Randomized phase III placebo-controlled trial of letrozole plus oral temsirolimus as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Recent data showed improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) when adding everolimus to exemestane in patients with advanced breast cancer experiencing recurrence/progression after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. Here, we report clinical outcomes of combining the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor temsirolimus with letrozole in AI-naive patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase III randomized placebo-controlled study tested efficacy/safety of first-line oral letrozole 2.5 mg daily/temsirolimus 30 mg daily (5 days every 2 weeks) versus letrozole/placebo in 1,112 patients with AI-naive, hormone receptor-positive advanced disease. An independent data monitoring committee recommended study termination for futility at the second preplanned interim analysis (382 PFS events).

RESULTS

Patients were balanced (median age, 63 years; 10% stage III, 40% had received adjuvant endocrine therapy). Those on letrozole/temsirolimus experienced more grade 3 to 4 events (37% v 24%). There was no overall improvement in primary end point PFS (median, 9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.07; P = .25) nor in the 40% patient subset with prior adjuvant endocrine therapy. An exploratory analysis showed improved PFS favoring letrozole/temsirolimus in patients ≤ age 65 years (9.0 v 5.6 months; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.93; P = .009), which was separately examined by an exploratory analysis of 5-month PFS using subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot methodology (P = .003).

CONCLUSION

Adding temsirolimus to letrozole did not improve PFS as first-line therapy in patients with AI-naive advanced breast cancer. Exploratory analyses of benefit in younger postmenopausal patients require external confirmation.

[Evolution and revolutionary events in oncology in the end of XX - beginning of XXI century]

This review highlights major achievements of the Russian oncology in the past decades, such as works of N.N. Petrov, L.A. Zilber, N.N. Blokhin, E.E. Pogosyants. Revolutionary shift in the understanding of the malignization process have become possible after decoding of human genome, as well as genome of several tumors such as breast cancer, acute myeloblastic leukemia, several brain tumors, testicular cancer and other neoplasms. The issue of stem cells being possible ancestors of tumor cells is also discussed in the review. Also the author observes main modern therapeutic approaches towards cancer treatment. It is specially highlighted that XXI century molecular biology achievements made it possible to start personal tumor treatment based on its' specific genotype.

A prognostic model in patients treated for metastatic gastric cancer with second-line chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study was carried out to evaluate the prognostic significance of clinical factors in patients treated for metastatic gastric cancer with second-line chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated the prognostic significance of various clinical factors in 126 patients, who were treated with second-line chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Median progression-free and overall survival (OS) for second-line chemotherapy were 3.3 and 5.3 months, respectively, with an overall response rate of 11.1%. Multivariate analysis identified three independent prognostic factors: performance status: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group zero to one [hazard ratio (HR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-5.4], hemoglobin (Hb) level: >/=10 g/dl (HR 2.2, 95% CI 2.1-2.4) and time-to-progression (TTP) under first-line therapy: >/=5 months (HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8). From the obtained data, a prognostic index was constructed, dividing the patients into three risk groups: good (n = 40), intermediate (n = 36) and poor risk group (n = 56). The median survival for good, intermediate and poor risk groups were 13.5, 6.0 and 2.9 months, respectively, whereas the 1-year OS rates were 50.2%, 14.2% and 2.6%, respectively (P = 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

With inadequate data from randomized controlled trials at the moment, our report indicates that second-line chemotherapy is effective and beneficial in patients with good performance status, higher Hb level along with higher TTP under first-line therapy.

