1
|
Sim VR, Gupta M, Taylor B, Mullassery V, Winship A, Chan K, Galante J, White I. Single Institute Experience Treating Uterine Carcinosarcoma: Outcome Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e543-e544. [PMID: 37785677 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is rare with a poor prognosis. We report over 10 years' experience, reporting prognostic and predictive factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). MATERIALS/METHODS Patient, tumor, treatment and relapse characteristics of 168 women with stages I-IVB UCS treated at our institute between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed. OS and DFS at 2 and 5 years were the primary outcomes, estimated with Kaplan-Meier. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the curative cohort was estimated using the log rank test. RESULTS Median follow up was 23 months (range 1-137 months). 34% had FIGO stage IA disease, 10% IB, 8% II. 16% IIIA-IIIC1, and 10% IIIC2 and 22% IVB. The overall 2-year OS was 52% and 5-year OS 30%. 2-year OS by FIGO stage were: IA 66%; IB 63%; II 54%; IIIA-IIIC1 54%; IIIC2 45%; IVB 26%. Within the curative cohort who were surgically staged, 2-year DFS was 47% and 5-year was 30%. 2-year DFS were 61% in IA disease, 53% IB, 12% II, 51% IIIA-IIIC1, and 45% IIIC2 and 4% IVB. A greater risk of death was conferred by lack of adjuvant treatment (lack of chemo > lack of radiotherapy). The most common chemotherapy regimen used was Carboplatin Paclitaxel and pelvic radiotherapy 45Gy 25F over 5 weeks. The combination of surgery and chemotherapy +/- radiotherapy significantly improved OS compared to surgery +/- radiotherapy (HR 0.5 with CI 0.3 - 0.9) p<0.05. Radiotherapy improved OS compared to surgery only (HR 0.4 with CI 0.2 - 1.1) p<0.05. Relapse rate in all patients following curative treatment is 72% within year 1 and 86% within year 2 from diagnosis. In 52 patients with stage 1A disease treated with surgery +/- radiotherapy only, 42.4% relapsed, median time to relapse was 8 months from diagnosis. Relapse occurred despite 69.2 % stage 1A patients receiving adjuvant pelvic EBRT and in these patients relapse within the pelvis occurred in 50%. CONCLUSION This study constitutes the largest retrospective analyses of long-term mortality outcomes in UCS and confirms poor outcomes despite curative surgery and adjuvant therapy. Most patients relapse within the first year following curative treatment. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy improves OS in all stages. In stage 1A disease 42 % patients relapse locally and distantly. This is an area of controversy and this data would strongly suggest that the addition of adjuvant paclitaxel-carboplatin or cisplatin-doxorubicin chemotherapy to EBRT should be considered in all patients including earliest stage disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V R Sim
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Gupta
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - B Taylor
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - V Mullassery
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Winship
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - K Chan
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - J Galante
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - I White
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cooper S, Gupta M, Sim VR, Mullasery V, Winship A, Taylor B, White I. Single Institute Experience with MRI-Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer: Long Term Outcomes and Toxicity Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e508. [PMID: 37785591 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) We report over 10 years' experience of MRI-guided adaptive brachytherapy (MRIGABT) in locally advanced cervix cancer (LACC). MATERIALS/METHODS A total of 162 patients with LACC FIGO stage IB-IVB were treated at our institute between 2010 and 2020. Treatment consisted of chemoradiotherapy (weekly intravenous cisplatin 40 mg/m², 5 cycles, 1 day per cycle, 45-50.4 Gy external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in 1·8-2 Gy fractions, followed by MRIGABT. Target volume definition and dose reporting for MRIGABT was according to GEC-ESTRO recommendations. MRIGABT dose prescription was according to our institutional practice. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were the primary endpoints. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for OS and DFS at 2, 5 and 10-years. Organ-specific late toxicity grade ≥3 (≥G3) (CTCAEv5.0) was reported, alongside rates of bowel fistula, stricture, and perforation. Using logistic regression, we explored the relationship between EQD2 D2cc bladder and ≥G3 genitourinary (GU) toxicity. We compared patient proportions developing ≥ G3 GU toxicity in those who received EQD2 ≥85 Gy versus <85 Gy. We examined the following predictors of ≥G3 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity: EQD2 dose (≥65 Gy versus <65 Gy), pre-existing bowel conditions, nodal boost, and extended field EBRT. RESULTS Median follow up was 4.7 years (IQR 3.3-7.1 years). Median EBRT dose was 50.4 Gy (IQR 50.4-50.4 Gy); 91% received chemotherapy. Median high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) was 23.6 cm3 (IQR 16.6-31.3 cm3). Median doses were as follows; D90 HRCTV 88.9 Gy EQD210 (IQR 84.1-91.3 Gy), median D2cc bladder 81.6 (IQR 76.9-85.7 Gy), rectum 62.2 (IQR 57.9-65.3 Gy), sigmoid 67.4 (IQR 60.8-71.1 Gy), and