What is the optimal cut-off threshold in self-home blood pressure measurement?: A cohort study according to STROBE statement

Two aspects arise concerning the use of self-measured blood pressure monitoring to diagnose white-coat hypertension (WCH): the presence of target organ damage (TOD) and the normal cut-off threshold. This study aims to evaluate the cardiovascular risk of WCH according to different self-measured blood pressure normal cut-off thresholds and the influence of TOD at baseline.In all, 678 patients were followed for 6.2 years; 223 normotensive patients, 271 patients with sustained hypertension (HT), and 184 with WCH. TOD was defined as: left ventricular hypertrophy according to ECG, albuminuria, or low estimated glomerular filtration rate. The risk for different cutting points of self-measured blood pressure (<135/85 mm Hg, <130/85 mm Hg, and <130/80 mm Hg) has been determined.The patients with HT experienced an increase in cardiovascular risk and death higher than the normotensive patients (odds ratio [OR] 7.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8-16.2 for sustained HT; and OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.6-7.4 for WCH). This was observed for all the cut-off thresholds analyzed. In white-coat hypertensive patients (cut-off <135/85 mm Hg) with TOD, the risk was higher than in normotensive patients (OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.9-10.6). Using a self-monitoring blood pressure cut-off threshold of <130/80 mm Hg without TOD at baseline, the WCH cases exhibited no differences in risk to the normotensive patients (OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.5-7.7).The decisions being taken for patients with WCH based on the presence of TOD and a self-administered home monitoring blood pressure measurement cut-off point probably lower than the one that is currently recommended.

Prediabetes is associated with glomerular hyperfiltration in a European Mediterranean cohort study

BACKGROUND

Glomerular hyperfiltration is well recognized as an early renal alteration in subjects with diabetes mellitus. However, what is not well-known is whether hyperfiltration also occurs in the early stages of hyperglycaemia, for instance in prediabetes. Identifying subjects with glomerular hyperfiltration from among those with prediabetes might be helpful to implement preventive and therapeutic strategies. This study aimed to investigate the association of prediabetes with glomerular hyperfiltration and its associated variables.

METHODS

A representative sample of 9238 people aged ≥ 30 years and whose entire clinical and laboratory data were available, were included in this study. Hyperfiltration was defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) above the age- and gender-specific 95th percentile. The eGFR was assessed using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation.

RESULTS

After adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, cholesterol, log (triglycerides), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, serum uric acid, smoking status, hypertension, and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was found to be independently positively associated with eGFR. The hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for hyperfiltration were 1.61 (1.28-2.03) and 2.30 (1.89-2.79) for prediabetes and diabetes, respectively, when compared with participants with normoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

Prediabetes was associated with glomerular hyperfiltration. Longitudinal studies are needed to investigate whether hyperfiltration in prediabetes is associated with a later decline in eGFR.

Glycaemic control and treatment of type 2 diabetes in adults aged 75 years or older

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess glycaemic control and prescribing practices of antihyperglycaemic treatment in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 aged 75 years or older.

METHODS

We analysed data from health electronic records from 4,581 persons attended at primary healthcare centres of the Institut Català de la Salut (ICS), in the Girona Sud area of Catalonia, Spain, during 2013 and 2016. Variables such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diabetes duration, age at diabetes diagnosis, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), creatinine, glomerular filtrate rate and the albumin/creatinine ratio in urine were collected. A descriptive analysis of the study variables was done to determinate the percentage of persons on antidiabetic treatment.

RESULTS

We identified 4,421 persons aged 75 years or older who provided data on HbA1c and antidiabetic treatment. Mean age was 82.3 (5.1) years. In 58.1% of patients, the level of HbA1c was below 7.0%, while in 36.8% it was below 6.5%. Between patients with HbA1c below 7.0%, antidiabetic drugs were taken by 70.2%, where 15.2% were either on insulin, sulphonylureas or repaglinide therapy.

CONCLUSION

Intensive treatment among older adults with diabetes mellitus type 2 is common in primary care clinical practice in our area. Intensive glycaemic control confers an increased risk of hypoglycaemia and little benefit among older individuals with diabetes. Physicians should take care more not to harm those populations and treatment should be de-intensified to reduce the risk of hypoglycaemia.

