatment disproportionately affect racial minorities and women of low-SES.In contrast to population-based studies, retrospective single academic institution studies and ancillary analysis of large cooperative group phase III trials in advanced ovarian cancer have demonstrated no difference in overall survival in women of African-American and Caucasian descent.

The reported research in ovarian cancer indicates that unequal delivery of quality care, obstacles to the delivery of recommended care, and limited access to expert care may account for the disparities seen in ovarian cancer care. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has targeted disparities in access to health care as the centerpiece of the Healthy People 2020 campaign and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has unveiled an action plan to reduce racial and ethnic Health disparities.[8, 9] The 5 goals of the HHS Disparities Action Plan are: (1) transform health care; (2) strengthen the nation's Health and Human Services infrastructure and workforce; (3) advance the health, safety, and well-being of the American people; (4) advance scientific knowledge and innovation; and (5) increase the efficiency, transparency, and accountability of HHS programs. The HHS Disparities initiative will specifically target programs to increase knowledge of, access to, and utilization of biomedical and behavioral procedures to reduce cancer disparities.[9]

Listed below are future research objectives that will reduce and potentially eliminate health care disparities in ovarian cancer in the United States:

Improve our knowledge of the interaction between race, ethnicity, SES, geographic location and ovarian cancer health care disparities across the United States to harmonize existing data and identify opportunities for intervention.Improve our knowledge regarding cultural barriers to care.Promote community-based participatory research to increase ovarian cancer awareness and review standards of care.Develop interventions to provide expedient access to expert care by trained specialists in Gynecology Oncology, cytoreductive surgery, and administration of multiagent platinum-based chemotherapy in order to increase the likelihood of NCCN adherent standard of care therapy.

References:

1. Bristow RE, Chang J, Ziogas A, Anton-Culver H, Vieira VM. Spatial analysis of adherence to treatment guidelines for advanced-stage ovarian cancer and the impact of race and socioeconomic status. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jul;134(1):60-7

2. Bristow RE, Powell MA, Al-Hammadi N, Chen L,Miller JP, Roland PY, et al. Disparities in ovarian cancer care quality and survival according to race and socioeconomic status. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013;105:823–32.

3. Harlan LC, Greene AL, Clegg LX, Mooney M, Stevens JL, Brown ML. Insurance status and the use for guideline therapy in the treatment of selected cancers. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:9079–88.

4. Harlan LC, Clegg LX, Trimble EL. Trends in surgery and chemotherapy for women diagnosed with ovarian cancer in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3488–94.

5. Parham G, Phillips JL, Hicks ML, Andrews N, Jones WB, Shingleton HM, et al. The National Cancer Data Base report on malignant epithelial ovarian carcinoma in African-American women. Cancer 1997;80:816–26.

6. Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Talnsky MA, Abrams J, Severson RK, Qureshi F, Jacques SM, et al. Ethnic differences in survival among women with ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 2002;94:1886–93.

7. Terplan M, Schluterman N, McNamara EJ, Tracy JK, Temkin SM. Have racial disparities in ovarian cancer increased over time? An analysis of SEER data. Gynecol Oncol 2012;125:19–24.

8.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2020: disparities. [cited 2014 Jan 14]. Available from: http://healthypeople.gov/2020/about/disparitiesAbout.aspx.

9. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. HHS Action Plan to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. A Nation free of disparities in health and health care. [cited 2014 Oct 1]. Available from: http://www.minorityhealth.hhs.gov/npa/files/Plans/HHS/HHS_Plan_complete.pdf

Citation Format: Angeles A. Secord. Standard of care and clinical disparities in epithelial ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Seventh AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 9-12, 2014; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015;24(10 Suppl):Abstract nr IA41.

Comparison of bevacizumab alone or with chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer patients

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy of chemotherapy (C) combined with bevacizumab (Bev) versus Bev alone in recurrent, heavily pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

A multicenter analysis of patients treated from 2004 to 2011 was performed. Demographic, treatment, response, and adverse event information were obtained. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 277 patients (median age: 58years), the majority had Stage III and IV (86%) disease, and 72% had serous histology. 244 (88%) were treated with C+Bev and 33 (12%) with Bev. Corresponding median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.7 and 6.7months, and median overall survival (OS) was 14.3 and 10.5months, respectively. The chemotherapeutic agents combined with Bev and the median OS include: pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (n=19, OS of 20.4months), taxanes (n=55, OS of 20.2months), gemcitabine (n=106, OS of 14.1months), topotecan (n=43, OS of 13months), and cyclophosphamide (n=21, OS of 13months). There was no significant difference in toxicities between the C+Bev vs. Bev alone group.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective analysis supports that combination chemotherapy and bevacizumab prolongs PFS and OS compared with bevacizumab alone.