bowel 55 (IQR 49.9-63.2 Gy), (all EQD23). The 2, 5 and-10-year OS were 98%, 80% and 75%. The 2, 5 and 10-year DFS were 98%, 75% and 60%. Late toxicity ≥G3 was 9% GU, 6% GI and 3% vaginal. There was a significant relationship between EQD2 and ≥G3 GU toxicity (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.25; P = 0.04). When comparing those who received EQD2≥ 85Gy versus <85Gy, higher doses were associated with a greater proportion of ≥G3 GU toxicity (13% vs 6%). No significant predictors of ≥ G3 GI toxicity were observed. CONCLUSION We observed excellent LC and OS. A significant relationship was found between EQD2 >85 Gy and bladder toxicity, although ≥G3 toxicity was low. We did not identify predictors of bowel toxicity. New predictors of bowel toxicity are required. Mean EBRT dose, D1.0 cc rectum, sigmoid and bowel are being investigated further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Cooper
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - M Gupta
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - V R Sim
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - V Mullasery
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Winship
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - B Taylor
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - I White
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Griffiths M, Marshall S, Cousins F, Care A, Winship A, Hutt K. P–416 Radiotherapy inflicts long-term damage upon the uterus, causing uterine artery endothelial dysfunction and pregnancy loss in mice. Hum Reprod 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab130.415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Study question
Does the uterus sustain direct and long-term damage following radiotherapy, independent of ovarian damage?
Summary answer
Radiotherapy causes direct and long-term uterine damage. Ovariectomised and hormonally supplemented mice experience uterine artery endothelial dysfunction and pregnancy loss following transfer of healthy blastocysts.
What is known already
The detrimental off-target impacts of cancer therapies on the ovary are well established, with some fertility preservation techniques available to ensure patients maintain their fertility following gonadotoxic treatment. Low doses of radiotherapy kill the majority of primordial follicle oocytes in the ovary, reducing the ovarian reserve and fertile lifespan. Patients who have received radiotherapy experience higher rates of pregnancy complications including preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirth. However, no studies have investigated if radiation inflicts direct, fertility compromising damage to the uterus.
Study design, size, duration
Adolescent female mice were untreated or exposed to whole body y-irradiation (7Gy), then ovariectomised. Immediate damage was assessed up to 24 hours post-irradiation (n = 4/group). Four weeks following treatment, mice were hormone primed to induce endometrial receptivity (n = 7/group), artificial decidualisation (n = 7–8/group), or receive embryo transfers from healthy, unexposed donor mice to assess embryo implantation (n = 11–13/group), and mid-gestation development (n = 8–10/group).
Participants/materials, setting, methods
Four week old C57BL6/CBA (F1) female mice were used for this study. Immunofluorescence and in situ hybridisation were utilised to localise markers of immediate DNA damage and cell death following irradiation, and markers of receptivity in hormone primed uteri. Measurements of uterine artery blood flow were recorded using Doppler ultrasonography, and indices of pulsatility and resistance calculated. Uterine artery wire myography was performed to assess competency of endothelial and smooth muscle compartments following irradiation.
Main results and the role of chance
Within 24 hours of irradiation, DNA damage (yH2AX) and apoptosis (Puma/TUNEL) were elevated in uteri, compared to control. Irradiated mice that received embryo transfers from untreated donors had similar numbers of implantation sites 3-days post-transfer versus controls, however uteri were pale and atrophic suggesting impaired vascularisation. By 10-days post-transfer, implantation sites in irradiated mice were resorbing (p < 0.001), although uterine artery Doppler ultrasound measurements demonstrated no change in pulsatility or resistance indices. When the brain was shielded from irradiation to protect the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, resorption still occurred (p < 0.001), suggesting direct uterine damage is the likely cause of pregnancy loss. To investigate uterine damage in the absence of an embryo, endometrial receptivity was induced artificially. Uteri from irradiated animals were lighter compared to control (p < 0.05), however localisation of receptivity markers (E-cadherin, Mucin1, Ki67) was normal. When decidualisation was artificially induced irradiated uteri were also lighter (p < 0.01) indicating impaired decidualisation and reduced capacity to adapt to pregnancy. Wire myography performed on uterine arteries demonstrated endothelial dysfunction in irradiated mice (p < 0.0001).
Limitations, reasons for caution
Here, only a single age and dose of radiotherapy exposure are modelled. Patients of all ages can receive many doses of radiotherapy in combination with various chemotherapies. Our highly manipulable model enables any treatment variation to be modelled and the effect on the uterus and pregnancy examined.
