Surveillance or Dynamic Sentinel Lymph-Node Biopsy in Low-Risk Clinically N0 Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Single-Institution Real World Data

INTRODUCTION

Surveillance is the standard management in low-risk cN0 penile squamous cell carcinoma (peSCC) patients. However, no previous analysis focused on early and long-term outcomes of these patients. We report on main oncological outcomes of a large series of low-risk cN0 peSCC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1980 and 2017 included, 93 evaluable consecutive low-risk (ie, pT1a G1 cN0M0) peSCC patients underwent primary tumor surgery and either observation (74) or dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) (19) following a clinical diagnosis of T1 in 66 (71%), T2 in 15 (16.1%) and Tx in 12 (12.9%) patients, respectively. The statistical significance of differences in medians and proportions was tested with the Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests. Kaplan-Meier plots illustrated 5-year inguinal relapse (IR)-free survival rates.

RESULTS

Median age was 60 years (IQR: 50-69 years). Median follow-up was 92 months (IQR 54-133 months). Surveillance was more frequently adopted in clinical (c)T1 than in cT2 tumors (79.7% vs. 36.8%). None of 19 patients who had DSNB had nodal metastasis. Overall, 7 (7.5%) out of 93 pT1aG1cN0 peSCC patients had IR after a median interval of 9 months. Of note, 1 patient only relapsed after 12 months of surveillance. After stratification according to IR, relapses occurred more frequently in younger patients (59 vs. 64 years, P < .001). The 5-year IR-free survival rates for the entire cohort was 92% (95% Confidence interval [CI] 87-98%).

CONCLUSIONS

Observation is a safe and effective management for low-risk peSCC patients. Younger patients may be offered a mini-invasive staging as an alternative.

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection in metastatic nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors

OBJECTIVES

To support laparoscopic post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (L-PC-RPLND) as a potential new standard, we report on a large dataset of patients systematically undergoing L-PC-RPLND.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with unilateral residual mass (≥1 cm), normalized markers, limited encasement (<30%) of gross retroperitoneal vessels underwent unilateral L-PC-RPLND with no adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgical performances, histology, hospital stay, complications within 30 days and follow-up visits were recorded. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used.

RESULTS

Between February 2011 and January 2021, 151 consecutive patients underwent L-PC-RPLND. Median size of the residual mass was 25 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 20-35 mm). Overall median operative time was 208 min (IQR 177-241) and was 51 min longer (p-value <0.001) for right L-PC-RPLNDs. Eleven procedures were converted to open surgery. Median number of removed and positive nodes was 11 (IQR 8-16) and 1 (IQR 1-2), respectively. Mean hospital stay was 2 days (IQR 2-3). Nine complications (6%) occurred: two were Clavien-Dindo grade III. Definitive pathology revealed post-pubertal teratoma in 65.6%, fibro-necrotic tissue in 23.8%, teratoma with malignant somatic component in 6.6% and viable tumour in 4.0% patients. In multivariable linear regression models, fibro-necrotic tissue (32 min, CI 8.5-55.5; p < 0.01) and residual volume (1.05 min, CI 0.24-1.85; p < 0.01) achieved independent predictor status for longer operative time. All patients, but one, are alive and disease-free after a median follow-up of 22 months (IQR 10, 48).

CONCLUSION

L-PC-RPLND, when adequately planned, is safe and effective for most patients with low to medium volume residual masses.

Renal tumor biopsy in patients with cT1b-T4-M0 disease susceptible to radical nephrectomy: analysis of safety, accuracy and clinical impact on definitive management

PURPOSE

Renal tumor biopsy was provided in patients candidate to radical nephrectomy for a renal mass ≥4 cm, to evaluate treatment deviation.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2017, 102 patients with a solid renal mass ≥4 cm with no distant metastases underwent preliminary renal tumor biopsy. We investigated the proportion of patients who proceeded with radical nephrectomy, variables predicting non-renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and concordance between biopsy findings and definitive pathology.