[Docetaxel in the treatment of metastatic gastric cancer]

Since the late 1990s, docetaxel (Dtx), an antitubular drug, has been studied as a tool for the treatment of GC. Maximum effectiveness of docetaxel as monotherapy amounted to 24%, with a median survival of 7 months. Two-drug combinations were developed containing docetaxel with 5-fluorouracil (DF) and docetaxel with cisplatin (DC). They proved effective in 43 and 33% of the cases respectively and ensured a similar median survival of 9-10 months. Clinical studies of a three-component combination containing docetaxel, 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (DCF) as first-line therapy of metastatic GC were carried out in the XXIst century and showed its efficacy in 50% of the cases with a median survival of 10-12 months. The DCF regimen may be considered as a new standard for the treatment of patients with metastatic GC and satisfactory health status (ECOG 0-1). The combination is being modified to improve its toxicity profile by substituting oxaliplatin for cisplatin and oral fluoropyrimidines for i.v. 5-fluorouracil.

[Targeted drugs for the treatment of disseminated colonic cancer]

5-Fluorouramcil has been the medicine of choice for systemic treatment of metastatic colonic cancer for the last 35 years. Objective positive results of this therapy were documented in 30% of the cases, it delayed the development of active disease by 4 months, and ensured a 6 month survival. Introduction of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, capecitabine, S = 1, and other drugs into clinical practice improved overall efficiency of therapy to 40-50%, increased time till progression of the disease to 6 months and survival to 15 months. Targeted drugs (bevacizumab, cetuximab) combined with the known chemotherapeutic programs (FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, XELIRI, XELFOX, etc.) showed even higher therapeutic effect, i.e. overall efficiency 50-60%, time to progression 10 months and survival of more than 1.5 years. Panitumumab is an active agent to be used in the third-line therapy.

Prevention of cisplatin-induced acute and delayed emesis by the selective neurokinin-1 antagonists, L-758,298 and MK-869

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have suggested that antiemetic therapy with a triple combination of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist MK-869, a serotonin (5-HT(3)) antagonist, and dexamethasone provides enhanced control of cisplatin-induced emesis compared with standard therapy regimens. The authors compared the antiemetic activity of a dual combination of MK-869 and dexamethasone with that of a standard dual combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone to characterize further the efficacy and tolerability profile of MK-869.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, active agent-controlled study of 177 cisplatin-naïve patients with malignant disease. On Day 1, MK-869 was given intravenously as its water-soluble prodrug, L-758,298. Patients were randomized to one of three groups as follows. Group I received L-758,298 100 mg intravenously (i.v.), then dexamethasone 20 mg i.v., and cisplatin >or= 70 mg/m(2) on Day 1 followed by 300 mg MK-869 (tablet) orally on Days 2-5; Group II received L-758,298 100 mg i.v., then dexamethasone 20 mg i.v., and cisplatin >or= 70 mg/m(2) on Day 1 followed by placebo on Days 2-5; and Group III received ondansetron 32 mg i.v., then dexamethasone 20 mg i.v., and cisplatin >or= 70 mg/m(2) on Day 1 followed by placebo on Days 2-5. Emesis was recorded over Days 1-5 in a diary. Nausea was assessed every 24 hours by visual analog scale. Additional medication was available for emesis or nausea at any time. The primary efficacy parameters of interest were the proportion of patients without emesis and the proportion without emesis or rescue therapy on Day 1 (acute phase) and on Days 2-5 (delayed phase).

RESULTS

No serious adverse events were attributed to L-758,298 or MK-869. On Day 1, the proportions of patients with no emesis and no use of rescue medication were 44% of patients in Group I, 36% of patients in Group II, 40% of patients in Groups I and II combined, and 83% of patients in Group III (P < 0.001 for Group III vs. the combined Groups I and II). The proportions of patients with no emesis and no use of rescue medication on Days 2-5 were 59% of patients in Group I, 46% of patients in Group II, and 38% of patients in Group III (P < 0.05 for Group I vs. Group III). The proportions of patients who were without emesis on Day 1 were 49% of patients in Group I, 47% of patients in Group II, and 84% of patients in Group III (P < 0.01 for Group I or II vs. Group III). On Days 2-5, however, the proportions of patients who were without emesis on Days 2-5 were 65% of patients in Group I, 61% of patients in Group II, and 41% of patients in Group III (P < 0.05 for Group I or II vs. Group III). Nausea scores in the acute phase were lower for Group III than for Group I, Group II, or Groups I and II combined (P < 0.05), although there was no significant difference among groups either for the delayed phase or overall for Days 1-5.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the L-758,298 and dexamethasone combination reduced acute (Day 1) emesis compared with historic rates, dual therapy with ondansetron and dexamethasone was superior in controlling acute emesis. Continued dosing with MK-869 may enhance control of other measures of delayed emesis, such as the use of rescue medication, although confirmation is required before a definitive conclusion may be drawn. MK-869 given as dual therapy with dexamethasone was superior to ondansetron with dexamethasone for the control of delayed emesis (Days 2-5) and control of the need for rescue medication on Days 2-5.