Selective cardiac surveillance in patients with gynecologic cancer undergoing treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to examine the safety and cost savings of selective cardiac surveillance (CS) during treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD).

METHODS

A retrospective, dual institution study of women receiving PLD for the treatment of a gynecologic malignancy was performed. The study period was 2002-2014. At both institutions, a selective strategy for CS was implemented in which only high-risk women with a cardiac history or with symptoms suggestive of cardiac toxicity during PLD treatment underwent a cardiac evaluation. Patient demographics, clinical and treatment history were evaluated. Cost analyses were performed utilizing professional/technical fee rates for echocardiogram and multi-gated acquisition scan for each state.

RESULTS

PLD was administered in 184 women. The mean patient age was 62.7years, and 79% were treated for recurrent ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma. The median cumulative administered dose of PLD was 300mg/m(2); 24 received >550mg/m(2). The median follow-up time was 20months. Of the 184 patients, the majority (n=157, 85.3%) did not undergo either an initial cardiac evaluation or surveillance during or post-PLD treatment. Fifty-three patients considered high risk for anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity underwent CS. Only three patients (1.6%) in the entire cohort developed CHF that was possibly related to PLD treatment; all had significant pre-existing cardiac risk factors. Selective instead of routine use of CS in the study population resulted in a cost savings of $182,552.28.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing cardiac surveillance in select women undergoing PLD treatment for gynecologic malignancies resulted in significant health care cost savings without adversely impacting clinical outcomes.

MHC class I-presented tumor antigens identified in ovarian cancer by immunoproteomic analysis are targets for T-cell responses against breast and ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to test whether peptide epitopes chosen from among those naturally processed and overpresented within MHC molecules by malignant, but not normal cells, when formulated into cancer vaccines, could activate antitumor T-cell responses in humans.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Mixtures of human leukocyte antigen A2 (HLA-A2)-binding ovarian cancer-associated peptides were used to activate naive T cells to generate antigen-specific T cells that could recognize ovarian and breast cancers in vitro. Combinations of these peptides (0.3 mg of each peptide or 1 mg of each peptide) were formulated into vaccines in conjunction with Montanide ISA-51 and granulocyte monocyte colony stimulating factor which were used to vaccinate patients with ovarian and breast cancer without evidence of clinical disease in parallel pilot clinical trials.

RESULTS

T cells specific for individual peptides could be generated in vitro by using mixtures of peptides, and these T cells recognized ovarian and breast cancers but not nonmalignant cells. Patient vaccinations were well tolerated with the exception of local erythema and induration at the injection site. Nine of the 14 vaccinated patients responded immunologically to their vaccine by inducing peptide-specific T-cell responses that were capable of recognizing HLA-matched breast and ovarian cancer cells.

CONCLUSION

Mixtures of specific peptides identified as naturally presented on cancer cells and capable of activating tumor-specific T cells in vitro also initiate or augment immune responses toward solid tumors in cancer patients.

ADAM metallopeptidase domain 17 (ADAM17) is naturally processed through major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules and is a potential immunotherapeutic target in breast, ovarian and prostate cancers

Selection of suitable antigens is critical for the development of cancer vaccines. Most desirable are over-expressed cell surface proteins that may serve as targets for both antibodies and T cells, thus maximizing a concerted immune response. Towards this goal, we characterized the relevance of tumour necrosis factor-α-converting enzyme (ADAM17) for such targeted therapeutics. ADAM17 is one of the several metalloproteinases that play a key role in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling and has recently emerged as a new therapeutic target in several tumour types. In the present study, we analysed the expression profile of ADAM17 in a variety of normal and cancer cells of human origin and found that this protein is over-expressed on the surface of several types of cancer cells compared to the normal counterparts. Furthermore, we analysed the presentation of a human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-restricted epitope from ADAM17 protein to specific T cells established from normal donors as well as ovarian cancer patients. Our analysis revealed that the HLA-A2-restricted epitope is processed efficiently and presented by various cancer cells and not by normal cells. Tumour-specific T cell activation results in the secretion of both interferon-γ and granzyme B that can be blocked by HLA-A2 specific antibodies. Collectively, our data present evidence that ADAM17 can be a potential target antigen to devise novel immunotherapeutic strategies against ovarian, breast and prostate cancer.