Wider implications of the findings: Reproductive aged cancer patients need to be appropriately counselled regarding the risks to their long-term fertility following treatment. Until now, potential permanent impacts to the uterus following cancer treatment have not been considered. It is clear radiotherapy can impose long-term damage to the uterus and influence pregnancy success and fertility.
Trial registration number
NA
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Griffiths
- Biomedicine Discovery Institute- Monash University, Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Clayton, Australia
| | - S Marshall
- Monash University, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Clayton, Australia
| | - F Cousins
- Hudson Institute of Medical Research, The Ritchie Centre, Clayton, Australia
| | - A Care
- University of Adelaide, Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - A Winship
- Biomedicine Discovery Institute- Monash University, Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Clayton, Australia
| | - K Hutt
- Biomedicine Discovery Institute- Monash University, Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Clayton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nakamura M, Souri EA, Osborn G, Laddach R, Chauhan J, Stavraka C, Lombardi S, Black A, Khiabany A, Khair DO, Figini M, Winship A, Ghosh S, Montes A, Spicer JF, Bax HJ, Josephs DH, Lacy KE, Tsoka S, Karagiannis SN. IgE Activates Monocytes from Cancer Patients to Acquire a Pro-Inflammatory Phenotype. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E3376. [PMID: 33203088 PMCID: PMC7698027 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
IgE contributes to host-protective functions in parasitic and bacterial infections, often by monocyte and macrophage recruitment. We previously reported that monocytes contribute to tumour antigen-specific IgE-mediated tumour growth restriction in rodent models. Here, we investigate the impact of IgE stimulation on monocyte response, cellular signalling, secretory and tumour killing functions. IgE cross-linking on human monocytes with polyclonal antibodies to mimic formation of immune complexes induced upregulation of co-stimulatory (CD40, CD80, CD86), and reduced expression of regulatory (CD163, CD206, MerTK) monocyte markers. Cross-linking and tumour antigen-specific IgE antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) of cancer cells by cancer patient-derived monocytes triggered release of pro-inflammatory mediators (TNFα, MCP-1, IL-10, CXCL-10, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23). High intratumoural gene expression of these mediators was associated with favourable five-year overall survival in ovarian cancer. IgE cross-linking of trimeric FcεRI on monocytes stimulated the phosphorylation of intracellular protein kinases widely reported to be downstream of mast cell and basophil tetrameric FcεRI signalling. These included recently-identified FcεRI pathway kinases Fgr, STAT5, Yes and Lck, which we now associate with monocytes. Overall, anti-tumour IgE can potentiate pro-inflammatory signals, and prime tumour cell killing by human monocytes. These findings will inform the development of IgE monoclonal antibody therapies for cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mano Nakamura
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, Tower Wing, 9th Floor, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.N.); (G.O.); (R.L.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (S.L.); (A.B.); (A.K.); (D.O.K.); (H.J.B.); (D.H.J.); (K.E.L.)
| | - Elmira Amiri Souri
- Department of Informatics, Faculty of Natural & Mathematical Sciences, King’s College London, London WC2B 4BG, UK; (E.A.S.); (S.T.)
| | - Gabriel Osborn
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, Tower Wing, 9th Floor, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.N.); (G.O.); (R.L.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (S.L.); (A.B.); (A.K.); (D.O.K.); (H.J.B.); (D.H.J.); (K.E.L.)
| | - Roman Laddach
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, Tower Wing, 9th Floor, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.N.); (G.O.); (R.L.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (S.L.); (A.B.); (A.K.); (D.O.K.); (H.J.B.); (D.H.J.); (K.E.L.)
- Department of Informatics, Faculty of Natural & Mathematical Sciences, King’s College London, London WC2B 4BG, UK; (E.A.S.); (S.T.)
| | - Jitesh Chauhan
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, Tower Wing, 9th Floor, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.N.); (G.O.); (R.L.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (S.L.); (A.B.); (A.K.); (D.O.K.); (H.J.B.); (D.H.J.); (K.E.L.)
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Chara Stavraka
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, Tower Wing, 9th Floor, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.N.); (G.O.); (R.L.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (S.L.); (A.B.); (A.K.); (D.O.K.); (H.J.B.); (D.H.J.); (K.E.L.)
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Sara Lombardi
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, Tower Wing, 9th Floor, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.N.); (G.O.); (R.L.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (S.L.); (A.B.); (A.K.); (D.O.K.); (H.J.B.); (D.H.J.); (K.E.L.)
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Anna Black
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, Tower Wing, 9th Floor, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.N.); (G.O.); (R.L.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (S.L.); (A.B.); (A.K.); (D.O.K.); (H.J.B.); (D.H.J.); (K.E.L.)
