Systematic evaluation of radiological findings in the assessment of resectability of peri-ampullary cancer by CT using different contrast phase protocols.
Clin Radiol 2017;
72:691.e11-691.e17. [PMID:
28292513 DOI:
10.1016/j.crad.2017.02.012]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Revised: 02/01/2017] [Accepted: 02/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
AIMS
To determine the relative significance of radiological signs in determining the resectability of peri-ampullary cancer (PC) and to assess the value of multi-phase imaging in detecting these findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Blinded, double re-reporting of preoperative imaging from five hospitals was undertaken of 411 patients undergoing surgery for PC over an 8-year period, of whom 119 patients were found to be inoperable at the time of surgery.
RESULTS
The median tumour size was 26.7 mm and the proportion of patients reported to have regional lymphadenopathy (RL), venous (VI) and arterial involvement (AI) was 24.7%, 11.5%, and 3.9%, respectively and was similar regardless of the number of contrast phases undertaken. Significant associations were, however, noted between individual risk factors: VI was closely associated with tumour size (p=0.002) and AI (p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis AI, VI, and RL were independently associated with resectability (relative risk of resection=0.05, 0.31, and 0.51, respectively). Tumour size, however, was not associated with resectability when VI was included in the multivariate model.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of multiple vascular contrast phases has no measureable impact on the rate of determination of tumour resectability of PC. In preoperative staging, AI is the most significant adverse finding for resectability. Large tumour diameter is not an adverse finding in isolation from other risk factors.
Collapse