Prospective assessment of quality of life in ovarian cancer patients receiving whole abdomen hyperthermia and liposomal doxorubicin

PURPOSE

Prospective assessment of quality of life (QoL) in patients with refractory, residual or recurrent ovarian cancer receiving whole abdomen hyperthermia and intravenous liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy.

METHODS

Treatment consisted of six cycles of intravenous liposomal doxorubicin at 40 mg m2 followed by whole abdomen hyperthermia with each cycle delivered every 4 weeks. QoL assessment was performed at baseline, prior to each cycle of chemotherapy and every 3 months during follow-up using self-administered questionnaires. Global QoL was rated on a seven-point scale and specific domains of QoL, disease related symptoms and treatment related toxicity were rated on a four-point scale.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled on the study and 129 QoL questionnaires were completed. Average age was 57.9 (range 45-76); nine patients had persistent and 23 recurrent disease. Ten patients completed six cycles of therapy. Three patients returned follow-up surveys. Subjects rated their overall QoL and health at baseline as above average with mean scores 5.10 (95% CI=4.62-5.58) and 4.66 (95% CI=4.23-5.08), respectively. No significant change in overall QoL was found between baseline and cycles 4-6 of therapy. Mean ratings of overall health and subject reported differences in QoL between cycles were not significantly changed during therapy. Limited follow-up data were available, but scores suggest possible improvement in QoL for patients completing all therapy. Subjects rated the greatest negative impact on QoL in areas of role functioning and social functioning, where the mean (SD) over all cycles was 2.00 (0.67) and 1.98 (0.70), respectively. For physical symptoms, fatigue and sleep disturbance had the most negative impact on QoL with means (SD) of 2.26 (0.62) and 1.91 (0.70). The moderate treatment related toxicity seen in this study did not significantly impact patients reported QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with unfavourable ovarian cancer responding to intravenous liposomal doxorubicin and whole abdomen hyperthermia maintained above average QoL during therapy. Limited data on patients completing protocol therapy demonstrated possible improvement in QoL.

A multi-institutional evaluation of factors predictive of toxicity and efficacy of bevacizumab for recurrent ovarian cancer

While bevacizumab has shown activity in recurrent ovarian cancer, a higher than expected incidence of bowel perforations has been reported in recent trials. We sought to determine factors associated with toxicity and tumor response in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer treated with bevacizumab. A retrospective review of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with bevacizumab was undertaken. Response was determined radiographically and through CA125 measurements. Statistical analysis to determine factors associated with toxicity and response was performed. Sixty-two eligible patients were identified. The cohort had received a median of 5 prior chemotherapy regimens. Single-agent bevacizumab was administered to 12 (19%), while 50 (81%) received the drug in combination with a cytotoxic agent. Grade 3–5 toxicities occurred in 15 (24%) patients, including grade 3–4 hypertension in 4 (7%), gastrointestinal perforations in 7%, and chylous ascites in 5%. Development of chylous ascites and gastrointestinal perforations appeared to correlate with tumor response. The overall response rate was 36% (4 complete response, 17 partial response), with stable disease in 40%. A higher objective response rate was seen in the bevacizumab combination group compared to single-agent treatment (43% vs 10%) (P = 0.07). However, 29 grade 3–5 toxic episodes were seen in the combination group vs only 1 in the single-agent bevacizumab cohort (P = 0.071). We conclude that bevacizumab demonstrates promising activity in recurrent ovarian cancer. The addition of a cytotoxic agent to bevacizumab improved response rates at the cost of increased toxicity. Gastrointestinal perforations occurred in 7%. The perforations occurred in heavily pretreated patients who were responding to therapy

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor masquerading as advanced ovarian cancer

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a rare abdominal malignancy usually diagnosed in young adult males. Most patients have widespread disease at presentation, with an organ of origin difficult to ascertain. A 33-year-old female presented to her gynecologist with complaints of suprapubic pressure, abdominal pain, and increased abdominal girth. She had a large intraabdominal tumor on ultrasound, thought to be ovarian cancer. She underwent surgical exploration, which confirmed a malignancy, but the exact etiology was uncertain. Final pathology was consistent with DSRCT. DSRCT is a rare malignancy that can mimic other more commonly seen tumors such as lymphoma and ovarian cancer. When encountering an extensive intraabdominal malignancy of uncertain etiology, DSRCT should be in the differential diagnosis.

