Comorbidity, Polytherapy, and Drug Interactions in a Neurological Context: An Example of a Multidisciplinary Approach to Promote the Rational Use of Drugs

Purpose:

A high number of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), mainly caused by drug–drug interactions (DDIs), occur in neurological wards and few data are available about incidence and prevalence of DDIs in this context. This study investigated—(1) the prevalence of drug–drug and drug–disease interactions in patients admitted to a neurological unit in Italy, (2) the risk factors for DDIs, and (3) the diseases and the drug classes mostly involved in drug–drug and drug–disease interactions.

Methods:

For 2 months, we performed a retrospective, observational study in the neurological unit of St Bassiano Hospital, enrolling 79 patients who received a drug prescription at discharge.

Results:

About half of the patients were discharged with 5 or more prescribed drugs, and 72% of patients showed potential, clinically relevant DDIs. Linear correlations were observed between age and number of prescribed drugs ( P < .01) and between age and number of interactions ( P < .01). The number of prescribed drugs was associated with the number of detected DDIs ( P < .01). The application of drug interaction alerts and the use of medication inappropriateness criteria (ie, Beers criteria) were not satisfactory in choosing the best therapy for each patient. Therefore, multidisciplinary discussions of each clinical case was required.

Conclusion:

The study demonstrated that the neurological patient, especially if elderly, has a high risk of DDI and ADRs and that many of these can be avoided by case discussion in multidisciplinary team meetings, in which the presence of a dedicated clinical pharmacist is crucial.

Sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma - a post marketing evaluation

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib is an orally active multikinase inhibitor licensed for the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The web-based registry, used for appraisal on new drugs, allows developing the observational prospective analysis of innovative drug therapies. To establish clinical impact of Sorafenib, institutional data were collected prospectively through the registry.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients treated with Sorafenib were reviewed (median age = 65 years) and the follow-up duration was 30 months. Every patient was checked for length of treatment, toxicity and outcomes. Based on the study sample, the median time to progression was 3 months and median overall survival was 8 months. We found 52% progressions at first evaluation and the disease control rate was 32%.

CONCLUSION

Our data from real life practice showed that the clinical benefit of Sorafenib in unresectable HCC was gained in selected responder patients.

Optimization of resources by drug management: A multicentred web-administered study on the use of ipilimumab in Italy

Objective

In a scenario of new expensive cancer therapies entering the market, strategies of optimisation and cost containment are crucial in oncology care. Better management of drug waste and centralization of drug preparation can be effective strategies to achieve these goals. The aim of this work is to describe the economic management of a high cost anticancer drug (ipilimumab) in some Italian reference centres.

Methods

This was an observational, multicentred study in which economical and clinical data of 21 cancer centres (418 patients) were collected during the enrollment period from February 2013 to August 2014. The follow-up period ended in July 2015.

Results

Participants purchased 10.7% more vials of ipilimumab than necessary for compounding. The results were variable among centres, and only five centres had a deviation lower than 5% between the drug purchased and the drug prescribed. Hospitals applying the drug day reached a statistically significant residual of drug effectively used compared to the amount prescribed (P = 0.018). Consequently, the price for treating a model patient was significantly lower in those hospitals (median spare of 7456 euro per patient).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the careful management of drug waste and the application of drug-day, through a proper selection of vial and the ability to use the leftover drug, can generate economic savings. However, tailoring the drug stock to clinical need is still an open issue which deserves further analysis.

[Is the price of cancer drugs related to the cost of develo-pment and production or to the economic value of their clincal efficacy?]

In the past years, the expenditure for cancer drugs has quickly increased, especially for biologic agents. Pharmaceutical companies and national health systems have different approaches in handling the issue of drug reimbursement. Companies support a price based on research and development (R&D) expenditures including those for unsuccessful drug projects while national health systems generally argue that pricing should be based on the incremental benefit generated by the agent under examination (value-based pricing - VBP). Nevertheless, current oncologic drugs prices are too high and not really justified by their incremental benefits or innovation, nor can they demonstrate that higher thresholds in QALYs could bring wider societal benefits. In this article we discuss these two points of view in the light of the most recent national and international literature. In Italy, drug reimbursement is currently managed through a mixed approach between the recognition of R&D expenditures and VBP. Reimbursement is also integrated with post-marketing patient-based national registries, particularly in the field of anti-cancer agents, that provide rebates based on financial risk sharing, cost-sharing, payment by results and success fee methods.