[Results of a phase I clinical trial of "theraphthal + ascorbic acid" catalytic system]

Phase-I clinical studies of teraphtal and a "teraphtal + ascorbic acid" catalytic system have been completed. The dose-limiting toxicity and maximum tolerable dose were not reached even at the end of maximal dose trials. No side-effects characteristic of antitumor cytostatic drugs were registered. The gravest side-effect ever recorded was a collapse which could not be linked to teraphtal dosage and was probably caused by hypersensitivity to the drug. The drug was recommended for phase II trials.

Drug dose delivery and treatment outcome relationship in standard bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in nonseminomatous germ cell tumor patients

This study retrospectively evaluated the influence of drug dose delivery components (DDDC) of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors on treatment outcome (NSGCT). Between December 1987 and January 1995, 75 NSGCT patients were treated with a median of 4 cycles (range 3-8) of cisplatin 120 mg/m2 on day 1, etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5 and bleomycin 30 U on days 1, 3, and 5 every 3 weeks. DDDC, such as cumulative dose, cumulative dose in mg/m2, dose intensity (DI), relative dose intensity (RDI), dose intensity products, and relative dose intensity products by drug, were calculated and tested as possible predictors of treatment outcome in patients classified according to Indiana University (IU), and International Germ Cell Cancer Cooperative Group (IGCCCG) classifications. Overall complete response (CR) rate was 64%, and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 59%. By IU classification there were statistical differences in CR and survival between moderate (89-81%) and advanced disease (42-40%) (p < 0.005), while for patients classified according to IGCCCG criteria, statistical differences in CR and PFS there were not registered. DI (mg/m2/week) and RDI values for the entire group were: cisplatin 33-0.82; etoposide 133-0.80 and bleomycin 11-0.37. We did not observe a statistically significant difference in drug dose delivery components for treatment outcome between patients who achieved a CR and incomplete response when analyzed by either extent of disease or whole group. Extent of disease was the most important predictor of treatment outcome.

Paclitaxel and cisplatin as salvage treatment in patients with non-seminomatous germ cell tumour who failed to achieve a complete remission on induction chemotherapy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy as salvage treatment in patients with non-seminomatous germ cell tumour. Sixteen patients with histologically proven germ cell tumour, measurable disease and/or elevated serum tumour markers were eligible for the protocol. All patients had previously not achieved a complete remission (CR) to platinum-based induction chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery. The treatment consisted of paclitaxel 175-225 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion, followed by cisplatin 100 mg/m2, repeated every 3 weeks for up to four cycles. Seven patients achieved a marker-positive partial remission (PR) by the end of the cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy; the remainder had disease progression at the start of the paclitaxel plus cisplatin treatment. One (6%) CR and 3 (19%) PRs were achieved, with an overall response rate of 25% (90% confidence interval 7-43). The duration of the CR is currently 9+ months; two PRs lasted 2 months. One patient with a PR has been lost to follow-up. During a median follow-up of 8 months (range 1-11), 12 patients died from the disease progression. The median survival for the whole group was 7 months. Toxicity was moderate, with neutropenia grade 3 occurring in 29% of patients, thrombocytopenia grade 1-3 in 29%, creatinine > 130 mmol/l in 36%, peripheral neuropathy grade 1-2 in 50%, and nausea and vomiting in 43%. Paclitaxel plus cisplatin showed modest activity, with an overall response rate of 31% in patients with poor prognosis who had not achieved a CR on induction chemotherapy.

