Comparative analysis of human tear fluid and aqueous humor proteomes

PURPOSE

Technological advancements allowing for the analysis of low-volume samples have led to the investigation of human tear fluid and aqueous humor (AH) as potential biomarker sources. However, acquiring AH samples poses significant challenges, making human tear fluid a more accessible alternative. This study aims to compare the protein compositions of these two biofluids to evaluate their suitability for biomarker discovery.

METHODS

Paired tear and AH samples were collected from 20 patients undergoing cataract surgery. Tear samples were collected using Schirmer strips prior to surgery, and AH samples were collected from the anterior chamber immediately after corneal incision. Proteins were extracted and analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

RESULTS

A total of 481 proteins were identified in greater than 50% of the tear samples, and 191 proteins were detected in greater than 50% of the AH samples. Of these proteins, 82 were found to be common between the two biofluids, with ALB, LTF, TF, LCN1, and IGKC being the most abundant.

CONCLUSION

Although tear fluid and the AH are functionally independent and physically separated, many of the proteins detected in AH were also detected in tears. This direct comparison of the proteomic content of tear fluid and AH may aid in further investigation of tear fluid as a source of readily accessible biomarkers for various human diseases.

Sigma-1 receptor agonist, (+)-pentazocine, is neuroprotective in a Brown Norway rat microbead model of glaucoma

PURPOSE

Glaucoma is a worldwide leading cause of irreversible blindness. Standard treatments lower intraocular pressure (IOP). Novel treatments to prevent optic nerve (ON) degeneration are needed. Here, we investigate the hypothesis that sigma-1 receptor (S1R) agonist (+)-pentazocine (PTZ) is neuroprotective in a Brown Norway (BN) rat, microbead model of glaucoma.

METHODS

BN rats (9-11 weeks, male and female) were treated by intraperitoneal injection, 3 times per week with (+)-PTZ (2 mg/kg) or vehicle (VEH) alone. Treatment started 1 week prior to intraocular injection of polystyrene microbeads to elevate IOP. IOP was measured 2-3 times per week. Five weeks post microbead injection, rats were euthanized. ONs were removed, then fixed and processed for 63x oil, light microscope imaging of toluidine blue stained ON cross sections. To facilitate comparison of ON morphology from VEH and (+)-PTZ treated rats with similar ocular hypertensive insults, rats were assigned to low (IOP ≤15.8 mmHg), moderate (15.8 < IOP <28.0 mmHg), and high (IOP ≥28.0 mmHg) groups based on average IOP in the microbead injected eye. Axon numbers, axon density, axonal and glial areas, axon loss, and axon size distributions of naïve, bead, and contralateral ONs were assessed using QuPath program for automated image analysis.

RESULTS

(+)-PTZ treatment of BN rats protected ONs from damage caused by moderate IOP elevation. Treatment with (+)-PTZ significantly reduced axon loss and glial areas, and increased axon density and axonal areas compared to ONs from VEH treated rats with moderate IOP. (+)-PTZ-mediated neuroprotection was independent of IOP lowering effects. At average IOP ≥28.0 mmHg, (+)-PTZ treatment did not provide measurable neuroprotection. ONs from contralateral eyes exhibited subtle, complex changes in response to conditions in the bead eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

S1R agonist (+)-PTZ shows promise as a neuroprotective treatment for glaucoma. Future studies to understand the complex molecular mechanisms by which (+)-PTZ provides this neuroprotection are needed.