EAACI Position paper on the standardization of nasal allergen challenges

Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is an important tool to diagnose allergic rhinitis. In daily clinical routine, experimentally, or when measuring therapeutic success clinically, nasal allergen challenge is fundamental. It is further one of the key diagnostic tools when initiating specific allergen immunotherapy. So far, national recommendations offered guidance on its execution; however, international divergence left many questions unanswered. These differences in the literature caused EAACI to initiate a task force to answer unmet needs and find a consensus in executing nasal allergen challenge. On the basis of a systematic review containing nasal allergen challenges of the past years, task force members reviewed evidence, discussed open issues, and studied variations of several subjective and objective assessment parameters to propose a standardized way of a nasal allergen challenge procedure in clinical practice. Besides an update on indications, contraindications, and preparations for the test procedure, main recommendations are a bilaterally challenge with standardized allergens, with a spray device offering 0.1 mL per nostril. A systematic catalogue for positivity criteria is given for the variety of established subjective and objective assessment methods as well as a schedule for the challenge procedure. The task force recommends a unified protocol for NAC for daily clinical practice, aiming at eliminating the previous difficulty of comparing NAC results due to unmet needs.

Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Refractory to Maximal Medical Therapy: A Prospective Observational Study Under Real-World Conditions

This investigation explored the outcomes of 4 standardized treatments in patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), despite recent maximal medical therapy (MMT). In a prospective observational study, we compared continued nasal steroids and irrigation (cNSI), repeated MMT (rMMT), pulsed nasal steroid inhalation (PSI), and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Between November 2015 and March 2016, patients with symptomatic CRS despite having received MMT during the year prior to symptom reoccurrence were offered 1 of 4 standardized treatments. Reflecting real-world conditions, patients selected their treatment option following physician counseling. Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) scores were obtained before treatment, at the end of treatment, and at 2 months and 1 year following treatment. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) duration since last MMT was 144 (±36 days). Of the 130 patients, 52 selected cNSI, 16 PSI, 19 rMMT, and 43 ESS. Mean SNOT-22 scores before treatment did not significantly differ between treatments (P = .99). Overall, SNOT-22 scores decreased from 38 ± 2 before treatment to 20 ± 2 after 1 year (P < .001), with a higher reduction for patients having CRS with nasal polyps than for those without nasal polyps (35 ± 2 to 15 ± 2 vs 41 ± 3 to 25 ± 4, respectively; both P < .001). Overall, no difference between the 3 medical treatments was observed (all P > .2). Post-treatment scores following ESS (19 ± 2) were significantly lower than for each of the 3 medical treatments (cNSI 26 ± 2, P = .004; PSI 27 ± 3, P = .026; rMMT 28 ± 3, P = .008). At 1 year following ESS, 26 of 31 patients were asymptomatic and did not require additional systemic steroids, compared to 25 of 50 patients following medical treatment (P = .002). The investigated standardized treatments significantly improved SNOT-22 scores in patients with refractory CRS under real-world conditions. Both patients having CRS with and those without nasal polyps showed significant improvement in SNOT-22 scores, although a less profound effect was found among the latter group. Patients who selected ESS were less symptomatic during the first follow-up year than patients who selected medical treatment alone. Patients with refractory CRS did not benefit from an additional course of MMT in comparison to those who were treated only with cNSI.

Pre-surgery planning tool for estimation of resection volume to improve nasal breathing based on lattice Boltzmann fluid flow simulations

Purpose

State-of-the-art medical examination techniques (e.g., rhinomanometry and endoscopy) do not always lead to satisfactory postoperative outcome. A fully automatized optimization tool based on patient computer tomography (CT) data to calculate local pressure gradient regions to reshape pathological nasal cavity geometry is proposed.