Noninsulin Antidiabetic Drugs for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Are We Respecting Their Contraindications?

AIM

To assess prescribing practices of noninsulin antidiabetic drugs (NIADs) in T2DM with several major contraindications according to prescribing information or clinical guidelines: renal failure, heart failure, liver dysfunction, or history of bladder cancer.

METHODS

Cross-sectional, descriptive, multicenter study. Electronic medical records were retrieved from all T2DM subjects who attended primary care centers pertaining to the Catalan Health Institute in Catalonia in 2013 and were pharmacologically treated with any NIAD alone or in combination.

RESULTS

Records were retrieved from a total of 255,499 pharmacologically treated patients. 78% of patients with some degree of renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 mL/min) were treated with metformin and 31.2% with sulfonylureas. Even in the event of severe renal failure (GFR < 30 mL/min), 35.3% and 22.5% of patients were on metformin or sulfonylureas, respectively. Moreover, metformin was prescribed to more than 60% of patients with moderate or severe heart failure.

CONCLUSION

Some NIADs, and in particular metformin, were frequently used in patients at high risk of complications when they were contraindicated. There is a need to increase awareness of potential inappropriate prescribing and to monitor the quality of prescribing patterns in order to help physicians and policymakers to yield better clinical outcomes in T2DM.

Comparison of different vascular risk engines in the identification of type 2 diabetes patients with high cardiovascular risk

Background

Some authors consider that secondary prevention should be conducted for all DM2 patients, while others suggest that the drug preventive treatment should start or be increased depending on each patient’s individual CVR, estimated using cardiovascular or coronary risk functions to identify the patients with a higher CVR. The principal objective of this study was to assess three different cardiovascular risk prediction models in type 2 diabetes patients.

Methods

Multicentre, cross-sectional descriptive study of 3,041 patients with type 2 diabetes and no history of cardiovascular disease. The demographic, clinical, analytical, and cardiovascular risk factor variables associated with type 2 diabetes were analysed. The risk function and probability that a cardiovascular disease could occur were estimated using three risk engines: REGICOR, UKPDS and ADVANCE. A patient was considered to have a high cardiovascular risk when REGICOR ≥ 10 % or UKPDS ≥ 15 % in 10 years or when ADVANCE ≥ 8 % in 4 years.

Results

The ADVANCE and UKPDS risk engines identified a higher number of diabetic patients with a high cardiovascular risk (24.2 % and 22.7 %, respectively) compared to the REGICOR risk engine (10.2 %). The correlation using the REGICOR risk engine was low compared to UKPDS and ADVANCE (r = 0.288 and r = 0.153, respectively; p < 0.0001). The agreement values in the allocation of a particular patient to the high risk group was low between the REGICOR engine and the UKPDS and ADVANCE engines (k = 0.205 and k = 0.123, respectively; p < 0.0001) and acceptable between the ADVANCE and UKPDS risk engines (k = 0.608).

Conclusions

There are discrepancies between the general population and the type 2 diabetic patient-specific risk engines. The results of this study indicate the need for a prospective study which validates specific equations for diabetic patients in the Spanish population, as well as research on new models for cardiovascular risk prediction in these patients.

Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in individuals with type 2 diabetes who had recorded diabetic retinopathy from retinal photographs in Catalonia (Spain)

Background/aims

Retinal photography with a non-mydriatic camera is the method currently employed for diabetic retinography (DR) screening. We designed this study in order to evaluate the prevalence and severity of DR, and associated risk factors, in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) screened in Catalan Primary Health Care.

Methods

Retrospective, cross-sectional, population based study performed in Catalonia (Spain) with patients with T2DM, aged between 30 years and 90 years (on 31 December 2012) screened with retinal photography and whose DR category was recorded in their medical records. DR was classified as: no apparent retinopathy (no DR), mild non-proliferative DR (mild NPDR), moderate NPDR, severe NPDR, proliferative DR (PDR) and diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Non-vision threatening DR (non-VTDR) included mild and moderate NPDR; VTDR included severe NPDR, PDR and DMO. Clinical data were obtained retrospectively from the SIDIAP database (System for Research and Development in Primary Care).