Use of trastuzumab in the treatment of metastatic endometrial cancer

Systemic therapy of metastatic endometrial cancer is relatively ineffective. Response rates to chemotherapy and hormonal therapy in published studies range from 11% to 57%, but most responses are partial and of limited duration. In this case, we present a 76-year-old woman with stage IIIA endometrial adenocarcinoma who was initially treated with surgery and pelvic radiation. She developed multiple pulmonary metastases. She was treated with weekly paclitaxel chemotherapy. Immunostaining revealed that the primary endometrial cancer overexpressed HER-2/neu. Trastuzumab was added to the regimen, and a dramatic partial response was achieved. After a second pulmonary relapse following discontinuation of prior therapy, she was again successfully treated with trastuzumab in combination with paclitaxel and then docetaxel. Therefore, trastuzumab may be a useful adjuvant to taxane-based chemotherapy in some patients with metastatic endometrial cancers that overexpress HER-2/neu.

Comparison of gracilis and rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap neovaginal reconstruction performed during radical pelvic surgery: flap-specific morbidity

To compare flap-specific complications of gracilis myocutaneous (GM) and rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAM) flap neovaginal reconstructions after radical pelvic surgery. The study was a single-institution retrospective review of patients undergoing concurrent radical pelvic surgery with GM or RAM neovaginal reconstructions performed on a gynecological oncology service, 1978–2003. Flap-specific complications were compared between the techniques. Forty-four GM and 32 RAM neovaginal reconstructions were analyzed: plastic surgeons developed 12 (27%) GM and 4 (13%) RAM flaps, with all other flaps performed by gynecological oncologists. Primary procedures included 54 (71%) total pelvic exenterations, with partial exenterations or radical vulvovaginectomies in 16 (21%) and 6 (8%) patients, respectively. Forty (53%) patients had received radiation and 28 (36%) received chemoradiation before radical surgery. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics, other than more frequent use of continent urinary conduits (P < 0.001) and a trend for more frequent sidewall radiation (P < 0.1) in the RAM group, reflecting use in more recent patients (P < 0.001). Median follow-up is 28 months (range: 2 weeks to 216 months), with 5% acute operative mortality. Flap-specific complications were significantly increased in GM patients (P < 0.03). Overall flap loss was significantly increased in GM patients (P < 0.02). Thirty (59%) of 51 patients surviving for more than 12 months reported coitus, with no significant difference between the groups. Because of lower overall incidence of flap-specific complications and significantly lower incidence of flap loss compared with GM flap, RAM flap has become our technique of choice for neovaginal reconstruction concurrent with radical pelvic surgery.

Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for neovaginal reconstruction after radical pelvic surgery

The objective of this article is to compare the flap-specific complications associated with vertical (VRAM) and transverse (TRAM) rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap vaginal reconstructions performed during radical pelvic procedures. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients who underwent VRAM and TRAM neovaginal reconstructions performed on the Gynecologic Oncology Service at Duke University Medical Center. Flap-specific complications were compared between the two techniques. From 1988 to 2003, 14 VRAM and 18 TRAM flap neovaginal reconstructions were performed on 32 women during the course of 22 (68%) total pelvic exenterations, 8 (25%) partial exenterations, and 2 (6%) radical vulvovaginectomies. Twenty-eight (88%) patients had been previously treated with radiation therapy or concurrent chemoradiation. Associated procedures included continent urinary conduit in 21 (66%), rectosigmoid reanastomosis in 8 (25%), and intraoperative or postoperative sidewall radiation therapy in 7 (22%) of patients. Overall median survival was 14 months (range: 2-week postoperative death to 65 months), with two (6%) acute postoperative mortalities. Fifteen flap-specific complications occurred in 12 (38%) patients, with no significant differences in flap type. Abdominal wound complications included four (12%) superficial wound separations, while one (3%) patient had a fascial dehiscence associated with complex fistulas that contributed to her death, but no patient developed incisional hernia. One patient each developed > 50% flap loss after TRAM and < 50% flap loss after VRAM flap, respectively. Four (12%) patients developed vaginal stricture or stenosis, two (6%) required percutaneous drainage of pelvic abscess or hematoma, and two (6%) developed rectovaginal fistula. Univariate analysis revealed a trend for increasing flap loss with body mass index > 35 (P = 0.056, Fisher exact two-tailed test), but there were no significant associations with other patient characteristics or flap-specific complications. Thirteen (62%) of 21 patients who survived >12 months reported coitus. Both VRAM and TRAM are reliable techniques for neovaginal reconstructions after radical pelvic surgery and have a similar distribution of flap-specific complications involving the donor and recipient sites.