[Results of phase II clinical trial of Tamoxifen and Toremifen in two different doses in advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women]

Efficacy and safety of toremifene 60 and 240 mg daily (TOR 60 and TOR 240) are compared to 40 mg tamoxifen daily (NFV 40) in postmenopausal women with advanced estrogen receptor (ER) positive of ER unknown breast cancer. The study is randomized in three parallel groups. Primary efficacy variables are response rate and time to progression. WHO and ECOG criteria were used for measurable and nonmeasurable disease assessment, respectively. Safely was reported according to WHO criretia. Altogether 463 patients were randomized (157 to TOR 60, 157 to TOR 240 and 149 to TAM 40). By data cut-off, after 20.5 months medianfollow-up time, over 70% of the patients had experienced disease progression. Response rates are 20.4%, 28.7% in TOR 60, TOR 240 and TAM 40, respectively. TOR 60 and TAM 40 show statistically equivalent efficacy and the difference between TOR 240 and TAM 40 is not significant (P = 0.112). Median times to progression are 4.9 (TOR 60), 6.1 (TOR 240) and 5.0 (TAM 40) months and corresponding hazard ratios (TAM:TOR) 1.015 and 1.124. Again, TOR 60 and TAM 40 are statistically equivalent and the difference between TOR 240 and TAM 40 is not significant (P = 0.374). All treatments were well tolerated. As a conclusion TOR 60 and TAM 40 show equivalent clinical efficacy and tolerability. The higher dose of toremifene slightly but not significantly improved response rate and time to progression. In postmenopausal women, toremifene (60 mg) daily is an effective and safe treatment of advanced ER positive or ER unknown breast cancer.

[The role of antitumor drugs in treating stomach cancer patients]

The treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma is a challenge to oncologists. Within the last 6-7 years several new regimens have been introduced: EAP, FAMTX, MEP, MVP, ELF. Overall response rate of these schemes is 30-40%, a complete response seldom reaching 10%. Anticancer drugs significantly improve quality of life. Chemotherapy of advanced cancer is the method of choice. New combinations and regimens may appear promising.

[The chemotherapy of nonseminomatous testicular tumors]

236 patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors have been treated for the last decade with VAB-6 combination and 188 ones with etoposide-containing regimens BEP and EP. Complete remissions were achieved in 97(41%) VAB-6 treated patients, 72(31%) patients were currently alive without evidence of the disease for 76 months of follow-up. Patients on BEP-EP presented better outcomes: 130(69%) of 188 patients achieved a complete remission and 119(63%) of them were free of symptoms within 47 months of follow-up. In spite of more pronounced toxicity, mainly myelosuppression, etoposide-containing combinations are more efficient than VAB-6 and should be considered as an induction chemotherapy in patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors.

[High-dose ifosfamide in the treatment of patients with soft tissue sarcoma]

The increasing doses of 2.4-3.5 g/m2 ifosfamide, i/v, dropwise, were administered for 40 min, on days 1-5 each week, for 3 weeks, in 4 courses. Simultaneously, MESNA was given in a dose two-thirds of that of ifosfamide. The maximum single tolerable dose of ifosfamide was 3.2 g/m2. The dose of 3.5 g/m2 proved neurotoxic causing encephalopathy. The other toxic effects were stage III-IV neutropenia (47%), nausea and vomiting (91%) and weakness (33%). No clinical evidence of renal failure was attributed to the high dosage of the drug in the course of assays of biochemical components of the blood, blood- and urine-beta-2-microglobulins, N-acetyl-D-hexoaminidase (NAG) level in urine, creatinine clearance and complex renoscintigraphy data. On days 3-5, ifosfamide treatment was followed by increase in NAG and beta-2-microglobulin levels in urine which pointed to the toxic effect exerted on the epithelium of renal tubules. The antitumor effect was apparent in 5 (29%) patients for 6 months, which testifies to the high effectiveness of ifosfamide treatment for soft-tissue sarcoma.

