1
|
Houben J, Janssens M, Winkler C, Besser REJ, Dzygalo K, Fehn A, Hommel A, Lange K, Elding Larsson H, Lundgren M, Roloff F, Snape M, Szypowska A, Weiss A, Zapardiel-Gonzalo J, Zubizarreta N, Ziegler AG, Casteels K, Arnolds S, Bißbort M, Blasius K, Friedl N, Gezginci C, Göppel G, Heigermoser M, Höfelschweiger B, Jolink M, Kisfügedi K, Klein N, Lickert R, Matzke C, Alvarez KM, Niewöhner R, Scholz M, Schütte‐Borkovec K, Voß F, Weiß A, Gonzalo JMZ, Schmidt S, Sifft P, Kapfelsberger H, Vurucu M, Sarcletti K, Sporreiter M, Jacobson S, Zeller I, Warncke K, Bonifacio E, Lernmark Å, Todd JA, Achenbach P, Bonficio E, Larsson HE, Ziegler AG, Achenbach P, Schütte‐Borkovec K, Ziegler AG, Casteels K, Jannsen C, Rochtus A, Jacobs A, Morobé H, Paulus J, Vrancken B, Van den Driessche N, Van Heyste R, Houben J, Smets L, Vanhuyse V, Bonifacio E, Berner R, Arabi S, Blechschmidt R, Dietz S, Gemulla G, Gholizadeh Z, Heinke S, Hoffmann R, Hommel A, Lange F, Loff A, Morgenstern R, Ehrlich F, Loff A, Weigelt M, Zubizarreta N, Kordonouri O, Danne T, Galuschka L, Holtkamp U, Janzen N, Kruse C, Landsberg S, Lange K, Marquardt E, Reschke F, Roloff F, Semler K, von dem Berge T, Weiskorn J, Ziegler AG, Achenbach P, Bunk M, Färber‐Meisterjahn S, Grätz W, Greif I, Herbst M, Hofelich A, Kaiser M, Kaltenecker H, Karapinar E, Kölln A, Marcus B, Munzinger A, Ohli J, Ramminger C, Reinmüller F, Vollmuth V, Welzhofer T, Winkler C, Szypowska A, Ołtarzewski M, Dybkowska S, Dżygało K, Groele L, Kajak K, Owczarek D, Piechowiak K, Popko K, Skrobot A, Szpakowski R, Taczanowska A, Zduńczyk B, Zych A, Larsson HE, Lundgren M, Lernmark Å, Agardh D, Mortin SA, Aronsson CA, Bennet R, Brundin C, Dahlberg S, Fransson L, Jonsdottir B, Jönsson I, Maroufkhani S, Mestan Z, Nilsson C, Ramelius A, Amboh ET, Törn C, Ulvendag U, Way S, Snape M, Todd JA, Haddock G, Bendor‐Samuel O, Bland J, Choi E, Craik R, Davis K, Hawkins S, de la Horra A, Farooq Y, Scudder C, Smith I, Roseman F, Robinson H, Taj N, Vatish M, Willis L, Whelan C, Wishlade T. The emotional well-being of parents with children at genetic risk for type 1 diabetes before and during participation in the POInT-study. Pediatr Diabetes 2022; 23:1707-1716. [PMID: 36323590 DOI: 10.1111/pedi.13448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study examined the emotional impact that parents experience when confronted with an increased genetic risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in their child. Population-based screening of neonates for genetic risk of chronic disease carries the risk of increased emotional burden for parents. METHODS Information was collected using a well-being questionnaire for parents of infants identified as having an increased risk for T1D in a multinational research study. Parents were asked to complete this questionnaire after they were told their child had an increased risk for T1D (Freder1k-study) and at several time points during an intervention study (POInT-study), where oral insulin was administered daily. RESULTS Data were collected from 2595 parents of 1371 children across five countries. Panic-related anxiety symptoms were reported by only 4.9% after hearing about their child having an increased risk. Symptoms of depression were limited to 19.4% of the parents at the result-communication visit and declined over time during the intervention study. When thinking about their child's risk for developing T1D (disease-specific anxiety), 47.2% worried, felt nervous and tense. Mothers and parents with a first-degree relative (FDR) with T1D reported more symptoms of depression and disease-specific anxiety (p < 0.001) than fathers and parents without a FDR. CONCLUSION Overall, symptoms of depression and panic-related anxiety are comparable with the German population. When asked about their child's risk for T1D during the intervention study, some parents reported disease-specific anxiety, which should be kept in mind when considering population-based screening. As certain subgroups are more prone, it will be important to continue psychological screening and, when necessary, to provide support by an experienced, multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
|
2
|
Ziegler AG, Arnolds S, Kölln A, Achenbach P, Berner R, Bonifacio E, Casteels K, Elding Larsson H, Gündert M, Hasford J, Kordonouri O, Lundgren M, Oltarzewski M, Pekalski ML, Pfirrmann M, Snape MD, Szypowska A, Todd JA. Supplementation with Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis EVC001 for mitigation of type 1 diabetes autoimmunity: the GPPAD-SINT1A randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e052449. [PMID: 34753762 PMCID: PMC8578987 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Global Platform for the Prevention of Autoimmune Diabetes-SINT1A Study is designed as a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre, multinational, primary prevention study aiming to assess whether daily administration of Bifidobacterium infantis from age 7 days to 6 weeks until age 12 months to children with elevated genetic risk for type 1 diabetes reduces the cumulative incidence of beta-cell autoantibodies in childhood. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Infants aged 7 days to 6 weeks from Germany, Poland, Belgium, UK and Sweden are eligible for study participation if they have a >10.0% expected risk for developing multiple beta-cell autoantibodies by age 6 years as determined by genetic risk score or family history and HLA genotype. Infants are randomised 1:1 to daily administration of B. infantis EVC001 or placebo until age 12 months and followed for a maximum of 5.5 years thereafter. The primary outcome is the development of persistent confirmed multiple beta-cell autoantibodies. Secondary outcomes are (1) Any persistent confirmed beta-cell autoantibody, defined as at least one confirmed autoantibody in two consecutive samples, including insulin autoantibodies, glutamic acid decarboxylase, islet tyrosine phosphatase 2 or zinc transporter 8, (2) Diabetes, (3) Transglutaminase autoantibodies associated with coeliac disease, (4) Respiratory infection rate in first year of life during supplementation and (5) Safety. Exploratory outcomes include allergy, antibody response to vaccines, alterations of the gut microbiome or blood metabolome, stool pH and calprotectin. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was approved by the local ethical committees of the Technical University Munich, Medical Faculty, the Technische Universität Dresden, the Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, the Medical University of Warsaw, EC Research UZ Leuven and the Swedish ethical review authority. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations and will be openly shared after completion of the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04769037.
Collapse
|