Methods

Five anonymous pre- and postoperative CT datasets with nasal septum deviations were used to simulate the airflow through the nasal cavity with lattice Boltzmann (LB) simulations. Pressure gradient regions were detected by a streamline analysis. After shape optimization, the volumetric difference between the two shapes of the nasal cavity yields the estimated resection volume.

Results

At LB rhinomanometry boundary conditions (bilateral flow rate of 600 ml/s), the preliminary study shows a critical pressure gradient of −1.1 Pa/mm as optimization criterion. The maximum coronal airflow ΔA  := cross-section ratio \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\frac{\mathrm{virtual surgery }}{\mathrm{post}-\mathrm{surgery}}$$\end{document}virtualsurgerypost-surgery found close to the nostrils is 1.15. For the patients a pressure drop ratio ΔΠ  := (pre-surgery − virtual surgery)/(pre-surgery − post-surgery) between nostril and nasopharynx of 1.25, 1.72, −1.85, 0.79 and 1.02 is calculated.

Conclusions

LB fluid mechanics optimization of the nasal cavity can yield results similar to surgery for air-flow cross section and pressure drop between nostril and nasopharynx. The optimization is numerically stable in all five cases of the presented study. A limitation of this study is that anatomical constraints (e.g. mucosa) have not been considered.

[Acute rhinosinusitis in adults--EPOS 2012 Part II]

Rhinosinusitis (RS) is an inflammatory disorder of the mucous membranes of the nose and paranasal sinuses, which are almost always affected concurrently. The EPOS2012 position paper initiated by the European Rhinologic Society and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology is a recent comprehensive source on this common disease affecting approximately 20% of the population worldwide. Inflammation, not infection, is considered the cornerstone of RS, which is considered a temporal and pathophysiologic disease continuum with various subtypes. Acute rhinosinusitis is diagnosed, if typical symptoms last less than 12 weeks. It affects approximately 10% of the European population. Acute RS is further subdivided into acute viral, acute postviral and acute bacterial RS. Acute viral RS lasts less than 10 days with decreasing symptom intensity, while acute postviral RS is characterized by longer duration or a sudden increase of symptom severity around the 5th day ('double sickening'). Acute bacterial RS is assumed if 3 of the following 5 criteria are additionally met: Discoloured discharge (with unilateral predominance), severe local pain (with unilateral predominance), fever (>38ºC), elevated ESR/CRP, and 'double-sickening'. For the treatment of acute viral RS, nasal saline irrigations and OTC cold remedies are advised. In acute postviral RS, additional topical steroids are suggested. Advantages and disadvantages of antibiotic treatment in acute bacterial RS are detailed. Overall, the new EPOS position paper infers a reorientation in this area of high medical, pharmaceutical and economic relevance.

Regulation of nucleotide excision repair by wild-type HRAS signaling in head and neck cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is characterized by a high rate of locoregional or distant relapse among patients. It is well established that resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs has an important role in the emergence of the recurrent and/or metastatic type of this malignancy which is associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, understanding the molecular basis of chemoresistance in head and neck cancer is required for the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Activating mutations in the HRAS gene are driver events in human cancer. Although numerous studies have demonstrated that oncogenic HRAS mutations promote chemoresistance in HNSCC, the molecular profile of HNSCC tumors that overexpress wild-type HRAS (wtHRASov) and their response to chemotherapy is poorly investigated. To gain deeper insights into the characteristics of wtHRASov tumors, we conducted a gene expression analysis using transcriptome data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). This analysis revealed a distinct signature of overexpressed nucleotide excision repair (NER) genes in wtHRASov tumors, which are associated with chemoresistance. We further explored the role of these NER components in response to genotoxic stress, utilizing a diverse panel of HNSCC cell lines and patient-derived xenografts. Our findings indicate that in a specific cluster of head and neck tumors, ERK/cJun signaling activation is strongly reliant on HRAS activity. Inhibiting HRAS in these tumors results in a significant downregulation of the NER signature components, re-sensitizing cancer cells to platinum-based chemotherapy.