Relationship between cancer status and medical response by an emergency dispatch center: From a French SAMU database

OBJECTIVE

In many countries, the first line response to an emergency call is decided by the emergency dispatch center EMS clinician. Our main objective was to compare the pre-hospital response to calls received from cancer and non-cancer patients. We also compared the reasons for calling, for each group.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of data collected between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020, from emergency dispatch center records of the Isère county, France. Statistical tests were conducted after matching one cancer patient with two non-cancer patients, resulting in a cohort of 44,022 patients. We used multivariate logistic regression to determine the impact of patient cancer status on the medical decision taken in response to the emergency call.

RESULTS

Overall, data on 849,110 patients were extracted, including 16,451 patients with a diagnosis of cancer and 29,348 non-cancer patients. In the matched cohort, cancer was associated with a higher odd of having a mobile intensive care unit (MICU) [odds ratio (OR)=2.02 (1.81-2.26), p<0.001] or an ambulance being dispatched to the patient's home or other location [OR=2.36 (2.24-2.48), p<0.001]. The two most frequent medical responses were to send an ambulance (58.6%) and giving advice only (36.8%). The five main reasons for the emergency call for the cancer group were cardiovascular disease symptoms (13.5%), respiratory problems (10.6%), digestive disorders (10.4%), infections (8.9%) and neurological disorders (6.0%).

CONCLUSION

An MICU or an ambulance was more often dispatched for cancer patients than for others. Considering that cancer is a very frequent comorbidity in Western countries, knowledge of the patient's cancer status should be sought and taken into consideration when a patient seeks emergency help.

Efficacy of Plasmapheresis in Nivolumab-Associated ANCA Glomerulonephritis: A Case Report and Pathophysiology Discussion

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized solid organ and hematologic cancer treatments by improving overall prognoses. However, they can lead to overactivation of the immune system and several immune-related adverse events and sometimes affecting the renal system. Although acute interstitial nephritis is well described, we know little about ICI-associated glomerular injury. Herein, we report an exceptional case of renal ANCA positive-associated vasculitis (AAV) after nivolumab therapy. Three weeks after the last nivolumab injection, the patient presented with proteinuria at 1.73 g/g of creatininuria, hematuria, and acute kidney injury needing dialysis associated with lung hemorrhage; anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA titer ≥1,280 with myeloperoxidase specificity of 780 U/mL) was positive, and kidney biopsy confirmed glomerular injury with crescents. The patient underwent treatment with steroid pulses, rituximab, and plasmapheresis, resulting in an improvement of the renal function and lung hemorrhage and produced a negative ANCA titer. Despite the results of the PEXIVAS study and the absence of clear benefit of plasmapheresis demonstrated in idiopathic AAV, we suggest that drug-induced AAV may be effectively treated by plasmapheresis, steroids, and rituximab.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Rechallenge Efficacy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) rechallenge could represent an attractive option in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet no sufficient data supporting this strategy are available. This retrospective observational multicenter national study explored the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) rechallenge in advanced NSCLC patients, looking for potential clinical features associated with greater outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 144 advanced NSCLC patients whose disease was rechallenged with ICPis after ≥ 12 weeks of discontinuation. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from first or second ICPi initiation to disease progression (PFS1 and PFSR, respectively), death, or last follow-up (OS1, OSR), respectively.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) age was 63 (58-70) years. Most patients were male (67%) and smokers (87%). Most had adenocarcinomas (62%) and/or stage IV disease at diagnosis (66%). The best response at rechallenge was not associated with that under the first ICPi (P = 1.10^-1). The median (95% confidence interval) PFS1 and PFSR were 13 (10-16.5) and 4.4 (3-6.5) months, respectively. The median (95% confidence interval) OS1 and OSR were 3.3 (2.9-3.9) and 1.5 (1.0-2.1) years, respectively. Longer PFSR and OSR were found in patients discontinuing first ICPi because of toxicity or clinical decision, those not receiving systemic treatment between the two ICPis, and those with good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status at rechallenge. Only performance status proved to affect outcomes at multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Patients discontinuing first ICPi because of toxicity or clinical decision, those able to maintain a treatment-free period, and those with good performance status may be potential candidates for rechallenge.

Integrative and comparative genomic analyses identify clinically relevant pulmonary carcinoid groups and unveil the supra-carcinoids

The worldwide incidence of pulmonary carcinoids is increasing, but little is known about their molecular characteristics. Through machine learning and multi-omics factor analysis, we compare and contrast the genomic profiles of 116 pulmonary carcinoids (including 35 atypical), 75 large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC), and 66 small-cell lung cancers. Here we report that the integrative analyses on 257 lung neuroendocrine neoplasms stratify atypical carcinoids into two prognostic groups with a 10-year overall survival of 88% and 27%, respectively. We identify therapeutically relevant molecular groups of pulmonary carcinoids, suggesting DLL3 and the immune system as candidate therapeutic targets; we confirm the value of OTP expression levels for the prognosis and diagnosis of these diseases, and we unveil the group of supra-carcinoids. This group comprises samples with carcinoid-like morphology yet the molecular and clinical features of the deadly LCNEC, further supporting the previously proposed molecular link between the low- and high-grade lung neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Characteristics and outcome of patients with newly diagnosed advanced or metastatic lung cancer admitted to intensive care units (ICUs)

Background

Although patients with advanced or metastatic lung cancer have poor prognosis, admission to the ICU for management of life-threatening complications has increased over the years. Patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer appear as good candidates for ICU admission, but more robust information to assist decisions is lacking. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prognosis of newly diagnosed unresectable lung cancer patients.