RESULTS

Median tumor size was 70 mm (IQR 55-110). Clinical stage was cT1b in 41, cT2 in 33, cT3 in 25 and cT4 in three patients. A median of three (IQR 2-3) renal tumor biopsies were taken with 16/18 Gauge needles in 97% of cases. Clavien grade I complications occurred in five cases. Malignant tumors were documented in 84 patients: 78 RCCs and six non-RCCs. Fifteen biopsies documented oncocytoma and three were non-diagnostic. Grade was reported in 50 RCCs: 42 (84%) were low and eight (16%) high grade. Eighty-three patients proceeded with radical nephrectomy; six non-RCC malignant tumors underwent combined and/or intensified treatment; 13 of 15 patients with oncocytoma did not undergo radical nephrectomy (eight underwent observation). Definitive pathology confirmed diagnosis in all cases. Grade concordance was 84%, considering two tiers (high vs low grade). No preoperative clinical variable predicted definitive pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal tumor biopsy is a safe procedure that leads to radical nephrectomy in most tumors ≥4 cm. Nonetheless, 20% of patients exhibited non-RCC histology. Renal tumor biopsy should be considered in this setting.

Retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (RPLND) as upfront management in stage II germ-cell tumours: evaluation of safety and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Patients with stage II germ-cell tumours (GCT) usually undergo radiotherapy (seminoma only) or chemotherapy. Both strategies display a recognised risk of long-term side effects. We evaluated retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as exclusive treatment in stage II GCT.

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2019 included, 66 selected stage II GCT patients underwent primary open (O-) or laparoscopic (L-)RPLND. Type of procedure and extent of dissection, operative time, node rescue, hospital stay, complications (according to Clavien-Dindo), administration of chemotherapy, relapse and site of relapse were evaluated.

RESULTS

Five patients had pure testicular seminoma. Nineteen (28.8%) had raised markers prior to RPLND; 48 (72.7%), 16 (24.2%) and two (3.0%) were stage IIA, IIB and IIC, respectively. O-RPLND and unilateral L-RPLND were 36 and 30 respectively. Six stage II A patients (12.5%) had negative nodes. Four patients underwent immediate adjuvant chemotherapy. One patient was lost at follow-up. After a median follow-up of 29 months, 48 (77.4%) of the 62 patients undergoing RPLND alone remained recurrence-free; one patient had an in-field recurrence following a bilateral dissection. According to procedure, number of rescued nodes (O-RPLND: 25. IQR 21-31; L-RPLND: 20, IQR 15-26; p: 0.001), hospital stay (L-RPLND: 3 days, IQR 3-4; O-RPLND: 6 days, IQR 5-8; p: .001) and grade ≥2 complications (L-RPLND 7%, O-RPLND 22%; p: 0.1) were the only significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Primary RPLND is safe in stage II GCT, including seminoma, and may warrant a cure rate greater than 70%. When feasible, L-RPLND may be as effective as O-RPLND with better tolerability.

The Role of Carbon Dioxide Laser Therapy in Penile Kaposi’s Sarcoma: A Case Series of Three HIV-Negative HHV-8-Positive Patients

Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) is a rare tumor of vascular origin. It is quite common in HIV patients. It is rarely located on the glans penis, especially in HIV-negative patients (just some tens in the literature). Owing to the rarity of the disease, both the real impact on survival and the most suitable therapy are not known.However, in this 3-patient case series, carbon dioxide laser therapy was effective both for local control and survival. In fact, two late relapses but no disease-related death were recorded. Probably, KS in HIV-negative patients is a slowly progressive disease, not so aggressive as in HIV-positive patients. Laser therapy is easy, fast, and cheap, and may treat the disease radically.If these data are confirmed by further studies, in the foreseeable future, laser therapy may become the gold standard for treating HIV-negative patients affected by penile KS.

Active surveillance in prostate cancer patients: Modeling upgrading and upsizing at 1 year rebiopsy