[Current procedure for treating testicular germ-cell tumors]

The treatment of testicular cancer has undergone considerable evolution since the introduction of cisplatin and widespread recognition of its curative potentials in any stage of this disease. The authors provide a review of today's therapeutic approaches to testicular cancer with special emphasis on the disease stage and tumor histology.

Cisplatin-etoposide and carboplatin-etoposide induction chemotherapy for good-risk patients with germ cell tumors

BACKGROUND

In an attempt to reduce the toxicity of chemotherapy in good-risk testicular cancer patients the two drug combinations, cisplatin plus etoposide (EP) and carboplatin plus etoposide (EC), have been compared.

METHODS

Good risk was defined according to the MSKCC and IU criteria. 39 Patients have been treated with EP (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 to 5), and 23 patients received EC (carboplatin 350 mg/m2 on day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5). Four cycles of chemotherapy were given at 21- and 28-day intervals, respectively, with delays of up to 7 days in instances of leukocyte counts less than 3.0 x 10(9)/l or platelet counts less than 100 x 10(9)/l.

RESULTS

In the EP group 34 (87%) of 39 patients achieved CR (26 with chemotherapy alone, 8 with additional surgery). After a median follow-up of 26 (12-58) months 3 (9%) patients relapsed from CR. Currently 38 patients are alive, and 37 (94%) are NED. In the EC group 20 (87%) of 23 patients achieved CR (15 with chemotherapy alone and 5 with additional surgery). After a median follow-up of 45 (26-57) months 6 (30%) patients relapsed from CR. Currently 19 patients are alive and 17 (74%) are NED. There was no difference in survival between the two groups (p = 0.13), but in the EC group the relapse rate was higher (p = 0.052) and the proportion of patients with NED was lower (p = 0.03) in comparison with EP. Toxicity in both groups was mild and similar, but 3 EP-treated patients presented hair loss.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that carboplatin-etoposide combination therapy is inferior to cisplatin-etoposide in patients with good-risk germ cell tumors.

Long term results of treatment in patients with extragonadal germ cell tumours

From 1979 to 1991 56 patients with extragonadal germ cell tumours (EGCT) received cisplatin based chemotherapy. From 16 patients with seminomatous EGCT 13 achieved complete remission (CR) with chemotherapy alone, 2 with additional radiotherapy with final CR rate of 94%. 5 (31%) patients developed relapses and at a median follow-up of 38 (5-103) months 11 (69%) are alive and 10 (62%) have no evidence of disease (NED). Only 7 patients with non-seminomatous EGCT reached CR with chemotherapy alone and 8 more with additional chemotherapy or surgery. Overall CR was 37% and 3 (20%) relapses have been observed. At a median follow-up of 26 (3-114) months 14 (35%) are alive and remain free of disease, 26 (65%) have died. By univariate analysis seminomatous EGCT patients had a significantly greater likelihood of achieving a CR, for non-seminomatous EGCT BEP induction chemotherapy was superior to VAB-6, and NSEGCT patients with serum levels > 2000 ng/ml had worse prognosis. Current staging systems are insufficient to predict the treatment outcome in EGCT.