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Atousa Khiabany
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, Tower Wing, 9th Floor, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.N.); (G.O.); (R.L.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (S.L.); (A.B.); (A.K.); (D.O.K.); (H.J.B.); (D.H.J.); (K.E.L.)
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Duaa O. Khair
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, Tower Wing, 9th Floor, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.N.); (G.O.); (R.L.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (S.L.); (A.B.); (A.K.); (D.O.K.); (H.J.B.); (D.H.J.); (K.E.L.)
| | - Mariangela Figini
- Biomarker Unit, Department of Applied Research and Technology Development, Fondazione, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumouri Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| | - Anna Winship
- Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK; (A.W.); (S.G.); (A.M.)
| | - Sharmistha Ghosh
- Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK; (A.W.); (S.G.); (A.M.)
| | - Ana Montes
- Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK; (A.W.); (S.G.); (A.M.)
| | - James F. Spicer
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Heather J. Bax
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, Tower Wing, 9th Floor, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.N.); (G.O.); (R.L.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (S.L.); (A.B.); (A.K.); (D.O.K.); (H.J.B.); (D.H.J.); (K.E.L.)
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Debra H. Josephs
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, Tower Wing, 9th Floor, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.N.); (G.O.); (R.L.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (S.L.); (A.B.); (A.K.); (D.O.K.); (H.J.B.); (D.H.J.); (K.E.L.)
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Katie E. Lacy
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, Tower Wing, 9th Floor, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.N.); (G.O.); (R.L.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (S.L.); (A.B.); (A.K.); (D.O.K.); (H.J.B.); (D.H.J.); (K.E.L.)
| | - Sophia Tsoka
- Department of Informatics, Faculty of Natural & Mathematical Sciences, King’s College London, London WC2B 4BG, UK; (E.A.S.); (S.T.)
| | - Sophia N. Karagiannis
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, Tower Wing, 9th Floor, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK; (M.N.); (G.O.); (R.L.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (S.L.); (A.B.); (A.K.); (D.O.K.); (H.J.B.); (D.H.J.); (K.E.L.)
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Cancer Centre, London SE1 9RT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rozen G, Rogers P, Chander S, Anderson R, McNally O, Umstad M, Winship A, Hutt K, Teh WT, Dobrotwir A, Hart R, Ledger W, Stern K. Clinical summary guide: reproduction in women with previous abdominopelvic radiotherapy or total body irradiation. Hum Reprod Open 2020; 2020:hoaa045. [PMID: 33134561 PMCID: PMC7585646 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What is the evidence to guide the management of women who wish to conceive following abdominopelvic radiotherapy (AP RT) or total body irradiation (TBI)? SUMMARY ANSWER Pregnancy is possible, even following higher doses of post-pubertal uterine radiation exposure; however, it is associated with adverse reproductive sequelae and pregnancies must be managed in a high-risk obstetric unit. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY In addition to primary ovarian insufficiency, female survivors who are treated with AP RT and TBI are at risk of damage to the uterus. This may impact on its function and manifest as adverse reproductive sequelae. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION A review of the literature was carried out and a multidisciplinary working group provided expert opinion regarding assessment of the uterus and obstetric management. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS Reproductive outcomes for postpubertal women with uterine radiation exposure in the form of AP RT or TBI were reviewed. This included Pubmed listed peer-reviewed publications from 1990 to 2019, and limited to English language.. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The prepubertal uterus is much more vulnerable to the effects of radiation than after puberty. Almost all available information about the impact of radiation on the uterus comes from studies of radiation exposure during childhood or adolescence.An uncomplicated pregnancy is possible, even with doses as high as 54 Gy. Therefore, tumour treatment doses alone cannot at present be used to accurately predict uterine damage. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION Much of the data cannot be readily extrapolated to adult women who have had uterine radiation and the publications concerning adult women treated with AP RT are largely limited to case reports. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This analysis offers clinical guidance and assists with patient counselling. It is important to include patients who have undergone AP RT or TBI in prospective studies to provide further evidence regarding uterine function, pregnancy outcomes and correlation of imaging with clinical outcomes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS This study received no funding and there are no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Rozen
- Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne and Gynaecology Research Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Melbourne IVF, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - P Rogers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne and Gynaecology Research Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - S Chander
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - R Anderson
- University of Edinburgh, MRC Centre for Reproductive Health Queens Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh, UK
| | - O McNally
- Royal Women's Hospital, Gynae-Oncology Unit, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - M Umstad
- Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne School of BioSciences, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - A Winship
- Development and Stem Cells Program, Monash University Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Clayton, VIC, Australia.,Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - K Hutt
- Development and Stem Cells Program, Monash University Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - W T Teh
- Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, University of Melbourne and Gynaecology Research Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Melbourne IVF, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - A Dobrotwir
- Royal Women's Hospital, Radiology, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - R Hart