90

Background: Prostate biopsy findings at diagnosis and follow-up are essential criteria in Active Surveillance (AS). In a previous work (Nicolai Eur Urol Suppl 2013) upgrading (UPG) and upsizing (UPS) at 1-yr rebiopsy resulted to be independent outcomes with different predictors. Aim of the present work is to validate these models on an independent population and to evaluate the probability of not-developing UPG, thus the chance of continuing AS Methods: Pts enrolled in 2011-2017 were considered for validation, while 318 AS pts enrolled in 2005-2011 were considered for model development. UPG model included: age (risk), PSA density (risk), prostate volume (>60 cc, protective); UPS model: age (protective), % core length containing cancer (>5%, risk), number of positive cores (>1, risk) Performance on the independent population was evaluated through AUC and calibration. Logistic model for not-developing UPG at 1 yr was fitted using all available AS pts Results: 433 pts were included in the validation set. UPG and UPS were registered in 43 and 29 pts, respectively; 38 pts had UPG+UPS. Predictors for UPG and UPS were mainly confirmed in the validation cohort (Table), with Odds Ratios (OR) very similar to the development model. Discrimination was confirmed (AUCs) and calibration was excellent (slope~1, R2>0.90). Probability of not-developing UPG (evaluated on 751 pts) was associated to age, prostate volume and PSA density (Table). Conclusions: UPG and UPS in AS pts should be considered as independent events and their management implying different strategies. Specifically, age, volume and PSA density play a key role in the chance to continue AS, i.e. in not developing UPG. A nomogram estimating the likelihood of continuing AS has been developed and will be presented. [Table: see text]

Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors of the Testis: Safety and Efficacy Analyses at a High Volume Center

PURPOSE

The prognosis of stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis is favorable. Early and late side effects of treatment may affect quality of life and survival. We determined the tolerability, safety and efficacy of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in patients with stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor of the testis at a high volume center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Unilateral laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was prospectively recorded in 225 patients from 2000 to 2014. Since 2007, patients have been treated at a multidisciplinary clinic and were proposed surgery as an alternative to surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy. The indication for adjuvant chemotherapy changed during the study period. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were used to evaluate the domains of safety and oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 221 patients were evaluable. Median operative time was 200 minutes. Conversion to open surgery was done in 20 cases (9%). A median of 14 nodes (IQR 11-20) was retrieved. Grade greater than 2 complications in 8 cases (3.6%) increased as the number of retrieved nodes increased. Antegrade ejaculation was maintained in 98.6% of patients. Nodal metastases were found in 29 patients (13%), of whom 7 underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. There were 14 recurrences (6.3%), including 8 of 192 (4.2%) associated with no nodal metastases and 6 of 22 (27.3%) associated with nodal metastases in patients not undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. At regression analyses lymph node ratio was the only significant factor predictive of recurrence and of the administration of any chemotherapy (each p <0.001). Operative time, the number of retrieved nodes and conversions improved with time.

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of a high volume center laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was safe and its oncologic efficacy was comparable to that of open surgery. Select patients with stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumor could be offered laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as an alternative to other options.

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (L-RPLND) as therapeutic in stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testicular tumors: Findings from a referral center

411

Background: Active surveillance or one course of BEP are the usual policies in stage I NSGTT. RPLND has been progressively abandoned due to morbidity and, mostly, to its low reproducibility. L-RPLND was introduced aiming at reducing morbidity, but few systematic data are available concerning its therapeutic efficacy. A long-term accrual in a referral center is presented. Methods: Analysis includes patients undergoing primary L-RPLND between 2000 and 2014, performed by 4 different surgeons. Patients underwent unilateral dissection according to a template in use since 1980. Adjuvant chemotherapy was provided in cases with a positive nodal ratio ≥ 25%. Regular follow-up was provided. Performance, safety and effectiveness measures have been analyzed. Results: Out of 225 patients, full data including clinico-pathologic variables and follow-up are available in 188 cases. Mean age is 31 yrs, vascular invasion is present in 37.2%. Left dissections are 52%. Fifteen (8%) cases have been converted to open RPLND. Median duration of RPLND is 200 min. Median number of removed nodes is 15 (IQR: 11-20). Complications of Clavien Dindo grade ≥ 3 are 9. Twenty-six patients have metastatic nodes (pN+) and 6 received adjuvant chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 40 months (range: 24, 71), 11 relapses occurred: 6 (3.7%) of 162 pN0 and 5 of 20 pN+ not undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy. Infield recurrences are not reported. All relapsed patients have been rescued by first line chemotherapy. Presence of vascular invasion (p .073) and node ratio as continuous variable (p .097) are not associated with recurrence considering all cases, while conversion to open RPLND is significant (p .019), considering patients operated by the two surgeons with homogeneous variables. Conclusions: L-RPLND in a referral centre is a safe procedure and is apparently effective as open surgery, as there is no an excess of relapses in pN0 cases (3.6%), and the proportion of relapses in pN1 (25%) compares with the traditional figures of open surgery. Conversion to open surgery may be a marker predicting recurrence in a mature phase of experience.