VAB-6 and cisplatin-cyclophosphamide combinations in the treatment of metastatic seminoma patients: the U.S.S.R. experience

In a non-randomized study the treatment results of 59 patients with disseminated seminoma were evaluated: 21 patients were treated with a VAB-6 combination and 38 with a CP (cyclophosphamide and cisplatin) combination. After VAB-6 CR was observed in 8 patients and 6 achieved CR with additional treatment: 1 with chemotherapy (PVB) and 5 with radiotherapy (RT). The final CR rate was 67%. At a median follow-up of 38 (11-70) months 15 (71%) are alive, and 11 of them (52%) are NED; 6 have died. Of the 38 patients treated with CP alone only 18 achieved CR and 9 had a CR after additional RT and 1 chemotherapy (VAB-6), the overall CR rate was 72%. The median follow-up is 24 (4-55) months, 28 (74%) are alive, 24 (66%) are currently NED, and 9 have died. Both regimens were well tolerated, the main toxicity being leukopenia: 48% (WHO grade 111-1V-5%) for VAB-6, and 59% (13%) for CP. Hearing loss was registered in 8 patients receiving CP and in 2 receiving VAB-6. There were no fatal toxicities. Thus, VAB-6 and CP regimens seem to have compatible and high activity in disseminated seminoma.

[The results of the use of bleomycin and its analogs in the VAB-6 protocol in treating testicular tumors]

Efficacy and toxicity of VAB-6 combinations with bleomycin, bleomycetin or peplomycin were studied in treatment of 77 patients with metastases of germ-cell tumors: testicle tumors in 71 patients and extragonadal tumors in 6 patients. After the chemotherapy complete regression was observed in 37 patients (48.7 per cent). In 44 patients (57.1 per cent) residual metastases after the chemotherapy were resected. The frequency of complete regression after using the VAB-6 combinations with bleomycin, bleomycetin and peplomycin amounted to 58.8, 61.5 and 47.1 per cent respectively. The treatment results depended on the disease extent. When the disease extent was minimal complete regression was observed in 87.5 per cent of the patients. The respective figures for the disease moderate and significant extents were 66.7 and 37.8 per cent. During the average observation period of 22.1 months (7-40 months) 39 patients survived and had no signs of the disease. The combinations markedly differed in their toxicity.

[Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of radiotherapy and chemo-radiotherapy of stage III-IV nasopharyngeal cancer]

The paper is concerned with the results of radiation and chemoradiotherapy of stage III-IV rhinopharyngeal cancer. Short- and long-term therapeutic results, the time of a recurrence-free course, the frequency of recurrences and metastasizing, expression of reactions, and complications were used as criteria. The most effective method of combined therapy of locally spread rhinopharyngeal cancer was polychemotherapy (bleomycetin, methotrexate, vinblastine, and cyclophosphamide) before irradiation with subsequent maintenance cyclophosphamide chemotherapy once in 4 weeks for 3-6 months. The 5-year survival rate for combined modality therapy of stage III-IV rhinopharyngeal cancer was within 62%, for radiotherapy used alone-50%.

[Combination of platidiam and bleomycetin in disseminated skin melanoma]

Clinical trials of bleomycetin and platidiam combination were carried out in 13 patients with disseminated melanoma of the skin. Two regimens of the treatment were used. Regimen I included intravenous administration of platidiam in a dose of 20 mg/m2 with a water load on days 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the treatment course and intravenous administration of bleomycetin in a dose of 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 7. The intervals between the courses consisted of 4 weeks. Regimen II included the use of platidiam in a dose of 20 mg/m2 administered as 6-hour intravenous infusions in 1.2 1 of isotonic sodium chloride solution daily for 5 days. On the first day of this cycle bleomycetin was administered intravenously in a dose of 30 mg/m2. The cycles were performed during the 1st and the 3rd weeks of the treatment course. During the 2nd and the 4th weeks platidiam was administered in a dose of 40 mg/m2 once a week and bleomycetin was administered intramuscularly in a dose of 6 mg/m2 daily for 5 days. A more than 50 per cent decrease in the tumor formation was observed in 38 per cent of the patients. The combination had no toxic effect on hemopoiesis and may be used in new programs on chemotherapy of disseminated melanoma of the skin.