Physical exam is not an accurate predictor of injury in geriatric patients with low-energy blunt trauma - A retrospective cohort study

Background

When evaluating trauma patients, many centers perform computed tomography of the head, cervical spine, chest, abdomen, and pelvis, the so-called “pan-scan.” Here, we evaluate the utility of physical exam against pan-scan in geriatric patients who sustained ground-level falls.

Methods

We performed a single-centered retrospective cohort review of consecutive patients from the trauma registry of a large, urban Level 1 trauma center. Inclusion criteria were registration during the 2019 calendar year, age ≥65, mechanism of fall from either sitting or standing, and performance of “pan-scan” at time of assessment. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the physical exam for significant injuries were calculated. The effect of such injuries on disposition from the emergency department and hospital were determined.

Results

An initial query for patients age ≥65 yielded 1280 patients. After exclusion of patients who did not undergo pan-scan or who had GCS <14, 751 patients were included in analysis. Median age was 84 years old. 351 patients had at least one injury identified on pan-scan. Physical exam was determined to have a sensitivity of 0.69 when compared to pan-scan as a gold standard. Patients with injury identified on CT scan had significantly more admissions, mortalities, and ICU and OR requirements.

Conclusion

Approximately half of all patients were found to have at least one injury on pan-scan. Physical examination was insensitive at identifying such injuries which ultimately altered patient management, disposition, and outcomes. Pan-scan is recommended in this vulnerable population.

•

A selective approach to CT scan may not be appropriate for elderly patients with low-energy blunt falls.

•

Approximately half of all elderly patients who fall from sitting or standing have at least one traumatic injury.

•

Traumatic injuries alter the hospital course and disposition of elderly fall patients.

•

Physical exam is neither sensitive nor specific enough to detect these injuries.

PvMSP8 as a Novel Plasmodium vivax Malaria Sero-Marker for the Peruvian Amazon

The measurement of recent malaria exposure can support malaria control efforts. This study evaluated serological responses to an in-house Plasmodium vivax Merozoite Surface Protein 8 (PvMSP8) expressed in a Baculovirus system as sero-marker of recent exposure to P. vivax (Pv) in the Peruvian Amazon. In a first evaluation, IgGs against PvMSP8 and PvMSP10 proteins were measured by Luminex in a cohort of 422 Amazonian individuals with known history of Pv exposure (monthly data of infection status by qPCR and/or microscopy over five months). Both serological responses were able to discriminate between exposed and non-exposed individuals in a good manner, with slightly higher performance of anti-PvMSP10 IgGs (area under the curve AUC = 0.78 [95% CI = 0.72–0.83]) than anti-PvMSP8 IgGs (AUC = 0.72 [95% CI = 0.67–0.78]) (p = 0.01). In a second evaluation, the analysis by ELISA of 1251 plasma samples, collected during a population-based cross-sectional survey, confirmed the good performance of anti-PvMSP8 IgGs for discriminating between individuals with Pv infection at the time of survey and/or with antecedent of Pv in the past month (AUC = 0.79 [95% CI = 0.74–0.83]). Anti-PvMSP8 IgG antibodies can be considered as a good biomarker of recent Pv exposure in low-moderate transmission settings of the Peruvian Amazon.