Results

108 723 patients with T2DM had been screened with retinal photography. The prevalence of any kind of DR was 12.3% (95% CI 12.1% to 12.5%). Non-VTDR and VTDR were present in 10.8% (mild 7.5% and moderate NPDR 3.3%) and 1.4% (severe NPDR 0.86%, PDR 0.36% and DMO 0.18%) of the study patients, respectively.

Conclusions

The prevalence of any type of DR in patients with T2DM screened with retinal photography was lower when compared with earlier studies.

Metabolic control and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients according to diabetes duration

BACKGROUND

Control of glycaemic levels as well as cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) is essential to prevent the onset of complications associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

AIM

To describe the degree of glycaemic control and CVRF in relation to diabetes duration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Multicentre cross-sectional study in T2DM patients seen in primary care centres during 2007.

VARIABLES

Demographical and clinical characteristics, antidiabetic treatments and development of disease complications. Diabetes duration classification: 0-5, 6-10, 11-20 and >20 years. Logistic regression models were used in the analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 3130 patients; 51.5% males; mean age: 68±11.7 years; mean diabetes duration:7.0 (±5.6) years, median: 5 (interquartile range:3-9) years; mean HbA1c: 6.84 (±1.5), were analyzed. There has been a progressive decline in HbA1c levels (HbA1c > 7% in 25.8% of patients during the first 5 years and 51.8% after 20 years). Blood pressure values remained relatively stable throughout disease duration. The mean value of low density lipoprotein (LDL) experienced a slight decline with the progression of the disease, but due to the significant increase of cardiovascular disease (CVD) after 20 years of duration, less patients reached the recommended target (LDL < 100mg/dl) in secondary prevention. Logistic regression model controlling for age, sex and CVD showed that diabetes duration was related to glycaemic control (odds ratio: 1.066, 95% confidence interval: 1.050-1.082 per year) but not to blood pressure or LDL control.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of glycaemic control and the risk factors in relation to the duration of T2DM followed different patterns. Diabetes duration was associated with a poorer glycaemic control but in general had a limited role in blood pressure control or lipid profile.

Impact of chronic kidney disease on the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes in Spain: PERCEDIME2 study

BACKGROUND

The presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) regardless of the presence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. There is controversy about the impact of each of the manifestations of CKD on the prevalence of CVD, whether it is greater with decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or increased urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR).

METHODS

This study is a national cross-sectional study performed in primary care consults. We selected participants of both sexes who were aged 40 years or older, had been diagnosed with T2DM and had complete information on the study variables recorded in their medical records. The participants were classified according to eGFR : ≥ 60; 45-59; 30-44; <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and UACR : < 30; 30-299; ≥ 300 mg/gr. The results were adjusted to compare the prevalence of CVD across all categories.

RESULTS

A total of 1141 participants were included. Compared to participants with eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) those with eGFR between 30-44 mL/min/m(2), (OR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.9); and eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (OR = 4.1 95% CI 1.6-10.2) showed increased likelihood of having CVD. Participants with UACR ≥ 30 mg/g compared to participants with UACR < 30 mg/g increased significantly the likelihood of having CVD, especially with UACR above 300 mg/g, (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.4 for UACR = 30-299 mg/g; OR = 3.9; CI 1.6-9.5 for UACR ≥ 300 mg/g).

CONCLUSION

The decrease in eGFR and increase in UACR are independent risk factors that increase the prevalence of CVD in participants with T2DM and these factors are independent of each other and of other known cardiovascular risk factors. In our study the impact of mild decreased eGFR in T2DM on CVD was lower than the impact of increased UACR. It is necessary to determine not only UACR but also eGFR for all patients with T2DM, both at the time of diagnosis and during follow-up, to identify those patients at high risk of cardiovascular complications.

Chronic kidney disease in the type 2 diabetic patients: prevalence and associated variables in a random sample of 2642 patients of a Mediterranean area

Background

Kidney disease is associated with an increased total mortality and cardiovascular morbimortality in the general population and in patients with Type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of kidney disease and different types of renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).