Methods

A retrospective multicentric study analyzed the outcome of patients admitted to the ICU with a newly diagnosed lung cancer (diagnosis within the month) between 2010 and 2013.

Results

Out of the 100 patients, 30 had small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 70 had non-small cell lung cancer. (Thirty patients had already been treated with oncologic treatments.) Mechanical ventilation (MV) was performed for 81 patients. Seventeen patients received emergency chemotherapy during their ICU stay. ICU, hospital, 3- and 6-month mortality were, respectively, 47, 60, 67 and 71%. Hospital mortality was 60% when invasive MV was used alone, 71% when MV and vasopressors were needed and 83% when MV, vasopressors and hemodialysis were required. In multivariate analysis, hospital mortality was associated with metastatic disease (OR 4.22 [1.4–12.4]; p = 0.008), need for invasive MV (OR 4.20 [1.11–16.2]; p = 0.030), while chemotherapy in ICU was associated with survival (OR 0.23, [0.07–0.81]; p = 0.020).

Conclusion

This study shows that ICU management can be appropriate for selected newly diagnosed patients with advanced lung cancer, and chemotherapy might improve outcome for patients with SCLC admitted for cancer-related complications. Nevertheless, tumors’ characteristics, numbers and types of organ dysfunction should be taken into account in the decisional process before admitting these patients in ICU.

CT-texture analysis of subsolid nodules for differentiating invasive from in-situ and minimally invasive lung adenocarcinoma subtypes

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of computed tomography-texture analysis (CTTA) in differentiating between in-situ and minimally-invasive from invasive adenocarcinomas in subsolid lung nodules (SSLNs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed 49 SSLNs in 44 patients. There were 27 men and 17 women with a mean age of 63±7 (SD) years (range: 47-78years). For each SSLN, type (pure ground-glass or part-solid) was assessed by consensus and CTTA was conducted independently by each observer using a filtration-histogram technique. Different filters were used before histogram quantification: no filtration, fine, medium and coarse, followed by histogram quantification using mean intensity, standard deviation (SD), entropy, mean positive pixels (MPP), skewness and kurtosis.

RESULTS

We analyzed 13 pure ground-glass and 36 part-solid nodules corresponding to 16 adenocarcinomas in-situ (AIS), 5 minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIA) and 28 invasive adenocarcinomas (IVA). At uni- and multivariate analysis CTTA allowed discriminating between IVAs and AIS/MIA (P<0.05 and P=0.025, respectively) with the following histogram parameters: skewness using fine textures and kurtosis using coarse filtration for pure ground-glass nodules, and SD without filtration for part-solid nodules.

CONCLUSION

CTTA has the potential to differentiate AIS and MIA from IVA among SSLNs. However, our results require further validation on a larger cohort.

[Not Available]

TREATMENT OF NSCLC WITH NIVOLUMAB

Chemotherapy with docetaxel has remained a cornerstone of second-line treatment for more than 15 years, but it is associated with an unfavorable safety profile. Recently, the results of 2 randomized phase III trials assessing nivolumab in lung cancer, Check-Mate-017 and Check- Mate-057, have deeply changed our current clinical practice and open the debate for further improvements in the clinical care of lung cancer. This paper explores the recent findings about nivolumab in the second-line setting and discusses future directions for nivolumab and other immune Oncology drugs.

Personalized chemotherapy of lung cancer: What the radiologist should know

Lung cancer is the leading cause of deaths due to cancer in France. More than half of lung cancers are discovered at an advanced-stage. New anticancer treatment strategies (i.e., the so-called personalized or targeted therapy) have recently been introduced and validated for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in addition to or in association with standard chemotherapy. Personalized therapy includes tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), antiangiogenic treatments and immunotherapy. Because these treatments may be responsible for atypical thoracic adverse effects and responses as compared to standard chemotherapy, RECIST 1.1 criteria may be inadequate to evaluate the responses to these agents. The goal of this article was to review personalized treatment strategies for NSCLC, to consider the therapy-specific responses and thoracic complications induced by these new therapeutic agents and finally to discuss future directions for the personalized assessment of tumor response.

Primary lung adenocarcinoma: characteristics by smoking habit and sex

The incidence of adenocarcinoma is increasing, particularly among females. We sought to assess the role of tobacco consumption in clinical presentation according to sex. In this retrospective study, 848 patients diagnosed between 1997 and 2006 at Grenoble University Hospital (Grenoble, France) were stratified into four groups according to smoking habits. Differences between sexes and two contrasting female profiles emerged. Female current smokers were younger than female never-smokers (median 51 versus 69 yrs; p < 0.001), more often had surgery (62.7% versus 39%; p = 0.01) and had a median (95% CI) estimated survival of 26.2 (18.1-49.2) versus 15.1 (12.8-22.2) months (p = 0.002). Both groups had similar survival when taking treatment into account. Among males, smoking did not influence presentation. Male current smokers were older than female current smokers (median 59 yrs; p < 0.001) and fewer had surgery (48.8%; p = 0.015), although the percentage of stage IIIb-IV disease was similar (53% and 46%; nonsignificant) and they had a poorer estimated survival of 14.3 (13.0-18.5) months (p = 0.0024). Males smoked more than females (median 41 versus 30 pack-yrs; p < 0.001). Quitting smoking delayed age at diagnosis by 11 yrs for females (p = 0.0035) and 8 yrs for males (p < 0.001). Our results support the hypothesis that carcinogenesis differs between males and females, and between female smokers and never-smokers.