- University of Western Australia, School of Womens and Infants Health University of Western Australia King Edward Memorial Hospital Subiaco, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - W Ledger
- University of New South Wales, School of Womens and Childrens Health Level 1, Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - K Stern
- Reproductive Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Melbourne IVF, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bax HJ, Khiabany A, Stavraka C, Pellizzari G, Chan Wah Hak C, Robinson A, Ilieva KM, Woodman N, Naceur‐Lombardelli C, Gillett C, Pinder S, Gould HJ, Corrigan CJ, Till SJ, Katugampola S, Barton C, Winship A, Ghosh S, Montes A, Josephs DH, Spicer JF, Karagiannis SN. Basophil activation test in cancer patient blood evaluating potential hypersensitivity to an anti-tumor IgE therapeutic candidate. Allergy 2020; 75:2069-2073. [PMID: 32086828 PMCID: PMC7581190 DOI: 10.1111/all.14245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Heather J. Bax
- St. John’s Institute of DermatologySchool of Basic & Medical BiosciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKing’s College LondonGuy’s HospitalLondonUK
| | - Atousa Khiabany
- St. John’s Institute of DermatologySchool of Basic & Medical BiosciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKing’s College LondonGuy’s HospitalLondonUK
| | - Chara Stavraka
- St. John’s Institute of DermatologySchool of Basic & Medical BiosciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKing’s College LondonGuy’s HospitalLondonUK
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical OncologyGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Giulia Pellizzari
- St. John’s Institute of DermatologySchool of Basic & Medical BiosciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
| | - Charleen Chan Wah Hak
- St. John’s Institute of DermatologySchool of Basic & Medical BiosciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical OncologyGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Alexandra Robinson
- St. John’s Institute of DermatologySchool of Basic & Medical BiosciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
| | - Kristina M. Ilieva
- St. John’s Institute of DermatologySchool of Basic & Medical BiosciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
- Breast Cancer Now Research UnitSchool of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesGuy’s Cancer CentreKing’s College LondonLondonUK
| | - Natalie Woodman
- King’s Health Partners Cancer BiobankSchool of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
| | - Cristina Naceur‐Lombardelli
- King’s Health Partners Cancer BiobankSchool of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
| | - Cheryl Gillett
- King’s Health Partners Cancer BiobankSchool of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
| | - Sarah Pinder
- King’s Health Partners Cancer BiobankSchool of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
| | - Hannah J. Gould
- Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular BiophysicsSchool of Basic and Medical BiosciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Asthma UK CentreAllergic Mechanisms in AsthmaKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Christopher J. Corrigan
- Asthma UK CentreAllergic Mechanisms in AsthmaKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy and School of Immunology and Microbial SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Stephen J. Till
- Asthma UK CentreAllergic Mechanisms in AsthmaKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy and School of Immunology and Microbial SciencesKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Claire Barton
- Centre for Drug DevelopmentCancer Research UKLondonUK
- Barton Oncology LtdEastcoteUK
| | - Anna Winship
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical OncologyGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Sharmistha Ghosh
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical OncologyGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Ana Montes
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical OncologyGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Debra H. Josephs
- St. John’s Institute of DermatologySchool of Basic & Medical BiosciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKing’s College LondonGuy’s HospitalLondonUK
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical OncologyGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - James F. Spicer
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesKing’s College LondonGuy’s HospitalLondonUK
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical OncologyGuy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Sophia N. Karagiannis
- St. John’s Institute of DermatologySchool of Basic & Medical BiosciencesKing’s College LondonLondonUK
- Breast Cancer Now Research UnitSchool of Cancer & Pharmaceutical SciencesGuy’s Cancer CentreKing’s College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bax HJ, Chauhan J, Stavraka C, Khiabany A, Nakamura M, Pellizzari G, Ilieva KM, Lombardi S, Gould HJ, Corrigan CJ, Till SJ, Katugampola S, Jones PS, Barton C, Winship A, Ghosh S, Montes A, Josephs DH, Spicer JF, Karagiannis SN. Basophils from Cancer Patients Respond to Immune Stimuli and Predict Clinical Outcome. Cells 2020; 9:cells9071631. [PMID: 32645919 PMCID: PMC7408103 DOI: 10.3390/cells9071631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Basophils are involved in manifestations of hypersensitivity, however, the current understanding of their propensity for activation and their prognostic value in cancer patients remains unclear. As in healthy and atopic individuals, basophil populations were identified in blood from ovarian cancer patients (n = 53) with diverse tumor histologies and treatment histories. Ex vivo basophil activation was measured by CD63 expression using the basophil activation test (BAT). Irrespective of prior treatment, basophils could be activated by stimulation with IgE- (anti-FcεRI and anti-IgE) and non-IgE (fMLP) mediated triggers. Basophil activation was detected by ex vivo exposure to paclitaxel, but not to other anti-cancer therapies, in agreement with a clinical history of systemic hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel. Protein and gene expression analyses support the presence of basophils (CCR3, CD123, FcεRI) and activated basophils (CD63, CD203c, tryptase) in ovarian tumors. Greater numbers of circulating basophils, cells with greater capacity for ex vivo stimulation (n = 35), and gene signatures indicating the presence of activated basophils in tumors (n = 439) were each associated with improved survival in ovarian cancer. Circulating basophils in cancer patients respond to IgE- and non-IgE-mediated signals and could help identify hypersensitivity to therapeutic agents. Activated circulating and tumor-infiltrating basophils may be potential biomarkers in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather J. Bax
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (H.J.B.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (A.K.); (M.N.); (G.P.); (K.M.I.); (D.H.J.)