Methods

Cross-sectional study in a random sample of 2,642 T2DM patients cared for in primary care during 2007. Studied variables: demographic and clinical characteristics, pharmacological treatments and T2DM complications (diabetic foot, retinopathy, coronary heart disease and stroke). Variables of renal function were defined as follows: 1) Microalbuminuria: albumin excretion rate & 30 mg/g or 3.5 mg/mmol, 2) Macroalbuminuria: albumin excretion rate & 300 mg/g or 35 mg/mmol, 3) Kidney disease (KD): glomerular filtration rate according to Modification of Diet in Renal Disease < 60 ml/min/1.73 m² and/or the presence of albuminuria, 4) Renal impairment (RI): glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m², 5) Nonalbuminuric RI: glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min/1.73 m² without albuminuria and, 5) Diabetic nephropathy (DN): macroalbuminuria or microalbuminuria plus diabetic retinopathy.

Results

The prevalence of different types of renal disease in patients was: 34.1% KD, 22.9% RI, 19.5% albuminuria and 16.4% diabetic nephropathy (DN). The prevalence of albuminuria without RI (13.5%) and nonalbuminuric RI (14.7%) was similar. After adjusting per age, BMI, cholesterol, blood pressure and macrovascular disease, RI was significantly associated with the female gender (OR 2.20; CI 95% 1.86–2.59), microvascular disease (OR 2.14; CI 95% 1.8–2.54) and insulin treatment (OR 1.82; CI 95% 1.39–2.38), and inversely associated with HbA1c (OR 0.85 for every 1% increase; CI 95% 0.80–0.91). Albuminuria without RI was inversely associated with the female gender (OR 0.27; CI 95% 0.21–0.35), duration of diabetes (OR 0.94 per year; CI 95% 0.91–0.97) and directly associated with HbA1c (OR 1.19 for every 1% increase; CI 95% 1.09–1.3).

Conclusions

One-third of the sample population in this study has KD. The presence or absence of albuminuria identifies two subgroups with different characteristics related to gender, the duration of diabetes and metabolic status of the patient. It is important to determine both albuminuria and GFR estimation to diagnose KD.

Why is cardiovascular risk stratification important in hypertensive patients?

BACKGROUND

The aim is to evaluate whether cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients according to the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) guidelines, can predict the evolution of target organ damage (TOD) using routine examinations in clinical practice during 1 year.

METHODS

Prospective study of recently diagnosed untreated hypertensives. At the moment of inclusion and 1 year later, urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER), blood analysis, electrocardiogram, retinography, self-monitored blood pressure (BP) and ambulatory BP measurement were performed. TOD was defined following the ESH guidelines and evaluated as having favorable or unfavorable evolution.

RESULTS

Four hundred and seventy-nine hypertensive patients were included (58.8 years; 43.4% women). The baseline prevalence of TOD was: high UAER (2.4%), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) (20.7%), advanced lesion of the fundus oculi (FO) (10.2%). After 1 year, no differences were found between the final systolic and diastolic BP neither in the high/very high nor in the low/moderate CV risk groups. Patients with low/moderate CV risk had less unfavorable TOD evolution, LVH (9.2% vs 41.7%; p <0.001), FO advanced damage (0.99% vs 14.3%; p <0.001), high UAER (0.3% vs 5.1%; p <0.005) and amount of TOD (9.2% vs 44.0%; 0<0.001) than those with high/very high CV risk. The odds ratios of favorable TOD evolution adjusted for BP change and antihypertensive drug treatment were (low/moderate vs high/very high CV risk); 5.14 (95% confidence interval, CI, 3.99-6.64) for LVH; 12.42 (6.67-23.14) FO advanced damage; 10.71 (3.67-31.22) high UAER and 13.99 (10.18-19.22) for amount of TOD.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to detect variations in TOD in hypertensive patients with a 1-year follow-up using the examinations available in routine clinic practice. The risk determined by the ESH guidelines predicts the evolution of TOD at 1 year.