Online access to male factor infertility care: the challenge of finding a specialist

OBJECTIVE

To investigate internet search results available to couples searching for a male factor infertility specialist.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Online search engine.

PATIENTS

The phrase "male infertility specialist " was searched in Google for 50 states and Washington D.C. The top 10 results (i.e., first page) of each search were evaluated for website content.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The first page of each search was evaluated for provider type (urology vs. obstetrics and gynecology), level of training (fellowship vs. none), male factor fertility information provided, and procedures offered. We compared search position rank (1-10) to determine the likelihood of finding an urologist versus a practitioner in obstetrics and gynecology.

RESULTS

A total of 419 results were identified; the majority were obstetrics and gynecology-related (N = 229, 54.7%). Urology-related results appeared higher than obstetrics and gynecology-related results (median, 4 vs. 5). Andrology fellowship-trained urologists were identified in 153 (36.5%) results. Among 229 obstetrics and gynecology results, 152 unique practices were identified. A small portion (N = 38, 16.6%) of these practices had a fellowship-trained urologist identified on the website. Most obstetrics and gynecology websites did not mention vasectomy reversal (N = 116, 76.3%) or varicocele repair (N = 93, 61.2%). A minority of practices offered referral to urologists for sperm extraction (N = 23, 15.1%) or offered sperm retrieval themselves (N = 23, 15.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

When searching online for a male factor infertility specialist, most results identified obstetrics and gynecology physicians. A large proportion of obstetrics and gynecology websites lacked information on male factor fertility treatments and did not offer these treatments. These data indicate the need for a more robust online presence of male reproductive urologists to optimize online access.

Renal Papillary Mapping and Quantification of Randall's Plaque in Pediatric Calcium Oxalate Stone Formers

Introduction: Randall's plaque (RP) with attached stones is recognized as a primary mechanism for stone formation in adult calcium oxalate stone formers (CaOx SFs). The role of RP in pediatric stone pathogenesis is unknown, with no reported studies to date. The purpose of this study is to investigate renal papillary abnormalities and quantify RP in pediatric CaOx SFs. Methods: Eight pediatric CaOx SFs underwent ureteroscopy for symptomatic urolithiasis. The collecting system was mapped using a digital ureteroscope. Video for each patient was then reviewed using a retrograde pyelogram to confirm the location of each papilla. A single investigator (N.L.M.) reviewed the video to quantify RP. Each papilla was graded as having mild, moderate, or severe amount of RP. Patient history was recorded. Results: An average of nine papillae were mapped per patient. RP was present in 100% of patients and in 88.8% (64/72) of all papillae examined. When present, RP was uniformly distributed throughout the kidney without preferential distribution to a region or pole. The amount of RP on the papillae was graded as mild in 60%, moderate in 20.8%, and severe in 8.3%. The mean fractional RP coverage ranged from 0.39% to 9.34%. No correlation was found between the amount of plaque and age at first stone episode or number of prior stone episodes (p = 0.84). Attached stones were rare (1/8 patients). The two patients with severe RP had a small amount of calcium phosphate in their stone analysis. Conclusions: RP is common in pediatric CaOx SFs. Compared with adult CaOx SFs wherein up to 75% of stones are found attached to RP, attached stones were rare. The significance of these findings in the pathogenesis of pediatric stone formation remains unclear and will require longer term follow-up.