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Jitesh Chauhan
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (H.J.B.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (A.K.); (M.N.); (G.P.); (K.M.I.); (D.H.J.)
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Chara Stavraka
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (H.J.B.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (A.K.); (M.N.); (G.P.); (K.M.I.); (D.H.J.)
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK; (A.W.); (S.G.); (A.M.)
| | - Atousa Khiabany
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (H.J.B.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (A.K.); (M.N.); (G.P.); (K.M.I.); (D.H.J.)
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Mano Nakamura
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (H.J.B.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (A.K.); (M.N.); (G.P.); (K.M.I.); (D.H.J.)
| | - Giulia Pellizzari
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (H.J.B.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (A.K.); (M.N.); (G.P.); (K.M.I.); (D.H.J.)
| | - Kristina M. Ilieva
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (H.J.B.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (A.K.); (M.N.); (G.P.); (K.M.I.); (D.H.J.)
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Cancer Centre, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Sara Lombardi
- Guy’s and St Thomas’ Oncology & Haematology Clinical Trials (OHCT), Guy’s Cancer Centre, London SE1 9RT, UK;
| | - Hannah J. Gould
- Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK;
- Asthma UK Centre, Allergic Mechanisms in Asthma, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (C.J.C.); (S.J.T.)
| | - Christopher J. Corrigan
- Asthma UK Centre, Allergic Mechanisms in Asthma, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (C.J.C.); (S.J.T.)
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy and School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Stephen J. Till
- Asthma UK Centre, Allergic Mechanisms in Asthma, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (C.J.C.); (S.J.T.)
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy and School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Sidath Katugampola
- Centre for Drug Development, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London E20 1JQ, UK; (S.K.); (P.S.J.); (C.B.)
| | - Paul S. Jones
- Centre for Drug Development, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London E20 1JQ, UK; (S.K.); (P.S.J.); (C.B.)
| | - Claire Barton
- Centre for Drug Development, Cancer Research UK, 2 Redman Place, London E20 1JQ, UK; (S.K.); (P.S.J.); (C.B.)
- Barton Oncology Ltd., 8 Elm Avenue, Eastcote, Middlesex HA4 8PD, UK
| | - Anna Winship
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK; (A.W.); (S.G.); (A.M.)
| | - Sharmistha Ghosh
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK; (A.W.); (S.G.); (A.M.)
| | - Ana Montes
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK; (A.W.); (S.G.); (A.M.)
| | - Debra H. Josephs
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (H.J.B.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (A.K.); (M.N.); (G.P.); (K.M.I.); (D.H.J.)
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK; (A.W.); (S.G.); (A.M.)
| | - James F. Spicer
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK;
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK; (A.W.); (S.G.); (A.M.)
| | - Sophia N. Karagiannis
- St. John’s Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK; (H.J.B.); (J.C.); (C.S.); (A.K.); (M.N.); (G.P.); (K.M.I.); (D.H.J.)
- Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Cancer Centre, London SE1 9RT, UK
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44(0)20-7188-6355; Fax: +44(0)20-7188-8050
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nakamura M, Bax HJ, Scotto D, Souri EA, Sollie S, Harris RJ, Hammar N, Walldius G, Winship A, Ghosh S, Montes A, Spicer JF, Van Hemelrijck M, Josephs DH, Lacy KE, Tsoka S, Karagiannis SN. Immune mediator expression signatures are associated with improved outcome in ovarian carcinoma. Oncoimmunology 2019; 8:e1593811. [PMID: 31069161 PMCID: PMC6492968 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2019.1593811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune and inflammatory cascades may play multiple roles in ovarian cancer. We aimed to identify relationships between expression of immune and inflammatory mediators and patient outcomes. We interrogated differential gene expression of 44 markers and marker combinations (n = 1,978) in 1,656 ovarian carcinoma patient tumors, alongside matched 5-year overall survival (OS) data in silico. Using machine learning methods, we investigated whether genomic expression of these 44 mediators can discriminate between malignant and non-malignant tissues in 839 ovarian cancer and 115 non-malignant ovary samples. We furthermore assessed inflammation markers in 289 ovarian cancer patients’ sera in the Swedish Apolipoprotein MOrtality-related RISk (AMORIS) cohort. Expression of the 44 mediators could discriminate between malignant and non-malignant tissues with at least 96% accuracy. Higher expression of classical Th1, Th2, Th17, anti-parasitic/infection and M1 macrophage mediator signatures were associated with better OS. Contrastingly, inflammatory and angiogenic mediators, CXCL-12, C-reactive protein (CRP) and platelet-derived growth factor subunit A (PDGFA) were negatively associated with OS. Of the serum inflammatory markers in the AMORIS cohort, women with ovarian cancer who had elevated levels of haptoglobin (≥1.4 g/L) had a higher risk of dying from ovarian cancer compared to those with haptoglobin levels <1.4 g/L (HR = 2.09, 95% CI:1.38–3.16). Our findings indicate that elevated “classical” immune mediators, associated with response to pathogen antigen challenge, may confer immunological advantage in ovarian cancer, while inflammatory markers appear to have negative prognostic value. These highlight associations between immune protection, inflammation and clinical outcomes, and offer opportunities for patient stratification based on secretome markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mano Nakamura
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Heather J Bax
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, UK.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Daniele Scotto
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Elmira Amiri Souri
- Department of Informatics, Faculty of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sam Sollie
- King's College London, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), London, UK
| | - Robert J Harris
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Niklas Hammar
- Unit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Goran Walldius
- Unit of Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Winship
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sharmistha Ghosh
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ana Montes
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Clinical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - James F Spicer
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- King's College London, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology & Urology Research (TOUR), London, UK.,Unit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Debra H Josephs
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, UK.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Katie E Lacy
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sophia Tsoka
- Department of Informatics, Faculty of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sophia N Karagiannis
- St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Menkhorst E, Winship A, Van Sinderen M, Dimitriadis E. Human extravillous trophoblast invasion: intrinsic and extrinsic regulation. Reprod Fertil Dev 2017; 28:406-15. [PMID: 25163485 DOI: 10.1071/rd14208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2014] [Accepted: 07/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
During the establishment of pregnancy, a human blastocyst implants into the uterine endometrium to facilitate the formation of a functional placenta. Implantation involves the blastocyst adhering to the uterine luminal epithelium before the primitive syncytiotrophoblast and subsequently specialised cells, the extravillous trophoblast (EVT), invade into the decidua in order to engraft and remodel uterine spiral arteries, creating the placental blood supply at the end of the first trimester. Defects in EVT invasion lead to abnormal placentation and thus adverse pregnancy outcomes. The local decidual environment is thought to play a key role in regulating trophoblast invasion. Here we describe the major cell types present in the decidua during the first trimester of pregnancy and review what is known about their regulation of EVT invasion. Overall, the evidence suggests that in a healthy pregnancy almost all cell types in the decidua actively promote EVT invasion and, further, that reduced EVT invasion towards the end of the first trimester is regulated, in part, by the reduced invasive capacity of EVTs shown at this time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Menkhorst
- MIMR-PHI Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright St, Clayton, Vic. 3168, Australia
| | - A Winship
- MIMR-PHI Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright St, Clayton, Vic. 3168, Australia
| | - M Van Sinderen
- MIMR-PHI Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright St, Clayton, Vic. 3168, Australia
| | - E Dimitriadis
- MIMR-PHI Institute of Medical Research, 27-31 Wright St, Clayton, Vic. 3168, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nahab C, Aldridge S, Jones EL, Bozic N, Johnstone R, Winship A, Mullassery V. The Advancing Role of the Radiographer/Radiation Therapist in the Vaginal Vault HDR Brachytherapy Service at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Brachytherapy 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.04.172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
11
|
Tse V, Shiarli AM, Aldridge S, Nahab C, Jones EL, Bozic N, Winship A, Mullassery V. A Review of Practice and Outcomes of External Beam Radiotherapy Treatment with Concurrent Chemotherapy Followed by MRI-Assisted Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer. Brachytherapy 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.04.151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
Krishnan T, Winship A, Sonderegger S, Menkhorst E, Horne AW, Brown J, Zhang JG, Nicola NA, Tong S, Dimitriadis E. The role of leukemia inhibitory factor in tubal ectopic pregnancy. Placenta 2013; 34:1014-9. [PMID: 24074901 DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2013] [Revised: 09/04/2013] [Accepted: 09/06/2013] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ectopic pregnancy is unique to humans and a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. The etiology remains unknown however factors regulating embryo implantation likely contribute. Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) has roles in extravillous trophoblast adhesion and invasion and is present in ectopic implantation sites. We hypothesised that LIF facilitates blastocyst adhesion/invasion in the Fallopian tube, contributing to ectopic pregnancy. METHODS We immunolocalised LIF receptor (R) in tubal ectopic pregnancy (N = 5). We used an oviduct cell line (OE-E6/E7) to model Fallopian tube epithelial cells and a trophoblast spheroid co-culture model (HTR-8/SVneo cell line formed spheroids) to model blastocyst attachment to the Fallopian tube. We examined LIF signaling pathways in OE-E6/E7 cells by Western blot. The effect of LIF and LIF inhibition (using a novel LIF inhibitor, PEGLA) on first-trimester placental outgrowth was determined. RESULTS LIFR localised to villous and extravillous trophoblast and Fallopian tube epithelium in ectopic pregnancy. LIF activated STAT3 but not the ERK pathway in OE-E6/E7 cells. LIF stimulated HTR-8/SVneo spheroid adhesion to OE-E6/E7 cells which was significantly reduced after PEGLA treatment. LIF promoted placental explants outgrowth, while co-treatment with PEGLA blocked outgrowth. DISCUSSION Our data suggests LIF facilitates the development of ectopic pregnancy by stimulating blastocyst adhesion and trophoblast outgrowth from placental explants. Ectopic pregnancy is usually diagnosed after 6 weeks of pregnancy, therefore PEGLA may be useful in targeting trophoblast growth/invasion. CONCLUSION LIF may contribute to the development of ectopic pregnancies and that pharmacologically targeting LIF-mediated trophoblast outgrowth may be useful as a treatment for ectopic pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Krishnan
- Prince Henry's Institute of Medical Research, P.O. Box 5152, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Wellington Road, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Van Sinderen M, Cuman C, Winship A, Menkhorst E, Dimitriadis E. The chrondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG4) regulates human trophoblast function. Placenta 2013; 34:907-12. [PMID: 23953863 DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2013.07.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2013] [Revised: 07/19/2013] [Accepted: 07/23/2013] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Trophoblast growth and invasion of the uterine endometrium are critical events during placentation and are tightly regulated by locally produced factors. Abnormal placentation can result in early miscarriage or preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction, leading to impaired fetal and/or maternal health. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4) is involved in cancer cell migration and invasion, processes which are critical during placentation but unlike in cancer, trophoblast invasion is highly regulated. CSPG4 expression and function in trophoblast is unknown. We determined CSPG4 expression in human first trimester placenta and implantation sites, and investigated whether CSPG4 influenced proliferation, migration and invasion of a human extravillous trophoblast (EVT) cell line (HTR8/SVneo cells) as a model for extravillous trophoblast (EVT). METHODS AND RESULTS Immunoreactive CSPG4 localized to EVT cells in the trophoblast shell, subpopulations of interstitial EVT cells within the decidua and cytotrophoblast cells in placental villi. In HTR8/SVneo cells, siRNA knockdown of CSPG4 stimulated proliferation and decreased migration/invasion. In primary first trimester placental villi explants two cytokines, interleukin 11 (IL11) and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) with known roles in trophoblast function, stimulated CSPG4 mRNA expression and immunoreactive protein in the cyotrophoblast. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION This is the first demonstration of the production and function of CSPG4 in human placentation. These data suggest that locally produced CSPG4 stimulates human EVT migration and invasion and suggests that IL11 and LIF regulate villous cytotrophoblast differentiation towards the invasive phenotype at least in part via CSPG4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Van Sinderen
- Prince Henry's Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Montes A, Okera M, Ayis S, Natas S, Jacques A, Winship A. Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.e15555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
15
|
Aldridge S, Block G, Naeem M, Johnstone R, Humphreys S, Winship A. 657 poster OPTIMISATION TECHNIQUE FOR MRI BASED 3D TREATMENT PLANNING FOR HDR BRACHYTHERAPY CERVIX TREATMENTS. Radiother Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(11)70779-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
16
|
Winship A, Cheow H, Rankin S, Landau D, O'Doherty M. 2 Is the whole body PET/CT scan a luxury procedure for investigating pulmonary lesions compared to a thoracic and upper abdominal study? Lung Cancer 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(07)70328-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
17
|
Winship A. 114 Agreement of CT imaging and histopathology in non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 2005. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(05)81091-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|